UK Tabloid Known For Publishing Naked Photos Complains About The Harm Of Porn Online

from the that's-what-we-call-hypocrisy dept

Folks who have been online for a while probably recall the infamous Rimm Report from back in 1995, which was the first mainstream attempt to claim that evil “cyberporn” (yes, that’s the word they used) was taking over the internet and threatening children everywhere. Of course, that report was based on ridiculously faulty research, but many have sustained this moral panic that online porn simply must be evil. Enter UK tabloid The Daily Mail, who apparently has decided that this is an issue that needs attention, in the form of some moral panic reporting based on a couple of loosely sourced anecdotes. The story appears to be written by the mother of a kid who’s going through the initial stages of teenagerdom/puberty, and his mother can’t handle it, so she blames the kid’s changes on access to porn online.

Martin Robbins, over at the Guardian does a pitch perfect satire in response, mocking The Daily Mail’s article. Here’s just a snippet:

As an infant, I was exposed to breasts almost every single day. Thirty years later, breasts have taken over my life. Not a day goes by without some stray breast seeping into my consciousness. Occasionally I catch myself glancing at the breasts of my female friends, and I habitually pour milk all over my cornflakes. Worse, breasts have served as a gateway drug for vaginas.

I used to think I was alone, but extensive new research in the form of almost three anecdotes published by the Daily Mail – a seedy gossip website specializing in celebrity erotica, catering to men too old to buy Nuts and too married to run up hard-to-explain credit card charges on proper porn – has revealed the devastating impact that breasts have been having on other young children.

Each tragic case of boob trauma follows the same remarkable pattern. An ordinary little boy approaching his teenage years suddenly starts to change his behaviour: becoming withdrawn and moody and mysteriously growing about six inches in height. Detailed investigation of the child’s browser history reveals that the cause is not the rough patch the parents have been going through, a recent change of schools, or puberty; but an addiction to online porn.

Of course, even more amusing is that Robbins goes on to point out that The Daily Mail’s moral panic against porn might take on slightly more credibility if the publication wasn’t well known for publishing nude photos itself (the links in the next paragraph may be slightly NSFW depending on your work environment):

The Daily Mail makes money from posting pictures of scantily-clad women on the internet. Sometimes these women are topless. Sometimes they are completely naked. Often the images are captioned with breathy descriptions of ‘cleavage’, ‘dangerous curves’, ‘thigh-skimming’ dresses. Sometimes the images are of disturbingly young girls, accompanied with phrases like the infamous “all grown up.”

It’s only worth a moral panic if it’s not about the publication in question making money, it seems. I recognize that the UK tabloid culture involves moral panic articles like the Daily Mail’s all too often, but you have to wonder how anyone takes such things seriously when those same publications are publishing naked photos online itself.

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “UK Tabloid Known For Publishing Naked Photos Complains About The Harm Of Porn Online”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
49 Comments
PaulT (profile) says:

Would this be the same paper that ran an attack on the satirical TV show Brass Eye over its look at hypocrisy in media regarding paedophilia, right next to photos of underaged princesses in bikinis?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brass_Eye#Paedophilia_special_.282001.29

Why, yes it is!

Rule of thumb as ever: if it’s in the Daily Fail, it’s either a half-assed attempt at riling up the middle classes, or an outright lie.

Sadly, these attempts occasionally bear fruit (their ridiculous video nasties campaign, for example), so it’s worth being vigilant even if the hypocrisy is particularly obvious – their readership does have low comprehension and critical thinking skills.

Call me Al says:

Re:

The Daily Mail is a horror story of reporting. They jump on every moral panic going and if things get quiet they just make them up.

Trouble is that it was also recently claimed to be the online paper with the highest readership in the world.

I know people who read it in a “know your enemy” kind of way but there are still many who read it and believe it.

PaulT (profile) says:

Re:

“Ultra right-wing, populist, nationalistic, xenophobic, isolationist often hysterical and notoriously obsessed with the immigrants and house prices and, lately, campaigns against same sex marriage and claimants of state benefits”

“The Mail is very similar to The Sun when at its worst, but likes to pretend it’s more upmarket.”

That sounds about right, TBH…

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

Summer Glau played a cyborg(Depending on your definitions). There is at least one instance where she is topless, thought it is a back shot. Not to mention all the people who have robotic limbs.

Rule 34 wins again.

This is the same rule that brought us Amputee Toilet Seat Handjob porn(Really, do not search for that. It was on a Rule 34 Demotivational Poster). Do you really think there are limits?

Not an Electronic Rodent says:

Re:

What I find truly amazing is your penchant for trying to rant about something irrelevant to the article in an attempt to obscure that you have no point to make other than that you hate Mike.

Any difference between titillation and porn is;
a/ In the eye of the beholder
b/ Irrelevant to any harm that “porn” may or may not do to a teenager and
c/ In no way removes the irony or indeed inevitability of it being the Daily Mail printing such a thing.

I do, however, find it unsuprising that you’d come out with such a rant since you are almost Techdirts own resident Daily Mail.

Oh, and if you show such a serious lack of understanding of teenagers in the relevance of “titillation vs. porn” in such an argument then either
a/ You are way too long away from being a teenager or
b/ On behalf of any putative offspring please don’t become a parent.

John Van Dyke: Show the average teenage male a condom and his mind will turn to thoughts of lust.
Toby Ziegler: Show the average teenage male a lug wrench and his mind will turn to thoughts of lust.

– West Wing

Anonymous Coward says:

True to Form

I’ve never heard anyone suggest the Daily Mail is known for naked pictures.
Actually The Mail is acting true to form here. It’s always been the right wing, conservative tabloid. The tabloid for the stuffy, old fashioned reader.
It is hypocritical, and also one of the worst newspapers in the UK, but I’m not at all surprised to see them mount an attack against porn. It’s totally in keeping with the paper’s long history.

PaulT (profile) says:

True to Form

That’s somewhat true offline, but have you checked out their website recently? It’s pretty much all models and celebrity gossip with pictures of them in various states of undress. Yeah, it would be stretch to call them “porn”, but as I look at it today, there’s women in bikinis, posing in bubble baths, at a strip club, gossip about their sex lives…

It’s hard to take a moral stand when your own site clearly depends on broadcasting salacious images, even if they manage to keep some clothes on much of the time…

Niall (profile) says:

Re:

Yes, I’ve never forgiven them for cosying up to Andrew Wakefield, the MMR = autism faker.

I also love how every other paper can be covering a serious story of national or international significance, but they care more about how ‘women on Royal Navy ships distract the men with their wicked wiles’.

About the only good thing that can be said about them is that they *aren’t* a Murdoch rag.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...