Funnyjunk's Lawyer Charles Carreon Just Keeps Digging: Promises He'll Find Some Law To Go After Oatmeal's Matt Inman

from the wow dept

Wow. Just... wow. Following the net fight between The Oatmeal webcomic creator Matt Inman, and aggregator of non-funny stuff, Funnyjunk, we've been pointing out that Funnyjunk's lawyer, Charles Carreon needs to stop digging himself deeper into the hole he's found himself in. Instead, he seems to have decided on the opposite strategy, and he's digging deeper and deeper every minute.

If you don't recall, he was trying to shut down the fundraising effort that Inman set up in response to Funnyjunk's threat. And then he accused Inman of "instigating security attacks" against his website. The latest is that he's now redirected his own website to a sales page for his book, but also has done an interview with Dave Thier at Forbes, in which he's even more aggressive in fighting back against Inman and those who are mocking him. It's really quite incredible. Thier describes Carreon as being "excited about this bizarre new world he had stumbled into" and now focused on somehow pinning the blame on Matt Inman:
In his 20 years as a lawyer, he says, he’s written hundreds of letters like the one he sent Inman, but the response to this one was unique.

“So someone takes one of my letters and takes it apart. That doesn’t mean you can just declare netwar, that doesn’t mean you can encourage people to hack my website, to brute force my WordPress installation so I have to change my password. You can’t encourage people to violate my trademark and violate my twitter name and associate me with incompetence with stupidity, and douchebaggery,” he says. “And if that’s where the world is going I will fight with every ounce of force in this 5’11 180 pound frame against it. I’ve got the energy, and I’ve got the time.”
Except, uh, nowhere has Inman "declared netwar" nor has he encouraged anyone to hack Carreon's website. If it's true that scriptkiddies have gone after Carreon's website, that's unfortunate, but it's a ridiculous (and obnoxious) stretch to pin the blame for that on Inman. Of course, associating someone with incompetence, with stupidity and with douchebaggery is broadly a statement of opinion. There's a First Amendment thing we have that generally says that's okay. People can call each other stupid douchebags, and we like that in America.

For color commentary, we turn to Ken at Popehat, who decides to educate Carreon on the First Amendment:
The implications of Mr. Carreon's position are profoundly chilling. Under the rule he seems to suggest, if you write about bad behavior by someone else, even if you don't urge action, you run the risk that you will be held liable when one of your readers is inspired to hack or threaten or harass. Perversely, this means that the more criminal or unconscionable or horrific the conduct you are describing, the greater legal risk you take by writing about it. That's not the law, thank God. The very suggestion is un-American and contemptible.

Moreover, note that Mr. Carreon is suggesting that it is actionable not only to inspire people to undertake (alleged) illegal action, but actionable to inspire people to "associate me with incompetence with stupidity, and douchebaggery." In other words, if your criticism of someone's conduct leads others to form an opinion of him, and express that opinion, that's actionable. That's true to the extent that someone states false facts about a person — for instance, by falsely accusing them of child abuse. But The Oatmeal offered satirically expressed opinions about Mr. Carreon's conduct in a letter which The Oatmeal presented to his readers to review. To the extent that The Oatmeal opined that Mr. Carreon is incompetent, stupid, and a douchebag, those are classic opinions absolutely protected by the First Amendment. Under First Amendment law governing defamation, they are particularly protected because The Oatmeal presented the facts based on which he drew his opinions — namely, the letter itself. Under the theory that Mr. Carreon seems to be advancing, if I wrote you a letter suggesting that your wife beds down with diseased ocelots and calling for your children to be flogged, and you publish the letter and say that it suggests that I am a disturbed person of low character, then I would be legally responsible if people formed the same opinion based on the evidence you provided. Indeed, under Mr. Carreon's apparent theory, if he criticizes The Oatmeal's response to him as vulgar or unprofessional or uncivilized, he's legally responsible for people agreeing with him. This is not law, this is madness. And bear in mind that Mr. Carreon markets himself as a First Amendment champion.
But Carreon has decided that "there must be a law!" against this, and dammit, he's going to find it:
He may have a very difficult time proving that Inman “instigated attacks,” as he said on his website, but he’s certain he can find some legal recourse for what’s going on right now – “California code is just so long, but there’s something in there about this,” he says.
Back to Ken at Popehat, who notes in response, why yes, there is a law:

Oh, Mr. Carreon, indeed there is. There's California's magnificent anti-SLAPP statute, under which you'll be paying the attorney fees of anyone you sue. There's California's judgment debtor exam law, under which you can be interrogated about your income and assets in preparation for garnishing your income and, if necessary, seeking liquidation of your assets to satisfy a judgment for attorney fees against you. There's California's sanctions statute, under which you can be sanctioned for bringing suit to harass or without adequate legal or factual basis.

Read them carefully. And think. Think hard. Step back from the precipice. This can get better, by you letting it go. Or it can get worse. Much, much worse.

Carreon tells Thier that he welcomes "the opportunity to confront legally the misuse of a new technology." First of all, it's not that new, and he might want to do some digging into other clueless lawyers who have sought to shut down online criticism of themselves. Carreon is still digging and he's going to lose very, very badly in court with the arguments he's making right now. Given his statements to various reporters, he's already made it clear that he's seeking to suppress speech and that he's willing to use any law he can find to do so. That's a particularly short-sighted thing to do, given California's relatively strong anti-SLAPP law, which one hopes Carreon familiarizes himself with.

But, really, there's the bigger issue: what the hell is he thinking at this point? And isn't there anyone with a basic grasp of the internet who knows him who can sit him down and tell him to stop digging?


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 7:54pm

    Now you know why everyone hates lawyers.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    icon
    minerat (profile), Jun 15th, 2012 @ 7:59pm

    The Oatmeal's Legal Response

    The actual response from The Oatmeal's lawyer is pretty good (courtesy of a comment at Ars) http://www.scribd.com/doc/96850920/FunnyJunk-The-Oatmeal-Response

    His attorney provides a solid background and thoroughly dismantles each of FunnyJunk's original claims, and suggests that FunnyJunk hasn't registered their DMCA agent with the copyright office. That oversight could negate their Safe Harbor defense regarding The Oatmeal's content being posted by FunnyJunk's users.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    icon
    Alana (profile), Jun 15th, 2012 @ 8:00pm

    Hey, I found a way to read his thoughts! Here's what I think he's thinking.

    "Herp derp"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 8:01pm

    Re:

    Hey, that sounds exactly like the shill that posts here.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    icon
    Zos (profile), Jun 15th, 2012 @ 8:06pm

    Please, no one tell him. This is the most entertaining thing going on on the interwebz this week.

    You missed the quote at the end, where Carreon says he has "plenty of time and energy" to fight this thing out.

    I'd submit that the internet is littered with the corpses (metaphorical ofc) of those who made the same mistake.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    STStone, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 8:06pm

    I know his thought process all too well:

    "Those people said bad things about me on the Internet! Make it stop MAKE IT STOP MAKE IT STOOOOOOOOOOOP!"

    He cannot deal with the idea that not only do people disagree with him and his legal "shakedown" tactic ("pay FunnyJunk $20,000 or something…bad could happen to you"), and not only did The Oatmeal call him out on that tactic ("fuck both you and FunnyJunk -- I will raise that money for charity"), but he really can't deal with the idea that they have the absolutel legal right to disagree with him.

    Someone who calls himself a "champion of the First Amendment" often finds himself tested when people use those First Amendment rights to say things within their rights that paint him in a poor light. The true test of their self-appointed "champion" status comes from their reaction.

    From his reaction to The Oatmeal's rebuttal, "Mister" Carreon appears to support the First Amendment only if people say nice things about him, and that hardly justifies his "champion of the First Amendment" label. A true "champion" would let the insults and bullshit roll off their back instead of resorting to a weaponized use of the legal system.

    If The Oatmeal had intentionally defamed him or asked others to intentionally attack Carreon, I'd support Carreon in his attempts to have legal sanctions brought against The Oatmeal and his "co-conspirators" -- but that didn't happen, and if Carreon brings any sort of actual legal challenge towards The Oatmeal, I will indulge in a heaping helping of schadenfreude when Carreon's career comes crashing down around him.

    "Champion of the First Amendment", my ass.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    icon
    David Spira (profile), Jun 15th, 2012 @ 8:07pm

    I love this show!

    In my mind Carreon is associated with incompetence and douchbaggery because his actions are clearly the result of incompetent douchbaggery.

    I want him to keep digging. I can't wait for the next episode!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 8:08pm

    Poor lawyer.

    That's not an expression of sympathy, just an assessment of his skills handling this...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 8:16pm

    Re:

    The absolute beauty of this is that Carreon fired the first shot, with his attempt to extort $20,000 from the Oatmeal. This entire fiasco, he brought on himself. And he's going to damage his career if he keeps on with this, if he hasn't already. Hoisted by his own petard, and it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.

    Carreon - keep digging, you dumb fuck!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Nick Nafpliotis, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 8:18pm

    New Carreon Interview

    Just finished an interview with him; he's definitely dug in.

    http://www.ramblingbeachcat.com/2012/06/not-backing-down-rambling-beach-cat.html

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    [citation needed or GTFO], Jun 15th, 2012 @ 8:19pm

    History keeps repeating itself...

    This whole situation almost mirrors when Paul Christoforo tried to take on Penny Arcade, doesn't it?

    Watch as Carreon ends up the same way: still being a lawyer and totally clueless of what just happened to him.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 8:22pm

    Re:

    In Carreon's delusion mind, the First Amendment means the right to agree with Carreon, fawn over his idiocy, and pay him large sums of money because he is so teh winning at law. He is an idiot, and so is anyone who hires him for legal advice.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    icon
    Alana (profile), Jun 15th, 2012 @ 8:23pm

    This is certainly some...

    *sunglasses*

    Funny junk.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    STStone, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 8:24pm

    Re: Re:

    After this little kerfluffle, I doubt he'll have too many First Amendment cases coming his way.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 8:27pm

    The Carreon Effect: The act of doubling and then quadrupling down on an untenable position.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    STStone, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 8:29pm

    Re:

    I second this definition!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 8:30pm

    Re:

    Actually, the "time and energy" thing is indeed mentioned...

    But the real question is: does he have the money? Cuz when he loses, he's going to be paying sanctions ;)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 8:32pm

    Re: Keep digging

    Yep. The more this guy runs his mouth, the stupider he becomes. 'Corse there's no law about being stupid on the Internet yet, so he's safe. What we need is an Internet Stupid Tax. All the states would be able to stop worring about their budgets because people like Carreon will be paying for everything.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 8:33pm

    Re:

    I think the problem is - his mind is too narrow to realize that it's not Matt Inman who he needs to answer to now, it's the whole fucking internet that is pissed at hime (well, a large subsection of it that can cause him lots of trouble).

    He thinks one person is responsible for the difficulties he's currently experiencing, when in reality, it's probably several hundred thousand. His mind simply can't comprehend just how many people he has pissed off that want to make him suffer.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 8:35pm

    Re:

    Carreon Affect: Blaming one guy and suing him for everything bad that happens after you piss off the entire world.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    identicon
    Ray Radlein, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 8:38pm

    Cripes, at this point I wouldn't even trust that FunnyJunk lawyer dude to successfully protect my Third Amendment rights.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    identicon
    Ray Radlein, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 8:41pm

    Re: Re:

    But one person is responsible for the difficulties he's currently experiencing -- just not the one he is blaming, is all. Charles really should look into going after that Carreon character who has ruined his good name.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23.  
    icon
    Cory of PC (profile), Jun 15th, 2012 @ 8:46pm

    With all of this digging happening, when will it be to when we sealed the hole on Carreon or he "accidentally" causes a cave-in on himself? I know a lot of people want to see this drag on for a bit (and I'm one of them), but I'm curious on when we'll see Carreon trapped himself underneath the ground he was trying to dig.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  24.  
    identicon
    Scote, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 8:47pm

    Re: The Oatmeal's Legal Response

    ...Especially the "are you sure you want to go there?" part where he mentions that Funnyjunk doesn't seem to have a registered DMCA agent and may not have Safe Harbor protection...legal comedy gold. :-)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  25.  
    icon
    Ann (profile), Jun 15th, 2012 @ 8:51pm

    Get your foil hats

    We are talking about an attorney who sent an equally ridiculous threatening letter to Google when his wife's psychotic, rambling web dump disappeared from Google's index in 2007 (probably due to the fact that most of its content is copied and pasted articles and screen shots with no proper attribution or back links, or relevant original content. Try not to choke on that irony). Here is an excerpt of his demands on Google:

    "1. An accounting of all the ad revenue generated from the advertising that appeared on the search page during the entire time the search page was operative.
    2. Full disclosure of the identities of each and every person or governmental or business entity that has communicated with Google, directly or through intermediaries, concerning American Buddha, the Library Site, or Tara Carreon.
    3. Full disclosure of all statistical and other information stored in the Google system concerning the Library Site.
    4. Full disclosure of the identities of all persons and entities to which Google has disclosed information concerning the Library Site, including all communications in electronic or other format received from or sent to:
    a. Google employees, agents, or contractors
    b. Third parties, including:
    i. Government entities including law enforcement agencies
    ii. Corporations or businesses
    iii. Individuals
    iv. Attorneys for any of the above
    5. Full disclosure of all information that Google disseminated internally or disclosed to any such third parties.
    6. Full disclosure of every occasion when any Internet user has inputted a search for “American” and “Buddha” or “Buddhist” in any search request since the Library Site was purged from the Google search index. "

    For the full version of this cray you can read it all from his wife's and his "library" here: http://www.american-buddha.com/ambu.ltrkentwalkergoogle1.htm

    In my opinion, we are talking about someone with narcissistic personality disorder at best, and paranoid delusions at worst. This is going to get a lot worse before it gets better for all involved. I feel mostly sorry for Inman, who is going to have to spend even less time doing what he loves (writing hysterical ORIGINAL content), while he endures Carreon's pathologically egocentric nervous breakdown. Even FunnyJunk has to be shaking their heads. They signed up for the legal powerhouse who got the sex.com guy his $15 million. Not a government conspiracy theorist with bad hair, and not even a rudimentary knowledge of how the Internet works. Fail all around. At least the bears win.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  26.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 8:51pm

    hundreds of times?

    How does one become such a recognized hatchet man than they end up sending hundreds of extortionate letters threatening cases without legal merit - I can't imagine this one isn't representative of his whole body of work, given his lack of elucidation. Is there some registry online where I can find a lawyer who lacks ethics in my specific area of need?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  27.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 8:53pm

    He's going to go down in history as one of the dumbest lawyers in America if he keeps heading in this direction.

    He just keeps pissing into the wind even AFTER he's already soaked himself in it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  28.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 8:56pm

    These "series" of articles confuse me.

    The comics author is a rights holder who has accused another site of infringing his rights.

    The other site fights back.

    Ordinarily the former would be vilified, and the latter praised.

    Not sure why the 180 turn supporting the rights holder against the other site that has raised a defense.

    Is it safe to assume that copyright holders are now finding favor with the TD community? It certainly appears to be the case.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  29.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 9:00pm

    Re: Get your foil hats

    Oh wow...

    popcorn.jpg

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  30.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 9:01pm

    Re:

    Do you enjoy playing dumb?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  31.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 9:02pm

    Re: The Oatmeal's Legal Response

    *golf clap*

    That was quite well done. I do so love the ending were he flat out says it isn't a good idea if FunnyJunk sues ad the will lose, and lose badly.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  32.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 9:04pm

    This is becoming popcorn worthy. It's like a comedy of errors unfolding before our eyes.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  33.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 9:05pm

    strange goings on in the last article's comments...

