Rupert Murdoch Lashes Out Bizarrely Against The White House For Asking Congress Not To Break The Internet

from the get-your-stories-straight dept

While the lobbyists favoring SOPA/PIPA have decided that the talking point on the White House's statement opposing SOPA/PIPA as written really means that the bills, as they are, are great, it appears that no one sent Rupert Murdoch the talking points. Murdoch, who has been personally lobbying Congress in support of the bills, took to his relatively new Twitter account to lash out at the President:
Of course, almost nothing in those statements is true. First, it's well documented that Hollywood spends ridiculously more money lobbying than the likes of Google. Second, Silicon Valley is the heart of software development. Kind of bizarre for him to claim that Obama's "paymasters" from Silicon Valley want to... um... destroy Silicon Valley. Third, nothing in the White House's statement said that they were solely supporting the other side's view here. They simply expressed specific concerns with the existing bill. Considering that they specifically rejected parts of the bill that would lead to censorship, excess private litigation and problems for online security... is Rupert Murdoch really coming out in favor of censorship, excessive private litigation and a broken online security system? Really, Rupe?

Next, when it comes to streaming films, it's true that Google puts advertising around certain videos on YouTube. However, it's not all videos, and their system (quite famously) allows the actual copyright holder to make the money from those ads, leading to a rather lucrative new revenue stream for many content creators. Furthermore, for years, people have mocked YouTube for losing a ton of money, so it's not like this is a particularly lucrative part of Google's business. As for filmmaking being "risky as hell," so what? Lots of things are risky, but most of us don't think that the government should censor free speech, break internet security and create massive undue litigation... just to make Rupert's investments less risky. That he seems to think that's a reasonable tradeoff shows just how Rupert Murdoch views the government: as a tool to funnel extra money to himself. Furthermore, his claims that it will lead to "less" are just laughable as well. The number of movies made per year has more than tripled in the past fifteen years, just as online piracy ramped up. Also, Nigeria, China and India -- three countries known to have more infringement than the US -- all built up huge film businesses over the last few years, despite all the infringement.

After thinking about it for a few hours, Murdoch went right back to it:
He later admits that he had a "damn you autocorrect" moment in that first one. "Optus" was supposed to be POTUS, but his iPad "changed it." First of all, we haven't seen any "anger" towards Obama over this -- other than from Murdoch. Quite the opposite. We've seen widespread agreement (and surprise!) that the White House would actually dare speak out against Hollywood on an issue. And, once again, it's insulting and ridiculous (but typical of the disdain the Hollywood old guard has for the rest of the world) to claim that concern over censorship, excess litigation and online security problems means "backing piracy." As for the stats, it's nice to see him use the 2.2 million jobs number, rather than the 19 million jobs that is usually thrown around (someone in Hollywood really needs to get Rupe the talking points memo on this one), but even that is misleading.

As was highlighted in an excellent report by Zach Carter just last month, the 2.2 million jobs number is complete bunk:
[The] 2.2 million jobs figure, however, exaggerates Hollywood's contribution to the American economy. According to supplemental data provided to HuffPost by MPAA, only 272,000 people work for movie studios and television companies. The lobby group claims that an additional 430,000 people work in related "distribution" jobs dependent on Hollywood, legal web streamers like Netflix, the few remaining video store clerks and cashiers checking out DVD purchases.

But the vast majority of the jobs Dodd & Co. claim are threatened by online piracy are only peripherally related to the entertainment business. MPAA takes credit for nearly 1.6 million jobs at florists, catering companies, hardware stores and other industries that work with major movie studios, assuming that these jobs could not ultimately be out of a job without Hollywood help.
Yeah. 1.6 million of those jobs are not actually in the entertainment industry at all. Rupe, before you tweet, perhaps try learning the details of the "facts" you're about to spew so you look a little less ridiculous next time.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    icon
    gorehound (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 9:55am

    Investigate this ASS !

