RIAA Whines That Google Won't Let It Program Google's Search Algorithm

from the it-must-be-easy-when-you-see-the-world-that-way dept

There's been some discussion about the RIAA's ridiculous report card on Google's "progress" in dealing with infringement. Remember, a year ago, Google promised to take steps to appease the RIAA, even though it wasn't required to under the law. Both Ars Technica and TorrentFreak have good coverage of the ridiculousness of the report card, but I wanted to dive into a few of the specific claims, which just seem laughable. Let's start with the really ridiculous claim that Google isn't doing enough to remove search terms from "autocomplete." As we noted at the time of Google's announcement, this seemed silly and pointless. How would you figure out what words to choose? For example, 10 years ago, the industry would be upset about mp3 -- but now everyone sells unencrypted mp3s. And, indeed, the RIAA seems to believe that certain words that aren't illegal should be associated with infringement:
Autocomplete still suggests terms associated with piracy when a user is searching for a piece of music or a movie. For example, when “lady gaga mp3” is typed into the search bar, autocomplete directs a user to choose “lady gaga mp3 free” or “lady gaga mp3 download,”
Now that's interesting. I didn't realize that "free" and "download" were illegal terms. Especially since Lady Gaga and her manager have both expressed interest in giving away her music for free. It seems that the RIAA's real complaint is that the end result of the searches still points people to some sites that offer infringing works. But that's a totally different complaint. Google could censor the words "free" and "download" and within hours people involved in infringement would come up with alternative words.

The RIAA then goes totally off the rails, insisting that Google needs to pre-screen every mobile app for Android. Sure, Apple does this, but it's why there are so many complaints from iPhone developers. The whole point of Google's more open system is to allow more open innovation. We recognize that anything "open" is horrific to RIAA-types, but for those of us who recognize how innovation works, we'd prefer that Google continue to allow such innovation, rather than putting up a big wall just because the RIAA is too clueless to adapt. It's ridiculously presumptive for the RIAA to presume that it has the right to dictate a big part of Google's setup just to please the RIAA.

Finally, the RIAA whines that Google won't listen to its own suggestions for how Google's algorithm should work.
We don’t understand why Google can’t take delisting notices for a site into account in determining rankings if it uses this information in its other copyright policy activities.
Funny, but I also don't think that the RIAA listens to Google's suggestions on how their labels should sign bands. Why should the RIAA get to determine how Google's algorithm should work?

In the end, this whole thing is a ridiculously obnoxious attempt by the RIAA to pretend that Google "isn't doing enough" when the company already goes significantly beyond what is required under the law (and now generates significant income for the RIAA's labels through things like YouTube's monetization scheme).


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 21st, 2011 @ 11:37am

    Because it's hard, cant someone else do the work for us wah wah. Call a wambulance

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    anonymous, Dec 21st, 2011 @ 11:40am

    why should Google or anyone else do anything at all? the RIAA itself does very little, if anything to help itself, relying entirely on others, at their own expense, to do the 'internet policing' for it. what the RIAA wants is no sites on the 'net unless previously 'ok'd' by them, no search terms allowed unless 'ok'd' by them and no sales of any sort unless 'ok'd' by them. basically, complete control of something that, as usual, they have no right or claim to.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 21st, 2011 @ 11:44am

    Let's be reasonable.

    You wouldn't download a car, would you?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 21st, 2011 @ 11:48am

    In the RIAA's perfect world every item that shows up in a search result would have a 'censor' or 'delist' button that anyone could click on. Just 1 click would remove that search result from the search engine for everyone forever.

    The RIAA is upset that the closest anyone gives them to that is the option to vote up or down individual search results.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      DannyB (profile), Dec 21st, 2011 @ 11:57am

      Re:

      I'm appalled you would think the RIAA would want Google to add Censor and Delist buttons next to search results.

      It is untrue I tell you!




      The RIAA would want Arrest and Jail buttons.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Dec 21st, 2011 @ 12:21pm

      Re:

      Not anyone. It would have to be buttons only they (and maybe fellow accomplices like the MPAA) could use.

