Flickr Finally Realizes That Not All DMCA Takedowns Are Legit
from the about-freaking-time dept
A few months ago, we noted how in certain cases Flickr would completely delete images (and comments) when it received a DMCA takedown notice. That meant that even if the takedown was bogus -- as so many are -- after you contested the takedown and could put back the image, you probably lost everything else on that page. That's kind of ridiculous. As Jake Rome alerts us, Yahoo (owner of Flickr) finally realized that perhaps it should change its policy and, instead, put the targeted image in limbo to allow the uploader to contest the takedown:
We want to let you know that we have implemented a global change in the standard takedown process that will benefit the whole Flickr community going forward.It's really quite amazing that it took this long for Flickr to realize this was needed.
When a photo is removed from the site based on a notice of alleged copyright infringement, we will temporarily show a placeholder and the member will have an opportunity to respond before the image is made unavailable.
If the alleged copyright infringement is found to be fraudulent, the image in question will be restored, and the photopage will look like before.






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Megaupload
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Megaupload
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Megaupload
Just ask Kyle Goodwin.
Just ask soldiers who were trading pictures and videos with family using the site.
People assumed, maybe incorrectly, that their files were safe going across Mega... and they were until the DoJ went crazy.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
They knew it, it took this long to provide a fix
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
FTFY
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: FTFY
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: FTFY
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: FTFY
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: FTFY
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Shouldn't that be "if the alleged copyright infringement claim is fraudulent"?
After all, if the infringement itself is fraudulent, wouldn't that justify them taking it down?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Baby steps to the door, baby steps to the door...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
This is why we desperately need SOPA / ACTA / etc
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
What's really amazing
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
This just affects non-US users of Flickr
This crazy policy has only affected non-US users. It was first raised 3 years ago, but Flickr refused to change their policy until a well-known journalist and a celeb got involved and started creating bad publicity for them.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
If I had my way I'd sic John Steele over all of you so hard you'd beg for SOPA.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
When they threaten to sue you out of business for not jumping fast or soon enough, look at the Google lawsuits, you do the quickest fastest route. When that route starts costing you more business, you look at what the law actually says and modify your practices to follow those.
Yahoo! is sorta circling the drain, so keeping Flickr going is an effort they need to make.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment