Polish Government's Plan To Sign ACTA Gets The SOPA Treatment

from the you-do-not-know-what-you've-unleashed dept

We received an amusing email over the weekend chiding us for never having covered ACTA -- the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. Of course, we've actually written 247 articles that mention ACTA (yes, I just counted). It seems that among some folks who just joined the "worry about copyright legislation" bandwagon, they've just discovered ACTA as well. ACTA stories are quickly taking over the SOPA channel on Reddit. I'm happy that more people are coming around to these issues, but they might want to take some time to actually read up on things before they start screaming. For example, someone there put together a White House petition to stop ACTA, without even acknowledging that the US government already signed ACTA back in September.

The petition also ignores the most obvious line of attack for the US's participation: the questions about whether or not ACTA really qualifies as an "executive agreement." Instead, it takes that as granted, ignoring (or, more likely, simply not knowing) that there are serious constitutional questions about the claim that this is an executive agreement -- and that Senator Ron Wyden has already asked the White House to justify the claims that it's an executive agreement, rather than a treaty. Also, it's worth noting that other countries, including the EU, have already claimed that ACTA is a binding treaty, even as the US continues to deny that fact.

Either way, the EU failed to sign at the official signing ceremony (along with Mexico and Switzerland), claiming that it still had to get some legal ducks in a row. A legal review within the EU found that ACTA is terribly vague and wide open to interpretation, such that some of it may violate other directives -- which would be a pretty big problem. But rather than fix anything, it appears the EU (under great pressure from the US) is looking to go ahead with ACTA. We noted last month that an EU Council took a step forward in supporting ACTA, but did so by hiding it in an unrelated agriculture and fisheries meeting.

And, now, reports are spreading about how the Polish government is set to agree that the EU should sign onto ACTA, later this week. There are still more steps before the EU officially does sign ACTA, but the effort in Poland is definitely a step in that direction.

What's interesting to me, however, is how the SOPA/PIPA fight really has energized folks into fighting all sorts of efforts to encroach the internet with expanded copyright law and copyright enforcement efforts. Despite some of the hyperbole, ACTA is not SOPA. It's certainly bad -- though, massively watered down from what it was originally. But it's not the same thing by any stretch of the imagination. ACTA should not be approved, and there are significant legal questions in the US as to whether or not it really can be approved in the manner it was -- but either way, it's nice to see more people waking up to the serious problems with the ever expanding copyright law efforts -- pushed by the same folks who supported SOPA/PIPA.

And... it appears that these protests are already having at least some impact. Polish politicians are meeting ahead of the planned meeting "to review their stance on copyright protection policies." If the widespread online outrage about ACTA can actually lead countries to pushing back against this agreement, which is pretty much signed, sealed and delivered, it would be yet another sign of the growing power of online protests (though, some folks may ask where were you back when lots of people were arguing against ACTA, before it was signed by most participating countries).


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    icon
    Robert (profile), Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 2:42pm

    I was against ACTA before I went mainstream. B-|

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 2:43pm

    Wow...another chance to read internet blogs, tweets, petitions and the like by a whole bunch of people who likely have difficulty spelling ACTA, and almost certainly no substantive knowledge of what it says. Of course, it seems inevitable that experts will pop up everywhere to give them everything they need to repeat in those blogs, tweets, petitions and the like.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    icon
    weneedhelp (profile), Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 2:47pm

    I have been warning ppl since patriot act I. I guess detention and torture is ok, but dont fuck with our internets!!!! Ill just kill if I cant see lolcats.
    Sad really. Oh well. Whatever gets them aware i guess.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    icon
    The eejit (profile), Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 2:50pm

    Re:

    Dragons? In my entertainment?

    It's more likely than you think.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    icon
    Jay (profile), Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 2:57pm

    Re:

    The NDAA fight is getting rather poignant. It's just harder to mount against NDAA when people say "but this won't affect me".

    The internet being shut down has a much more immediate effect that people can understand.

    Baby steps...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    icon
    Nastybutler77 (profile), Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 2:58pm

    Better late than never.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 3:05pm

    Poland Defends Stance on Treaty After Web Attacks
    Polish officials vowed Monday to stick to plans to sign an international copyright treaty that has outraged Internet activists and prompted an attack on government websites.