    There's a "taracarreon" mounting a vigorous - for want of a better word - defense of Charles Carreon in prior article about the Funnyjunk fiasco, including a story about meeting 'Charles' in college an falling in love with him. If it's a troll, it's like no trolling I've ever tasted.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  34.  
    identicon
    rubberpants, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 9:07pm

    Re: Re:

    Concern troll.

    "I like Techdirt and all, but does this mean you guys like copyrights now?"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  35.  
    identicon
    rubberpants, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 9:08pm

    Re: strange goings on in the last article's comments...

    This is going to get better before it gets a lot better.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  36.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 9:08pm

    Re: Get your foil hats

    holy crap that is a whole bag of crazy. Now I'm beginning to suspect that http://www.techdirt.com/user/taracarreon IS the real deal...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  37.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 9:25pm

    Re:

    Let's be fair, this guy is bottom of the barrel - he's hardly representative of lawyers in general. There are plenty of good lawyers, e.g. Ray Beckerman

    Frankly, blaming the lawyers is short-sided - they're a symptom of the problem. You might as well blame accountants for tax law. The real problem is with the system itself.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  38.  
    icon
    That One Guy (profile), Jun 15th, 2012 @ 9:26pm

    Re:

    If he keeps this up he's going to have a lot more time on his hands, when no one will want to hire him as their lawyer for fear of that level of stupidity spreading.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  39.  
    identicon
    Nate, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 9:33pm

    Lawyers who live in glass houses should not throw stones

    Those who live in glass houses should be careful of casting stones least people find out about your law license suspension in California and Oregon, for violations of DR 3-101(B) and DR 9-101(A) - from a comment on the Forbes site on the California suspension which I turn finds the Oregon suspension via Google. Hmmmmm.

    So here it is:

    CHARLES H. CARREON

    OSB #93469

    Ashland - 60-day suspension

    Effective Oct. 24, 2005, the disciplinary board approved a stipulation for discipline suspending Ashland lawyer, Charles H. Carreon, from the practice of law for 60 days. Carreon admitted violations of DR 3-101(B) (unlawful practice of law) and DR 9-101(A) (failing to deposit or maintain client funds in trust).

    From Fall 2001 to Spring 2002, Carreon was employed by SEG as house counsel for its U.S. legal matters and business operations in British Columbia, when Carreon was not admitted or licensed to practice law in any province in Canada. Carreon did not apply for or obtain a permit to act as house counsel for SEG, in violation of British Columbia rules.

    As counsel for SEG, Carreon held in his trust account settlement proceeds for the benefit of SEG, received in connection with a litigation matter. Without consulting with SEG or obtaining its express consent, Carreon utilized $1,400 of the settlement proceeds to pay a portion of a money judgment that had been entered against Carreon and his wife for a residential lease they signed in connection with his employment in Canada, believing that SEG would ultimately be responsible for his lease obligation.

    In the stipulation, Carreon admitted that acting as house counsel in Canada was in violation of regulations of the profession in that jurisdiction, and that by utilizing the client settlement funds, he failed to properly maintain client funds in his lawyer trust account.

    Carreon’s sanction was aggravated by a selfish motive, multiple offenses and his substantial experience in the practice of law. Carreon was admitted in Oregon in 1993 and in California in 1987. However, in mitigation, the stipulation recited that Carreon had no prior discipline and that he displayed a cooperative attitude toward the disciplinary proceedings.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  40.  
    icon
    That One Guy (profile), Jun 15th, 2012 @ 9:38pm

    Re: Re: Get your foil hats

    Oh by the FSM those posts are just awesome...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  41.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 10:35pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    I read it as:

    "I came here wanting to trash this article but I kinda agree with it and now I'm all confused and cognitively dissonant..."

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  42.  
    identicon
    mrdarkrai, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 10:53pm

    This is familiar

    Check the back of of Jack Thompson articles at http://gamepolitics.com/

    He got a long way before being truly slapped. Wonder if he idolizes him. :3

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  43.  
    icon
    Rikuo (profile), Jun 15th, 2012 @ 10:54pm

    Re:

    That's because, in your mind, Techdirt, as a rule, vilifies all copyright holders. However, that is false. Mike Masnick has never said that. He supports copyright law, but fights against the ever-continued expansion and abuse of it by corporations, at the expense of the First Amendment rights of US citizens.

    This story has very little to do with copyright. Initially, it did, as some copyrighted content was taken from one site and posted to another without attribution or permission, but this story has since evolved into a tale of a madman lawyer destroying himself in the attempt to find a (non-existent) law he can use to take down Inman (who is completely innocent of everything this lawyer accuses him of).

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  44.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Hero, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 11:10pm

    Re: I love this show!

    Actually, he appears to be pretty competent at douchebaggery. It's his competence as a lawyer that he's bringing doubt upon.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  45.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 11:14pm

    Re:

    yeah, ain't it fun? It's not about 'our team' being freetards and 'their team' being power hungry misanthropists. It's about who's being a jerk or bully or trying to erode the foundations of the American Experiment in some closed-minded or short-sighted snit.

    Here we've got a great example of a rightsholder being human and the sharer playing the bully. And, of course, the audience roots for the human against the douchebag.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  46.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 15th, 2012 @ 11:24pm

    Re:

    I'm not against rights holders, but I am against people who interfere in my rights, degrade my rights or otherwise make a nusiance of themselves to me because of they want the rights they hold to be expanded at the expense of everyone else's rights.

    The rights holder here may or may not have had a point originally, but funnyjunk's response is appalling and deserving of ridicule.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  47.  
    icon
    harbingerofdoom (profile), Jun 15th, 2012 @ 11:26pm

    Re: hundreds of times?

    they pass the bar...thats how

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  48.  
    identicon
    STStone, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 12:04am

    Re: strange goings on in the last article's comments...

    I've taken to replying to her.

    I love dealing with people who make themselves look crazy, even if they only do so to troll others.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  49.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 12:37am

    it's like watching the crashing of the hindenburg.

    "oh the humanity"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  50.  
    identicon
    Lurker Keith, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 12:40am

    malicious prosecution

    Uh, does saying he's going to procede w/ a baseless case "no matter what", which goes against the 1st Ammendment, mean Carreon is opening himself up to a malicious prosecution charge?

    Also, checking for updates via Google, I think, I stumbled across an interview Carreon supposedly did at http://www.ramblingbeachcat.com/2012/06/not-backing-down-rambling-beach-cat.html

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  51.  
    identicon
    Lurker Keith, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 12:49am

    forgot...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  52.  
    identicon
    Doug, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 1:29am

    Connecting with his fans?

    I can't be certain about this, but it is not beyond the realm of possibility that this guy isn't quite as stupid as he might seem. It is possible that he knows at least a little bit about the Internet and the Streisand effect. By claiming that he's a failure, we are assuming we know what his goals are.

    If his goals are to get his name out into the media, to get some brand recognition, to become infamous, you could say his strategy is working pretty well. He's gotten some screen time on some high-profile sites.

    You might think all of this negative press would hurt him, but don't forget that not everybody really understands what's going on. While he's made a lot of enemies, he may also have garnered some kind of respect among a certain targeted audience. Perhaps this is his way of connecting with his fans.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  53.  
    icon
    Dionaea (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 1:35am

    Re: History keeps repeating itself...

    Exactly what I was gonna say. The stupidity of some people knows no bounds...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  54.  
    identicon
    STStone, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 1:47am

    Re: Connecting with his fans?

    Did Inman intend to have word of Carreon's actions on behalf of FunnyJunk spread across the Internet when he posted the rebuttal? Yes, he did.

    Did Inman intend to use the rebuttal as an attempt to spread his name across the Internet and gain a measure of fame? You can make the argument, but unless you direcly ask Inman about the reasons he posted the rebuttal, you can't know for sure.

    Did Inman intend for his fanbase and other outraged/sympathetic Internet patrons to start attacking Carreon's site or Carreon himself? I seriously doubt it.

    Inman strikes me as a shrewd, intelligent individual -- but he doesn't seem overtly egotistical or malicious.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  55.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 2:04am

    Carreon is working on his own defamation suit

    This is not likely to end well for Carreon. He must be lazy from dealing with laymen who are impressed by the fact he's a lawyer and poop their pants at every legal threat.

    His own claims about Inman may be defamatory.

    He apparently failed to take note of the fact that Inman has very quickly and easily raised over $170,000. If Carreon actually sues Inman, he should expect that Inman will raise a warchest for legal defense immediately. It's possible that fewer people will be willing to donate to a non-charitable cause, but it is also likely that just as many will be motivated to donate to see a scumbag lawyer get his ass kicked for a SLAPP lawsuit, especially given the rapidly increasing publicity. Inman would likely find some really great lawyers itching to take the case and I think it is unlikely that either Funnyjunk's owners or Carreon himself are willing to commit more money to this fight than Inman has already proven himself able to raise. I suppose if Carreon goes Jack Thompson style crazy and dedicates his life to suing Inman, maybe being his own free full-time lawyer will be enough to make a nuisance of himself. But with Inman's fundraising ability he can afford to have a lawyer work defense (or even offense) full time and get back to making comics.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  56.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 2:12am

    be better to just let him carry on. once he reaches bottom, just fill in the hole, smooth it over, pat it down, plant some flowers and have family visit occasionally

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  57.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 2:20am

    Re: Re: Connecting with his fans?

    The way I read that, I don't think Doug was talking about Inman, but rather Carreon.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  58.  
    icon
    Hephaestus (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 3:44am

    Re: Re:

    There should be a career ending lawyer version of the Darwin awards for people like him ...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  59.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 4:11am

    Re: Carreon is working on his own defamation suit

    Teh interwebs love the Oatmeal and hate douchebag Carreon. If he is so incredibly stupid as to pursue legal action, the response will be nuclear.

    His best action at this point is to apologize fully, get off the Internet, change his name, move to a third-world country, and live out his life in peace.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  60.  
    icon
    That Anonymous Coward (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 4:25am

    But he was offering his book as a peace offering to the net. Because when you look like a giant self centered dork, giving away a book about your singular claim to fame will dispel that in a heartbeat.
    o_O

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  61.  
    identicon
    Quawonk, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 4:32am

    "and associate me with incompetence with stupidity, and douchebaggery,”

    You did that yourself, Carreon. The grammar in that very sentence is yet another example.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  62.  
    icon
    That Anonymous Coward (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 5:30am

    Re: History keeps repeating itself...

    And I've been working so hard to keep the Christoforo School of Publicity going... now we have the Carreon School of Law.

    So many things to keep working on....

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  63.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 5:45am

    Direct quote from Charles Carreon. "When I get to China there will be heck to pay.. HECK TO PAY I TELL YAH"

    This next part I felt best I explain it in Chinese.

    Charles Carreon Wai Yu So Dum? Yu Lei Lo!! Fa Kin Su Pa!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  64.  
    icon
    Manabi (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 5:47am

    Re: Re:

    Carreon was considered a good lawyer before this fiasco. He's been involved in some important cases in the past, like the sex.com one.

    That's why it's particular shocking to see him behave this way, in the past he was one of the good guys. Now... now he seems to have gone nuts.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  65.  
    icon
    That Anonymous Coward (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 6:05am

    Re:

    He's got some good competition this month...
    One need only look at the antics of Candice Schwager to understand the stiff competition he is facing.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  66.  
    icon
    That Anonymous Coward (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 6:29am

    Re:

    到中國去不回。
    好感謝你,&# 20877;見。

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  67.  
    icon
    Sneeje (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 6:39am

    Re: I love this show!

    Unassailable logic on your part. My two year old even understands logic as strong as that. I ask him why he doesn't like something and he tells me, "I don't like it because I don't like it."

    He's a douchebag because he's a douchebag. Simple, yet compelling.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  68.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 6:40am

    Re:

    Put yourself in the shoes of a copyright abolitionist for an instant.

    The copyright abolitionist would not like the original complaint by the copyright holder. However, as soon as the lawyer asked for twenty thousand dollars, things change; the original copyright holder is still wrong, but the lawyer is much much more wrong, so even the copyright abolitionist, which is one of the most extreme positions in copyright you could find, will be rooting for the copyright holder in this case.

    Most people are not copyright abolitionists, so their reaction in opposition to the lawyer would be even stronger.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  69.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 6:44am

    His book says he's a "White Hat Lawyer" on the front page rofl what bullshit.

    I bet he's never even used the Chewbacca defense.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  70.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 7:18am

    Re: Re:

    Re the $20K and the letter in general, I have always subscribed to the approach that the less said in letters of this type the better. It is easy to criticize what was said. It is impossible to criticize what was not said (assuming that the letter is otherwise sufficient to place the other party on notice of a legal issue(s)).

    BTW, the response from the other person's counsel was likewise unnecessarily prolix, and he too fell prey to the the enticement of droning on incessantly to impress his client with his supposed mastery of law.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  71.  
    icon
    That Anonymous Coward (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 7:18am

    Re:

    tinfoil is more silver than white.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  72.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 7:25am

    Re: Re:

    Which ones?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  73.  
    identicon
    Pixelation, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 7:48am

    Favorite quote

    "And if that’s where the world is going I will fight with every ounce of force in this 5’11 180 pound frame against it."


    Ooooh, 5'-11" 180lb. SCARY! He's going to get all WWF on the internet.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  74.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 8:13am

    Re: strange goings on in the last article's comments...

    You just made me go back and look at the posting history of "taracarreon".

    Either that really is Charles's wife, or that's the best trolling I've seen in all my life. I'm leaning towards the former.

    But in her posts, I found this little gem of a quote:

    "This nonsense has gone on long enough. I posted this statement at Forbes, but I'll say it again here: 'The law is like math; it has an exactitude about it that is not friendly to irrational, mindless, stabbing in the dark.' You're deluding yourself that anyone thinks you're cool. You're just stupid."

    Hey, Charles, if you happen to read this, here's some free advice from the internet: Listen to your wife.

    P.S. The only thing worse than baseless and mindlessly aggressive legal flailing/bullying is baseless and mindlessly aggressive legal flailing/bullying that just doesn't know when to quit. Just ask SCO and Oracle.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  75.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 8:20am

    Re:

    No, but I think he's using the Chewbacca offense right now.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  76.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 8:26am

    Re: Favorite quote

    He's going to get all World Wildlife Fund on the internet?

    That sounds more like Inman's "Operation Bearlove Good. Cancer Bad" fundraiser.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  77.  
    identicon
    A REAL comic creator, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 8:32am

    "first shot" was fired by Inman.
    Don't forget who Inman is. ( it's well documented )
    Ignore it or don't even bother looking into him.
    Your choice.

    Carreon on the other hand is a tool.
    He played it wrong. His opponent didn't help him either.
    Inman being so versed in "internet" (look into him) has played this very well.
    He spams all the social networks regularly and I am 100% positive he spammed HIS BIASED SIDE of the story everywhere, to put the public on his side. (again...look into him)

    Carreon doesn't stand a chance against Inman.
    If he wins legally...he still loses.
    Inman is far smarter at "internet" and PR than 99% of people.He uses it, all the time. (look into it)

    Inman doesn't give a shit about you unless you are useful to him.(look into it)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  78.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 8:37am

    Re:

    I hope he WINS.

    Inman shouldn't call people copying THIEVES.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  79.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 8:38am

    Re: Re: Re:

    What if he wins ?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  80.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 8:42am

    Re:

    don't dig into Inman

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  81.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 8:44am

    Re: Re: Re:

    Yep

    It's ok now to say copying is stealing.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  82.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 8:46am

    Re: Re:

    But.....

