RSS
Tell The USTR To Stop Being A Pawn Of Hollywood Lobbyists
from the time-to-wake-up dept
Every year, the USTR puts out its infamously laughable Special 301 report (as I've pointed out in the past, I've seen people in the ideologically-aligned US Copyright Office mock the Special 301 report openly -- showing that even those who support it know that it's ridiculous). The way it works is that the USTR asks for comments about what countries aren't doing enough to protect US intellectual property abroad, and then puts out a "who's been naughty" and "who's been extra extra naughty" list to publicly shame countries. It's been so ridiculous that Canada -- whose copyright law is much stricter than the US in many ways -- is frequently listed as naughty, and has officially stated that it does not consider the Special 301 process to be legitimate.
And that's because it's not legitimate. The way the process works is that the USTR takes the claims of various lobbyists and companies -- does no additional objective analysis -- and puts together its list. They do allow for open comments, and a couple years ago I submitted some comments about the mistakes in the USTR approach, and how it might be improved. Many others did similar things... and when the report came out, it was the same jumbled mess of industry talking points.
Either way, it's that time of the year again, and Public Knowledge has put up a form to let people sign on to a simple letter asking the USTR to stop its "blind reliance on rights holder assertions" and to "put industry special interest claims under closer scrutiny." If PK's letter is not to your liking, you can submit your own reasoned comments (in 2000 characters or less -- which seems pretty limiting).
For more background info, PK has a blog post explaining the Special 301 process and why you should speak up and tell the USTR to stop acting as government-certified shills for the legacy entertainment business.
And that's because it's not legitimate. The way the process works is that the USTR takes the claims of various lobbyists and companies -- does no additional objective analysis -- and puts together its list. They do allow for open comments, and a couple years ago I submitted some comments about the mistakes in the USTR approach, and how it might be improved. Many others did similar things... and when the report came out, it was the same jumbled mess of industry talking points.
Either way, it's that time of the year again, and Public Knowledge has put up a form to let people sign on to a simple letter asking the USTR to stop its "blind reliance on rights holder assertions" and to "put industry special interest claims under closer scrutiny." If PK's letter is not to your liking, you can submit your own reasoned comments (in 2000 characters or less -- which seems pretty limiting).
For more background info, PK has a blog post explaining the Special 301 process and why you should speak up and tell the USTR to stop acting as government-certified shills for the legacy entertainment business.
I have an idea...
Finding Co-Founders in a Recovering Economy
From Noodles And Hot Sauce To Funding In 9 Weeks, With Oomf Founder Mikael Cho
I have a business...
How To Successfully Get Your App Into China
Why and How Developers Use Mobile Payments: Infographic
I have an app...
Marketing And Monetization Strategies For Free Apps
Top 5 Reasons Why Mobile Analytics Is Important
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
How so? It seems like a perfectly reasonable request. I think only a complete idiot doesn't realize that the USTR is captured by Hollywood on this issue. PK's writeup is measured and to the point.
The only one looking fringe and without authority is you. As per usual, of course. And, trust me, PK has plenty of respect and authority within DC these days.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Feb 3rd, 2012 @ 5:38pm
More likely they got so many signatures, their servers crashed.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Quote:
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_301_Report
That is exactly why Canada is trying to pass SOPA like laws there because they don't want to be sanctioned by the US, what countries should do is terminate the legal frames that enable the US to do so and reduce the deals they make with American companies, if they want any kind of control over their futures.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
x-posted but relevant comment content
Found in BoingBoing Article Comments: http://bit.ly/xxLymr
Petition Address: http://bit.ly/xarv5J
Text:
"The USTR needs to be more transparent and inclusive in the Trans-Pacific Partnership treaty. The public should be informed by regular drafts of language released and open for comment. Members of Technological and on line civil rights groups should be invited to the negotiations."
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment