Yet Another Of The FBI's Own Terrorist Plots… Involves A Group Of Senior Citizens
from the grump-old-terrorists dept
The latest Radiolab “shorts” episode, entitled Grumpy Old Terrorists, seems like a bit of a departure in subject matter for that program — but fits right in with something we’ve been talking a lot about lately. Over the past few years, we’ve noticed the rather disturbing trend in how the FBI keeps publicly celebrating stories about stopping terrorist plots — but in almost every case the details show that it was actually just stopping its own terrorist plots that it feeds to hapless individuals, often nudging them and pushing them down the road to “become” terrorists, despite commonly displaying little to no aptitude for actual terrorism.
In the last few weeks, the mainstream press has started to notice this as well, with stories about it appearing in both the NY Times and Rolling Stone. However, the Radiolab episode highlights a similar, but slightly different story, that was actually covered in great detail in an article in Esquire a few months back, entitled Waffle House Terrorists — which includes the mugshots of the four “terrorists.”
On Radiolab, they play the audiotapes the guy made of the plotting — and there’s obviously some crazy stuff being said. But, as they look deeper into the role of the informant, the Radiolab hosts conclude the episode by noting that the whole situation doesn’t really make them feel any safer. Yes, these old guys were hateful and helped join in this plan to cause lots of death and destruction. But, so much much of the plot and the participation of these guys really does seem driven by the “informant,” who does not seem like the most credible of guys. And it’s this exact scenario that we keep seeing over and over again. It may not reach the level of entrapment, and it may put some people really ignorant and crazy people in jail — but is this really the best use of the FBI’s time and efforts? Creating bogus “terrorist” plots involving people who had no real means to actually do anything?
Filed Under: entrapment, fbi, informant, terrorism
Comments on “Yet Another Of The FBI's Own Terrorist Plots… Involves A Group Of Senior Citizens”
I wonder about these odds: are you more likely to get caught up in a fake FBI terror plot then you are to actual be killed by real terrorists?
Re: Re:
Ts Yes.
FBI entrapment has far more likely odds given that is their mandate almost since inception.
Terrorist act occur less frequently than lightning strikes.
Point here is the FBI looks to subvert people it believes are threats, irregardless of if they actually are.
Re: Re:
Ts Yes.
FBI entrapment has far more likely odds given that is their mandate almost since inception.
Terrorist act occur less frequently than lightning strikes.
Point here is the FBI looks to subvert people it believes are threats, irregardless of if they actually are.
Re: Re: Re:
Irregardless isn’t a word, regardless of how often you see it used.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/irregardless
Re: Re: Re:2 Re:
From that link:
Its reputation has not risen over the years, and it is still a long way from general acceptance. Use regardless instead.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Language evolves over time. Things that were not words can become words, and things that were words can lose their meaning.
For the most part I’ve accepted this, and I acknowledge and appreciate that if a word has entered common usage it _IS_ a word regardless of its correctness.
That said “irregardless” is one of the few that grates on me every time I hear it. It’s totally redundant with “regardless”, and adds a negative prefix to it. It’s definitely not a word that brings a big value proposition to the English language.
Re: Re: Re:2 Re:
So you must just LOVE the new AP style guide that gives grammatical blessing to “hopefully”.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/aps-approval-of-hopefully-symbolizes-larger-debate-over-language/2012/04/17/gIQAti4zOT_story.html
Re: Re: Re:2 Re:
oh, you mean like ‘inflammable’?
Re: Re: Re:3 Re:
hehe, that one is the opposite, they started with the word inflammable, then made a new word, flammable, because they were worried there would be confusion that the “in” in inflammable would be confused as a prefix 🙂
Re: Re: Re:
I sure hope so.
There are 16 million lightning storms every year.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightning
Re: Re:
More likely the Feds or the Cops will Entrap you in a crime.
FBI:
Fucking Born Idiots.
Grandpa??!!!??
All About Intent
Consider four types of groups:
Group-1:
No intent to commit terrorists acts – No capability (knowledge & resources).
Just regular folks.
Group-2:
No intent – Has capability
Regular folks with the knowledge and resources needed to carry out a terrorist attack, but no intent to do so.
Group-3:
Has intent – No capability
Wannabee terrorists, but clueless as to how to proceed.
Group-4:
Has intent – Has capability.
Terrorists!
I believe the FBI would be happy to go after Group 4, is not interested in Group 1, uses Group 2 as subject matter experts, and convinces Group 3 that they have acquired capability (when they have not) then pounces on them.
It is the prexisting intent of those in Group 3 that gets them into trouble. The FBI is just making sure they don’t become members of Group 4 – good job!
Re: All About Intent
Except most of these people are angry group 1. There is no intent or ability UNTIL the FBI gives both to them. People in group 3 and 4 are smart enough to avoid the “Stings”.
Re: All About Intent
Have you read 1984? “Preexisting intent” is the same as thought police.
It’s a dangerous line to say someone is guilty of something because they would (or _might_) do that thing.
No, we’re not too concerned about the FBI arresting people who would’ve been willing to kill lots of civilians; but we should be wary any time the government uses “terrorism” as a way to encroach on our civil liberties.
Re: Re: All About Intent
Noah, I didn’t see your comment until after I posted mine. LOL that we thought exactly the same thing.