    The right, not to be called a "thief" ?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  83.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 8:47am

    Re: Re:

    This is NOT one sided.

    fuck.... Inman's PR is good.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  84.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 8:50am

    Re: Re:

    completely innocent of saying funnyjunk "steal content" ?

    Right.. got it

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  85.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 8:54am

    Re: Re:

    So then funnyjunk should be eg."arrested" for "stealing"

    or

    Inman should have to ????? for claiming funnyjunk are criminals.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  86.  
    identicon
    The Laughing Hyena, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 8:55am

    Re: Re: Re:

    It's very common for someone lost in the wilderness to believe an end to their fear and suffering is always just over the next hill. They believe so strongly in this that they inevitably make things worse for themselves, ending up far away from where rescue teams are most likely to be looking for them (provided you bothered to tell someone where you were going, another common mistake). I've actually been through this. The dread slowly builds all day until you finally admit to yourself that you're completely lost and in trouble. Then fear sets in which generally has a negative impact on the life and death decisions you'll make from that point on. Perhaps something like that is going on with Mr. Carreon.

    He probably believes he's gotten in so deep that there is nowhere else to go but down. Righteous indignation can drive people to do bizarre things after all. Whatever the specific reason, I'm sure it all boils down to delusional reasoning, something we humans excel at. For example, tell a lie long enough and you begin to believe it. In this case Mr. Carreon probably believes Inman threw the first stone, the old "but mom, he started it!" mentality that a lot of folks never seem to grow out of. At this point taking responsibility for his actions and apologizing would be the sane way to go, but I doubt we'll see that happen. He'll just have to learn his lesson the hard way I suppose. Nobody ever takes the easy way by simply listening to the advice of experienced people older and wiser than you.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  87.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 8:58am

    Re: Re: Keep digging

    Is there a law that stops you "running your mouth off" by calling people/business thieves ?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  88.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 9:02am

    WHO is playing people well

    Inman off the hook ?

    Call people "thieves". Not an issue.

    Call them pedophiles , why not.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  89.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 9:05am

    Re: Re: Re:

    I am not surprised at Inman's playing of this situation.

    He has the knowledge in manipulating the "internets".

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  90.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 9:08am

    Re: Re: The Oatmeal's Legal Response

    REAL comedy gold




    Inman has to pay the $20,000 punnishment


    For calling filesharers "Thieves"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  91.  
    identicon
    The Laughing Hyena, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 9:19am

    Re:

    I'm not sure it qualifies as bias when you have hard evidence in hand proving the person attacking you is acting like a complete tool and plans to keep on acting like a complete tool. The "new technology" quote is pretty humorous too. I've been using the international network since 1995 and prior to that it was the bulletin board systems. I don't think something 17+ years old counts as being new lol. It truly amazes me that there are still people in the dark regarding the internet, an invention which may very qualify as being one of mankind's greatest achievements of all time. Even my parents, who are in their mid-60's, understand and use it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  92.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 9:21am

    Re:

    . . . I'm kind've disinclined to believe someone who claims to be a 'real' comic creator.

    You just sound kinda jealous that Inman has succeeded.


    Welcome to the internet. It's not like previous media. You can get noticed pretty easily with 'cheap gimmicks', but there's so many other good things around that you can't keep that attention unless you actually do have something that people like.

    Inman isn't good at the internet, he's good at having a fanbase. The many, many, many times he has been pitchforked against indicate this pretty clearly.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  93.  
    identicon
    Th Laughing Hyena, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 9:23am

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Knowledge of the "internets" doesn't change anything. The factual evidence is there for everyone to see. Mr. Carreon only has himself to blame and the sooner he takes responsibility for his actions, the better off he'll be. I wouldn't hold my breath on that though. He is a lawyer after all.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  94.  
    icon
    Zos (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 9:24am

    Re: Re:

    he's welcome to call anyone whatever he wants, that's a far cry from lawyering up over it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  95.  
    icon
    bobwyzguy (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 9:24am

    Carreon - carrion - coincidence?

    Hey Chuck - just maybe you ARE a douche-bag. You are an attorney after all, I've only ever met two who weren't, and they both left the legal profession.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  96.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 9:25am

    Re: Re:

    Ah, that's your angle.

    Frankly, this is theft. This isn't file-copying for private use, this is plagiarism for the point of profit against the stated wishes of the author. (Many authors, actually)

    And what did Inman do after funnyjunk refused to change . . .?

    Nothing. He could definitely have taken a route that would have us here at techdirt riled, but instead just shrugged and continued creating, which is really a much more productive path.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  97.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 9:29am

    Re: Re: Re:

    Read Inman's lawyers reply. It's one-sided.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  98.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 9:51am

    Re: Re:

    Don't look into it then.
    Ignorance holds no bounds.

    YOU ARE ALL being PLAYED...... fools



    The Guardian ( 2008 )
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/feb/14/searchengines.blogging


    Matthew Inman may be a genius. Or he may be a fiend. What the Seattle-based web developer and online marketer has done is figure out a way to get people to advertise his sites without paying them. What's even smarter is that he's got the people who search engines rank most highly to do the advertising: bloggers and social networkers.


    Using Yahoo's Site Explorer, Danny Sullivan, a search engine guru and editor-in-chief for SearchEngineLand.com, found more than 150,000 inbound links to cashadvance1500.com. "I think putting an entirely off-topic link next to a graphic is pushing it," he says.

    The Guardian emailed bloggers who had published the Blog Readability Test with its links intact.

    'Offending code'

    Stephen Sherlock in Massachusetts didn't realise what was happening until we told him. Now, somewhat annoyed, he's removed the "offending code" - the link to cashadvance1500.com. "I don't like those who game the system. I'll be much more careful with the next opportunity to participate in a meme like this," he says.

    Dan Thornton, a community marketing manager for Emap and editor for Disposable Media, innocently added the test to his blog. He says: "If I'd examined the HTML I definitely would not have included the link on my page, and would have publicised the fact that it's a scam.

    "Hiding link code in a widget like this is basically using the same methods as you would use to spread a virus, and while this is essentially just to aid someone's Google ranking, the fact they felt they had to hide it in such a way makes me a little annoyed."



    Inman

    I am a 27 year old web designer, developer, and online marketer.

    In early 2007 I built a full-featured online dating website, from concept to launch, in only 66.5 hours. The end result was Mingle2, and within six months the website received several million visitors and was eventually acquired by a competitor. Mingle2 now receives 40 million page views a month.

    Prior to working full-time at Mingle2, I co-founded SEOmoz and acted as CTO, web designer, and web developer.


    SEOmoz he knows nothing about manipulating Social media... right !
    SEO -- no knowledge about generating traffic either.

    SEOmoz PRO combines SEO management, social media monitoring, actionable recommendations, and so much more in one easy-to-use platform.






    THERE IS MORE ... if you care to look.

    You wont but, will you ? ( happily a puppet of Inman )

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  99.  
    identicon
    Larry, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 10:00am

    Re:

    Nice post funnycrap or whatever your name is.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  100.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 10:11am

    http://badwebcomics.wikidot.com/the-oatmeal

    This has nothing to do with his success.
    There are people who create comics because they love the stories, the artwork etc...
    The success of good comics goes far beyond Inman's work.



    But that is besides the point... Inman is playing people, gaming the system for his profit.
    Inman is all about the cash via traffic.


    Other comic artists have know it for a long time.
    (2010)
    http://unfunnythings.tumblr.com/post/1312737586/theoatmeal

    http://badwebcomics.wik idot.com/the-oatmeal

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  101.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 10:12am

    This has nothing to do with his success.
    There are people who create comics because they love the stories, the artwork etc...
    The success of good comics goes far beyond Inman's work.



    But that is besides the point... Inman is playing people, gaming the system for his profit.
    Inman is all about the cash via traffic.


    Other comic artists have know it for a long time.
    (2010)
    http://unfunnythings.tumblr.com/post/1312737586/theoatmeal

    http://badwebcomics.wik idot.com/the-oatmeal

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  102.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 10:17am

    Re: Re: Re:

    did you actually have a point? nothing you posted is relevant to the discussion in any way.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  103.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 10:18am

    Re: Re:

    Not even close.

    If you look at the FACTS.
    The side that shills the most, spams to all the social networks and blogs.... is Inman. There is a PROVEN history. It is his area of expertise.

    Your choice, be a puppet if you want.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  104.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 10:22am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    True about Carreon 100%.

    But don't disregard the power of Inman to manipulate the internet.
    He is fucking good at being sneaky.
    ( for a start read )http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/feb/14/searchengines.blogging

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  105.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 10:35am

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    People and SITES being played, is relevant.

    He is good.
    Calls people "thieves" for copying...ok
    Lies about credit being removed by funnyjunk...ok
    Publicly slanders funnyjunk...ok
    Get's defamation threat...ok


    This is a DEFAMATION case

    What has it been manipulated into ?
    by whom ?

    It's NOW not about the defamation is it !
    Charity !
    Evil funnyjunk admin !
    Evil Lawyer !
    Stupid Lawyer !
    Unreasonable Lawyer !


    To say Inman has not used his skills of "manipulation of the internet" would be really quite naive.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  106.  
    icon
    Ann (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 10:40am

    Re: Re: Re:

    Mrs. Carreon, you and your husband fundamentally do not understand new media. In that interview Matt did he actually explains why he got out of traditional SEO. He was an aggressive and very skilled link builder, but he didn't like feeling slimy. So, now he does "white hat" (see what I did there?) SEO, which boils down to this: creating useful, funny, or otherwise entertaining content that people will naturally want to share. That's not playing the "internets" or spamming social media. It's not even manipulation, and it's certainly not threatening to sue google when you don't get your way in the search engines like you and your husband did.

    Inman didn't like feeling like a douchebag, so he stopped participating in things that are douchey. Your husband would be well served to learn that lesson. Stick to what you know. Bad poetry and government conspiracy theories.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  107.  
    identicon
    Pixelation, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 10:49am

    Re: Re: Favorite quote

    I was thinking WWF wrestling but maybe he should try saving pandas instead of practicing law.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  108.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 11:06am

    Re: Re:

    The bias was there from the first appearance of the story.

    Everyone knew that Inman was "Giving to charity to stop the evil funnyjunk"
    Inman is just a poor cartoonist

    Funny how everyone knew at the same time.
    Wouldn't be Inman using his internet skills to push this NARRATIVE ?


    Linkbait Developer & Viral Marketer:
    If there's one marketing firm that's become synonymous with linkbait, it's SEOmoz. Being a former top 100 digg user, I was tasked with crafting content that drove page views far into the millions. My work has also been featured on BoingBoing, SlashDot, Wired Magazine's blog, and countless other social media websites (Reddit, del.icio.us, StumbleUpon).


    http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2007/dec/05/getacashadvanceformyblog
    htt p://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/dec/07/blogreadability
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/ blog/2007/dec/14/loanscompanyexploitingblogg

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  109.  
    icon
    That Anonymous Coward (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 11:15am

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    We'll all be dead anyways as hell will have frozen over.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  110.  
    icon
    That Anonymous Coward (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 11:19am

    Re: Re: Re:

    So I'm sure that funnyjunk will be more than willing to turn over all of the proceeds they earned from having cartoons from the Oatmeal on their pages.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  111.  
    icon
    Ann (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 11:22am

    Re: Re: Re:

    Mrs. Carreon, you and your husband fundamentally do not understand new media. In that interview Matt did he actually explains why he got out of traditional SEO. He was an aggressive and very skilled link builder, but he didn't like feeling slimy. So, now he does "white hat" (see what I did there?) SEO, which boils down to this: creating useful, funny, or otherwise entertaining content that people will naturally want to share. That's not playing the "internets" or spamming social media. It's not even manipulation, and it's certainly not threatening to sue google when you don't get your way in the search engines like you and your husband did.

    Inman didn't like feeling like a douchebag, so he stopped participating in things that are douchey. Your husband would be well served to learn that lesson. Stick to what you know. Bad poetry and government conspiracy theories.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  112.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 11:23am

    Carve your own path and think for yourself.

    Again with the ... wtf
    WHY would a lawyer and his wife give a shit about one of the hundreds of articles about this ?
    paranoid as fuck !

    YOU have been played. ALL the fact's point to it.
    (be honest with yourself)


    It's your choice.
    Look at the facts or believe the spin, it's up to you.



    Why would you believe Inman after the things he said and the things he has done ?

    He is a master, even a genius at what he does.

    What he does is play people and internet sites.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  113.  
    icon
    That Anonymous Coward (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 11:24am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    So we will start with the original defamation case we should have seen when funnystuff lied to their followers claiming they were going to be sued by Oatmeal.

    I'd expect the damage to funnystuff should be entertaining as many content creators are now well aware of their work being hosted on the site, and will be sending many notices to have their work removed from the site.

    oh that's right funnyjunk doesn't have a DMCA agent registered, so they don't have the protections of the DMCA provided for sites.

    So would you care to comment on Carreon's loss of the right to practice for violating the law? Or maybe the insane letter he sent to Google to uncover the conspiracy about his wife's scraping of crazy theories from the internet being delisted?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  114.  
    icon
    Ann (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 11:29am

    Re: Carve your own path and think for yourself.

    Oh, I don't know, Dear Heart. Maybe because he and his wife took time away from all that top knotch lawyering to hijack Inman's pterodactyl comic and write a horribly sad poem about him and post it to their website?

    http://www.american-buddha.com/poet.donttalkaboutmother.htm

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  115.  
    identicon
    [citation needed or GTFO], Jun 16th, 2012 @ 11:32am

    Re: Re: Re: Favorite quote

    They're called the WWE (World Wrestling Entertainment) now ever since the World Wildlife Foundation called WWF for their website over a decade ago.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  116.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 11:35am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Hope not.

    $20,000 damages for...calling fileshares "thieves" is win win.



    1) Inman doesn't win his obvious internet manipulation.

    2) We filesharers get a victory against the MAFFIA propaganda.


    Can imagine the TF article now...
    Call Filesharers Thieves And Get $20,000 Fine

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  117.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 11:43am

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    I don't know, possibly.
    But that would be a licensing issue. Not a defamation issue.


    This really has been twisted by Inman's genius PR.
    It's a defamation case...Plain and simple.

    Inman is just a genius at manipulation. FACT
    There is lot's of proof of it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  118.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 12:09pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    a. IF funnyjunk lied to it's users in a PERSONAL ARMY request.
    yea... that would be similar BUT different.
    Calling people criminals, saying they committed a crime is not the same as saying someone wants to shut a site down with legal means.


    b. the effect to funnyjunk... Look at all the fucks I give







































    c.Why would I "care to comment on Carreon's" phaggotry ?
    ( don't tell me your assuming Anon )



    DENIAL ANON
    Plain and simple.... You may be CURRENTLY fooled but I am not.
    I have seen this before, YOU will see it again.

    Proxies by the hundreds for gems like Scrapebox , Inman knows what the fuck that is.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  119.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 12:14pm

    Re: Re: Carve your own path and think for yourself.

    I don't believe it is true.
    ( looks like Inmans work of what he is FAMOUS for )
    Forgot you ignore what he has done previously.



    I am Barack Obama
    Prove me wrong ?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  120.  
    icon
    Benjo (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 12:22pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Can't blame a guy for being competent. It's true that Inman might be harnessing the rapidly fleeting attention span of the internet, but this:

    "It's NOW not about the defamation is it !
    Charity !
    Evil funnyjunk admin !
    Evil Lawyer !
    Stupid Lawyer !
    Unreasonable Lawyer !"