    We have all known that Rupert Murdoch has done many questionable things.I just post simply it is time for this ASS to be investigated for the crimes I am sure he has committed.
    And I will reply to his tweeting and all should do the same.
    Go To The Hell you deserve Rupert.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    The eejit (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 9:55am

    Remember also that Fox was a contributor greater than the entire tech sector to Obama's campaigns for a number of Congresses.

    Schadenfreude pie, anyone?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    weneedhelp (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 9:56am

    I just want to punt this man in the nuts soooo bad.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    hothmonster, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 9:56am

    " Rupe, before you tweet, perhaps try learning the details of the "facts" you're about to spew so you look a little less ridiculous next time."

    Mike, if you want him to learn anything just leave the info on the the voicemail of a recent murder victim or famous criminal suspect. That's how he gets all his news.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Gwiz (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:42am

      Re:

      In a related note, Murdoch is now furiously trying to figure out who fire in the Editing and Legal Departments for not correcting his Tweets before they "went to press".

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    jupiterkansas (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 9:57am

    "Old Man Yells at Cloud"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Chronno S. Trigger (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 9:57am

    I think that if these tweets show anything (outside of Murdoch's own idiocy), they show that Murdoch will take any option to abuse SOPA and PIPA to attack Google. All those SOPA supporters out there who claim that it won't get abused, I think this just proved you wrong.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 9:58am

    11 people work at reddit. *11*.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      :Lobo Santo (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:05am

      Re: Redditors

      Plus like 2(?) million unpaid volunteers. They're called "Redditors".

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:06am

        Re: Re: Redditors

        They're called suckers. Loser generated content, indeed.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:08am

          Re: Re: Re: Redditors

          But at least reddit actually employs people. How many people does this bastion of innovation and job creation, Techdirt, employ? LOL

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Simon, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:14am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Redditors

            TIL - headcount is a measure of innovation.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            MrWilson, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 11:24am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Redditors

            How many shills do your corporate overlords and beloved "job creators" employ? That's clearly the statistical evidence of corporate magnanimousness and benevolence.

            "Please sir, may I have some more? I swear I'll impugn Google for you on ten more blogs!"

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, Sep 17th, 2012 @ 4:51am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Redditors

            "But at least reddit actually employs people. How many people does this bastion of innovation and job creation, Techdirt, employ? "

            Damn right, Masnick show a list of senators and congressmen that you employ or admit that you contribute nothing to meaningful employment.
            Show how much money you give to the MPAA or admit that you have no connection to producing original content.
            Show how many jobs you've outsourced from the U.S. or admit that you make no contribution to the U.S. economy.

            Time to replace the freetard term with plain ol' Mike and his the alternative to more copyright enforcement is more jobs and business, magically bigger on the inside tardi supporters, now known as tardises.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Ninja (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:22am

          Re: Re: Re: Redditors

          No, no, ppl like you are called suckers. Morons and other nice words. Redditors, along with the Wikipedia contributors and many others are all but suckers. They are what your legacy greedy industry cannot understand and because of that you fear them. You cannot understand the logic of money through free, it scares the shit out of you. But it's happening everywhere. It starts with free and evolves into money. But you can't grasp it. So you swear, scream and buy politicians. And Mike is your icon for this new model. A man that publishes his work for FREE and yet gets decent money at the end of the month.

          Well, it's said that once you reach a determined age your brain only loses neurons daily so I'm sorry for you. You can't grow brains to try and understand what's happening therefore your only option seems to be death and oblivion. Good riddance I say. Keep trolling, it's amusing ;)

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased) (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 11:14am

          Re: Re: Re: Redditors

          Sucker (noun) - somebody who pays someone to do a job that somebody (or something) else will do better for free.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Jan 18th, 2012 @ 8:55am

          Re: Re: Re: Redditors

          from one anon to another...

          yeah, user generated content is a scam. yeah, millions of us perform free and unpaid labor on behalf of the oligarchs who control facebook, google, and so on...

          it's still no reason to side in favor of SOPA/PIPA. piracy doesn't hurt artists - the media industry does.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            PaulT (profile), Jan 18th, 2012 @ 9:04am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Redditors

            "user generated content is a scam. yeah, millions of us perform free and unpaid labor on behalf of the oligarchs who control facebook, google, and so on."

