Yet Another Of The FBI's Own Terrorist Plots... Involves A Group Of Senior Citizens

from the grump-old-terrorists dept

The latest Radiolab "shorts" episode, entitled Grumpy Old Terrorists, seems like a bit of a departure in subject matter for that program -- but fits right in with something we've been talking a lot about lately. Over the past few years, we've noticed the rather disturbing trend in how the FBI keeps publicly celebrating stories about stopping terrorist plots -- but in almost every case the details show that it was actually just stopping its own terrorist plots that it feeds to hapless individuals, often nudging them and pushing them down the road to "become" terrorists, despite commonly displaying little to no aptitude for actual terrorism.

In the last few weeks, the mainstream press has started to notice this as well, with stories about it appearing in both the NY Times and Rolling Stone. However, the Radiolab episode highlights a similar, but slightly different story, that was actually covered in great detail in an article in Esquire a few months back, entitled Waffle House Terrorists -- which includes the mugshots of the four "terrorists."

The youngest one of that bunch is 65-years old. The oldest is 73. As the Radiolab episode and the Esquire piece detail, while these guys do seem hateful, they also seemed absolutely unable to do anything... until an "FBI informant" joined their pack and pushed and prodded them along, introducing them to the "contacts" to get weapons and even providing "the money" to buy said weapons. The Esquire article goes into great detail about the "informant" and his rather questionable legal history (he first contacted the FBI while in jail for molesting his wife's daughter from a previous marriage).

On Radiolab, they play the audiotapes the guy made of the plotting -- and there's obviously some crazy stuff being said. But, as they look deeper into the role of the informant, the Radiolab hosts conclude the episode by noting that the whole situation doesn't really make them feel any safer. Yes, these old guys were hateful and helped join in this plan to cause lots of death and destruction. But, so much much of the plot and the participation of these guys really does seem driven by the "informant," who does not seem like the most credible of guys. And it's this exact scenario that we keep seeing over and over again. It may not reach the level of entrapment, and it may put some people really ignorant and crazy people in jail -- but is this really the best use of the FBI's time and efforts? Creating bogus "terrorist" plots involving people who had no real means to actually do anything?


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    icon
    Nick Dynice (profile), Jun 6th, 2012 @ 8:05am

    I wonder about these odds: are you more likely to get caught up in a fake FBI terror plot then you are to actual be killed by real terrorists?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    icon
    Jay (profile), Jun 6th, 2012 @ 8:19am

    Re:

    Ts Yes.

    FBI entrapment has far more likely odds given that is their mandate almost since inception.

    Terrorist act occur less frequently than lightning strikes.

    Point here is the FBI looks to subvert people it believes are threats, irregardless of if they actually are.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    icon
    Jay (profile), Jun 6th, 2012 @ 8:20am

    Re:

    Ts Yes.

    FBI entrapment has far more likely odds given that is their mandate almost since inception.

    Terrorist act occur less frequently than lightning strikes.

    Point here is the FBI looks to subvert people it believes are threats, irregardless of if they actually are.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Juan Sikks-Paque, Jun 6th, 2012 @ 8:35am

    FBI:

    Fucking Born Idiots.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    icon
    Mesonoxian Eve (profile), Jun 6th, 2012 @ 8:49am

    Grandpa??!!!??

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 6th, 2012 @ 8:52am

    All About Intent

    Consider four types of groups:

    Group-1:
    No intent to commit terrorists acts - No capability (knowledge & resources).
    Just regular folks.

    Group-2:
    No intent - Has capability
    Regular folks with the knowledge and resources needed to carry out a terrorist attack, but no intent to do so.

    Group-3:
    Has intent - No capability
    Wannabee terrorists, but clueless as to how to proceed.

    Group-4:
    Has intent - Has capability.
    Terrorists!

    I believe the FBI would be happy to go after Group 4, is not interested in Group 1, uses Group 2 as subject matter experts, and convinces Group 3 that they have acquired capability (when they have not) then pounces on them.

    It is the prexisting intent of those in Group 3 that gets them into trouble. The FBI is just making sure they don't become members of Group 4 - good job!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 6th, 2012 @ 8:57am

    Re: All About Intent

    Except most of these people are angry group 1. There is no intent or ability UNTIL the FBI gives both to them. People in group 3 and 4 are smart enough to avoid the "Stings".

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    Noah Callaway, Jun 6th, 2012 @ 8:58am

    Re: All About Intent

    Have you read 1984? "Preexisting intent" is the same as thought police.

    It's a dangerous line to say someone is guilty of something because they would (or _might_) do that thing.