    Is just stupid. He posted a letter that Carreon wrote, and refused to give in to bogus legal claims. There is nothing nefarious about how he has handled the situation. There may be a big crowd of people that for right now think Carreon is some super evil lawyer, but they will be talking about something else by next week. If anything, this series of events plays out more like a funny documentary then sound-byte ridden news broadcasts that you are likely to hear on tv.

    I bet you love conspiracy theories.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  121.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 12:27pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    So a news report calling you a cannibal, murdering peedo is ok ?

    Will remember that.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  122.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 12:31pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    They removed the infringing links provided.

    It is NOT theft. Nothing was stolen.
    Funnyjunk Admin did not upload it.
    That has got FUCK ALL to do with it.

    DEFAMATION CASE IS DEFAMATION CASE.


    YOUR OPINION was GIVEN TO YOU. (by Inman)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  123.  
    identicon
    soooo, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 12:34pm

    am i the only one that hopes this guy gets dibarred from practicing law?

    also he needs a wambalance.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  124.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 12:55pm

    Last attempt at intervention

    Defamation is now "bogus claims"
    Publish an article calling your local Corporation a group of Paedo's then.
    Do It.. Dare you.

    As for conspiracy.
    I am not the one who believes bullshit stories a person says without looking into the facts.

    Yous are the people who believed the....
    GOOD, SMALL, CHARITABLE, POOR cartoonist
    against the
    EVIL, BIG, STEALING, RICH, EXTORTIONIST funnyjunk


    How WRONG is that narrative and impression ?
    FACT's tell you what ?


    PEEPS BEEN PLAYED ! ( no shame , it happens )

    Still can't see it ? shame on you.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  125.  
    icon
    David Sanger (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 1:11pm

    Violating a Twitter name

    Clearly the most egregious and illegal activity was violating his twitter name!!

    Eh, what??

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  126.  
    identicon
    Annie Sisk, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 2:11pm

    Except that without lawyers...

    ... nobody would be around to inform TechDirt that the First Amendment has jack-squat to do with this, and only applies to *government* restrictions against speech.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  127.  
    icon
    Gwiz (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 2:12pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    YOUR OPINION was GIVEN TO YOU. (by Inman)


    Next you are going to tell us he has been putting subliminal messages in his comics and we have all been turned into his personal interwebz zombie army.

    Mmmmmmmmmmmmmm. Brains.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  128.  
    icon
    art guerrilla (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 2:58pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    U R fucking weird; and i don't mean weird in a 'good' way, i mean fucked-in-the-head weird...
    the crap you have spammed here -EVEN IF 'TRUE'- is beside the point...
    seems like you don't like the guy, fine...
    from what you've shown so far -'real' comic artiste- i don't like you...
    i have more evidence to base that opinion on than you do of the oatmeal guy...
    art guerrilla
    aka ann archy
    eof

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  129.  
    icon
    JMT (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 4:25pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    It's amusing how desperate you are to turn this discussion about Carreon into an expose of Inman, despite nobody else's interest in doing so? Why don't you tell us all about your very obvious personal interest in Inman? I doubt anyone believes for a second that you're just some neutral observer.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  130.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 4:31pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Hahaha - an angry idiot loser posting anonymously on the internet. What a unique phenomenon...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  131.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 4:33pm

    Re: Last attempt at intervention

    Wow - you're delusional. Is your surname Carreon, by any chancev

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  132.  
    identicon
    MarcW, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 4:34pm

    Re:

    Frankly, at this point I'd be afraid if I hired him to protect my Constitutional rights I'd soon have British soldiers quartered in my house.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  133.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 4:37pm

    Re: Re: Re: Carve your own path and think for yourself.

    Anyone who uses "prove me wrong" in an argument has nothing useful to say. All you're doing is the exact thing Carreon did - you people need to learn when to shut up when you're embarrassing yourselves.

    Or continue to post cretinous nonsense so we can continue to laugh at you. Choice is all yours...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  134.  
    identicon
    MarcW, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 4:38pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    Actually, that's what we call "scorched earth." It's how lawyers say to other lawyers, "Mess with me, and I will destroy you." I can see where you might make that mistake, though. It does sometimes resemble needless meter-running. It's a judgement call.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  135.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 4:41pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Inman's mysterious "powers of manipulation" are just knowing when someone is trying to extort money from him, and knowing how much people detest immoral brain-damaged asshole lawyer extortionists - it's as simple as that.

    No conspiracy here, other than the conspiracy to keep you off your meds, you paranoid nutcase...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  136.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 4:43pm

    Re: Except that without lawyers...

    So? And? Are you another one who can't find their haldol this morning?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  137.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 4:47pm

    Re: Re: Re: The Oatmeal's Legal Response

    Wow. That was just

    some words


    in bold


    stuck in a comment. You couldn't be further from a coherent point if you tried.

    Please find your medication and take some of it - you are probably making your close family sad with these contemptuous displays.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  138.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 4:48pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    What's a "peedo", some kind of swimsuit you can urinate in?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  139.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 4:59pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Seriously, you fail at life. You are quite possibly, the most wrong person who has ever lived. You are delusional, paranoid, round the bend. And yes, that sniggering you can hear? We're all laughing at you: the people reading your comments, the people you work with (behind your back of course), and the voices in your head. Laughing at you. Because you are a joke. Even your psychiatrist thinks that you're hilarious, although he's embarrassed to be the same species as you, you dolt, you speck, you cretin. I'd call you a lunatic, but frankly, that's a insult to lunatics. Every time you open your mouth, something embarrassing slides out. I could go on, but I have to go bash my head repeatedly into a stone wall, and I'd rather do that than continue to interact with you. Try not to let your single-digit IQ get in the way of having a passable life, and try to see if you can get your fingers and/or tongue into an electric outlet - there are cookies in there from the magical electric fairy - enjoy them!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  140.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 5:10pm

    So an Oregon lawyer wants to sue someone in Washington under Californian law?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  141.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 6:07pm

    Re: Re: Re: Keep digging

    I hope to god that you're a child, because otherwise, you seem to have some quite profound issues. The thought of you driving a car, voting, or god forbid, raising children scares me.

    It is a fact that Funnyjunk was removing the attribution from Matt Inman's work in an attempt to drive ad revenue. (This is presumably because nobody who works for Funnyjunk has any actual creativity or talent to draw their own damn cartoons.) When Inman rightfully complained about this (the removal of the copyright), then rather than do the right thing, Funnyjunk began to behave as if they were the ones who were being wronged. This escalated to the point that Funnyjunk's nutcase-for-hire, Carreon, tried to bully Inman into paying him $20,000 (for what? Compensation to Funnyjunk for suffering the indignity of being called thieves, when they were caught stealing?) This is when Inman went public on this and Carreon went into conniptions, and started to have what seems to be some kind of mental breakdown.

    The above is indisputable, but allow me to offer my opinion as well. For people like Funnyjunk and Carreon, lying and bullying is just their modus operandi - they do this day in, day out. They're so used to people rolling over and appeasing them, or just giving up and walking away, that they are genuinely upset that Inman has called them on their bullshit. These people are no better than the Mafia. I wouldn't do business with them - I wouldn't even piss on them if they were on fire. But the whole world can now see them for the reprobates that they are. If they do end up damaging their careers (if aggregating unattributed cartoons even qualifies as a career), then good. The only thing they can do to make amends is to apologize at the very least, and maybe match Inman's charity contributions. They brought this on themselves and they deserve every last moment of it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  142.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 6:42pm

    Drill baby, drill!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  143.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 6:45pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Keep digging

    There was no stealing, there was a lot of copying going about, but nothing have been stolen.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  144.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 6:53pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Copying is fine. Removing the attribution isn't. You are dumb. Good day.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  145.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 6:54pm

    Re:

    Please call WHINE-1-1 for the wambulance.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  146.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 6:56pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    Stop digging, Charles. It's starting to become worrying.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  147.  
    identicon
    apauld, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 7:08pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    It is a drag that the insightful/funny comments are tallied on Sunday, AC, that is the funniest/best slam I've read online in a long time.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  148.  
    identicon
    apauld, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 7:33pm

    Carreon bills himself as a "lawyer concentrating in Internet-related legal and intellectual property issues," but he certainly doesn't seem to grasp any issues related to the internet or IP issues. I am just guessing; but maybe Carreon has based his entire career off of the sex dot com case (which seems to have been a simple fraud case), and thinks he knows more than he actually does...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  149.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 7:36pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    But the right of tax payers and those who genuinely need the courts' intervention, to not have the courts expensively and wastefully bogged down or the legal system abused for drama-whoring or extortion.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  150.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 7:44pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    Funnyjunk should register to ensure their DMC safeharbour protection and ought to take every reasonable effort to ensure their resources are not used for unlawful purposes.

    Inman should donate the charitable donations to the bear loving and cancer hating charities he has proposed to raise funds for.

    I think maybe the offered pictures as settlement ought to be foregone in the name of avoiding further drama whoring. Everyone should go to their respective corners and cool off.

    The law-chap should have a good hard think. Whether out of narcisstic self interest or because he has genuine hopes of being a better person, he should persist in this deep thinking until he figures out where he went wrong and incorporates this learning into his future conduct.

    And then they might all live happily ever after.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  151.  
    icon
    dwg (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 8:02pm

    Re:

    Really? That's the best "first" you could come up with? Hey first: guess who drafted the excellent anti-SLAPP law that's going to work against this numbskull? Lawyers who recognized the need to protect people's freedom of speech. Guess who's going to work that law in Inman's favor to slap the taste out of the idiot's mouth? A lawyer.

    Please, for the love of g-d, come up with something, anything to say with some substance to it. Being first is a rare opportunity, and you've utterly wet the bed.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  152.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 8:03pm

    It's pretty easy to guess how much Carreon knows about the internet, given that the header he used for the letter he sent to The Oatmeal appears to use a logo made of clipart.

    Seriously, it's a crappy globe with a mouse, a monitor with an "@" on it, a CD, a copyright symbol and a trademark symbol orbiting around it. With "ONLINE MEDIA LAW" written on a banner across the middle.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  153.  
    icon
    dwg (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 8:05pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    This is very astute. It's like gambling--when you dig yourself a hole the size of your house, car and next year's wages at the roulette table, you're sure that the next spin will restore it all and even bring you some extra cash.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  154.  
    icon
    dwg (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 8:10pm

    Re: Re: Re: Carve your own path and think for yourself.

    But...but...defamation!

    I can't wait for these posts to be sourced for the litigation, and to see who their author is. It's just too wonderful.

    Sometimes schadenfreude is a guilty pleasure.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  155.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 8:33pm

    His wife is ranting again in the previous topic.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  156.  
    icon
    Watchit (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 9:07pm

    Re: Re: Re: Keep digging

    Nope.avi

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  157.  
    icon
    Watchit (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 9:09pm

    Re: WHO is playing people well

    Ummmm, what kinda connection are you trying to make? really this entire time I have no idea what you've been trying to prove... mostly things about Inman being not a nice person or something? what's your deal?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  158.  
    icon
    Watchit (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 9:10pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Not sure if trolling... or really believes what he's saying...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  159.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 9:38pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Keep digging

    Who's talking about stealing? I certainly wasn't.

    Is this some kind of effort to get "stealing" mentioned in every single comment thread on Techdirt?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  160.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 16th, 2012 @ 10:51pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Only if you're R. Kelly

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  161.  
    icon
    techflaws (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 11:10pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Is there a point to your pointless layout?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  162.  
    icon
    techflaws (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 11:12pm

    Re: Re: Re: Carve your own path and think for yourself.

    Prove me wrong ?

    Why? Noone gives a damn.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  163.  
    icon
    techflaws (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 11:15pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Keep dreaming, skintube.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  164.  
    icon
    techflaws (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 11:17pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    About time.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  165.  
    icon
    techflaws (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 11:19pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    "Proof" in your twisted mind doesn't mean it'll convince anyone else. Tough luck.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  166.  
    icon
    techflaws (profile), Jun 16th, 2012 @ 11:21pm

    Re: Connecting with his fans?

    I can't be certain about this, but it is not beyond the realm of possibility that this guy isn't quite as stupid as he might seem

    I'm gonna go with Occam's Razor here.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  167.  
    icon
    That Anonymous Coward (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 12:10am

    Re: Re: Re:

    The real delightful things are on the websites she folded, and the posts she would make and then delete after they were indexed by Google.

    The post on Houston Press is just the tip of the iceberg, a sockpuppet from "Australia" supporting Candice in the comments but using a TX IP address.

    She was much more vocal in the thread about her on petapixel, and her 6th "DMCA" notice to GoDaddy against petapixel is hysterical.

    She continues to call Jay Lee fag and other wonderful names from her Twitter account trying to make it trend. Making allegations about her car being stolen by the hackers, and so much more.

    She is less than pleased that multiple copyright infringements were found on her blogs and I hope Anne Gedees crushes her.

    I might have been following this case just a little bit and exposing her sockpuppetry, her inactive "non-profit" from which she was making political statements, and so many other little devious tricks shes been using for years to slander and libel people. One can only hope the Texas Bar got to see her handy work before she started trying to cover her tracks.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  168.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 1:38am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Keep digging

    "a fact that Funnyjunk was removing the attribution from Matt Inman's work"

    NO .. that is a lie ( told by ? )

    Show us proof or it is a lie

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  169.  
    icon
    Anonymous Coward of Esteemed Trolling (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 1:40am

    Re: Re: WHO is playing people well

    I think the existence of defamation is the point.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  170.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 1:46am

    Re: Re: Last attempt at intervention

    Show the "superior evidence to the contrary".

    ONLY then you can claim "delusional".


    Evidence against emotion, you chose.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  171.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 1:49am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Carve your own path and think for yourself.

    Sarcasm is lost on idiots.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  172.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 1:51am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Carve your own path and think for yourself.

    again, obvious sarcasm is obvious IN CONTEXT.

    http://www.american-buddha.com/poet.donttalkaboutmother.htm

    is as Legit... as me saying I am Barack Obama. Get it ?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  173.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 1:52am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Carve your own path and think for yourself.

    Impersonation by the way, not defamation.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  174.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 2:00am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Paranoid... LOL

    It's now paranoid to look into things without emotion informing your judgement.

    Bad, immoral, assholes, evil, bullying, extortionate funnyjunk.


    Do you lot, watch FOX news ?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  175.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 2:08am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    You all have jumped onto the narrative, the Viral Marketer made.

    end of.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  176.  
    icon
    Anonymous Coward of Esteemed Trolling (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 2:09am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: The Oatmeal's Legal Response

    lol.

    People can read.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  177.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 2:14am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Not subliminal.

    He has the blog, the cartoon, all the news sites reported that.
    Zombie army is a bit extreme, but traffic to his site ?


    Now this is conspiracy... just a question.
    If you found out that this was a publicity stunt by funnyjunk and Inman ?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  178.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 2:16am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Clap clap.

    Personal insults are funny....

    I hate hate hate funnyjunk.

    Fox news told me

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  179.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 2:18am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Someone is in denial.


    Shame on you.... run along and watch Fox news

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  180.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 2:20am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    hate for funnyjunk sure is stronger that hate for the MAFFIA.


    List of other things Fox news told you to hate ?

    It was fox news who set out this NARRATIVE ?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  181.  
    icon
    Cory of PC (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 6:20am

    Re: Re:

    ... Care to elaborate?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  182.  
    identicon
    Dreddsnik, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 6:21am

    Re:

    " "first shot" was fired by Inman.
    Don't forget who Inman is. ( it's well documented )"

    You presented the position, you present your citations.
    We'll wait.