            You're a sad human being if the reward for that labour has to be measured in dollar amounts and nothing else. Still, nice of you to come here and put in the work free of charge anyway.

            "piracy doesn't hurt artists - the media industry does."

            This, however, I can't argue with.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:28am

      Re:

      Yes because number of jobs = worth

      That's why we must fight to continue to employ the displaced veterans of the horse and buggy industry.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
         
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:37am

        Re: Re:

        Oh look, it's yet another dummy trying bring the horse and buggy into it.

        People didn't want the horse and buggy anymore. However they mega-want movies, games and music.

        So, now you're also a total failure at coming up with analogies. Nice job.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Gwiz (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:48am

          Re: Re: Re:

          People didn't want the horse and buggy anymore. However they mega-want movies, games and music.

          But, people wanted transportation. Just not in same the way that the horse traders and buggy manufacturers wanted to provide it.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 11:02am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            what are you babbling about?

            Is this like yesterday's post where I paraphrased a congressman informing you of itunes and amazon and inquiring whether or not you were retarded?

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              icon
              Gwiz (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 11:17am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              what are you babbling about?

              I quoted your statement and rebutted. What are you babbling about?

              The horse and buggy analogy, although not completely correct, is analogous to piracy whether you like it or not.

              Is this like yesterday's post where I paraphrased a congressman informing you of itunes and amazon and inquiring whether or not you were retarded?

              Since I didn't post any comments yesterday - I really, really don't know what you are babbling on about here either.

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              •  
                identicon
                Anonymous Coward, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 12:12pm

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                transportation = music, movies, etc.

                MODE of transportation = MEDIUM of content delivery.

                Car, plane = streaming, digital files, CDs

                horse + buggy = wax cylinder, 78s, 8 -track.

                Now stop being a fucking dunce.

                 

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                •  
                  identicon
                  Anonymous Coward, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 12:26pm

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                  Boat = Piracy

                  We have to get rid of boats!!!

                   

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                •  
                  identicon
                  Anonymous Coward, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 12:34pm

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                  so is this an auto owned, because thats what he is traying to explain in the past there were horse and buggys which are analogus to caset and cd, now the car is the new fancy transportation that is equal to internet where you can transfer mp3

                   

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                •  
                  icon
                  Gwiz (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 12:56pm

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                  transportation = music, movies, etc.

                  MODE of transportation = MEDIUM of content delivery.

                  Car, plane = streaming, digital files, CDs

                  horse + buggy = wax cylinder, 78s, 8 -track.


                  Since this is the argument I was making, I am not sure what your point is.

                  People still wanted transportation, just not the kind the horse traders and buggy manufactures wanted to provide.

                  People still want content, but they want it in the formats and quality they desire, they want to purchase it once and use it on any and all of their devices, they don't want DRM and they don't want artificial release windows. The legacy gatekeepers don't want to provide any of that because it involves giving up control to some degree. If your customer is under served, they will find another means.

                  Now stop being a fucking dunce.

                  Whatever dude. Doesn't seem like it's me who not grasping simple concepts here.

                   

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                •  
                  icon
                  PaulT (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 12:46am

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                  Erm, you do realise you made exactly the point he was making, right? You've literally made the same argument you attacked him for, then called him stupid for making it. Wow.

                   

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          The eejit (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:49am

          Re: Re: Re:

          I'll just buy the HUmble Indie Bundles now then.

          WHERE IS YOUR LOBBY NOW?

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:59am

          Re: Re: Re:

          Yet I'm pretty sure the move is away from dvds (the horse and buggy) and regional restrictions (th horse and buggy) and drm (the horse and buggy) to online, global and unemcumbered formats. (The automobile)

          So who is failing at analogies?

