One More Copyright Infringement, And HADOPI Must Disconnect Itself From The Net
from the equal-before-the-law dept
The governmental body that oversees France’s “three-strikes” law, HADOPI, has already been caught once infringing on the copyright of others — by using a logo designed with unlicensed fonts. Now it’s been spotted using photographs without respecting the so-called “moral rights” of the photographer, which include the right to attribution (French original), absent on HADOPI’s site. Such moral rights are taken very seriously in France, where they are automatic, perpetual and cannot be waived (unlike in some other jurisdictions, such as the United Kingdom.)
As with the earlier slip, the current example shows just how easy it is for someone to infringe on copyrights through error or oversight. Of course, HADOPI doesn’t accept either excuse when it’s a matter of sending out its famous warnings, or disconnecting people from the Net. So, in the spirit of fairness, it would be unjust to grant itself any leeway either.
That makes two strikes against it so far; let’s hope it’s more careful in the future, or it will obviously be forced to cut off its own Internet connection to set an example to the rest of France.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+
Comments on “One More Copyright Infringement, And HADOPI Must Disconnect Itself From The Net”
Unless HADOPI serves itself a warning, they can infringe all they want. They’re above the law.
Legate
One could argue: if the party to which a warning is to be served is oneself, the written/verbal portion is unnecessary as the recipient is, without doubt, fully aware of the actions and consequences said warning is intended to convey…
Re:
Je suis la loi!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NL82qbvDHD4&feature=related
But then it must tdo business with old-fashioned phone lines!
WON’T SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THOSE POOR, ABUSED PHONE LINES!!!
So I guess if they slip up again and don’t turn themselves over to prosecution then those who are prosecuted can just use that in their defense. Makes perfect sense to me.
You know.. I want them to infringe another time, just to see what they’d do. But I think I can guess – they’ll say ‘ahh, but we don’t pirate stuff, which is what we meant when we introduced this law’ and they’ll just carry on as usual, giving strikes against people that make the same mistakes they did and you can bet your bottom dollar, when they get 3 strikes, they’re outta here.
Long story short – HADOPI will hold itself above the law. I hope you Frenchies are up for some more protests 😀
Hahahaha !!! But unfoirtunately in this case it will be a 3 Strikes your not out deal.
They are of course above the law.
Oh, c’mon Glyn, they are the “good guys”! They are no “stinking pirates”, whatever they do – it can’t be wrong…
plebs: do as i say, not as i do
if there was a country to revolt, i expect it to be france
Re:
What is this “dial-up” you speak of?
Oh Glyn… you try so hard.
What have you pirated this week? Movies? Software?
Re:
I think he copied your brain. It fit on a floppy disk.
Re:
Oh Glyn… you try so hard.
What have you pirated this week? Movies? Software?
You’re late today.
You usually get in your “This is just piracy justification from Glyn” comment within a few minutes time and it’s taken you almost an hour today.
You feeling OK? Should we be worried about you?
Re:
To paraphrase Kryten:
“That was an important speech, AC 11, and it needed to be made. Might I suggest, however, that all further contributions to this discussion be made by those with brains larger than a grape?”
Unwaivable "rights"
> Such moral rights are taken very seriously in France, where
> they are automatic, perpetual and cannot be waived (unlike
> in some other jurisdictions, such as the United Kingdom.)
Oh, even in the UK you have unwaivable rights — for example, the right of an artist to get resale royalties on his paintings is “unalienable” in the UK.
What I find absurd about such “rights” is that by codifying them, the governments are stripping at least one other “right” from creators — the right to give one’s creations away to someone else or to the general public, with no strings attached. For many creators in the modern era, this right is much more important.
Re:
Sacred Blue!
Re:
Low density, single sided.
Burn!
Later, Masters of the Universe is about to come on…
Re:
I pirated a few films and Mobys latest album this week.
HADOPI has infringed copyright twice and by their own laws, have one chance left.
I fail to see how these two sentences are related (also, use-mention distinction).
Re:
Dude, on a good day, four heads or tails coins is all you need for his mind.
Re:
Monie dew!
They’ll use the same arguments all the name calling anti-freetards idiots and say it doesn’t apply to them, or apply some magical unicorn RIAA accounting that doesn’t count what they did as strikes.
Re:
DeeedeeedeeedeeedooodedoodrrkssssshhhhHSSSSSHHHHHHshhhhhhh!
The law applies to one and all...
…except on the planet Hadopi, where bold knights riding unicorns vanquish filthy pirates by the clever use of insults and baguettes.
Meanwhile, back on Earth, HADOPI shrugs and says “No comment, and you can quote me on that.”