    " He spams all the social networks regularly and I am 100% positive he spammed HIS BIASED SIDE of the story everywhere, to put the public on his side. (again...look into him) "

    Again, you presented the position, the onus of proof is on you. Citations please.

    " Inman is far smarter at "internet" and PR than 99% of people.He uses it, all the time. (look into it) "

    Seriously ?

    See above.
    No proof, no credibility. Might as well be methane.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  183.  
    identicon
    Malyngo, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 8:15am

    First Amendment

    You really should take a good read of the First Amendment before mentioning it here.
    I am sorry to say, but it does NOT allow you to call someone else a douchebag.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  184.  
    icon
    Khaim (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 8:20am

    Details are important

    Inman has indeed accused FunnyJunk of infringing his rights. However - and this is the important part - he has not threatened legal action. He has not even suggested there should be any legal action. FunnyJunk are the ones that cried "lawyer!", and that's why Techdirt is on Inman's side.

    The point of Techdirt isn't "Copyrights are bad".
    The point of Techdirt is "Copyright abuse is bad".

    Most of the time, rights-holders are abusing their granted monopoly powers. That's why Techdirt seems like it hates copyright. But it doesn't, and this is a perfect example: when Matt Inman uses his copyrights correctly, everyone wins. Except FunnyJunk, but they brought this on themselves.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  185.  
    icon
    Khaim (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 8:24am

    False dichotomy

    Neither.

    FunnyJunk is not liable for anything (assume they can claim DMCA safe harbor - Inman's lawyer seems to think they may have screwed up here, but we'll give them the benefit of the doubt and assume they're safe).

    Inman has broken no laws.

    This isn't a court battle. The courts aren't even involved, and they shouldn't be. This is a media battle, a fight for public opinion about "right" and "wrong". No matter what happens, no one is going to jail, and the only people being paid are lawyers. Oh, and that charity than Inman set up.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  186.  
    icon
    Gwiz (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 8:46am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Now this is conspiracy... just a question.
    If you found out that this was a publicity stunt by funnyjunk and Inman ?


    Personally, I would continue on my merry way, not giving a shit.

    People do stunts for publicity all the time, so what? The only reason any of this is on my radar at all is because of all the amusingly stupid comments here on Techdirt.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  187.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 8:48am

    Re: Re: Re: Keep digging

    "If property was taken from an unwilling donor without compensation, call it a theft!" - Charles Carreon, The Sex.Com Chronicles

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  188.  
    icon
    Cory of PC (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 9:48am

    Re: Re: Re:

    ... Excuse me, but you're confusing me. What facts? What history? Puppets? Are you saying that you're a complete lunatic?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  189.  
    icon
    Cory of PC (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 9:50am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Carve your own path and think for yourself.

    And I think we all know who's the real idiot here is...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  190.  
    icon
    Cory of PC (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 9:54am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Have you ever look in a mirror?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  191.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 11:07am

    Re: Except that without lawyers...

    Did you know that courts are part of the government?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  192.  
    icon
    That One Guy (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 12:01pm

    Re: First Amendment

    You need to take your own advice and read the thing again.

    As far as I know, the only things that aren't covered by the first amendment are those that would cause a clear and present danger(yelling 'fire' in a crowded movie theater being the classic example).

    Free speech doesn't mean 'free speech as long as it doesn't offend someone', so calling someone a douchebag is indeed protected speech.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  193.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 12:49pm

    Re: Re: First Amendment

    There's a big surprise waiting for you on this "free speech" issue. I can't give it away right now. It's a matter of strategy. Which is what my next post is about.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  194.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 12:50pm

    LISTEN: we're not talking about RELIGION here. We're not talking about right and wrong, heaven and hell, and Christian martyrs (here the Devil Matt Inman is on the cross --it's so Illuminati!). In this country, where our Constitution allows us freedom FROM religion, some of us have taken the opportunity to be REAL atheists, not just fake gnostics like Richard Dawkins. With copyright infringement, we're talking about THE LAW, not religion, law made by civil servants in the legislature and in Congress, not in the Vatican.

    Now appealing to people's subconscious religious conditioning, subtly transferring that understanding to a non-understanding of the law, is a real good trick for mind controllers in the pay of large corporations, in this case the publishing industry. It's obvious that that is what this whole story is about: the publishing industry. It can be compared to the recording industry's beat-up of mp3 file sharing. Every reporter who has written about this story has been distinctly biased from the get-go in favor of Matt Inman's bogus claim of "copyright infringement." They don't care what Charles has to say. Their stories start and end with threats towards Charles Carreon, and an appeal to the Internet to rise up against him. You should be aware that this story broke at the very moment that the Department of Justice was settling with the publishing industry after prosecuting them for a giant conspiracy against the People to set e-book prices. We've talked a little about strategy here, Sun Tzu and Machiavelli, and I would add, in honor of Leo Strauss, Simonides. Remember how I said that to understand modern history you had to know about the Jewish Nazis?

    So when you suffer a big defeat, it's time to marshal your forces and wage another campaign. And the Matthew Inman/Oatmeal/Funnyjunk fight provided just the ammunition and fresh soldiers they needed. They got all their compromised reporters lodged in various news agencies' "Internet departments," which is to say, young people who don't know anything, who aren't making REAL news, just gossiping about the Internet, to jump on this issue and make a martyr of -- who is the real martyr here? -- Charles Carreon. Matt Inman is only the COVER martyr, the mask.

    Not one reporter has considered this fracas as a real story in the real world. No, this is "Internet" news. Which can be analogized to our unconscious, the real world being our conscious mind. In the "Internet" things can happen that can't happen in the real world. Like transferring religious understanding to the law. What an opportunity for those who know how to use it. In this realm, you can wage a Crusade, and most likely, no one will even be conscious of it. Because, as I said, people are not educated in philosophy. Not being educated in philosophy, various ideas, pro and con, positive and negative, up and down, in and out, and all that is inbetween, float together randomly in a marvelous soup of potential and actual DOUBLETHINK.

    And that's what you're doing when you decide that some entity is simply "WRONG" if someone's copyrighted works end up on their site. You don't care about DMCA, you don't care about THE LAW, you care about your religious campaign, cynically disguised as THE LAW, to marshal people's unconscious forces for your own purposes. That end up with the very people you as the Publishing Industry are trying to control fighting in your own army, arguing your cause.

    Now, THAT'S strategy. And a marvelous response to a big defeat.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  195.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 12:56pm

    Re:

    Sorry, but the previous comments I refer to having made here, are on the other thread, "Carreon continues to lash out!" I made a mistake posting this comment on this thread.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  196.  
    icon
    Wendy Cockcroft (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 12:58pm

    ROFL!

    I usually read The Oatmeal when I want a laugh, but the comments thread here has trumped it!

    Some of you ACs have the funniest quotes. I'd love to be able to attribute them properly. As it is, the fairest thing to do is link to this page and let people find them by themselves. They work better in context anyway.

    Oh, and props to Ann, minerat, [citation needed or GTFO], Nate, mrdarkrai, and Lurker Keith for the epic digging up of pertinent information.

    First prize, however, to the troll/Mrs.Carreon/whatever, for the funniest contributions to this "debate."

    This is the most entertaining comments section I have ever read. :D

    Congratulations, all, on a job well done. *Applauds*

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  197.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 1:10pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Keep digging

    For the love of God, why do you care so much? Was Matt Inman mean to you at school? I've seen some one-track posters in my time, but you take scary obsession to a whole new level...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  198.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 1:12pm

    Re: Re: Re: Last attempt at intervention

    Fuck me you're insane...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  199.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 1:14pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    You are demented. Every comment you post just proves how detached from reality you are.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  200.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 1:14pm

    Re: Re:

    The admin can delete this comment if they want. I'm going to re-post it on the other thread.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  201.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 1:23pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Oh dear. You have no comprehension skills at all, do you? Oh well, continuing to insult you would be pointless. It's obvious that you work for funnyjunk, and you've demonstrated amply in this threat that you have no sense of shame, humility or decency. I hope that you get taken to the cleaners in the whichever of the next inevitable and avoidable lawsuits you bring upon yourself, and remember to stick it to the judge when he's sentencing you.

    You're the worst human being I've ever encountered and I take solace in knowing that you'll be the author of your own downfall, which you'll still probably blame Matt Inman for, you sketchy stalker weirdo.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  202.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 1:27pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    Original AC's point is that everything bad that has ever happened is Matt Inman's fault, as he has scary mind control powers which he uses in concert with Fox News to defame innocents.

    Only the AC is immune to Inman's jedi mind tricks, but no-one will take him seriously...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  203.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 1:35pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    Wow - this story seems to have drawn out literally all of the crazy from the whole of the internet. I don't think I've ever seen so much concentrated gobbledy gook in one place in a long time.


    On the other hand, I don't think I've had this much fun since the days of Usenet...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  204.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 1:37pm

    Re: ROFL!

    You can quote anything you like with my snowflake attached to it, Wendy.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  205.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 2:05pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    So true.
    All I am really saying is that none of us should give a shit now.
    Wow, the hate that has brought my way : )

    As you said to my hypothetical question "I would continue on my merry way, not giving a shit."
    That's just what I'll do in this instance : )
    I give up trying to point out facts about PR and perception manipulation with some of the people here.

    Edward Louis Bernays http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Bernays
    "The best PR happens with the people unaware that they are being manipulated."

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  206.  
    icon
    Khaim (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 4:11pm

    Re: TaraCarreon

    We're approaching TimeCube-levels here.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  207.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 4:18pm

    I love that scene from "Labyrinth," starring David Bowie, where Hoggle and Sarah are on their way to the center of the castle and the very rocks start speaking to them:

    "Don't go on. Go back while you still can. This is not the way. Take heed and go no further. Beware. Beware. Soon it will be too late."

    And Hoggle answers: "Yeah! Don't pay any attention to them. They're just false alarms. You get a lot of them in the labyrinth. Especially when you're on the right track."

    And a rock interrupts: "Oh, no, you're not."

    Hoggle tells him to shut up.

    The Rock explains: "Sorry. Just doing my job."

    And Hoggle says, "You don't have to do it to us. Just forget it."

    Rock says, "Oh, please, I haven't said it for such a long time."

    Finally, Hoggle gives in: "Oh, all right, but don't expect a big reaction."

    Rocks -- grateful -- says: "No, no, no, of course not -- (DUM DA DA DUM!) For the path you will take will lead to certain destruction."

    He's so very, very grateful to be able to do his job.

    http://www.naderlibrary.com/labyrinth.screen.toc.htm

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  208.  
    identicon
    STStone, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 4:42pm

    Re:

    I wonder if Sony Pictures knows you have its intellectual property (in the form of the Labyrinth screenplay) hosted on your site without its permission.

    Maybe I should contact the studio and find out.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  209.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 4:45pm

    Re: Re:

    There's a library exemption to copyright infringement. See the other thread "Carreon continues to lash out."

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  210.  
    identicon
    STStone, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 4:48pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    There's a library exemption to copyright infringement.

    Show me the exact wording in any relevant judicial case or active part of copyright law that creates a "library exemption", and I will believe you.

    Until then, you'll have to excuse me -- I need to start finding the email addresses of some major book and film publishers.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  211.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 4:54pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    I already replied to YOU on the other thread. But I'm happy to repost it here.

    ***** REPOST FOR RETARD *****

    I'll just quote the statute and add a comment and explain how it applies in the online context. Of course, you could have googled "copyright + library" and found it yourself, but that is apparently above your grade level.

    17 USC § 108 - Limitations on exclusive rights: Reproduction by libraries and archives

    Current through Pub. L. 112-128. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)

    " (a) Except as otherwise provided in this title and notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, it is not an infringement of copyright for a library or archives, or any of its employees acting within the scope of their employment, to reproduce no more than one copy or phonorecord of a work, except as provided in subsections (b) and (c), or to distribute such copy or phonorecord, under the conditions specified by this section, if—

    (1) the reproduction or distribution is made without any purpose of direct or indirect commercial advantage;

    (2) the collections of the library or archives are

    (i) open to the public, or

    (ii) available not only to researchers affiliated with the library or archives or with the institution of which it is a part, but also to other persons doing research in a specialized field; and

    (3) the reproduction or distribution of the work includes a notice of copyright that appears on the copy or phonorecord that is reproduced under the provisions of this section, or includes a legend stating that the work may be protected by copyright if no such notice can be found on the copy or phonorecord that is reproduced under the provisions of this section."

    At the American Buddha Online Library (ABOL), we have a notice posted that applies this section to the reproduction of transient digital copies on the user's computer, and voila, we have immunity from copyright infringement liability. No court has ever pronounced on the viability of this theory of copyright infringement immunity, and our legal counsel, Charles Carreon, has thusfar carried the day in defense litigation directed at ABOL by Penguin USA. Litigation is the test, and ABOL has passed it. Theorize in a knowledge vacuum if you are so inclined. In space, no one can hear you bloviate.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  212.  
    identicon
    STStone, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 4:58pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    So, basically, you think calling your website a "library" and saying "copyright law doesn't apply to me" will save your ass if a few big name book publishers and movie studios come a-callin' over the fact that you put up their legally-protected works online and tried to circumvent copyright law by calling the site you hosted their works on a "library"?

    You might find your husband willing to make the argument for you in court, but any competent attorney would tell you to shut up, take the infringing content down, and pray that those publishers don't seek restitution for your infringment upon copyright law.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  213.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 4:59pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Since when did you become a copyright chicken hawk? You probably still have MP3s and movies on your hard drive that you got through illegal file-sharing on Napster, Kaaza, and Pirate Bay, you hypocrite. Better delete all of them right now before Charles subpoenas them to prove that you're a media mole.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  214.  
    identicon
    STStone, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 5:04pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Subpoena me for what -- saying things you don't like?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  215.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 5:13pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    So far, ABOL has responded to a handful of DMCA notices, to which ABOL has replied with counternotices that have universally been accepted as valid by numerous international publishers, all of whom have accepted the legitimacy of ABOL as a library by taking no further action after the content was reposted. The sole exception to this is Penguin USA, that sued three years ago in the SDNY, was promptly pitched out of court by District Judge Lynch for lack of personal jurisdiction, appealed to the 2nd Circuit, ("American Buddha I") that booted the jurisdictional issue up to the New York Court of Appeals ("American Buddha II"), that sent it back to Judge Koeltl, who is now administering jurisdictional discovery, after which the motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction will be renewed, and we anticipate, granted, after American Buddha establishes its pure non-profit bona fides by showing no income.

    As an aside, no music publisher or movie studio has ever submitted a DMCA notice. It would seem that the RIAA accepts the library-lending exemption, which is buttressed by a downloading blocker that prevents more than one MP3 from being played at any time by any user, such that it is no different in its operations from the old-fashioned listening booths, i.e., a room with a turntable and a speaker, that were available for years at public libraries before the collapse of informational services at the neighborhood paper bricks and mortar level.

    With regard to transcriptions of screenplays and illustrated screencap galleries, American Buddha first became a huge resource in this field with its ground-breaking illustrated screenplay method of presenting Richard Linklater's "Waking Life," and became the go-to-source for students of that seminal post-modern work. Should any question of legal action arise, the statute of limitations, three years for copyright infringement, has long ago expired on virtually all of the motion picture content, since I was most prolific in that field a few years back, and have lately concentrated on archiving rare and otherwise unavailable works such as Jung's recently-published "Red Book," which will not be found outside a few rare-book reading rooms in American libraries. Thanks to my oversized scanner and trusty Dell Quad-Core, students of Jung can have access to this all-important work, that was kept unpublished for many years after his death by his literary executors, which I bought at the first opportunity.