          They don't want what you think they want.

          They mega want easily, globally available content at a price consumers are willing to py with no restrictions. Its not about the movies games or music anymore. Nice job.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Suja (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 12:44pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          Oh look, it's yet another dummy trying to deny the similarity of the MAFIAA to the horse & buggy industry.

          People don't want the horse and buggy anymore. They don't want the MAFIAA's outdated method of control either.

          So, now you're also in denial of, on top of a total failure when it comes to understanding, the accuracy of the analogy. Nice job.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          ZeeBat (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 3:02pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          Actually. I believe that "mega-want movies, games and music" means anything but what you think it means.

          I'm quite sure that the mega-wanters could give a hoot if your business, and all that it has to offer, dropped dead today. You honestly believe that the world wouldn't step up and bridge that pitifully narrow gap? Do you?

          You seem to espouse creativity via your offerings yet you can't poke your business plan out of a wet paper bag? Pathetic really, truly pathetic.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Trails (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:48am

      Re:

      You're right! This totally proves the need for DNS blacklisting and private right to block commerce!! Thank you for making such a lucid argument.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 1:14pm

      Re:

      more like 11 million, if you count all the companies that use reddit and have build a business around it, you know just like your precious little Hollywood. But you already knew that, didn't you Neo/TAM

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    John Doe, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:06am

    Is my math right?

    From one stat I found, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics says there are 139,415,000 (Nov 2010) jobs in the U.S. So Murdoch says 2,200,000 of them are related to the movie industry. So he is saying that we should break the internet and put at risk probably far more than 2,200,000 jobs for less than 2% of the jobs?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    TtfnJohn (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:06am

    Why let a small thing like facts get in the way of a good rant? Particularly when you own newspapers and TV news networks around the world!

    of course, this is the same Rupert Murdock whose companies have been found hacking into phones in England. (So far.)

    But at least he's proven that he's more tech savvy than most congresscritters. He knows how to use Twitter!!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:07am

    Murdoch is Robber Baron!

    Filmmaking has always been risky, but their are more and better economic opportunities there now than ever. For every filmmaker whinging on about all the unauthorized downloads of their product there is another who has learned to adapt to the future and monetize the new distribution channels. I work in the business, and the biggest threat to my future is Murdoch and his lying cronies!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:08am

    You would think Rupert Murdoch would know better then to support a censorship bill. You see, Murdoch's News Corp is one of the few foreign news sites willing to operate in China, where their news is mostly state run and heavily censored.

    Murdoch's China news company has gotten itself into trouble multiple times with the Chinese government for publishing stories their government didn't like. I read that Murdoch has already gotten so frustrated with the Chinese government's interference (and how his news company in China is still losing money and heavily lags behind China's state run news channels) that he's even considered bailing on his Chinese news company, because it's just too much of a hassle dealing with Chinese censorship at times.

    So if China's censorship has been such hell for Murdoch, and gotten his company in trouble with the government multiple times (included threats of revoking their media license) then why does he think it's a good idea to throw the same kind of censorship in place in America, where he already has the top news station (Fox News) and other top papers (like The Wall Street Journal)?

    If anything Murdoch should be fighting to keep the status quo the same in the US, no matter how much piracy he's suffering, he's still winning in US media markets. Introduce the uncertainty of censorship on the Internet and you might lose the top spot if competitors learn to work under the new rules better then you. Or worse yet, with government censorship the government might decide to shut you down or start censoring a lot of your stories, which will give Murdoch even more hell then he's experiencing in China right now.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:24am

      Re:

      Keep in mind what he's supporting here is closer to granting him the power to censor what he doesn't like in the US, than letting the government censor him. It's only unfair when he's on the losing side.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Ninja (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:10am

    Rupert the Grouper

    For some bizarre reason that Cartoon Network song came to my mind after I finished the second paragraph of the article:

