Jon Stewart Now Knows About SOPA/PIPA… And He's Not Impressed
from the hello-fair-use dept
Remember how, based on an audience question, Jon Stewart promised to study up on SOPA/PIPA for a future show. Looks like that happened. And, apparently, he did his homework before Wednesday, so he could actually use Wikipedia. In last night’s show, Stewart used yesterday’s blackouts and protests as a jumping off point to discuss the bill. There were two main points: (1) Congress is trying to pass laws about an internet they don’t understand at all, and (2) fair use is incredibly important, and anything that potentially damages fair use is dangerous to culture. For the first point, he played some clips of Rep. Mel Watt proudly displaying his ignorance of technology — and then points out that Watt is the ranking member on the IP sub-committee. He also mocks the calls during the markup from various Congressional Reps. to have a hearing with “the nerds” by reminding them that it’s not “nerds” they’re looking for… it’s experts. Something in short supply in Congress. For the second point, he ably uses a ton of short clips, fair use style, to demonstrate how important fair use is to a show like his… while mocking Viacom and its own lawyers for trying to limit fair use. Good stuff all around. And yes, for those people who live in foreign countries that don’t have a deal with Viacom, I apologize that you can’t see the video below. It’s just one more example of how Viacom encourages infringement by not giving people what they want.
Filed Under: blackouts, copyright, fair use, jon stewart, mel watt, pipa, protect ip, protests, sopa, the daily show
Companies: viacom
Comments on “Jon Stewart Now Knows About SOPA/PIPA… And He's Not Impressed”
One can only hope Bill Maher gets his thumb out.
A matter of priorities
I find it ironic (and also quite sad) that a comedian can figure out the core issue within two days and that congress has been working on this for two years and still hasn’t gotten the point.
Re: A matter of priorities
“I find it ironic”
Irony or corruption?
Re: Re: A matter of priorities
exactly!
Re: Re: A matter of priorities
I’d say “Irony”.
After all, Both Jon Stewart and the congresscritters in favor of SOPA are paid by Viacom.
Re: A matter of priorities
I think you greatly underestimate the power of comedy, and the skills of a satirist. Stewart’s career rests on his ability to cut to the core of a topic and expose absurdities.
Re: Re: A matter of priorities
I would say it’s less of an issue of underestimating Jon Stewart’s skills and more a question of why is that not what our legislator’s careers rest on too?.
Re: Re: Re: A matter of priorities
Politicians rely on a demonstrably different set of skills — that of obfuscating the key points and positioning themselves to look as they’re on “your” side, whoever you happen to be. This is what happens when you have career politicians.
Re: Re: A matter of priorities
The same can be said for the likes of George Carlin and Lewis Black, just to name two.
Re: Re: Re: A matter of priorities
Very much so. Some of the best minds in history were satirists.
Re: Re: A matter of priorities
Not all comedians are made equal, there is another one in congress right now that is in favor and probably has his name still as a co-sponsor of PIPA in the Senate.
Re: Re: A matter of priorities
And it’s sad that he can continue to do this daily for years on end.
Re: A matter of priorities
That would be because a comedian can look at the situation and make his observations… Congress has spent this time tying to analize it and find further interpretations of the situation to justify thier working on the behalf of big business instead of the people they’re supposed to work for… you know, us
Re: Re: A matter of priorities
Soooo you’re saying essentially, they’re working for corporate people, not people people? That would explain a lot…
Re: Re: Re: A matter of priorities
Hey now, corporations are people too!
After all, they pay the same taxe… no, that’s not it…
They breathe the same oxy… no, that’s not it either.
They have the same righ… no, wrong again.
Damnit, why are corporations people again?
Re: Re: Re:2 A matter of priorities
That totally made me think of this
Re: Re: A matter of priorities
Congress has spent this time tying to analize it
I thought the word was spelt “analyze” unless of course it was a completely different word that you were intending….
Re: Re: Re: A matter of priorities
Last comment was mine – missed that I wasn’t logged in.
Re: Re: Re: A matter of priorities
Oh, I missed the hyphen…
Anal-iaze.
Thanks for catching that 😉
Re: A matter of priorities
Well, you have to have a certain amount of brains and understanding of the masses to be a successful comedian. Neither is required to be a politician.
Re: Re: A matter of priorities
What if you are both like Al Franken
Re: Re: Re: A matter of priorities
What if you are both like Al Franken
Haven’t seen him in a long time. I believe he gave up on comedy (and his brain) when he was elected.