    Perhaps it is a mark of your own insufficient self-worth, perhaps due to not giving away enough of your labor, and instead holding forth spitting bile in digital fora, that you speak of things regarding which you have no understanding. Indeed, I will assume this and as a scholar, commend you to your books.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  216.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 5:17pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    For all of that illegal content on your hard drive. You'll have to seek a protective order to keep your porn stash private. What's your preference -- het, gay, bi, BDSM?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  217.  
    identicon
    STStone, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 5:18pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Wow.

    I thought I'd seen literally all the crazy before this comment.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  218.  
    identicon
    STStone, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 5:20pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    What law does he plan to subpoena me under? I haven't...

    ...wait. Did you just vaguely threaten to try and out me to the general public using a subpoena and use that as a tool to embarass and humiliate me?

    WOW. You, darling, have sunk lower than your husband.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  219.  
    icon
    Ann (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 5:27pm

    Awe-Inspiring Levels of Douchebaggery

    As of Friday, Charles Carreon has actually filed suit against not only Matthew Inman, but also IndieGoGo the site that is hosting his charity, but also...wait for it...

    HE HAS FILED SUIT AGAINST THE WORLD WILDLIFE FEDERATION AND THE AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY.

    http://www.popehat.com/2012/06/17/the-oatmeal-v-funnyjunk-part-iv-charles-carreon-sues-e verybody/

    @TaraCarreon - care to comment on your husband's robbing cancer patients of resources (I.e. his impending disbarment)?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  220.  
    identicon
    STStone, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 5:28pm

    Re: Awe-Inspiring Levels of Douchebaggery

    Holy shit.

    I need to go buy about half a ton of popcorn.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  221.  
    icon
    Ann (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 5:34pm

    Re: ROFL!

    *Takes undeserved bow*

    Here is the latest crazy. Hope you're not in public, because you are about to start screaming.

    http://www.popehat.com/2012/06/17/the-oatmeal-v-funnyjunk-part-iv-charles-carreon-sues -everybody/

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  222.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 5:36pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    "Darling?" Since we're exchanging terms of endearment, let's play a real free speech game. I link you to the ABOL archive of Italian spanking imagery, and to its screencap gallery of the lesbian bondage classic scene from Sexus, original music by Chet Baker, directed by Jose Benazaref, and you tell me which you like better.

    "Outing?" That's so pre-Obama! Who could "out" anyone for any sexual proclivity short of pederasty now, and claim any kind of "left" credentials? You're not suggesting something truly outre, are you?

    And about the subpoena, JK. I have no control over what Charles does. He's an officer of the court, who would never abuse his authority.

    http://www.american-buddha.com/italian.spank.htm
    http://www.american-buddha.com/love. discipline.htm

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  223.  
    identicon
    STStone, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 5:39pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    He's an officer of the court, who would never abuse his authority.

    He filed a lawsuit against Matthew Inman, IndieGogo, the National Wildlife Federation, and the American Cancer Society over supposed "trademark infringement" this past Friday.

    http://www.popehat.com/2012/06/17/the-oatmeal-v-funnyjunk-part-iv-charles-carreon-sues-ev erybody/

    It sounds like he wants to abuse his authority as an officer of the court and a practicing attorney to silence a critic.

    You can stomach the First Amendment until it lets someone else say mean things about you, huh?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  224.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 5:42pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Like I say, lawsuits are Charles' department. Which do you like better? Don't try to change the subject.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  225.  
    identicon
    STStone, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 5:46pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Sorry, darling, but I've had all the fun with you I can stomach without vomiting.

    If you'll excuse me, I need to go find some contact information for some major publishing houses. Toodles!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  226.  
    identicon
    apauld, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 6:05pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    "He's an officer of the court," but may not be for very long.... "who would never abuse his authority." except for the last time, oh, and this time. Do you really think he'll get through this and still have a license to practice, in any state? This seems to quickly becoming Rakofsky-esque.

    As an aside, for anyone who feels like answering, do any of anti-SLAPP laws include jail time, or just censure and fines?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  227.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 6:10pm

    Re:

    I assumed that the admin would delete this comment, so I changed it a little bit on the other thread, "Carreon lashes out." So please, don't anyone consider this the final version.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  228.  
    identicon
    CCarreon, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 6:48pm

    We will bury you

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  229.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 6:50pm

    Re: Re: TaraCarreon

    "[T]he Cube, emblem of Odin ..."

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  230.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 6:54pm

    Re: Re: TaraCarreon

    "Kepler had established that the cube of a planet's distance from the Sun divided by the square of its year always equaled a constant." -- "How the Dead Souls of Venice Corrupted Science," by Webster Griffin Tarpley

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  231.  
    identicon
    Chris, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 6:59pm

    http://censoriousdouchebag.wor... -- Charles Carreon's fake blog

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  232.  
    icon
    dwg (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 7:02pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Carve your own path and think for yourself.

    So wait: which one is the sarcastic post? Is it the one I replied to just now, the one above that you seem to be referencing, or the one below here?

    I mean, I got the Obama thing. That was inane, and thanks for hipping me to it unnecessarily. But I'm still hung up on the "it's pathetic to shill like that" thing. Can you work me around that one?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  233.  
    identicon
    Lurker Keith, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 7:28pm

    RE: mostly post 213: Tara on her library's download blocker

    Before I get to the subject above, I would like to point out that the post (which I tried to post before I posted the CBS link... which is why that was titled "Forgot") I tried to make that didn't get cleared by the mods here was about that interview linked to in Popehat's Oatmeal v. Funnyjunk Part IV. I have no idea why they didn't post the link to the Carreon interview on Rumblingbeachcat.com. I assume it was because it couldn't be confirmed at the time...

    (note, if you don't want to post the above, just delete it, rather than not post the rest, please)

    Now for my reply to Mrs. Carreon, regarding her website's download blocker... It can be bypassed, w/o hacking! I went there to see how secure it was against downloading, & it isn't. I won't post how here, as I doubt this would get posted if I did. (if it's OK to post, let me know by adding a character at the bottom of this post or posting or something -- I'd like to point out to Tara that Techdirt does not have a means to neither contact me nor identify me. :p Best they might have is an IP address, which doesn't necessarily mean that's where I live. :p).

    I searched her "library" for ".mp3" & the first thing listed that looked like it was a song was the Beastie Boy's Rhymin & Stealin (note, it is a bit slow to load). The site asked me join & to accept their ToS, but I got around that, too (the link above will probably just skip that & go straight to the song), again w/o hacking. I did NOT save the song, as I didn't need to to see if I could save it to know that I could, I didn't want Tara yelling at me about that, & I don't want anything associated w/ the Carrions (sic).

    Wendy, thanks, even though that was my first post (that got through).

    As to Popehat's Oatmeal coverage Part IV, I asked a friend for a word or phrase that goes beyond "moronic idiot" & he eventually sent me this:

    "There is no curse in Elvish, Entish, or the tongues of men for this treachery. --Treebeard [LotR: tTT], found via IMDb (he used "stupidity" instead, but considering what happened, I think the original fits better)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  234.  
    icon
    Ann (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 7:51pm

    Re:

    You are adorable

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  235.  
    identicon
    lolwut?!, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 9:38pm

    Re:

    You have no power over me.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  236.  
    identicon
    You always suspect that....., Jun 17th, 2012 @ 9:42pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    I wonder what your basis for comparison is....

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  237.  
    identicon
    [citation needed or GTFO], Jun 17th, 2012 @ 9:56pm

    Re: Awe-Inspiring Levels of Douchebaggery

    You know those forum morons who keep posting just so they get the last word?

    http://i689.photobucket.com/albums/vv254/4dri4ntxu/Gifs/1243444310255.gif

    This whole situation reminds me of that.

    Also reminds me of Jack Thompson. How'd pushing his ego into everyone's faces turn out for his career?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  238.  
    icon
    Alana (profile), Jun 17th, 2012 @ 11:17pm

    Re: Awe-Inspiring Levels of Douchebaggery

    ....PFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  239.  
    identicon
    econoline, Jun 17th, 2012 @ 11:34pm

    the really crazy thing is...

    That no one seems to care that Charles Carreon may have raped and murdered a 10 year old girl in 1990... I'm not saying he did but the rumor is definitely out there and he has made no attempt to refute it, I can't help but thinking it is true.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  240.  
    icon
    Ann (profile), Jun 18th, 2012 @ 12:28am

    Re: the really crazy thing is...

    This is exactly the kind of comment that does NOT help the situation. Point to one piece of evidence of that. Otherwise, you are just lending credence to his bogus Angry-Mobs-Are-Angry-Sue-Everyone mentality.

    Unless you are him?

    Nothing would surprise me at this point.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  241.  
    identicon
    Lurker Keith, Jun 18th, 2012 @ 12:28am

    RE: Post 213 regarding Tara's Library being download safe

    A while ago, I visited your "Library" site, Tara, to see if your site is as download-safe as you say. It isn't. & I didn't even have to hack anything! I did a search for ".mp3" & found a song. I didn't even have to join the site nor agree to the Terms of Service to access the song. Merely going to the URL bypasses that... I did NOT copy the song (Beastie Boy's Rhymin & Stealin); I merely looked to see if I could, & I can, if I wanted to... but I don't want anything from you Carrions (sic), so I didn't copy it.

    In short, your site needs to be programmed better, as your supposed security is easily bypassible w/o doing anything to the site itself (again, absolutely no hacking required, just a general understanding of how streaming works w/ a given user Browser/ OS).

    I'm not stupid enough to post how I could take a song if I were a content Pirate... Though, if you ask NICELY, I may consider enlightening you. However, keep in mind, if I post how it's done, anyone (at least Windows users, but I'm sure most OSes & Browsers work similarly w/ this) who sees that post will be able to do it (it's really that simple).

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  242.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 18th, 2012 @ 1:23am

    Re: RE: Post 213 regarding Tara's Library being download safe

    That is true for all sites and always has been. I don't see how its relevant.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  243.  
    identicon
    Lurker Keith, Jun 18th, 2012 @ 1:37am

    Re: Re: RE: Post 213 regarding Tara's Library being download safe

    That is true for all sites and always has been.

    That isn't exactly correct. I've seen sites, where the stream isn't as easily located. It may work the same way, but there are ways to hide it in a manner that requires more advanced skills to find.

    I don't see how its relevant.

    Give me a break. I don't just lash out at someone like some people. & I don't want to rehash stuff that's already been said. This was something in my field of knowledge I could point out to her.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  244.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 18th, 2012 @ 2:16am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Your alleged husband is going to subpeona someone for "probably" having illegal content on their hard drive, in a complete absence of evidence of this, just because . . . what, you got your feelings hurt a little?

    But no, he doesn't abuse his position as an attorney at all. Ever.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  245.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 18th, 2012 @ 2:19am

    Re: Re: the really crazy thing is...

    Eh, he's referring to a dumb bit that Gilbert Gottfried did at the Bob Saget roast.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  246.  
    identicon
    indieThing, Jun 18th, 2012 @ 3:26am

    Re: Re: Re:

    Yeah, know what you mean, from the 'stream of conciousness' rants from his wife(?) Tara on the last post, he may have been caught up in her ways. If he's been meditating or doing other exercises, it can sometimes be difficult to handle the 'juice' until it settles down!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  247.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 18th, 2012 @ 4:27am

    Re: Re: Re:

    "Carreon was considered a good lawyer before this fiasco. He's been involved in some important cases in the past, like the sex.com one.

    That's why it's particular shocking to see him behave this way, in the past he was one of the good guys. Now... now he seems to have gone nuts."


    According to Popehat, Marc Randazza had similar things to say. His initial reaction:

    "I have known Charles for a few years, and know him to be one of the good guys. I did ask him "what the fuck were you thinking?" when I first saw his letter.

    I think he just made a judgment error, which is different from saying that this event exposes a latent character flaw. I've never known him to do anything like this before, and I am prepared to give him a First Amendment mulligan. Let he who has never fucked up before cast the first stone. Well, ok, cast stones even if you have fucked up — since he might have asked for it and he can likely handle it, but I ask everyone to try and remember that Charles has been on the right side of the good fight far more times than he's been on the wrong side. On balance, he's one of the good guys, and I think he's engaging in some valuable self-reflection right now — which is itself a sign that he is one of the good guys."

    But after Carreon tried to shut down the fundraiser he followed with this:

    "Despite my earlier charitable comments, I can not find any words to defend trying to shut the fundraiser down. I can't even gin up a minor benefit of the doubt on that one. I can see an ill-considered demand as a mistake in judgment while hoping to gain an advantage for your client. But taking a shot at the fundraiser would not do that – it would just be lashing out to hurt bears and cancer patients? Holy fucking shitballs inside a burning biplane careening toward the Statue of Liberty, Captain! I hope that the reporter merely got the story wrong, because if not, that's more fucked up than a rhino raping a chinchilla while dressed up in unicorns' undergarments."

    More here in the post updates:
    http://www.popehat.com/2012/06/12/hey-did-somebody-say-something-was-going-on-with-the-oat meal/

    I wonder what he'll say after Friday's lawsuit being filed?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  248.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 18th, 2012 @ 5:06am

    So now he is suing the beneficiaries of the Oatmeal

    http://www.popehat.com/2012/06/17/the-oatmeal-v-funnyjunk-part-iv-charles-carreon-sues-everybody/

    If he keeps this up his career will be Carrion. Is he the Don Quixote of the DMCA.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  249.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 18th, 2012 @ 6:11am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Keep digging

    Compensation to Funnyjunk for suffering the indignity of being called thieves, when they were caught stealing?

    Cause knowledge is power.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  250.  
    icon
    Cory of PC (profile), Jun 18th, 2012 @ 7:21am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    In the words of Samuel L. Jackson...

    "ENGLISH, MOTHER(bleep) DO YOU SPEAK IT?"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  251.  
    icon
    Cory of PC (profile), Jun 18th, 2012 @ 7:24am

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    OK, that clears things up. Thanks for the info!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  252.  
    icon
    Cory of PC (profile), Jun 18th, 2012 @ 7:35am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Oh? How do you know he has illegal content on his hard drive?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  253.  
    icon
    Chris Hoeschen (profile), Jun 18th, 2012 @ 7:37am

    Sometimes when you find yourself in a deep hole you might find it faster/better to dig deeper to get out then to climb up.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  254.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 18th, 2012 @ 11:03am

    Re: Re: RE: Post 213 regarding Tara's Library being download safe

    Actually, lots of porn sites have it setup that even if you have the direct URL to an image, you can't view/download/access it until you are logged in with an account that as a subscription (or a house account).

    Wait, you didn't know there was more security available than you know about? Color me shocked.

    So it is not true for all sites and always has been. As for relevance, thats for you to decide.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  255.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 18th, 2012 @ 11:59am

    I really hope that Ken at Popehat (why is he the Pope's hat?)volunteers to represent Matt Inman pro bono. It'll be so much easier for us to win, then.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  256.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 18th, 2012 @ 12:01pm

    Or Marc Randazza ... please, please, please let it be one of them. These guys just talk out their ass.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  257.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 18th, 2012 @ 12:30pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    "Perhaps it is a mark of your own insufficient self-worth, perhaps due to not giving away enough of your labor, and instead holding forth spitting bile in digital fora, that you speak of things regarding which you have no understanding. Indeed, I will assume this and as a scholar, commend you to your books."

    Translation for everyone who isnt as highly-literate as Mrs. Carreon here: this is a self-important way of saying, "lol u don't know what ur talking about stfu"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  258.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 18th, 2012 @ 12:36pm

    Re:

    "us"?