      I mean, if anyone could use it, how fast do you think it would take for someone to delist them?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 21st, 2011 @ 11:56am

    The RIAA's arrogance and sense of entitlement is astonishing. They seem to genuinely believe that the world revolves (or should revolve) around them and the recording industry they represent. An individual displaying the same behavior would likely be diagnosed as having narcissistic personality disorder.

    Here's a definition from healthline.com - "Narcissistic personality disorder is a condition in which there is an inflated sense of self-importance and an extreme preoccupation with one's self."


    P.S. Google made HUGE a mistake when they gave in one iota more than the law demanded.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    mischab1, Dec 21st, 2011 @ 12:02pm

    So I went and read the RIAA's report card. I about choked when I saw them complaining that Google should "Stop the Self-Serving Alarmist Rhetoric and Engage in Constructive Dialogue" Do they not recognize their own face when they look at it in the mirror?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 21st, 2011 @ 12:04pm

    I ditched Google search anyway. I primarily use DuckDuckGo now, and only resort to Google when I am really desperate. DuckDuckGo has a %&*#-load of utilities built into it beyond simple search. If you are a programmer, I highly recommend it.

    Here's a link:

    http://duckduckgo.com/

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Don, Dec 21st, 2011 @ 12:04pm

    Google should delist the RIAA and MIAA

    I don't understand why Google hasn't blocked any searches that return the RIAA or MIAA as a search result.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Kevin H (profile), Dec 21st, 2011 @ 12:10pm

      Re: Google should delist the RIAA and MIAA

      that would be what they want in reverse. Thereby proving that it could be done.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      PRMan, Dec 21st, 2011 @ 4:51pm

      Re: Google should delist the RIAA and MIAA

      "I don't understand why Google hasn't bought them all with a leverage buyout just to shut them up already.

      FTFY

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        noko, Dec 22nd, 2011 @ 1:11am

        Re: Re: Google should delist the RIAA and MIAA

        Buying out failing companies is charity towards the top dogs in said company. Buying those guys out would only encourage other failing companies to act as terrible as possible so they can have their turn getting bought out of trouble. And their CEOs would make away with the money.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Colin, Dec 21st, 2011 @ 12:14pm

    Why can't you post comments on their blog? That's disheartening. It's almost like they don't want people calling them out on stuff...but that couldn't possibly be it...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    ervserver (profile), Dec 21st, 2011 @ 12:33pm

    re

    HAHAHA that reads like a grade school report card, complete with whiny teacher complaining about your bratty kid

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 21st, 2011 @ 12:48pm

    Give 'em an inch...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 21st, 2011 @ 12:56pm

    Hey, as long as auto-complete still knows 'free nelson mandela mp3', Google clearly isn't doing enough.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    The Logician (profile), Dec 21st, 2011 @ 1:00pm

    Here's a definition from healthline.com - "Narcissistic personality disorder is a condition in which there is an inflated sense of self-importance and an extreme preoccupation with one's self."

    I believe that definition could be ascribed to most individuals in Hollywood and the entertainment industry, as well as most politicians and many business executives.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    CJ (profile), Dec 21st, 2011 @ 1:08pm

    Stop whining RIAA

    I don't know why the RIAA whines so much they have their lobbyist sitting in congress bowing to their every word. Hell if I could get congress to bow to me I would be happy as hell.
    /s

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    The Coward, Dec 21st, 2011 @ 1:22pm

    Remove ALL References

    Google should remove all references to any big label music for a week or maybe a day just to show the big labels how poorly the music business would fair without Google's help. The real gatekeepers, in our modern age, is in fact Google. A website without a presence, whether it exists or not, has not presence.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Dec 21st, 2011 @ 1:38pm

      Re: Remove ALL References

      The coward got it right. If the RIAA has a problem with the searches Mike listed, just remove any search with Lady Gaga in it. All of them.