Re: A matter of priorities
It’s really a matter of common sense. Something which is severely lacking in our government for quite some time now…
Re: A matter of priorities
Todd:
Ironic, maybe, but hardly surprising. Jon and all the rest of the Daily Show team?s writers, researchers and presenters are content creators, not content publishers. Copyright was never about favouring the content creators, but about monopolies to prop up the content publishers. Artists readily see why ?strengthening? copyright can only hurt them and put barriers between them and their audience. The publishers, collection agencies, and other such middlemen, on the other hand, figure the more such barriers, the better, because it makes their own gatekeeper roles more important, and to hell with the actual interests of the content creators.
Re: Re: Your got your facts wrong re: copyright.
Just because copyright has been gradually becoming more and more maximalist doesn’t mean it was always that way. At the start of our republic, copyright had a maximum term of 28 years for two terms, 14 years a term. And since it was opt-in, 95% of authors chose not to copyright their material. And all copyright meant was no other publisher could publish anything copyrighted (which was limited to books, sheet music and maps). That’s it. You were allowed to copy it by hand and make derivative plays based on a copyrighted book. It was still a monopoly, but a much more limited monopoly than we have now.
And if you want to know WHY we (as in the US) have copyright, just read the US constitution, Article 1, Section 8:
[Ed: Bold Mine]
Notice what it does not say. It does not say “publishers and merchants”. It says “authors and inventors”, as in the actual people who have done the work as opposed to the people who make their work public or fund their work. Also, it says “limited times”, something this court has chosen to forget too many times.
Re: Re: Re: You got your facts wrong re: copyright.
You seem to think the US invented copyright. It didn?t. It copied (sic) the concept from Europe.
Here, go read up on the concept, then come back and tell me it was all about ?promoting the progress?.
Nerds? Experts!
He sure put them right on the “nerd” thing.
Re: Nerds? Experts!
I am a geek sir! And I expect you to address me as such!
Re: Re: Nerds? Experts!
I am a geek sir! And I expect you to address me as such!
How do chicken heads taste?
Re: Re: Nerds? Experts!
Q: What?s the difference between a geek and a nerd?
A: A geek can get a date.
Re: Nerds? Experts!
I was disappointed … I expected to hear “Geeks!” But no, he called us “experts.” 🙁
Re: Re: Nerds? Experts!
I don’t mind if a fellow nerd calls me a nerd, i take it as a compliment. It’s something else when these overgrown jockstraps start calling us nerds and/or geeks. I think Steward danced around that effect quite elegantly.
Re: Nerds? Experts!
As an ‘expert’ I almost always expect to be called a geek wherever I go.
“This content is not available at your location”
Irony! Thanks Big Media, for making the consumption of culture as difficult as possible.
Re: Re:
“This content is not available at your location”
On the internet, Ha.
Sure its not available. 😀
Re: Re: Re:
Don’t tell me you’re going to circumvent their perfectly reasonable determination that you can’t watch their show? 🙂
Re: Re:
Here… have a look at this copyright infringing video clip that is posted on Youtube.
http://youtu.be/SDqJTUpH6pI
Re: Re: Re:
I’m pretty sure that falls under fair use, and thus isn’t infringing.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Maybe we think it is and maybe Viacom think it isn’t…
Re: Re: Re:2 Re:
It either is or it isn’t, and the fact that we need a court to determine it for us is indicative of how broken the system is.
Re: Re: Re:
Now that was inspiring and the best TV coverage too date. A very funny guy but too bad this was done in the name of comedy and not major politics.
We can at least much thank him for taking the time to respond.
I think we can make a good fair use case on that clip.
Re: Re:
I live in the Netherlands.
I can actually see the video posted here, but indeed, when american, canadian or even british networks put videos on their own sites, I’m often not able to watch them because the content is blocked based on my location. Because they don’t have the necessary rights to broadcast it in my country.
What.. The.. Fuck..?!
YOU made the content, YOU published the content. Who else has the rights to broadcast it over the internet to other countries but YOU?
The same goes for sites like HULU. They claim they’re not allowed to show ANY clips in the country I live in, and they’re working on getting the rights to do so. Why don’t the companies who host their material with HULU tell HULU they are allowed to broadcast it wherever the hell they want? It’s not like they get any less revenues on advertising when I watch it, compared to a US citizen watching it? Google managed to make this work by showing me Dutch advertising based on my global position/IP?