    A government minister, Michal Boni, defended the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, or ACTA. He said that signing the international treaty would not hamper Internet usage and that Poland will sign it on Thursday, as planned.

    "The ACTA agreement in no way changes Polish laws or the rights of Internet users and Internet usage," Boni, the minister of administration and digitization, said after a meeting with Prime Minister Donald Tusk and Culture Minister Bogdan Zdrojewski.

    Internet opponents of ACTA fear it could lead to censorship online.
    Source: http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    John Doe, Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 3:10pm

    Imagine a world with no ip law?

    Wouldn't it be great?

    Maybe the MPAA and RIAA have finally woken up the masses as to whats going on and the masses will finally put a stop to this mess?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 3:11pm

    The European Parliament can still reject ACTA. Also, even if it passes, individual countries still need to make their own laws to support ACTA in their own country, although I don't know if they can refuse to do that after the EU Parliament votes for it, too.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    John Doe, Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 3:11pm

    Re:

    You mad bro?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    John Doe, Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 3:12pm

    Re:

    If it changes nothing, why sign it?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    **AA Shill, Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 3:13pm

    Why aren't we being allowed to participate in these debates? All of the public is being turned against us and we have no way of voicing our opinions! The government is ignoring us after we donate all this money to them!! How dare they. We are being misrepresented. We want a voice too and we want to be at the negotiation tables with the government as well.

    (nevermind the fact that the government only allows industry interests to discuss ACTA in secret while keeping everyone else out and unrepresented).

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 3:28pm

    Re:

    Because that's how the capitalist system/bourgeois "democracy" (democracy for the wealthy) works.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 3:32pm

    Re: Re:

    The reason why we have no voice because we're only the productive classes who are to be treated accordingly to the ones who own the means of production ("why should slaves have rights? They should be treated as such" which is in their sociopathical mindsets)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 3:35pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    As if capitalism will not only free open internet to exist because their totally incompatible. Infact the internet as it exists currently is the closest thing we have to socialism and capitalists can't allow that.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    icon
    ImTheRhino (profile), Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 3:36pm

    The more the citizens on this planet find ways to express themselves and have a voice, the more Governments will find ways to silence it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    icon
    Kevin H (profile), Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 3:37pm

    Re:

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 3:38pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    A 'free and open' Internet, with no government, is closer to capitalism than socialism because socialism is an intrusion of government.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 3:44pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    HAHAHAHAHAAHAHA....I can't stop laughing at this which is how delusional the populace has become.

    It's actually vice versa if you knew and studied political science.

    Because capitalism is a system where the wealthy privileged few control the means of production while socialism actually means the productive classes control the means of production.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 3:49pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Actually, everytime our society (well capitalists/libertarians/etc) talk about the "government" their actually talking about the productive classes against them. Actually "government" is only a shadow of whom controls the means of production which are currently the capitalists.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 3:51pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    And this is the wonder of the free and open Internet ladies and gentlemen. Its such a magical place that its both the ideal socialist utopia, and the ideal capitalist utopia. And to some of us, the ideal Cat utopia as well. See, we can all get along after all.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 3:52pm

    Re:

    the question is, will you let them?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 3:53pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    what we have now is the parasitic ... er, investment class leading.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  24.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 3:54pm

    Re:

    honestly tam, body gives a shit what you think. Go back to trolling torrenfreak, asshole.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  25.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 4:02pm

    I'd make a joke...

    ...but this one's just too easy.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  26.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 4:16pm

    Re: Re:

    Not him, but your comment leads me to believe that at this very moment you are waiting for someone to tell you what you have to think and say regarding ACTA.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  27.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 4:40pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    you can think anything you want TAM, like I said, nobody gives a shit.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  28.  
    icon
    Chosen Reject (profile), Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 5:08pm

    All laws reduce freedom in some way, from taxes to speeding laws, from narcotics laws to bureaucratic policies of what size paper building permit plans should use. Given that they reduce freedom, laws should be incredibly difficult to pass. Rather than a simple majority to pass a law, it ought to be higher (e.g., 75%).

