Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

•  

  

  Chris Rhodes (profile), May 1st, 2012 @ 5:52am

  
  

  Dead On, As Usual

  First thing I do is Google the headline, because I'm not interested in installing their stupid app.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, May 1st, 2012 @ 6:04am

  
  

  Where's Bob?

  I'm sure Bob will have some suitably insightful commentary that explains the value that Yahoo has in making these apps!

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  bob, May 1st, 2012 @ 7:40am

  
  

  Re: Where's Bob?

  Actually, I find them as annoying as everyone here. I would much rather just give the publications some money, but everyone around here keeps insisting that this is somehow bad and rotten. So the publishers keep concocting other insane ways to "monetize their eyeballs".
  
  If the cheapskates who keep insisting on getting everything for free would just give up on changing the laws of economics, we could have nice, simple web pages with just the facts and none of the squawking video ads and the weirdo Flash animations. The sites could earn enough money for health care and food by monetizing their content the old fashioned way: they would charge for it.
  
  But does anyone around here listen to me.... You brought these dumb apps on yourself.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Leigh Beadon (profile), May 1st, 2012 @ 8:12am

  
  

  Re: Re: Where's Bob?

  insane ways to "monetize their eyeballs"
  
  What a delightfully reductive synonym for "advertising" (hint: not a strange or alien concept)
  
  If the cheapskates who keep insisting on getting everything for free would just give up on changing the laws of economics
  
  You know I remember, as a kid, turning the plastic dial beside the TV to point at the grubby little sticker with the channel I wanted jotted on it, and listening for the hum of the motor and the creak of metal as the antenna outside rotated, and sometimes nudging the sticky dial back and forth for ten minutes then eventually settling for imperfect reception, and I remember the winter when someone would have to climb up the antenna tower and chip the ice away so it could turn...
  
  And amidst all those details, I don't remember ever having to put a coin in a slot.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  bob, May 1st, 2012 @ 8:57am

  
  

  Re: Re: Re: Where's Bob?

  You just weren't paying attention. You put the money in the slot at the movie theater. Or your school paid to rent prints of movies. Or your church paid to rent the film to show on Friday night to the kids. Your parents paid.
  
  
  
  And the free TV advertising model was just as annoying then as these readers. The number of ads kept increasing. They usually turned up the volume for the ads while denying that they did it. The stations would show their ads at the same time to prevent you from switching. In many ways, the new readers are even nicer than the old TV ad realm.
  
  Advertising only supports mass market content and good paywalls usually beat it down. Witness how many folks celebrate HBO now.
  
  Heck, pay cable tv is getting to be 70 years old in some parts of the country. Free didn't last long, did it?
  
  http://www.ncta.com/About/About/HistoryofCableTelevision.aspx

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Leigh Beadon (profile), May 1st, 2012 @ 9:00am

  
  

  Re: Re: Re: Re: Where's Bob?

  Wait a minute. First you said everyone should stop expecting companies to find other ways to monetize and should just pay directly for content - and now you're lecturing me on how I paid for free tv in other ways?
  
  You really can't keep your story straight, huh? Which is it bob - is it normal to offer free content and make money in other ways, as you just said, or is it some craaaazy new change to the "laws of economics" like you said before that?

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  hothmonster, May 1st, 2012 @ 9:07am

  
  

  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Where's Bob?

  Its the opposite of whatever you just said which is why he usually doesn't respond to posts because it only takes a minute before he contradicts himself. He doesn't have any logic or opinion of his own just the contrary opinion of whoever he is talking to.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Mike Masnick (profile), May 1st, 2012 @ 9:56am

  
  

  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Where's Bob?

  You really can't keep your story straight, huh? Which is it bob - is it normal to offer free content and make money in other ways, as you just said, or is it some craaaazy new change to the "laws of economics" like you said before that?
  
  Don't mind bob. He's refused to contribute to the paywall for "logic" and thus has been blocked from using that part of his brain.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Ninja (profile), May 2nd, 2012 @ 5:55am

  
  

  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Where's Bob?

  That explains a lot of things.
  
  And I do hope this makes the charts for the most funny comment of the week ;)

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  drew (profile), May 1st, 2012 @ 9:00am

  
  

  Re: Re: Where's Bob?