And I doubt very much that Dutch TV networks or the Dutch government would have any basis for sueing them for broadcasting their own material on Dutch soil over the internet, rather than selling it to the Dutch networks to show on Dutch TV. After all, the US networks can do whatever the hell they want with their own shows?
When foreign networks will no longer sell their shows but instead show them on the internet for ad money, I’d say that would be an incentive for Dutch networks to start making good shows of their own for once, rather than relying on foreign material. That would be great for a change, actual quality TV. Imagine that!
Anyways, all of the above is exactly why I have to resort to piracy. Yes, I download TV shows, because I have no way of watching them legally in this country, unless I wait for the DVD’s to get released in stores, which often takes years over here. Please make it inconvenient to consume your product, and thanks for making me a criminal!
Upload the thing to DailyMotion, Vimeo or whatever is more people-friendly and not MAFIAA-friendly. Any of our friendly TD contributors (via comments) can do that? Pretty please? *big round wet eyes*
Re: Re:
Comedy Central doesn’t region restrict it’s shows. You can just go and watch the whole episode on their site.
Re: Re: Re:
Alas, it does. I am in Australia, and when I tried to watch the video on the CC site (http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/wed-january-18-2012-joe-nocera), I got the message:
Sorry, this video is unavailable from your location.
That’s such bullshit. They’re not sorry at all. I bet they don’t give a rats arse.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Damn… I read wigelst’s comment and I thought ‘great!’, then I saw your comment underneath and I was all ‘pfft.. forgettaboutit!’.
Re: Re: Re:
They region restrict it to the regions they air their programming to. For instance, in NL they have a Comedy Central station, so I have access to some of their programming.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
http://youtu.be/SDqJTUpH6pI
*WARNING*
The Above Link Points To A Copyright Infringing Clip Of The Daily Show.
I was all set to click play until you mentioned Viacom. They are subject to a personal boycott. :shrug:
Re: Re:
How about some infringing video on youtube then?
http://youtu.be/SDqJTUpH6pI
Get ass cancer
I wish ass cancer to all the SOPA and PIPA supporters out there, and give a big FU to Viacom for not allowing me to watch this in Australia.
Re: Get ass cancer
Know what they need? The most comfortable asses in the world.
As a Network Admin, I was pretty pissed off to hear them say “I’m not a nerd.”
The demeaning tone just epitomizes how little respect they have for what they were pushing/being pushed to pass.
damn them to hell.
Re: Re:
Well, they’re old, fusty and trying to appeal to other fusty old people. Those people think of anyone knowledgeable of computers as a “nerd,” rather than a contributing member of society.
Re: Re:
Then you kinda missed the point. The ones calling for the nerds were the ones OPPOSED to SOPA, calling to get the nerds that actually actually understand all this stuff. Considering many in the tech and online communities are not at all opposed to labeling themselves geeks, that’s obviously the tone they were trying to use… Get in the people that are enthusiastic and knowledgeable about the internet and actually know what this would do.
I feel bad for laughing.
I saw this last night, and I feel really, really awful for laughing.
At the same time, my mom asked, and I quote, “Did they actually say that?”
My response: “Yes. Yes, they did.”
FU
Actually Comedy Central does region restrict. Can’t watch it there either. I guess they get wished ass cancer too.
Sorry John, it’s a day late and a dollar short. You promised that the Internet would be the guest on the next show and then waited a week to do anything. My faith in you is gone.
That being said the whole skit was well done and spot on. Thanks John!
Re: Re:
I am disappoint. You keep misspelling Jon Stewart’s first name. While it’s right there in the title of the program: “The Daily Show with Jon Stewart”.
Hmm. Everyone contact their congressperson and ask that we get some folks on this committee who either understand “this stuff” or at least will not support crafting legislation without hearing from people who do understand “this stuff”??
I just did.
Check out my group on Facebook “Boycott Big Content”.
Viacom
I once put a 4 min clip of The Daily Show on Youtube and had it yanked, Viacom blah blah. What I find ironic is the fact that the 4 min clip was Elmo with a mustache and turban (Gitmo). I just found it so funny that I wanted to share it with others that will never see it…ever.
Re: Viacom
eeek, Don’t speak ill of the job creators! The can have you whisked away to club gitmo… for indefinite days and ? nights you’ll enjoy the tranquility of solitary confinement while you indulge your taste buds with expired MRE rations and all the water you can breathe. It’s all inclusive, and it can be yours IF you do what’s right.
