The RIAA Was For Freedom Of Speech Before It... >>
<< Why Does The Government Fear Free Speech?
 tdicon 

Movie Industry

by Zachary Knight

Tue, Nov 22nd 2011 8:22am




Filed Under:
batman, batman forever, drm, reviews, ultraviolet, video games

Companies:
warner bros.


How Do You Promote A Bad DRM Scheme? With A Bad Movie Of Course

from the bad-gets-worse dept

Recently, we were talking about the horrible customer reviews that Warner's Ultraviolet DRM was getting. These customers were having such a hard time trying to justify the headache that came from complying with the requirements to watch their legally purchased movies. Warner seems to be trying to make the service worthwhile and is now bundling free digital movies with video games. If you buy Batman: Arkham City, you will also get a digital Batman movie for free. Which movie will you get? Batman Forever of course. Wait. What? If the goal of these promotions is to get people to start using the service, wouldn't you think they would try giving away a movie people would actually want to watch? As opposed to the worst Batman flick ever?

I guess the people running Warner just don't realize that customers want quality content. Sadly, when you are offering crap to customers there really isn't much you can do to polish it up. Maybe the next deal will actually be worth it. Most likely not though.

42 Comments | Leave a Comment

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    icon
    Josh in CharlotteNC (profile), Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 8:24am

    Worst?

    As bad as Batman Forever was, Batman and Robin was worse by an order of magnitude. Clooney as Batman? Arnie? Alicia Silverstone?

    Though I guess it could be worse. They could give away the movie Ultraviolet along with the DRM of the same name.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Donnicton, Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 8:35am

      Re: Worst?

      "Ice" to meet you.

       

      [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Rekrul, Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 9:42am

      Re: Worst?

      Though I guess it could be worse. They could give away the movie Ultraviolet along with the DRM of the same name.

      Still not worse than Batman & Robin. At least Ultraviolet had Milla and some impressive, if somewhat ridiculous, action scenes.

       

      [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Vincent Clement (profile), Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 11:33am

        Re: Re: Worst?

        Most people want to forget that Batman & Robin was ever made.

         

        [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Loki, Nov 23rd, 2011 @ 7:18am

        Re: Re: Worst?

        They could include Dungeons and Dragons. When you make even Jeremy Irons look lame and floppish, you have to qualify as worst directed movie even (although I know there are a lot of M Night Shyamalan detractors who would disagree).

         

        [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Rekrul, Nov 23rd, 2011 @ 10:53am

          Re: Re: Re: Worst?

          Dungeons and Dragons was silly, but at least I didn't want to claw my eye out after watching it. It didn't really strike me as any worse than a bunch of other sword & sorcery movies.

           

          [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      The Groove Tiger (profile), Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 9:53am

      Re: Worst?

      Batman Forever was worse than that movie with the shark repellent bat spray.

       

      [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        GlowInTheDark, Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 10:32am

        Bat Shark Repellent FTW

        Batman Forever was worse than that movie with the shark repellent bat spray.

        The movie in question, the 1966 Batman Movie, scored 86% on RT, one point better than Batman Begins.

         

        [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      DEF (profile), Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 10:51am

      Re: Worst?

      Agreed:

      http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1077027-batman_and_robin/

       

      [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      heyidiot (profile), Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 1:15pm

      Re: Worst?

      Ouch. Oh, my! I forgot about that one...

       

      [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Loki, Nov 23rd, 2011 @ 7:12am

      Re: Worst?

      Thank you. I knew I couldn't be the only one who thought that. I saw Batman Forever like four or five times in a bar with the sound off, and I thought it was decent. Then I heard it with sound, and realized the dialog could have used some serious work.

      By contrast, Batman and Robin just sucked all the way around. The action sucked. The acting sucked. The dialog sucked. If I'd been in that movie I'd leave it off my resume.

       

      [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    el_segfaulto (profile), Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 8:27am

    Yes...

    I agree with the sentiment, but Batman and Robin would have been far worse. It's up there with Crystal Skull, and the Star Wars Holiday Special. Batman Forever was bad...but not epically bad.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Donnicton, Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 8:27am

    ....huh.


    How do you promote a bad DRM scheme? Bundle it with a game that features a bad DRM scheme! BRILLIANT!