    So your husband files a complaint preaching about how he is always respectful of others online, while you call people on the Internet "RETARD"?

    If the case is about "us", maybe he should amend that part of the complaint.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  259.  
    identicon
    Marc, Jun 18th, 2012 @ 1:10pm

    Re:

    You are off my Christmas card list.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  260.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 18th, 2012 @ 2:39pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    It's not that Inman is in the right, it's a larger legal question. If Carreon was to win, it would have major legal implications across California in regards to what people can say on the internet. The First Amendment gives you the right to post all this stuff about Inman, but if Carreon wins, Inman could later claim that you were engaging in defamation against him, and encouraging others to do so. Sometimes the greater good is what matters.

    Are you honestly saying that you want to Carreon to win just because you don't like how Inman operates? Try to think of the wider picture here.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  261.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 18th, 2012 @ 9:32pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Quote:
    As an aside, no music publisher or movie studio has ever submitted a DMCA notice. It would seem that the RIAA accepts the library-lending exemption, which is buttressed by a downloading blocker that prevents more than one MP3 from being played at any time by any user, such that it is no different in its operations from the old-fashioned listening booths, i.e., a room with a turntable and a speaker, that were available for years at public libraries before the collapse of informational services at the neighborhood paper bricks and mortar level.

    Or the more obvious, you didn't appear in any search engine at the top, because the RIAA is not known to respect anything, ASCAP and BMI also may want to have a talk with you about some due royalties.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  262.  
    icon
    Niall (profile), Jun 19th, 2012 @ 3:19am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Considering the hate for Faux 'News' I've seen on this site from regular commenters, you really aren't doing too well here... like all your other FAIL comments and attempts to make up some wackoid consipiracy.

    And no, I don't give a flying monkey if there was a second gunman. Not caring is nowhere close to 'buying into'.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  263.  
    icon
    Niall (profile), Jun 19th, 2012 @ 4:28am

    Re:

    It's not safe to assume qanything, especially if you struggle with reading comprehension. No-one here is suddenly saying 'copying is theft', or doing 180s. Most people here do respect copyright somewhat, just not the abuses. If Inman had gone full-on lawyer, there would be a lot of disappointed fans on here. But he didn't. The worst he's guilty of is using the copying=stealing meme, and even that's more understandable when we are talking about files WITH THE ATTRIBUTION STRIPPED OFF.

    What's annoying us as a group is Carreon's cluelessness, from the original $20k demand a year later (wtf?) to then starting to attack legitimate charity fundraising.

    Stop trying to support your bias by assuming things here have changed totally from one post. If the MPAA went after a criminal DVD gang, we'd probably cheer on the MPAA. If they go after grandmothers and laser printers - we call their idiocy like it is.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  264.  
    icon
    Niall (profile), Jun 19th, 2012 @ 4:43am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Wow, you really worship Inman. I've never seen such admiration...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  265.  
    icon
    Niall (profile), Jun 19th, 2012 @ 8:47am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Favorite quote

    The pandas kicked egotistical wrestler butt!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  266.  
    icon
    Niall (profile), Jun 19th, 2012 @ 9:13am

    Re:

    I think I'm going to have to post this to Fundies Say the Darndest Things as a rare example of leftwing/anti-religious fundieism.

    Seriously, someone so 'atheist' that they accuse Dawkins of 'religion' (gnosticism)?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  267.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 19th, 2012 @ 2:05pm

    TDR wrote: "He held a position of no importance. He was a lowly parasite, a zero. A piece of sputum swirling around the toilet bowl of life. He was like the security guard at the front gate who thinks of himself as head of the corporation. And so, when this dispute with the Oatmeal arose, Charles Carreon went over the edge. It was his case, ergo, his pride. I ask the court to look at this man, this sad man, this pathetic man, this joke of a man. A man who sat and failed his mental health exam on no less than fourteen occasions. A man so petty and small-minded, he would while away his hours writing threat letters for defendants he hadn't even met yet. A man who commanded as much love and respect from his fellow human beings as Long John Silver's parrot. An overzealous lawyer with a Napoleon complex. Who would ask this man to represent them in a court of law? Only a yogurt."

    My response: You childish, aggressive, Un-American, contemptible, obnoxious, incompetent, constipated, bankrupt, hypocritical, stupid, carnivorous, wolverine, ranting, foaming at the mouth, smeghead scumbag thugs (you believe in tit-for-tat, right?)here at TechDirt claim that these types of statements are not actionable because they aren't "false facts," just "satire." Where is the dividing line?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  268.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 19th, 2012 @ 2:06pm

    Re: Re:

    You obviously know NOTHING about gnosticism.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  269.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 19th, 2012 @ 2:42pm

    Re:

    http://mixergy.com/matthew-inman-oatmeal-interview/

    Andrew: How do you respond to someone who says, “This is the worst comic I ever saw in my life”?

    Matt: When I used to work for people I had this sense of diplomacy. I had to respond like, “Well, I’m sorry you feel that way. I appreciate your criticism,” and blah, blah, blah. Now I work for myself and really no one can control what I say. So usually I tell them that I slept with their mom or I say the most vile, awful thing I can think of. If you read my Twitter account, it is like Hitler’s port-a-potty. It’s the worst thing that you’ve ever seen, just this awful stuff that I say to my critics on there. Just to troll them, mostly. So that’s usually how I respond to it. Like a drunk 15 year old, I think, is the best way to put it....

    Andrew: What about in the beginning when you were going into Digg and you knew that if you won this group of people over, they’d send you massive traffic and if you turned them into haters, they’d bury you and you wouldn’t get anything from them. At that point, weren’t you nervous?

    Matt: Yeah. At that point, I wouldn’t have gotten on Digg and been like, “Hey, your mom and I made love under the stars. Ha ha ha. I liked it.” That probably wouldn’t go over so well. But now I’m kind of at this comfortable level. And part of my writing style and the persona that I have online is sort of this crass, bloated, obese, drunk monster. So, in the beginning, you’re absolutely right, probably insulting my critics wouldn’t have gone over so well....

    Matt: I think the feedback that has changed my comics somewhat wasn’t from comments, it was from traffic. I found that certain themes, that if I attack, will actually drive traffic like crazy and that other things won’t.

    In particular, writing about a gripe. It’s the stand-up routine where someone gets up there and says, “What’s the deal with airline food?” You take that and you apply it to a comic. Those ones go crazy. Like, “Things That You Shouldn’t Do In E-Mail,” “How to Suck at Facebook,” “Words You Should Stop Misspelling,” these are all gripes. That was one that changed. But that is, hopefully the one that stands alone. I try to make things that I think are funny and that I enjoy. But the gripe one is one that I sort of embellished a little more because it seemed to resonate with people.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  270.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 19th, 2012 @ 4:21pm

    Re: Re:

    Commercial speech is regulated speech. Commercial speech is speech used when raising money.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  271.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 19th, 2012 @ 4:28pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Don't listen to him. He's a cannibal. You're a thousand times smarter than him.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  272.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 19th, 2012 @ 4:31pm

    Re: Re:

    Bullshit. And philosophical point of order: There is no breathing, living, acting being called "Internet." Only a handful of stupid people, in the pay of Matt Inman, who will be responsible for their own actions, if it's only in their own minds. You can't have this kind of hatred and self-delusion without it harming your mind.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  273.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 19th, 2012 @ 4:40pm

    Re:

    They're working for the Publishing Industry here at Techdirt.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  274.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 19th, 2012 @ 4:45pm

    Re: Lawyers who live in glass houses should not throw stones

    Charles didn't do anything. I made the decision to pay the rent from the trust account based on our client's commitment to pay the rent when we were in Canada, and when he started having trouble with his partner, who was more our friend that he was, he attacked us with a petty vinctive bar complaint. The guy was scum, just like you guys.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  275.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 19th, 2012 @ 4:58pm

    Re: Re: Carreon is working on his own defamation suit

    Whose response will be "nuclear," Mr. Anonymous Coward?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  276.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 19th, 2012 @ 5:13pm

    Re: Re:

    Fuck you!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  277.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 19th, 2012 @ 5:15pm

    These phaggotish, conspiratorial, childish, dorkish, baseless, mindless, shameful, dumb, aggressive, jealous, reprobate, obsessed, mad, clueless, shockingly delusional, completely lost and in trouble, bottom-of-the-barrel, short-sighted, dumb-fuck, ranting, Un-American, contemptible, obnoxious, embarrassing, incompetent, bizarre, constipated, bankrupt, hypocritical, stupid, fearful, carnivorous, wolverine, ranting, foaming at the mouth, bullying, lying, paranoid, no-better-than-the-mafia, smeghead, scumbag, cretinous, lazy, delusional, demented, narcissistic, pathological, extortionistic lunatic, thuggish drama-whores, poised on the edge of a precipice, hoisted by their own petard, their holy fucking shitballs burning inside a biplane careening toward the Statue of Liberty, rhinos raping chinchillas dressed up in unicorns' undergarments, who deserve every bad thing that happens to them, having to learn their lessons the hard way, and who I wouldn't even piss on if they were on fire (they believe in name-calling at TechDirt) claim that these types of statements are not actionable because they aren't "false facts," just "satire." Where is the dividing line?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  278.  
    identicon
    STStone, Jun 19th, 2012 @ 5:28pm

    Re:

    You childish, aggressive, Un-American, contemptible, obnoxious, incompetent, constipated, bankrupt, hypocritical, stupid, carnivorous, wolverine, ranting, foaming at the mouth, smeghead scumbag thugs

    Tell us how you really feel about yourself, Tara.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  279.  
    identicon
    STStone, Jun 19th, 2012 @ 5:30pm

    Re:

    Wow.

    You can't rebut a single comment with facts and logic, so you resort to a barrage of insults in the hopes that someone will react by saying something "actionable" and allow you to sue them out of house and home.

    You really are Carreon's wife.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  280.  
    identicon
    Deselect, Jun 19th, 2012 @ 5:36pm

    Sad.

    The Oatmeal blacked out his information in his blog, however Charles Carreon still insists The Oatmeal gave out his email. However Mr. Carreon has done exactly what he is suing over to someone else:

    http://www.ragingblog.com/2009/05/pornographers-infringe-emily-trademark-and-mattel-is-sile nt-how-swell-is-that/

    He also claims there is no other way to contact him, however on the above link up until today (when presumably Charles erased the evidence that he lied to the court) you could click "contact" and you would get his email address. Though in the below link there are many images and links to his information still or previously available. :)

    More reading:
    http://charles-carreon.com

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  281.  
    identicon
    STStone, Jun 19th, 2012 @ 5:43pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    Only a handful of stupid people, in the pay of Matt Inman

    Do you really think Matt Inman has paid people off to rip into you here on Techdirt?

    You can't have this kind of hatred and self-delusion without it harming your mind.

    Says the woman who called posters here "retards", "phaggotish", and...well, I'll let your own words bury you.

    I hope you enjoy digging holes, Tara. You seem to have dug a rather large one for yourself.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  282.  
    identicon
    Deselect, Jun 19th, 2012 @ 6:03pm

    Re:

    False facts? Like these:

    The Oatmeal blacked out his information in his blog, however Charles Carreon still insists The Oatmeal gave out his email. However Mr. Carreon has done exactly what he is suing over to someone else:

    http://www.ragingblog.com/2009/05/pornographers-infringe-emily-trademark-and-mattel-is-sile nt-how-swell-is-that/

    He also claims there is no other way to contact him, however on the above link up until today (when presumably Charles erased the evidence that he lied to the court) you could click "contact" and you would get his email address. Though in the below link there are many images and links to his information still or previously available. :)

    More reading:
    http://charles-carreon.com

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  283.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 19th, 2012 @ 6:54pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    You mnean, sadism isn't sadism in the "new" world?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  284.  
    icon
    Matt Scott (profile), Jun 19th, 2012 @ 7:17pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    Tara, Hi. I'm a philosophy student (well, double major in History and Philosophy with a certificate specializing in the humanities and new media) (oh [yes, you get two parenthetical comments here!] that's also why I was asking about your definition of the tautological nature of the mind, to which you gave a non-answer in reply. So, briefly, I'd like to point out that a tautology is an issue of logic [although not meaningless, as many logicians would argue] and relates to statements such as, "I'll get there when I get there," not to far more complex issues such as neuropathy and such.])

    Now, onto your "philosophical point of order." I'd like to list two points of contention regarding this claim. First, I'm sure you're familiar with Buddhist philosophical concepts (familiar with, but whether or not you comprehend them seems to be another issue entirely), in which a thing can both be and not be at the same time, such as with language in which a word, at once, means something and is meaningless. Second, Hegel's Geist perfectly applies to this situation, the "spirit" a community becomes a material thing itself, while having no materiality per se.

    Finally, I'd like to point out that I am no way in the pay of Matt Inman, nor, I believe, are any other individuals posting on this site. His lawyer certainly is, but that's probably the extent of it (at least regarding this particular case). Now, you should probably listen to the person who is in the employ of Matt Inman, as he is offering you Very Good Advice regarding the Very Bad Situation in which you and your husband have found yourselves.

    That advice was, to reiterate, that a lawsuit would be a Very Bad Idea (I believe the quote was, "just a really, really bad idea"). You can say all you want that your husband is the best lawyer ever on the face of the planet (and the most attractive and awesomest and whatever ad nauseum), but, based on the actions he is currently displaying, he is, sadly, not embodying such. Listening to Inman's lawyer would be a display of intelligence to which I would be thrilled to see (seriously, I kind of want this to end well for you guys, I've grown to like you in some strange ways [not those kind of strange ways]). All Charles would really have to do is just say, "Hey, what I've been doing... yeah that was a Really Bad Idea, and I'm sorry, but Inman's response bothered me and I reacted badly."

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  285.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 19th, 2012 @ 7:19pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Well he used to be a pterodactyl up in the sky,
    Tearin' people's heads off,
    and eatin' their eyes,
    But now he's done a change-up,
    Got a new disguise --
    All Points Bulletin: Look out for this guy!

    http://www.naderlibrary.com/santa-suit-empty1.jpg

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  286.  
    identicon
    Deselect, Jun 19th, 2012 @ 7:29pm

    Sad.

    It's also a failure to logically read a reply that led to this skirmish. In his response to original letter, Matthew Inman repeatedly referred to the owner of FunnyJunk as you, your, etc. Even when referring to Charles Carreon, he said "Your lawyer A+"

    However then Carreon goes and continues the fallacy that the picture of the woman seducing a bear is his mother, not the owner of FunnyJunk's mother. This is a fallacy and one a well read human being should have picked up on immediately. Please reread the post by Matthew and his follow up about now being sued, where he again reiterates that the original feud was between The Oatmeal and FunnyJunk.

    Just admit your husband had an old people's moment and walk away. No one will hold it against him in 2 weeks time. He'll be forgotten. Or he'll be mocked forever. His choice.

    Examples:
    http://charles-carreon.com

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  287.  
    identicon
    Adam Steinbaugh, Jun 19th, 2012 @ 7:46pm

    Re:

    Why, the dividing line is drawn in Hustler Magazine v. Falwell, U.S. 485 U.S. 46, 50 (1988): whether a reasonable person would view the content as stating actual facts. That case, by the way, concerned a depiction of someone's mother having sex in an outhouse.

    And, yes, offensive speech is protected even when it concerns a private figure, as well. See, Snyder v. Phelps, 131 S.Ct. 1207 (2011).