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMEcsBLr8OE

    For some reason I think it applies to our dear Rupe and his mumbling... Ok, off to read the rest.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:11am

    Is SOPA going ahead on the 18 of January or has that officially been called off?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Violated (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:17am

      Re:

      The PIPA debate and vote to continue goes through the Senate January 23rd and 24th. SOPA could not gain enough support and has been permanently suspended.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:21am

        Re: Re:

        SOPA is gone. PIPA might go to a vote, but more likely a different, reworked bill will finally go through later this year.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Violated (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 3:54pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          They seem to be pressing ahead with PIPA. All the vote on the 24th does is to end the filibuster. Win or lose they would have whatever time they desire to modify PIPA. If the filibuster ends though they are likely to aim for a quick vote pending small modifications.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Richard (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:13am

    Jobs?

    Rupert Murdoch? concerned about jobs?

    He never seemeed to be that bothered about jobs when he was slahing employment at his newspapers.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      The eejit (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:52am

      Re: Jobs?

      That might be because they got big, fat payouts in order to keep them quiet about all the illegal activities and acts of war Murdoch committed in order to sell a few more papers..

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Violated (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:14am

    Paymasters

    I got to love that phrase "Silicon Valley Paymasters"

    Let us not forget that the RIAA/MPAA pumped over $80 million lobbying money into Congress last year... their highest ever.

    Obama and Biden have not yet had their meeting with the Tech Industry but some funds to protect the freedom of the Internet is not such a bad idea.

    It also seems that Rabid Maddog (as I call him) ignores the vast Internet opposition. Yes here we are Rupert. *>WAVE

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Adrian Lopez, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:15am

    Dear Rupert Murdoch

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Vincent Clement (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:19am

    I guess Rupe hasn't heard of Hollywood Accounting. You know Rupe, the practice where a blockbuster movie 'loses' money despite raking hundreds of millions at the box office and via DVD/Blu-ray sales?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    John Doe, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:19am

    Can he ask for his money back?

    If he doesn't get the legislation he paid for, can he ask for his money back?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    anon, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:23am

    Murdoch is a dangerous fool

    Murdoch is an old fool but still dangerous. I am amazed at the stupidity of most people who buy any product (can his vicious manipulative filth be so classed?) connected with this megalomaniac. Will education ever be able to eradicate this basic flaw of human nature? But the best answer to this fool and the Hollywood/corporate world in general is NOT support them by buying or using what they push. For example are you one of the servile ipad owners - seems Rupe is!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:25am

    is Rupert Murdoch really coming out in favor of censorship, excessive private litigation and a broken online security system?


    Yeah! The only thing he should historically be in favor of is hacking the phones of dead little girls!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    DannyB (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:30am

    There's a word for expecting filmmaking not to be risky

    Entitlement.

    If you make something artistic, great.

    If you expect it to be vastly profitable, then good luck.

    But there is no guarantee it will be vastly profitable. Trying to anticipate what the public will like is inherently risky. There should be no guarantee that they will pay whatever you want.

    If I hear that a certain movie sucks, then I might be willing to see it at a lower price. Or not at all. If you don't want to charge what people are willing to pay, then tough luck that they didn't buy it.

    Oh, sorry. The MPAA doesn't want to fix their problems. They just want to whine about piracy.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Duke (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:35am

    Evidence backing up his argument

    I particularly liked this tweet mid-rant:

    Just been to google search for mission impossible. Wow, several sites offering free links. I rest my case.

    Out of curiosity I did a Google search (in a "clean" browser with no account logged in), and the top results are the official site, IMDB entries for the various films, Wikipedia pages, reviews and links to the trailers on YouTube. You have to get halfway down the second page to find a link to a search page on IsoHunt, and the next "pirate" link is to tPB on page 10.