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    RD, Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 8:28am

    Not the worst Batman

    Worst Batman movie on that chart maybe, but Batman and Robin is far and away worser. Both are directed by Joel Schumacher, who is otherwise a capable director, but should never have been let anywhere near a comic movie, he doesnt have the sensibility for it. He thought it would be a hoot (and of interest to ANYONE) to return Batman to the yuck yuck 60's style, after everyone and their mother had spent the intervening 30 years bringing Bats back to his darker, more serious roots. He single-handedly ruined the franchise until Nolan rescued it a decade later. The Nolan movies almost didn't get made because of the travesty that was the Schumacher Batman's, that's how bad they are.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Rekrul, Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 9:50am

      Re: Not the worst Batman

      Worst Batman movie on that chart maybe, but Batman and Robin is far and away worser. Both are directed by Joel Schumacher, who is otherwise a capable director, but should never have been let anywhere near a comic movie, he doesnt have the sensibility for it.

      Several years ago, I was talking to a guy who writes freelance articles for various SciFi/Action movie magazines, and who was at the premiere of Batman & Robin with Schumacher in attendance. He said that as soon as the movie ended, the audience started yelling "Kill Joel Schumacher!"

      I've seen Tim Burton's Batman films several times each and still enjoy them. I've only ever watched Schumacher's Batman films once each.

      However, contrary to most others, I didn't really care for Batman Begins and I still haven't watched The Dark Knight.

       

      [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    :Lobo Santo (profile), Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 8:30am

    I cannot help but wonder...

    I cannot help but wonder where the "Batman XXX: A Porn Parody" would fall on the above graphic ranking the popularity of various Batman movies...

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    PaulT (profile), Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 8:32am

    "the worst Batman flick ever"

    How did you miss Batman & Robin? 13% on RT...

    http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1077027-batman_and_robin/

    Anyway, maybe this is a reverse attempt at promoting the DRM. After all, if nobody wants to watch the crappy movie, nobody will notice the DRM and thus they can say they didn't get complaints about it.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    BeachBumCowboy, Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 8:35am

    Batman and Robin...

    13% on the rotten tomato meter. At 44%, Batman Forever looks like Citizen Kane in comparison.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Phil, Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 8:43am

    Kids movies

    Ever watch a kids movie lately? #DRM is used to force advertising on impressionable kids. 30-60 mins of forced ads? #copyrightabuse

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Another AC, Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 9:09am

      Re: Kids movies

      On most of my childrens' DVD's you can skip the ads pushing you to buy other DVD's at least. Can't say the same for all the FBI warnings my children don't understand (or care about, really).

       

      [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 9:47am

      Re: Kids movies

      This is why I'm teaching my granddaughter how to download: I really don't want her subjected to all those commercials. With any luck, I'll have her sufficiently-well trained in the ways of proxies, torrents, anonymizers and Unix by the age of 15-16 that she'll be able to pass it on.

       

      [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Lawrence D'Oliveiro, Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 2:09pm

      Re: Kids movies

      It’s all right, you can turn off Twitter mode while you’re here. And there’s no 140-character limit, you can write at length with no need to

       

      [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    anonymous, Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 8:44am

    it just goes to show
    a) how out of touch the movie studios are
    b) exactly what they think of their customers

    giving away a 16 year old movie if it's any good is one thing, but this???!!! absolute crock of s**t!

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Rob, Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 8:45am

    Movies worth it

    The list of movies worth getting with ultraviolet (counting all movies ever printed, not just ones currently available) listed below with equal signs above and below the list.

    ===
    ===

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Rikuo (profile), Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 8:52am

    "I guess the people running Warner just don't realize that customers want"

    I guess the people running Warner just don't realize at all what customers want, and even if they did, don't want to satisfy the market.

    FTFY

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Chris-Mouse (profile), Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 8:59am

    This fits right in with Warner's business model

    After all, their business model seems to be "extract the maximum number of dollars in exchange for the minimum amount of value"

    They're giving away stuff that they otherwise can't sell. They wouldn't want to give away good movies, those can be sold, oops, licensed for money.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    gorehound (profile), Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 9:00am

    The best idea of rus all is to avoid the RIAA & MPAA altogether.And they will be avoided once this Country realizes that these assholes are behind SOPA & PROTECT-IP ACT and their big money has now stolen their precious freedom away.
    How will the people react to you then MAFIAA when the truth is clear to see and can not be hidden away ?