HADOPI only applies to infringement through electronic communications services. Warnings are initiated from a complaint by the copyright holder. A second warning must come within 6 months of the first. A third warning must come within 1 year of the second.
How strong can a claim be if one has to rely on arguments that have no basis in reality?
Re:
Ah yes, just ignore the hypocrisy and focus on the semantics. That’s the way to go.
The law applies to one and all...
A free baguette every time I pirate something? I want to move to planet Hadopi.
Re:
maybe the poor troll is sick?
The law applies to one and all...
Forget the baguette! UNICORNS!!!! XD
Re:
+1 Dwarfer
Re:
Yeah, sick from being fed too much.
Re:
Unlike some on here, I have a life.
Unlike Glyn’s, it’s not dedicated to trying to justify my illegal online activities.
Re:
So you support the entire HADOPI organization being disconnected from the internet they next time they infringe on copyright?
Re:
and why would anyone be hesitant to complain to a powerful government entity? Don’t know, lobbyists seem to get that access all the time.
Really, your arguments for locking up culture and criminalizing the populace are just disgusting.
Pick a handle (alias) and let us know who you are .. oh .. right … that would demonstrate that there are not thousands of ACs clamoring for ever more stringent IP protection.
Re:
Merde!!!
Re:
The French are revolting.
Re:
And unlike you, AC 31, most of us here know the difference between an unethical law and an ethical one. And that it’s not wrong to oppose and ignore an unethical law. Which copyright law has become.
Re:
shhhh…they’ll hear you!
Re:
You spend the most time on here. Unlike most, you have no life. You’re entire time is spent spamming techdirt. You are by far the most pathetic troll I have ever seen.
Re:
He’s getting paid for it.
I’d do it myself if I thought putting “Stupid ass shill bitch” on my resume would have any chance of getting me my next job.
Re:
Are those ‘special’ ones that have identical heads and tails?
The law applies to one and all...
Better keep it down guys, or they will taunt us a second time…
GOLD DUST AND GOLD BARS FOR SALE
GOLD DUST / GOLD BARS FOR SALE
Attention: Sir/ Madam,
I am Prince Kwabena Mensah from Obuasi Community here in Ghana.I Am a Representative of the local Gold miners here in Obuasi Community Ghana. We have the capability of producing between 50-100 kilos of Gold Dust Monthly.
( The product Available Below )
Commodity : Gold Dust / Gold Bars
Available Quantity : 300kg
Origin : Ghana
Quality: 22+ Carats
Purity: 94.67%
Packaging: In metal Boxes.
Terms and conditions: In as much as I intend to establish a cordial business relationship with you, Interested buyer will have to arrange and come down to Ghana for inspection on our products, take a random sample for test at the ( Government Geological Survey Department ), having been satisfy with the assay report of the Gold, buyer/ seller will then sign ( Sales and Purchase Contract/Agreement ).
I shall be grateful to furnish you with any further information that you may require after hearing from you and shall consider it a privilege doing business with you to foster a cordial and long-lasting business relationship between both parties. Below are my contact information
Name: Prince Kwabena Mensah
Email: princekwabenamensah@gmail.com
Website: http://www.princekwabenagold.webs.com
Phone Number: +233 5417 94585
Skype: princekwabenamensah
We are waiting your purchase interest and quick responds.
Best Regards,
Prince Kwabena Mensah
Mandamus?
HADOPI has committed two electronic infringments. Let’s hope the copyright holders in the fonts and paintings make a point of sending the requisite notices to HADOPI. Then the third one, which will happen, no doubt.
After that, it’s just a matter of a private lawsuit to force the government to do what it is required by law to do. I remember the name for this in Anglo-American law — “mandamus” — but I don’t know the equivalent under French law, though I do know that there *is* one.
Re:
Except, as I explained, there is no hypocrisy. Learn what “semantics” means. Until then, nice try.
Re:
and why would anyone be hesitant to complain to a powerful government entity? Don’t know, lobbyists seem to get that access all the time.
Who said anything about hesitating to complain to government?
Really, your arguments for locking up culture and criminalizing the populace are just disgusting.
Who said anything about locking up culture or criminalizing the populace? I didn’t.
Pick a handle (alias) and let us know who you are .. oh .. right … that would demonstrate that there are not thousands of ACs clamoring for ever more stringent IP protection.
Paranoid much? Truth isn’t decided democratically. I’m sorry you think it is.
Mandamus?
Except under HADOPI, the second infringement must come within 6 months of the first, and the third must come within one year of the second.
That seems reasonable to me, unless you want the law to be more strict than it is written.