    No, we're not too concerned about the FBI arresting people who would've been willing to kill lots of civilians; but we should be wary any time the government uses "terrorism" as a way to encroach on our civil liberties.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 6th, 2012 @ 8:58am

    Re: All About Intent

    Ahhh yes, the marvels of bureaucratic, tabular thinking.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    anonymouse, Jun 6th, 2012 @ 8:59am

    Sad

    Yes these guys may be angry at the government or whatever andthey might have sat talking about how they hate everyone for supporting the governement but to be honest they would probably have not gone any further with there hate if the FBI had not encoraged them to. This is entrapment, plain and simple but in the eyes of the FBI they have removed people from the streets that might have commited a terrorist act.
    So lets say someone comes to you and offers you a job where you can make $1 million , all you have to do is drive someone across the border into Mexico. I bet there are a lot of people that would do it, it would not be illegal in itself but the FBI could very easily set this up and accuse you of assisting in the movement of a terrorist, it makes no difference if you did not know he was a terrorist you would still be guilty. This is the same thing.
    The rule of law does not exist in America any more , entrapment is used and anyone saying it is entrapment is told they are uneducated on the laws.
    Giving someone the power to do something they would never have had the power to do is the same as giving a kid a gun, someone is going to get hurt.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 6th, 2012 @ 9:02am

    Re: All About Intent

    Have you read 1984? The FBI's role of "Thought Police" is coming true, and you laud them with a "Good Job!"???? Idiot.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 6th, 2012 @ 9:04am

    Re: Re: All About Intent

    Noah, I didn't see your comment until after I posted mine. LOL that we thought exactly the same thing.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    icon
    Jeremy Lyman (profile), Jun 6th, 2012 @ 9:08am

    Witch Hunt

    Look, until we get some kind of Minority Report thought-crime machine we're going to have to keep creating fictitious plots and talking people into joining them. How else will we know about (and punish) the anti-American thoughts that are surging through so many American's minds? If you don't like it, please notify the nearest FBI anti-American-frameup unit so they can... 'respond' you your concerns.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 6th, 2012 @ 9:21am

    Re: Re:

    Irregardless isn't a word, regardless of how often you see it used.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    identicon
    TDR, Jun 6th, 2012 @ 9:27am

    When did the FBI turn into the Nightwatch? I just hope they don't start busting out the black armbands. Of course, at least then we'd easily be able to tell who the stooges are.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 6th, 2012 @ 9:30am

    Re: Re: Re:

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    identicon
    immortal, Jun 6th, 2012 @ 9:33am

    Bin Laden didn't blow up the projects.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    identicon
    Noah Callaway, Jun 6th, 2012 @ 9:44am

    Re: Re: Re:

    Language evolves over time. Things that were not words can become words, and things that were words can lose their meaning.

    For the most part I've accepted this, and I acknowledge and appreciate that if a word has entered common usage it _IS_ a word regardless of its correctness.

    That said "irregardless" is one of the few that grates on me every time I hear it. It's totally redundant with "regardless", and adds a negative prefix to it. It's definitely not a word that brings a big value proposition to the English language.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    icon
    jupiterkansas (profile), Jun 6th, 2012 @ 9:53am

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 6th, 2012 @ 9:54am

    Re: Re:

    I sure hope so.

    There are 16 million lightning storms every year.



    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightning

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    icon
    jupiterkansas (profile), Jun 6th, 2012 @ 9:56am

    Re: Re: All About Intent

    We bypassed 1984 long ago. It's not coming true. It is true.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    icon
    TtfnJohn (profile), Jun 6th, 2012 @ 9:58am

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23.  
    icon
    Ninja (profile), Jun 6th, 2012 @ 10:04am

    Next we'll see FBI agents putting kitties on high branches in random trees so they can save them later and take all the credit. Think of the poor kitties =/

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  24.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 6th, 2012 @ 10:08am

    Terrorists and their Social Security

    All of the other Old Farts I know, and I, have decided that being terrorists and losing our Social Security was not an option.
    We have voted to reject any offers presented by the FBI.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  25.  
    icon
    cjstg (profile), Jun 6th, 2012 @ 10:37am

    english as a deobfuscation tool

    "wife's daughter from a previous marriage" = step-daughter.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  26.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 6th, 2012 @ 10:38am

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    oh, you mean like 'inflammable'?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  27.  
    icon
    Liz (profile), Jun 6th, 2012 @ 10:38am

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    From that link:

    Its reputation has not risen over the years, and it is still a long way from general acceptance. Use regardless instead.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  28.  
    identicon
    Digitari, Jun 6th, 2012 @ 10:49am

    Re: english as a deobfuscation tool

    But "step daughter" in not as many word and when you get paid by how much of the page you fill........