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  288.  
    identicon
    Adam Steinbaugh, Jun 19th, 2012 @ 7:50pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    Are you alleging that Mr. Inman is paying people to commit crimes?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  289.  
    identicon
    Adam Steinbaugh, Jun 19th, 2012 @ 8:08pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    Commercial speech can be regulated by the government. And, even then, what counts as 'commercial speech' is quite limited. Even if Mr. Inman had, somewhere, some type of commercial motivation for doing what he did, that isn't enough to qualify his statements as commercial speech. See, Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products, 463 U.S. 60, 67 (1983) ("the fact that Youngs has an economic motivation for mailing the pamphlets would clearly be insufficient by itself to turn the materials into commercial speech").

    The basic definition of whether speech is 'commercial' is whether it does "no more than propose a commercial transaction." Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc., 425 U.S. 748, 762 (1976).

    Moreover, the Supreme Court has already held that charitable speech is not commercial speech: "Even assuming that the mandated speech [a requirement by the State of North Carolina that charitable organizations make certain disclosures -- exactly what is at issue in this case], in the abstract, is merely 'commercial,' it does not retain its commercial character when it is inextricably intertwined with the otherwise fully protected speech involved in charitable solicitations, and thus the mandated speech is subject to the test for fully protected expression, not the more deferential commercial speech principles." Riley v. Nat'l Fed'n of the Blind, 487 U.S. 781, 782 (1988).

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  290.  
    icon
    apauld (profile), Jun 19th, 2012 @ 8:38pm

    Re: Re:

    "They're working for the Publishing Industry here at Techdirt."

    Wow, never in my life would I have thought that I'd read that. Thanks for reminding all of us to never try bath salts.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  291.  
    icon
    Ann (profile), Jun 19th, 2012 @ 9:18pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    I'm sorry. Is there a response to anything I said in this posting?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  292.  
    icon
    TaraCarreon (profile), Jun 19th, 2012 @ 9:45pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    He's a psycho-Santa with a big bag of tricks,
    Ringin' a bell, and beggin' for clicks,
    Psycho Santa got a itty bitty stick,
    Psycho Santa, don't fall for his schtick.

    http://www.naderlibrary.com/three-inch-dick-final1.jpg

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  293.  
    identicon
    Sixth Dimensional Guardian, Jun 19th, 2012 @ 10:07pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    No, she is crossing 5 dimensions simultaneously and responding to something else entirely.

    Nothing to see here, folks. Return to your homes.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  294.  
    icon
    G Thompson (profile), Jun 19th, 2012 @ 10:35pm

    Re:

    Your head be likened to a fire, the stones unswept, and the ideas whirling round and round about in it, all obfuscated and darkened over with fuliginous matter.


    There.. That's how you insult someone... Next time use words that have meaning, context and don't make people go to sleep half way through the second line.

    Oh and based on prior postings here, and looking at your and your husbands website(s) you need professional mental health help. Deny it all you want, to any professional it is self evident. I feel sorry for you and sorry for the pain you are putting yourselves through, though please be aware that it is has been fully instigated by yourselves.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  295.  
    identicon
    Deselect, Jun 19th, 2012 @ 10:35pm

    You know you've won when your enemy resorts to calling your dick small.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  296.  
    icon
    G Thompson (profile), Jun 19th, 2012 @ 10:40pm

    Re:

    You realise with that statement of "us" you have just joined yourself to the case and any damages awarded against your husband acting as an individual can also be recouped from yourself making hiding monies/assets "owned" by yourself and not husband fair game.

    You do realise this is a world viewable forum (in the real sense of the word forum) don't you?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  297.  
    icon
    G Thompson (profile), Jun 19th, 2012 @ 11:18pm

    Re:

    Awww look.. your hubby has a fansite! :)

    http://charles-carreon.com/

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  298.  
    identicon
    STStone, Jun 19th, 2012 @ 11:41pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Well, look at that: you've decided to host one of Matthew Inman's copyrighted works on your website, and I'd bet you decided to do so without his permission!

    http://shop.theoatmeal.com/products/love-missile-greeting-card

    I really, really hope Inman sends you a DMCA notification.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  299.  
    identicon
    Deselect, Jun 20th, 2012 @ 1:58am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    To be fair, I am pretty sure Tara has copyright the IDEA of putting dicks inappropriately in an image. So it's all good :P

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  300.  
    icon
    Niall (profile), Jun 20th, 2012 @ 5:49am

    Re: Re: Re:

    Probably more than your husband does about internet psychology!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  301.  
    identicon
    aitreni, Jun 20th, 2012 @ 6:01am

    Re: Re: Re: WHO is playing people well

    The Oatmeal is entirely a satirical website that wields hyperbole like a giant purple dildo. Not even a really good lawyer would be able to make a defamation case stick.

    Carreon was simply hoping that Inman was too stupid to know better, or too broke to afford a lawyer himself.

    Note that it is now the 20th of June. As of the 12th of June, all mentions of FunnyJunk were still on the Oatmeal - and now there is even more there. Also it goes without saying that Inman did not deliver $20,000 to Carreon. Yet here we are eight days later and instead of filing the clearly baseless suit against Inman for defamation, Carreon donated to a fundraiser in an incredulous attempt to manufacture anything at all that he could actually sue Inman for.

    By the lack of filing a defamation suit against Inman on behalf of FunnyJunk, even your hero Carreon is capitulating to the reality that Inman did not defame them. Just up to you to catch up now.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  302.  
    icon
    aitreni (profile), Jun 20th, 2012 @ 6:21am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Calls people "thieves" for copying...ok

    Since you have place thieves in quotes, I am going to want to see the exact quote it was used in. Have fun with that.

    Lies about credit being removed by funnyjunk...ok

    yeah, you are going to have to quote where he made that claim. Exact words, in context. Ensure that he does say it was FunnyJunk who removed the credit, not just that it was removed.

    It's NOW not about the defamation is it !

    That is because it is now 8 days after deadline and Carreon has not filed a defamation claim against Inman on behalf of Funnyjunk. Instead he has attempted to manufacture a case by donating to a fundraiser he was trying to have shut down.

    To say Inman has not used his skills of "manipulation of the internet" would be really quite naive.

    Possibly. But to take everything you have said on face value when it is evident that you have an axe to grind and are hiding behind anonymity, giving us no insight into your personal agenda - that would but complete stupidity.

    You said it yourself. Inman is well documented. His skills have served him well in both his comics and SEO. That does not have any bearing on this case however.

    If you want people talking about the defamation case, tell Carreon to file it. People talking on the internet and donating to a fundraiser has no bearing on the outcome of the case. Except of course that Carreon knows it is baseless, did not realise what he was getting into sending a stock standard hardball message to Inman just because he was there and knows full well that claiming defamation because of blog posts on a satirical comic website will end up anti-SLAPPed faster than he could fill out the paperwork.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  303.  
    icon
    aitreni (profile), Jun 20th, 2012 @ 8:04am

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Well, duh.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  304.  
    icon
    aitreni (profile), Jun 20th, 2012 @ 8:12am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    So by your own definition, this is not a defamation case until the licensing issue has been sorted, because this could still be considered IP Theft. Glad you sorted that out.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  305.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 20th, 2012 @ 12:23pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    You can't have this kind of hatred and self-delusion without it harming your mind.


    I've read your posts on your website. Honestly, I'm almost at a loss for words at the unintentional irony here.

    You post like a 16 year old on tumblr, and yet you're clearly in my age group. Even 4chan would laugh you off.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  306.  
    icon
    Halleyscomet (profile), Jun 20th, 2012 @ 2:35pm

    Santa Nonsense

    What actual evidence do you have that he's not going to donate the full sum to charity?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  307.  
    icon
    Halleyscomet (profile), Jun 20th, 2012 @ 2:37pm

    Re: Re:

    What point are you trying to make?

    I've seen the "American Buddha" web site. That site and The Oatmeal seem fairly well matched in terms of the maturity level of your humor, although Matt tends to be funnier.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  308.  
    icon
    Halleyscomet (profile), Jun 20th, 2012 @ 2:52pm

    Re:

    "they aren't "false facts," just "satire." Where is the dividing line?"

    Believability and the "reasonable man" test is a good place to start. No one in their right mind would believe FunnyJunk's mother was trying to seduce a bear. The image is absurd. It's juvenile and cruel, but also absurd. Accusing Rush Limbaugh of being a closeted homosexual on the other hand is more dangerous ground. The Republican issues with homophobes being outed as closeted gays, and Rush's regrettable incident of smuggling black market Viagra on an "All boy's" fishing trip to a tropical region lends a certain believability to accusing Rush Limbaugh of being a homosexual.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  309.  
    icon
    Halleyscomet (profile), Jun 20th, 2012 @ 2:55pm

    Re: History keeps repeating itself...

    This may in fact be a marketing ploy by the lawyer in question. If he wants to deliberately seek out technologically illiterate clients for Internet related litigation then he's going about it the right way. He's getting his name associated with all the right keywords.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  310.  
    identicon
    Mut, Jun 20th, 2012 @ 4:23pm

    Re: hundreds of times?

    That is just it. He is basically a bully who sends threatening letters and either shuts down sites or extorts money. The last thing he expects is a fight with an armed opponent. He will escalate and play chicken until he swerves at the last minute or hits the wall.

    As I saw somewhere - it's this 90% that give the other 10% of lawyers a bad reputation.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  311.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 20th, 2012 @ 5:35pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    To her credit, she's still respecting due process more than the MPAA/RIAA ever have.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  312.  
    icon
    JackOfShadows (profile), Jun 20th, 2012 @ 6:11pm

    Intro to Ca. Law

    Wow. Nice introduction to the anti-SLAPP law here. Thank you.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  313.  
    icon
    WreckingBall (profile), Jun 20th, 2012 @ 10:28pm

    Obtuse beyond understanding

    It is funny to read Mrs Carreon's post.

    This is the Internet. Why are you bothering my donations and trying to represent Justice without consulting me, the donor if I really need a representative for my donations.

    Worse of all, I'm least bothered by your laws, constitutions and nonsense. I am the owner of my money, I choose Matthew Inman to represent my interested in donations and fairly aware if there is a 9% charge, I am least bothered by it. I am even aware that he only promised to raise 20k and I am aware that he might use it for other purposes after the initial 20k is raised.

    I am very bothered by your husband's action to even try to regulate it. Are you guys thinking you are some justice officer by regulating MY donations?

    Does your husband think he's Superman or God of Justice? It is my money and I do what I want with it.

    Go away and stop trying to practise your own justice on others. I don't require your fake sense of justice. Please go and help people who are poorer, need help in the world because of difficulties in funding for lawyers. Go help people in need. I am not in need of your HELP.

    Pretenders.

    Bye.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  314.  
    icon
    dwg (profile), Jun 21st, 2012 @ 1:10pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Thank you for saving me that trouble. And, um, sort of...how was her post in any way responsive to mine?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  315.  
    icon
    Cory of PC (profile), Jun 22nd, 2012 @ 5:56am

    Re: Re: Lawyers who live in glass houses should not throw stones

    Um, do remember that your husband is suing two respectable charities, Tara. That, in itself, is actually pretty low and really... kinda stupid.

    And now my brain is hurting. I'm off to get some medicine, and some bleach, to treat it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  316.  
    icon
    Cory of PC (profile), Jun 22nd, 2012 @ 6:00am

    Re: Re: Re: Carreon is working on his own defamation suit

    *steps up and carefully drops off large package* Here you go, it's a mirror. Enjoy!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  317.  
    icon
    Cory of PC (profile), Jun 22nd, 2012 @ 6:08am

    Re: Re: Re:

    Classy...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  318.  
    icon
    allengarvin (profile), Jun 23rd, 2012 @ 10:32pm

    Re: Dawkins

    "not just fake gnostics like Richard Dawkins."

    I'm just curious about this response. I've seen a couple reports in the mainstream media that Richard Dawkins is an "agnostic". It's pretty clear, after reading, that none of the authors have ever read any of Dawkins' books, or anything more than the most basic summary.

    But to accuse him of being a gnostic, an adherent to one of the mystery religions prominent around the east and south regions of the Mediterranean basin in the second and third century C.E., that believes in secret knowledge delivered by divine forces... that seems beyond the pale. What evidence do you have to accuse him of such ... outright, frank irrationality?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  319.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 24th, 2012 @ 8:42am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    And there we are, at the end of 104 comments, almost all of which are just childish little tantrums and attacks with no basis in fact. If your husband shows half the intelligence as you do... well, if he's only showing half, then I question if he ties his own shoes or can drink without a sippy cup.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  320.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 25th, 2012 @ 11:34pm

    Charles and Tara Carrion are playing some kind of prank on everybody. Seriously. Lighten up.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  321.  
    icon
    WreckingBall (profile), Jun 26th, 2012 @ 8:49pm

    Re:

    You are kidding me. An attorney at law filing a lawsuit because it is a prank?

    I doubt so. If it is a prank, then it is a contempt for the court.

    The reason why the Carreons are worked up are because they had become targets of hatred for the entire issue. If you understand the entire scenario, neither Matthew Inman nor the Carreons expected this outcome.

    From the case, it seemed that the Carreons' main target is the Doe(s) and to force TheOatmeal to remove any use of their trademark (the name Charles Carreon).

    I believe they drew the conclusion too early after looking at TheOatmeal's pictures and misinterpreted the drawing as themselves. Instead of requesting Matthew Inman nicely to remove any mention of names, Charles Carreon chose to take it legally and further cause widespread outrage.

    Looking at it closely, we can see that the fans were upset. Matthew first blog message about the lawsuit was STOP and let's focus on doing GOOD, but fans decided to act on their own. As Funnyjunk owner was never mentioned and they couldn't dig out FJ, the angry fans had a name which is Charles'. The angry fans lashed at him after digging up his entire information from State Bar of CA.

    Charles' response to the donation drive didn't help him either. While the angry fans were waiting urgently for new comic postings and the outcome, they decide to wage the war against Charles. They abused him verbally, phoned him, sent hate mail, wrong nasty emails etc which enraged Charles. Charles went deeper to file a lawsuit against the donation drive.

    It was a downhill ride. Matthew decided to write a blog post to cool people down, and some fans are still not appeased.

    To: Mrs Carreon, if you are still reading this, please get over the hate and be civil to others.

    To: Charles Carreon, please spend your effort elsewhere and stop talking to the media, you will only fan the flames of hatred further. Let the fans/readers decide. You can suggest other alternative source of fund raising which can help to raise 100% of the donations from the Internet from all parts of the World to Matthew if you have a better suggestion. Don't just act like a crusader of Justice when you didn't even spend time to educate others.

    Take a step back, take a deep breath and then let it cool down.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  322.  
    icon
    Zos (profile), Jun 26th, 2012 @ 9:10pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    news reports are held to different standards than "my opinion, presented as my own opinion, from some guy on the interwebz, to some d-bag lawyer".

    You murdering cannabilistic kiddyfiddler.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  323.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 2nd, 2012 @ 7:41am

    Im new here, whats been happening?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  324.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 11th, 2012 @ 5:05am

    Re:

    FUCK YOU, YOU FUCKNG WHITE NERDS ARE A BUNCH AOF FAGGETS ON 4CAHB/REDDIT
    I CALL GENOCIDE

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  325.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 11th, 2012 @ 5:07am

    Re: I love this show!

    ... YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT YOU ARE A FUCKING FAGGOT V

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  326.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 11th, 2012 @ 5:13am

    Re: Obtuse beyond understanding

    You people need help, your condescending+smugness, is fucking atrocious, remind me to dispatch the bullies where they are to incapciptate future weak-nerds/redditors.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This