Re: All About Intent
Ahhh yes, the marvels of bureaucratic, tabular thinking.
Re: All About Intent
Have you read 1984? The FBI’s role of “Thought Police” is coming true, and you laud them with a “Good Job!”???? Idiot.
Re: Re: All About Intent
We bypassed 1984 long ago. It’s not coming true. It is true.
Sad
Yes these guys may be angry at the government or whatever andthey might have sat talking about how they hate everyone for supporting the governement but to be honest they would probably have not gone any further with there hate if the FBI had not encoraged them to. This is entrapment, plain and simple but in the eyes of the FBI they have removed people from the streets that might have commited a terrorist act.
So lets say someone comes to you and offers you a job where you can make $1 million , all you have to do is drive someone across the border into Mexico. I bet there are a lot of people that would do it, it would not be illegal in itself but the FBI could very easily set this up and accuse you of assisting in the movement of a terrorist, it makes no difference if you did not know he was a terrorist you would still be guilty. This is the same thing.
The rule of law does not exist in America any more , entrapment is used and anyone saying it is entrapment is told they are uneducated on the laws.
Giving someone the power to do something they would never have had the power to do is the same as giving a kid a gun, someone is going to get hurt.
Witch Hunt
Look, until we get some kind of Minority Report thought-crime machine we’re going to have to keep creating fictitious plots and talking people into joining them. How else will we know about (and punish) the anti-American thoughts that are surging through so many American’s minds? If you don’t like it, please notify the nearest FBI anti-American-frameup unit so they can… ‘respond’ you your concerns.
When did the FBI turn into the Nightwatch? I just hope they don’t start busting out the black armbands. Of course, at least then we’d easily be able to tell who the stooges are.
Bin Laden didn’t blow up the projects.
Going in Style! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9YDnjJTOnY
Next we’ll see FBI agents putting kitties on high branches in random trees so they can save them later and take all the credit. Think of the poor kitties =/
Terrorists and their Social Security
All of the other Old Farts I know, and I, have decided that being terrorists and losing our Social Security was not an option.
We have voted to reject any offers presented by the FBI.
english as a deobfuscation tool
“wife’s daughter from a previous marriage” = step-daughter.
Re: english as a deobfuscation tool
But “step daughter” in not as many word and when you get paid by how much of the page you fill……..
/this is “almost” sarcasm, more akin to “sad but true”
Real Terrorists
If the FBI is responsible for ANY Planning of an attack AGAINST Citizens of the United States of America- It’s not entrapment. It’s the FBI Acknowledging they’re a Terrorist Organization, and OPENLY PLANNING THIS CRAZY NONSENSE.
Their job is to put people responsible for this behind bars- they’re instigating it, they’re planning it, they’re making the deals Happen- THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE AND GUILTY OF ATTEMPTED GENOCIDE.
You make a very good point here. About a month ago, an FBI informant tricked a high school student into falling in love with her and persuaded him to buy drugs for her, which led to his arrest. It makes me sick to my stomach that the FBI is using such questionable tactics to target people of all age groups, no matter how young or old. We are slowly becoming a security-paranoid state.
I wonder if they also managed to convince them to buy a set of encyclopedia britanicas.
Well, looks like Minority Report came early.
This is essentially the capture and prosecution of thought-crime.
Where’s that nearest habitable planet? Time to go…
If you’re upset by the FBI’s actions (or the DEA’s for that matter) you should make sure you’re on the list of potential jurors in your area.
Jurors can decide whatever they want without regard to the written law. If you think something is wrong (entrapment, drug enforcement, etc) do your best to get on a jury and don’t agree with the government’s charges.
Make sure everyone you know is registered and understands their rights as a juror.
Minority Report
It’s kinda of like Minority Report except instead of stopping them right before the crime happens the FBI is helping the crime actually get set in motion and then stops it.
Re: Minority Report
Until we have real precognition, creating the crime beforehand is the next best thing.
…for the FBI anyway. It would be hilarious for the rest of us if it didn’t suck so damn much.
“but is this really the best use of the FBI’s time and efforts?”
Yes. Their effort to spread fear of terrorism through society so the people will bend over and beg Big Brother to protect them by taking away even more of their freedoms.
FBI
Know the difference between the FBI and a terrorist organization? Me either…
but is this really the best use of the FBI’s time and efforts?
I guess that would depend on the purpose of the FBI’s efforts.
If the goal is really to stop terrorism, than I’d say probably not.
If, on the other hand, it is to lay the groundwork to further reduce the civil liberties of our society than it might very well be good use of their time.
so much for the incorruptibles, i guess? (or am i misremembering my random fragments of US history?)
reminds me of GLADIO in the EU.
kewl they didnt do it with students as in Bologna 82!
haplessly hanging out in waffle houses
but in almost every case the details show that it was actually just stopping its own terrorist plots that it feeds to hapless individuals, often nudging them and pushing them down the road to “become” terrorists, despite commonly displaying little to no aptitude for actual terrorism.
Once again, not knowing all the details, if any, I comment shortly on the “hapless” individuals involved in this article..
In so much as they didn’t kick the byjesus out of this informant from the git go, and became deeply involved with him instead, doesn’t that becry fowl and in the very least make them extremely S T U P I D ?? I had to get this in.. sorry if redundant, I didn’t read other comments.