    /this is "almost" sarcasm, more akin to "sad but true"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  29.  
    identicon
    BinaryRecoil, Jun 6th, 2012 @ 10:56am

    Real Terrorists

    If the FBI is responsible for ANY Planning of an attack AGAINST Citizens of the United States of America- It's not entrapment. It's the FBI Acknowledging they're a Terrorist Organization, and OPENLY PLANNING THIS CRAZY NONSENSE.

    Their job is to put people responsible for this behind bars- they're instigating it, they're planning it, they're making the deals Happen- THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE AND GUILTY OF ATTEMPTED GENOCIDE.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  30.  
    identicon
    wakeup, Jun 6th, 2012 @ 11:07am

    You make a very good point here. About a month ago, an FBI informant tricked a high school student into falling in love with her and persuaded him to buy drugs for her, which led to his arrest. It makes me sick to my stomach that the FBI is using such questionable tactics to target people of all age groups, no matter how young or old. We are slowly becoming a security-paranoid state.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  31.  
    icon
    crade (profile), Jun 6th, 2012 @ 11:15am

    I wonder if they also managed to convince them to buy a set of encyclopedia britanicas.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  32.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 6th, 2012 @ 11:15am

    Well, looks like Minority Report came early.

    This is essentially the capture and prosecution of thought-crime.

    Where's that nearest habitable planet? Time to go...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  33.  
    icon
    crade (profile), Jun 6th, 2012 @ 11:24am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    hehe, that one is the opposite, they started with the word inflammable, then made a new word, flammable, because they were worried there would be confusion that the "in" in inflammable would be confused as a prefix :)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  34.  
    icon
    gorehound (profile), Jun 6th, 2012 @ 12:46pm

    Re:

    More likely the Feds or the Cops will Entrap you in a crime.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  35.  
    icon
    Jim O (profile), Jun 6th, 2012 @ 1:02pm

    If you're upset by the FBI's actions (or the DEA's for that matter) you should make sure you're on the list of potential jurors in your area.

    Jurors can decide whatever they want without regard to the written law. If you think something is wrong (entrapment, drug enforcement, etc) do your best to get on a jury and don't agree with the government's charges.

    Make sure everyone you know is registered and understands their rights as a juror.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  36.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 6th, 2012 @ 1:09pm

    Minority Report

    It's kinda of like Minority Report except instead of stopping them right before the crime happens the FBI is helping the crime actually get set in motion and then stops it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  37.  
    identicon
    Ed C., Jun 6th, 2012 @ 2:47pm

    Re: Minority Report

    Until we have real precognition, creating the crime beforehand is the next best thing.

    ...for the FBI anyway. It would be hilarious for the rest of us if it didn't suck so damn much.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  38.  
    identicon
    quawonk, Jun 6th, 2012 @ 3:31pm

    "but is this really the best use of the FBI's time and efforts?"

    Yes. Their effort to spread fear of terrorism through society so the people will bend over and beg Big Brother to protect them by taking away even more of their freedoms.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  39.  
    icon
    ramjet57 (profile), Jun 6th, 2012 @ 4:08pm

    FBI

    Know the difference between the FBI and a terrorist organization? Me either...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  40.  
    identicon
    Loki, Jun 7th, 2012 @ 1:13am

    but is this really the best use of the FBI's time and efforts?

    I guess that would depend on the purpose of the FBI's efforts.

    If the goal is really to stop terrorism, than I'd say probably not.

    If, on the other hand, it is to lay the groundwork to further reduce the civil liberties of our society than it might very well be good use of their time.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  41.  
    icon
    Chargone (profile), Jun 7th, 2012 @ 5:10am

    so much for the incorruptibles, i guess? (or am i misremembering my random fragments of US history?)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  42.  
    identicon
    mett, Jun 7th, 2012 @ 5:30am

    reminds me of GLADIO in the EU.
    kewl they didnt do it with students as in Bologna 82!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  43.  
    identicon
    Fresh off the Press, Jun 7th, 2012 @ 9:33am

    haplessly hanging out in waffle houses

    but in almost every case the details show that it was actually just stopping its own terrorist plots that it feeds to hapless individuals, often nudging them and pushing them down the road to "become" terrorists, despite commonly displaying little to no aptitude for actual terrorism.

    Once again, not knowing all the details, if any, I comment shortly on the "hapless" individuals involved in this article..

    In so much as they didn't kick the byjesus out of this informant from the git go, and became deeply involved with him instead, doesn't that becry fowl and in the very least make them extremely S T U P I D ?? I had to get this in.. sorry if redundant, I didn't read other comments.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This