ESA Officially Supports SOPA, VGVN Members Left In The Cold

from the oil-and-water dept

With all the attention video game companies and the ESA are getting over their quiet SOPA support, it seems it is no longer feasible to stay quiet. Over the last few days, a number of outlets have been calling on the ESA to come out in the open in its support for SOPA. It had been listed as a supporter of the bill but had never made an official comment in that regard until now. In a statement to various press outlets, the ESA has said the following:
As an industry of innovators and creators, we understand the importance of both technological innovation and content protection, and do not believe the two are mutually exclusive. Rogue websites – those singularly devoted to profiting from their blatant illegal piracy – restrict demand for legitimate video game products and services, thereby costing jobs. Our industry needs effective remedies to address this specific problem, and we support the House and Senate proposals to achieve this objective. We are mindful of concerns raised about a negative impact on innovation. We look forward to working with the House and Senate, and all interested parties, to find the right balance and define useful remedies to combat willful wrongdoers that do not impede lawful product and business model innovation.
This statement does little but echo the talking points of other supporters of SOPA. So any complaints of job loss or lost revenue have been addressed. However, this new found vocal support has raised a new question within the gaming world: what about the grassroots organization the ESA set up for gamers? During the height of the video game violence debate, the ESA created the Videogame Voters Network (VGVN) as a way for those that buy and play games to add their voice in opposition to legislation regulating violent games. With that debate settled by the Supreme Court, what does the ESA's support for SOPA mean for members of the VGVN? This question was specifically raised by Jim Sterling of Destructoid.
Last year, when free speech in the videogame industry was threatened, you asked for help from gamers. The famous Brown vs. EMA/ESA case provided a landmark ruling that protected videogame content under the First Amendment. You appealed to gamers for their support and coverage, and many gamers rallied around the industry.

Now, when free speech at large is threatened, you not only refuse to fight the threat, you actually join forces with it. You operate a group that claims to protect free speech -- the Videogame Voters Network -- and pretend to champion the rights of gamers, but until you stop supporting the Stop Online Piracy Bill, that's all the VGVN is -- a pretense.
This confusion over the general fate of the VGVN and its implied support for SOPA is not limited to the media either. People visiting its Facebook page have been asking for clarification on the matter. Many have already made the connection that the interests of gamers are only important when those interests mirror those of the games industry. If ever the two should be opposed it would seem that the games industry wins as far as the ESA is concerned. As Jim put it:
It is hypocrisy on a most despicable level to continue supporting SOPA after asking gamers to fight for the rights of the game industry. You are sending the message that you want exclusive freedom for your stable of publishers, while the freedom of others means nothing. You are sending the message that the ESA is an organization that begs for help from a community, only to abandon and betray that community at the earliest convenience. You are the Starscream of trade associations.
While it is pretty easy to draw the conclusion that ESA member companies support SOPA via their membership in the ESA, it is quite another story for the VGVN. People who signed up for the VGVN did so under the idea that their support would go toward protecting the rights of gamers. However, this move by the ESA has shown that idea to be little more than a pretense, as Jim puts it. Why would anyone trust the VGVN in the future, if it actually has one at this point, if it will simply ignore the concerns of its members?


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    icon
    Jeff (profile), Jan 4th, 2012 @ 3:18pm

    OMG!!!1! I'm *so* surprised...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 4th, 2012 @ 4:39pm

    Good.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Pixelantes Anonymous, Jan 4th, 2012 @ 4:52pm

    VGVN + ESA

    It's exactly this sort of conflict of interest I resigned from VGVN soon after I joined.

    There's just no way I will ever help the video game industry in any way to lobby for its interest when they're busy screwing all video gamers on other, more important, issues.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Reverend Dak (profile), Jan 4th, 2012 @ 5:18pm

    List of ESA members

    Here's a list of members of the ESA:

    http://www.theesa.com/about/members.asp

    DRM free independent games have been so much better these days anyway.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Gamer #184,251, Jan 5th, 2012 @ 2:14am

      Re: List of ESA members

      Nvidia would do well to remove themselves from the ESA. A lot of people are already having driver/card problems and considering jumping ship to ATI, whom doesn't appear to be on the list. This news pretty much guarantees that future video card purchases will NOT be Nvidia. I was planning on buying two of whatever their next iteration was going to be, but that's not going to happen now, not after this news.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        ltlw0lf (profile), Jan 5th, 2012 @ 9:56am

        Re: Re: List of ESA members

        A lot of people are already having driver/card problems and considering jumping ship to ATI

        ATI is a wholly owned subsidiary of AMD. However, AMD is also not on the list.

        I hate NVIDIA because of the Blobs and because, when put up against ATI cards of the same price-point, they are slower and fail a lot more. I've had about a dozen and a half NVIDIA cards fail, while only had one ATI card fail during the same period of time, under normal usage conditions. (The ATI card failed on a hot day while playing Portal 2...never would have tried to use an NVIDIA card in that case because I would have gone through three or four of them.)

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Jan 5th, 2012 @ 8:39am

      Re: List of ESA members

      Wait, acti-blizzard isn't a member? That's a bit shocking.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        E. Zachary Knight (profile), Jan 5th, 2012 @ 11:14am

        Re: Re: List of ESA members

        Yeah they haven't been since the merger. They just decided they weren't getting their money's worth out of the ESA.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Jan 5th, 2012 @ 5:08pm

          Re: Re: Re: List of ESA members

          I imagine vivendi is big enough to do their own lobbying. They certainly dwarf everyone else on the list. Probably dwarf the whole list combined actually.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 4th, 2012 @ 5:22pm

    *cue average_joe suddenly becoming literate again*

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Leonidas, Jan 4th, 2012 @ 5:25pm

    When he said "find the right balance and define useful remedies to combat willful wrongdoers that do not impede lawful product and business model innovation" I'm sure he wasn't thinking about the RIAA's change in business model when they started suing everyone.

    I'm honestly half wondering when their site (and others like it, RIAA, MPAA, etc.) will be considered a "rouge site" by it's own members in the eyes of the scourge of SOPA/PIPA...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Violated (profile), Jan 5th, 2012 @ 12:56am

    Boycott

    I would not be surprised if some of these ESA members now suspend or cancel their membership in protest.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 5th, 2012 @ 5:35am

    "You are the Starscream of trade associations."

    Best line ever.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 5th, 2012 @ 8:38am

    VGVN has always been the astro-turf to the ECA's genuine turf.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Jeffhole (profile), Jan 5th, 2012 @ 8:54am

    Sweet!

    So far the only good thing to come from SOPA is that I know which companies definitely shouldn't get my money, now.

    Before SOPA it could be a little tricky and research-intensive to find out which companies are "bad" and which ones are "good." Now, armed with a list of SOPA supporters, it's easy as shit to tell who's bad.

    Thanks, SOPA supporters!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Jan 6th, 2012 @ 4:21am

      Re: Sweet!

      Actually, I think another good thing to come of SOPA is the general awakening of We the People. I know lots of folks who don't typically follow politics or the like who are suddenly writing to congressmen and engaging in online conversations. We'll see if it survives the winter, or the death/passing of SOPA, but it's been pretty impressive from my perspective.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 7th, 2012 @ 9:15am

    now a day ea games are a joke & nothing has been updated or new in them. they are just recycle graphics for 10yrs ago and they started the $10 fee to play used games online. even if you buy the new after it has been released for awhile. the code expires & good luck tring to get a new one from ea.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 20th, 2013 @ 3:28pm

    5 5

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This