      This reminds me of the Belgian case (was that several months ago), where Newspapers got a court order removing links, so Google removed all references to their content. They were pleading to get that fixed within days.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 21st, 2011 @ 2:25pm

    And, indeed, the RIAA seems to believe that certain words that aren't illegal should be associated with infringement:

    Where can I find this list of illegal words.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      TtfnJohn (profile), Dec 21st, 2011 @ 10:17pm

      Re:

      All 12 volumes of the abridged OED.

      Start at A and work your way to Z. Include all cross references to dead or archaic languages.

      You'll ALMOST be there.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 21st, 2011 @ 2:51pm

    the only way they will be happy is when every link on the internet points to their payment processor page.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Fu Man Dew, Dec 21st, 2011 @ 3:23pm

    Nanoseconds lulz

    "More work needs to be done by a company built on its ability to respond to search requests within nanoseconds." I know Google is fast, but nanoseconds? Seriously?

    I think I sense some sarcasm coming from the RIAA, and everybody knows that sarcasm is angers ugly cousin.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 21st, 2011 @ 5:03pm

    Android

    > The RIAA then goes totally off the rails, insisting that Google needs to pre-screen every mobile app for Android.

    Even if they did, Google's Market is not the only "app store" for Android. Android was designed to allow for alternative "app stores", and in fact there are several of them. For instance, see http://f-droid.org/, which specializes in FOSS software. I saw one somewhere which specialized in pornographic applications, which Google does not allow in its Market. And so on.

    And even if every "app store" for Android pre-screened its applications, you do not need to use any "app store". Again, go to the F-Droid website and scroll to the bottom. You will see a QR code, which is a direct link to an Android application. You can either click on the link on your Android phone, or use a barcode scanner application to load the link. It downloads and installs directly, without involving the Market or any other "app store" at all.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      TtfnJohn (profile), Dec 21st, 2011 @ 10:26pm

      Re: Android

      Well, you see, the RIAA is so hung up on restrictive copyright and control (as in total control freaks) that they have no idea what open source software is, what it means or that would mean there's more than one "app" "store" or that Android will run on a host of more devices than just a telephone. Just recomplile and go. Fix the inevitable bugs, then recompile and go again and you can jail break your smart meter the power company thrust on you complete with a nifty GUI!
      That would, of course, make SourceForge a pirate site but I'm sure the RIAA and MPAA consider that it is or at least potentially is. Look at all the stuff there that might just possibly, maybe, could be or might be used for piracy if someone adds a few lines of code!!!

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        tsavory (profile), Dec 22nd, 2011 @ 4:28pm

        Re: Re: Android

        I won't point out what all on SourceForge can end up being labeled as infringing and become targets later on. Those who know what the SOPA and PIPA paths head towards can already see it coming and those that can't never will.(till its hits them in the face)

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    TheSmokingGNU (profile), Dec 22nd, 2011 @ 2:32am

    Ugh!

    Things like this make me despair for the future. I wish more people realized that "piracy" is the new "terrorist" of buzzwords. They'll make a big fuss over it, be made to look like idiots, and come up with a new word... possibly "ponies" or "nanomachines" if you look at what they've freaked out about lately (the point being EVERYTHING. They've gone bananas over everything lately, so who knows what's next?) Also, I've just copyrighted this post, so no reposting or I'll get the government on your ass! :P

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 22nd, 2011 @ 4:14am

    R.I.A.A.

    Real Ignorant Asshats of America

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Jeremy Lyman (profile), Dec 22nd, 2011 @ 5:47am

    Finally some honesty.

    Hey, at least they've started admitting that they don't understand things.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Christopher, Dec 23rd, 2011 @ 7:24pm

    Keywords in RIAA's complaint: "We don't understand"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Invisible_Jester89, Jan 2nd, 2012 @ 5:11pm

    "Lady Gaga and her manager have expressed interest in giving away her music for free."

    Yet another reason why, regardless of what you think about the woman's musical talent, Lady Gaga is awesome.

    If you're so committed to illogical claims, misinformation, and misunderstanding, RIAA, why don't you marry them?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This