    Now, I'm assuming by "free links" he means somewhere to download the film without paying (rather than a link you don't have to pay to click on - possibly a poor choice of words - although maybe he does think that all sites should be behind paywalls like the Times's), which suggests either he thinks IMDB/Wikipedia/Review sites are actually offering the film, he thinks his company's own trailers on YouTube (where Google kindly hosts them for free) are piratical, or he uses Google so often to find free downloads that it has personalised his search page.

    So, he doesn't know what he's talking about or he's a hypocrite (or both). Sounds about right, as far as Murdoch and the Internet go...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      That Anonymous Coward (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 11:02am

      Re: Evidence backing up his argument

      Given how he put on his i'm a frail old man who doesn't understand the news business dog and pony show for the hearing into his companies activities....

      I find it perfectly believable that he think every "hit" on teh Googles is for a pirated copy of the film.

      Or maybe hes stupid like that Canadian Band Manager who claimed the band had gone Gold from pirates stealing their work, because of the fake search results some engines use.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      crade (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 11:12am

      Re: Evidence backing up his argument

      Assuming what he says is even true:
      Oooh, he searched for something on the internet and was able to find what he was looking for. The gall of Google! Making a tool that actually works! Pure Evil I tell you!

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        crade (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 11:29am

        Re: Re: Evidence backing up his argument

        Next he'll be telling me how he swung a hammer at his vase, and it actually broke the vase! Black and Decker is a vandal!

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      usul_of_arakis (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 12:58pm

      Re: Evidence backing up his argument

      Try Bing "Mission Impossible .torrent" (without quotes). Microsoft supporting "(p)irates"?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    DannyB (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:39am

    Let's try a thought experiment

    I pray to God this does not happen; but let's try a thought experiment.

    Imagine, just for a moment, that SOPA / PIPA are enacted into law.

    The MPAA / RIAA starts shutting down innocent non infringing material worldwide. Either (1) as collateral damage (using a nuclear weapon to kill an ant) or (2) because the site is innocent (using a nuclear weapon to kill an innocent party that never was engaged in piracy).

    Start putting people in jail. Extradite foreigners. Throw away the key. Label them as terrorists. Censor 'rogue' websites like YouTube or even TechDirt. Yeah, that's the ticket.

    Okay?

    Now a question.

    What do you think will happen?
    (A) Piracy will completely stop.
    (B) Piracy will decrease.
    (C) Piracy will stay about the same.
    (D) Piracy will go deep underground and increase wildly.



    (And no fair asking foreign dictators how trying to crush uprisings is working out. Keep your eyes on your own paper.)


    Okay. You can wake up from this nightmare now.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:44am

    Universal Anger

    Thinking it's time for old Rupee to feel some push back from reality. How can us activists get at him?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Trails (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:44am

    Rupert is right!

    God forbid people get access to unauthorized audio recordings!!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    crade (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:50am

    lol, thanks Rupert, but software developers do not want or need you to speak for us. Like Google tries to say with their lobbying: We are trying to make stuff here. Kindly get out of the way.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 10:57am

    Damn Silicon Valley paymasters!

    -Sent from my iPad

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    John, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 11:00am

    A Modest Proposal

    MPAA and RIAA studios, please take an example from the blackout of Wikipedia, Reddit, and several other sites planned for Wednesday.
    Use these blackouts as an example for your own protest, and take a year off of doing any work to foster "content creation", and any of the other things that you do, so that the citizens of the United States can make an informed decision about how necessary SOPA and PIPA are. I am certain that no movies will be created, and absolutely no new music will be recorded without you. That'll teach us to not like your proposed legislation.
    /s

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Karl (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 11:03am

    Salaries

    Whole entertainment ind employs 2.2 million ave salary 65 g

    This is a really weird figure. If Hollywood is including the florists, catering companies, etc. in their "2.2 million" figure, then the "ave salary" sure as hell wouldn't be "65 g."

    However, it's suspiciously close to the median income for producers and directors, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Of course, there are only 98,600 producers and directors employed in the entire country.