Did anyone else find the Comedy Central logo looks a hell of a lot like a copyright symbol?
Re: Re:
I know what you mean. I find it quite disturbing too. Then again, if it looks like the copyright symbol, it saves Comedy Central on trying to remind people that you’re a horrible thief equivalent to someone who mugs old ladies with those unskippable DVD/Blu-Ray FBI Warnings by just having their logo look like a copyright symbol. So all the work is done for them.
(o^.^)o Joy. Sopa and PIPA what a farce.
This video is unavailable from your location.
“proudly displaying his ignorance of technology”
I’m ignorant and I’m proud of it!!!
“Wait, no no no no no, even as a joke we don’t have John Lennon copyright money. By the way if you post this on Youtube, you will be hunted down and suedddd. And there’s nothing I can about it. It makes no sense.”
Pretty much sums up the absurdity of the situation right there.
Thanks Mike
Mike,
Thanks for this clip and others from the Daily Show. You know, I haven’t given much attention to The Daily Show before: to me, it wasn’t real news but news satire. Now, I like it for that very reason! you’ve created a fan in me of Stewart and the Daily Show. I’ve been to his site several times now and I’ve set up the DVR so I can watch his shows and I share Daily Show clips with my own online community. Sharing and linking promotes and drives traffic. SOPA/PIPA, DMCA, ProIP, ACTA,…would end this today if they could. YOU get it. Btw, I share a lot of your material with friends and credit you and techdirt at every opportunity. Thanks for what you do!
foreign countries... can't see the video below
Firefox has a plugin, modify headers, that solves this issue
Re: foreign countries... can't see the video below
How can a plug-in solve the issue? Don?t they check your IP address?
If anyone is looking for a free, simple way to get around the region lock, try FlyVPN. Easy, free, simple.
Re: Re:
I figured out quite a while ago that they didn’t want me watching, so I cancelled my cable.
piracy
Couldn’t agree more with what Martijn stated above. Hoi kerel 😉 Me myself also living in the Netherlands think the media companies, whom provide excellent content (from time to time) can’t be bothered with trying to find some obscure copy of something i’d like to see. The problems, in my opinion, with the movie companies, for why this many people resort to piracy, are two things. The main being availability. The key for any business, whether film, tv, newspaper, etc., is reaching customers. Something the film industry does in an excellent way when it comes to advertising what it has to offer, but not for it’s potential customers to acquire said advertised content.For myself, If only they some sort of platform from which I could cheaply download their content. Which brings me to my second point: cost! I was discussing just yesterday with a flatmate about how much we would pay fora movie. We agreed that the promotion the MediaMarkt had last week or the week before, ?14 for a blu-ray, was a marginally acceptable price.
One goes to the movies for approximattely ?9 here. But you go watch a movie for the cinematic experience of it. When you buy, or download, a movie it might be because you hadn’t seen it or because it is for a collection.
I download because I like to collect. Mind you I don’t upload, I’m trying to abide the law if possible. Then again, when I’m after something which should be available, but “isn’t in my country”, I think a big “f*ck you mediab*tches, I’ll find it elsewhere”.
Gotta leave the story here I’m afraid, I’m about at work, but you get the gist.
My message to the media companies: “Create a download platform for consumers which:
– offers all content, regardless of country!
– offers it cheap! I’d say around ?10 for UNLIMITED monthly subscription, download however much you can for it (look at newsgroups, it works!)
– cancel your pathetic lawsuits and join the future with your own, better developt, content platform
Here lies the truth about SOPA/PIPA that even TechDirt has yet to report: what MPAA, RIAA, and Hollywood execs do not want you to see.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJIuYgIvKsc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzS5rSvZXe8
The truth behind why these big companies responsible for SOPA and PIPA are also responsible for piracy itself is far more insidious than even their outmoded business model.
Can you say, do as I say so I can crush you under heel?
Good points
It’s OK, folks. I’m in the UK and the simple application of a proxy allowed me to watch! (Not a word of this to Lamar, otherwise I could be deported and end up doing five years in jail!) I have to say that the loud American humour with the bad language and screaming audience is probably an acquired taste but he has managed to ridicule all the supporters in no uncertain fashion. The “country boy” politician who seems singularly proud of the fact that he hasn’t got a clue about what he is trying to legislate against is priceless. Perhaps the entertainment industry has bribed him by promising him a new tractor and hen-house.