    All bills should have an automatic sunset feature. Of course, by all, I really mean all. Even murder laws or pedophile laws. Every 5-10 years bills come back into the legislature. If they haven't been passed again at the end of that session then they automatically become revoked. This ensures that only the laws that the vast majority of people want get on the books and only the laws the vast majority of people want stay on the books. The sunset time can be based on the voting percentage.
    * 100% yea-vote, sunsets in 10 years
    * >95% yea-vote, sunsets in 9 years
    * >90% yea-vote, sunsets in 8 years
    * >85% yea-vote, sunsets in 7 years
    * >80% yea-vote, sunsets in 6 years
    * >75% yea-vote, sunsets in 5 years

    As far as voting goes, simple yeas and nays need to be expanded. Before voting, every legislator should document the lobbying they received for that particular bill; time, money, gifts, names of people, names of companies/groups/people that were represented, etc, as well as the position of that lobbying. This means everything from
    * Evil Rich Lobbyist paid $10,000 for flight and 3-day stay on exotic island, representing Insidious Industry and encouraged a yay vote to
    * Old man Jenkins spent $10.00 for lunch, represented only his self and encouraged a nay vote.
    Once that information is out in the open, it'll be more difficult for a lawmaker to say they voted yay because it was the best for the people when the record could show otherwise. To keep anonymity, all lobbying involves only communication (letter, email, phone call, tweet, etc), can be recorded as
    * 1,000 letters for
    * 500 letters against
    * 5,000 emails for
    * 300 emails against

    What are the problems with these changes?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  29.  
    icon
    LC (profile), Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 5:40pm

    @ Robert.

    Me too. I was against ACTA before I even found out about SOPA/PIPA.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  30.  
    identicon
    bigpicture, Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 5:44pm

    Re: Expert

    And you are such an expert that you can be critical of others knowledge? I personally don't know what the content of a "special interests" document is only that it is for "special interests". Every time that anyone is granted "special rights", I loose some of mine. This is all anyone needs to know to be entitled to protest, and "to bear arms in fact".

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  31.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 5:54pm

    This whole thing reminds me of a movie called "A Bridge To Far".

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  32.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 6:21pm

    Poland already saved the european union once...

    http://thankpoland.info/
    let's hope they will do it again.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  33.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 6:59pm

    Re: Re: Expert

    You meant to spell lose *

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  34.  
    icon
    bjupton (profile), Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 7:45pm

    Re:

    Where were you during AEDPA?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  35.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 23rd, 2012 @ 9:53pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Here's the main problem....

    Most of you want to become rich/wealthy by becoming capitalists yourselves (hence becoming the next "Facebook", etc) and you don't want "government" interfering with your business....

    Thing is we already have a capitalist class who started the same way and they currently control the government and their trying crush the next capitalists as if we're actually living in a giant Ghetto/hood which drug dealers do the same thing which they also don't allow competition...

    It's the entire capitalist system that's the main root of the problem in the first place folks.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  36.  
    identicon
    Fabek, Jan 24th, 2012 @ 2:23pm

    I'M FROM POLAND.

    WE NEED YOUR HELP TO STOP ACTA!

    PLS TELL ABOUT ACTA TO YOUR FRIENDS!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  37.  
    identicon
    Jerome Berglund, Jan 25th, 2012 @ 12:20am

    Commercial to combat SOPA/PIPA/ACTA/OPEN

    Check out this commercial we made to combat SOPA, PIPA, ACTA and OPEN!

    Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92I0hrYvdjI
    Vimeo: http://vimeo.com/35405496

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  38.  
    identicon
    Chris, Jan 25th, 2012 @ 7:56am

    ACTA is extremely dangerous international agreement that has been made secretly and voted by the EU during meeting of ministers of agriculture and fishery (!). It states that Internet providers would be obliged to give personal data of every suspected person that may send or download "illegal" content (that may be everything in fact), on the private party ("copyright holder) application. The citizen has no vote to defend, there is no voice of the court. It leads to situation that IP would prefer to scan every activity to avoid prosecutions and paying high fines.

    We may compare this to the situation, in which the post is responsible for the content inside millions of envelopes and packages... but according to ACTA the power is in private hands! There is no State acting as independent judge. How citizens can defend themselves? Unbelieveable

    Polish citizens will never surrender and will fight against any form of censorship forever.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This