    Incidentally, even if he did include the music industry (he did say "whole entertainment ind" after all), that would actually bring the "ave salary" down. The median annual salary of music directors and composers is $41,270, again according to the BLS. And, of course, there are only 53,600 directors and composers employed in the entire country.

    ...Separately, Google responded to Murdoch's tweets, accurately calling them "nonsense:"
    http://news.cnet.com/8301-31001_3-57359506-261/google-calls-murdochs-piracy-allegations -nonsense/

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 11:33am

      Re: Salaries

      Also consider this, the *median* income for the Los Angles area is 69k for the 2011/2012 year. The average income stated could be higher or lower than the median (the income the average person makes, not the average of all incomes) but I'm going to assume the average is higher if they used it.

      Murdoc states this as good jobs... I personally think of a "good job" as something that makes more than the average, not 5 or possibly even more than the average.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 11:28am

    Also, Nigeria, China and India -- three countries known to have more infringement than the US -- all built up huge film businesses over the last few years, because of all the infringement.

    FTFY

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    AuntiFUD (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 12:01pm

    SOPA will pass Obama wants election jobs

    Google: ""We believe, like many other tech companies, that the best way to stop (pirates) is through targeted legislation that would require ad networks and payment processors -- like ours -- to cut off sites dedicated to piracy or counterfeiting." How much more "targeted" do you need Google? A URL in the bill?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Watchit (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 12:04pm

    Crazy Old Man

    Take into account that Rupert is an old man, a really really old man... I think he might actually believe the nonsense he's spewing out

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 12:57pm

    Film is supposed to be art. It's supposed to be something you make because you want to see it made, not because you want to make a profit.
    The only people who would complain about filmmaking being "risky" are people who want to spend their entire career churning out sequels, remakes, and sequels to remakes.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Hephaestus (profile), Jan 16th, 2012 @ 12:58pm

    "Yeah. 1.6 million of those jobs are not actually in the entertainment industry at all. Rupe, before you tweet, perhaps try learning the details of the "facts" you're about to spew so you look a little less ridiculous next time."

    Now we know where his newspapers get their fact checking skills.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Mike, Jan 16th, 2012 @ 8:11pm

    Murdoch is a bum

    Rupert Murdoch has no room to talk. The man is scum, he had his staff hack into celebrity phones for stories, then lied about it under oath, claiming he's old and failing. The world would be a better place without him in it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Michael, Jan 17th, 2012 @ 10:23am

    I love the bitches whining above !

    I simply love the bitches above, the days of illegal downloading are over. Uncreative dickheads will have to find a different way to make a living, piracy is over. Great news are coming !

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      btrussell (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 12:09pm

      Re: I love the bitches whining above !

      Finally legalizing filesharing? Yipee!

      Drugs are next!

      Was a waste of time and money anyway trying to enforce those laws.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    btrussell (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 12:06pm

    Google vs. Content Why Rupert Is Right!

    What a joke!

    http://www.themusicvoid.com/2012/01/google-vs-content-why-rupert-is-right/

    Finishes article off with:
    "Be Sociable, Share!"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 17th, 2012 @ 12:12pm

    Hypocrisy at its greatest!

    This from a guy who gave the okay to tap phones to get a news story.

    Lets see.. Its okay to tap into a phone system and listen into private conversations. But, Google placing ads around questionable copyright material!!! THAT IS AN OUTRAGE.

    OMG, how did this chump become so wealthy? He must have inherited it all.

    Gee, thank you Mr. Murdoch for the lecture. Because your moral compass is far superior to GOOGLE!! LAWL!!!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Gus, Jan 21st, 2012 @ 8:35pm

    Murdoch Tweeting ?

    I would be rather sure that Rupert the Old Sock has staff to do his tweeting.

    The whole operation of transnational media needs to be looked at. Just look at the sort of influence Murdoch has had in Britian until they went to far. The whole Murdoch business needs to be looked at. Democracy depends on independent media.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This