  That's right Bob, because we're all a bunch of freeloaders who never pay for anything.
  Perhaps if the publishers had figured out a few ways to keep some relevance people would be willing to pay for it, but in their rush to the bottom even the broadsheets are just re-hashing agency feed that I can get direct from Reuters.
  There are still plenty of opportunities for these companies to add value into the chain (and therefore earn something for that value) but if all they're doing is aggregating news feeds and providing politically-biased opinion then they're not providing a service I'm willing to pay for.
  Hence I don't sign up to their apps or read their content.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Eponymous Coward (profile), May 1st, 2012 @ 6:10am

  
  

  Only the tip of the iceberg

  In the past week, I've seen an explosion of these social reader/viewer apps. Viddy, Dailymotion, Yahoo, etc, etc. The real fun comes when someone approves use of the dailymotion social app and then fails to log off before viewing some sketchy vids.
  
  "Bill Swenson watched '7 sexual positions for less-endowed men', as well as 8 other videos on Dailymotion."
  
  The comments on that type of post are priceless.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Call me Al, May 1st, 2012 @ 6:41am

  
  

  Re: Only the tip of the iceberg

  I saw one of those too. I commented on it, it got a few laughs and then magically disappeared once the guy realised what he had done.
  
  I've signed up for a bunch of these apps because friends are using them. Trouble is that I always make the privacy settings so that only I can see what is published to my wall, so that I can avoid publishing things like the above ;-). Effectively negating any social value of my browsing. Of course if I see something I actually find interesting and want to share then I use the address rather than the app.
  
  All in all its just annoying.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Ninja (profile), May 2nd, 2012 @ 5:05am

  
  

  Re: Re: Only the tip of the iceberg

  I run my social media on a separate browser (ah the wonders of a healthy competition). So Chrome goes for social stuff and FireFox for all the rest. I use the incognito features too as well as the Do Not Follow and a few add-ons to prevent such things from happening. If u think about it, social networks are a damn hassle so it's no surprise I barely ever use my personal Facebook. Instead, I'm usually 100% online with my pseudonyms.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Ninja (profile), May 2nd, 2012 @ 4:52am

  
  

  Re: Only the tip of the iceberg

  Ah the wonders of ever invasive social networks. Srsly, social networks are like beer, if you don't take them with moderation you'll eventually make a fool of yourself ;)

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Ben (profile), May 1st, 2012 @ 6:13am

  
  

  It annoys me

  It annoys me because it doesn't tell me if the person enjoyed the article, only that they read it. As a social media sharing exercise, it's stupidly pointless.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Mesonoxian Eve (profile), May 1st, 2012 @ 6:34am

  
  

  AdBlocker has this wonderful tool compliment: ElementBlocker. By using this, I can pretty much kill these modal popups and allow the page to continue as normal.
  
  I thank the coders behind these tools every day, who make our internet experience enjoyable because others want to make it frustrating.
  
  Ads and content are the same, huh. Yep, this is why people constantly complain against this "content". ;)
  
  As I said: it's only content if people don't see it as an ad. :|

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Yogi, May 1st, 2012 @ 6:59am

  
  

  Thanks

  One of these popped up the other day and I had no idea what it was - I was sure it was virus or hijacking ploy so I closed the window as quickly as possible. But now that I understand that these are "social apps" I still won't bother, and I wont even google that stuff. If you want me to read it - just provide a working link - that's what the internet used to be for...

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  drew (profile), May 1st, 2012 @ 7:05am

  
  

  skip straight past

  The first couple of times I clicked on the links and realised it wanted to download an app. Now I just skip straight past the update.
  Some of them will access not just your details but your friends details. Now I'm comfortable with everything I put up on the web, but I'm pretty certain that none of my friends have given me permission to go spreading their details around like this, so any app that works in this way gets two fingers from me.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  TtfnJohn (profile), May 1st, 2012 @ 7:39am

  
  

  I guess a simple link is too complicated for some people, like app developers for Facebook. Just plain stupid.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Eponymous Coward (profile), May 1st, 2012 @ 7:58am

  
  

  Almost as annoying as...

  The kids who post a pic with captions that read "Like in 3 seconds or you (insert horrible thing)"
  
  BTW, Vote funny in 3 seconds or you want Super-SOPA.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Jeffrey Nonken (profile), May 1st, 2012 @ 9:15am

  
  

  I signed up for one or two at the beginning, but after a while I have to wonder: is there anybody on Earth who doesn't have control over my FB account? ... Besides me, I mean.
  
  Whenever I see one of these now, no matter how tempting or interesting, I just cancel and move on.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

Add Your Comment