    Throw them Politicians all out I say and so do millions of others.
    End Money Lobbying
    End Big Money Donations to Politicians/PAC Groups and other Political Groups/Political Parties
    Set Term Limits
    End Corruption
    Vote Smarter in 2012
    Maybe even force Democrats and Republicans out with new faces or Parties

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Zangetsu (profile), Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 9:35am

    Polishing Crap

    I object. You stated "Sadly, when you are offering crap to customers there really isn't much you can do to polish it up"

    Mythbusters showed that you can polish crap. I submit that this is the reason why UltraViolet DRM exists.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Nigel (profile), Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 9:53am

    while I am clearly with the pitchforks and torches crowd on this stuff I will at least give them credit for trying something, anything. Nice whack at it but try again please.
    Nigel

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Leander (profile), Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 11:07am

      Re:

      I have a couple of WB movies with the "free digital copy insde" And in my experience they do not deserve points for trying, because they're not.
      It's so horribly bad and broken I gave up using this crap. The download is slow, the website used for registering is user-unfriendly, and (my personal favourite) once you download the file, the DRM system prohibits you from moving the file to another directory or disk.

      I wonder: didn't someone at WB download a torrent from a movie to see what the appeal was?

       

      [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Chronno S. Trigger (profile), Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 10:07am

    Batman Forever?

    We got Under the Red Hood when we got Arkham City. Still had the same stupid DRM and we still didn't watch it.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Allomancer (profile), Nov 23rd, 2011 @ 12:21am

      Re: Batman Forever?

      Well, I'm not really going to recommend watching anything with the Ultraviolet DRM, but I watched Under the Red Hood on Netflix Instant and it was pretty decent. Don't know if it's still on there, though.

       

      [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 10:44am

    So, Ultraviolet is like a... reverse... garbage truck? It brings garbage to your house for free?

    I'm confused.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    PRMan, Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 11:33am

    Ironic

    They could have given away any of the excellent Animated Batman movies (Mask of the Phantasm, SubZero, Batman Beyond: Return of the Joker). Excellent movies that most people haven't seen.

    As a freebee, who would complain that it's a cartoon?

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Ed, Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 12:13pm

    Forever is not the Worst

    Batman Forever is a masterpiece compared to Batman and Robin !!

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 4:28pm

    Self-Inflicted Injury

    Why do people even bother trying things with DRM in them, these days? If something requires you to use a DRM scheme, then stay away. It is that simple. DRM is a deal killer, every time.

    As for infecting your computer with DRM, just so you can watch a Hollywood movie, what were you thinking? Hollywood movies are directed at 17-year-old boys. Grow up, people. Pay attention to computer security. The security problems of DRM schemes are well known.

    Do not buy anything with DRM in it. Just walk away. The only exceptions to this rule are:

    1. The item has primary useful functions which you can use without involving the DRM. Then the DRM just increases the cost of the item slightly without adversely affecting its utility. For example, SD cards.

    2. The DRM has been comprehensively broken for years. So, DVDs are OK, but blu-ray is not, because blu-ray has not been broken well enough for long enough.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    The Devil's Coachman (profile), Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 5:44pm

    One thing about Warner I never understood

    Since all they make is shit, how is bundling more shit with their shit antithetical to their business model? Shit plus shit - shit!

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
The RIAA Was For Freedom Of Speech Before It... >>
<< Why Does The Government Fear Free Speech?
 tdicon 
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
A word from our Sponsors...
Sponsored Resource
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat

A word from our Sponsors...
Recent Stories

Friday

12:45pm: If You Thought Copyright Was A Mess On Earth, What Does It Look Like In Space? (12)
11:45am: Guy Sues Twitter For Taking Away His Twitter Handle (8)
10:40am: Copyright... Patent... It's All The Same To The World's Third-Largest News Agency (32)
9:37am: Ex-Prenda Lawyer Brett Gibbs Pleads Poverty To Judge Wright (32)
8:40am: Another CA Cop Thinks A Cell Phone Might Be A Dangerous Weapon (48)
7:33am: RIAA: The Copyright Reform We Need Is To Make Everyone Else Copyright Cops (86)
5:36am: Ron Paul Doesn't Win RonPaul.com And Is Guilty Of Reverse Domain Hijacking (33)
3:31am: President Obama Is 'Troubled' About Chilling Effects His Own Administration Is Causing To Journalism? (56)

Thursday

11:20pm: Yet Another Anti-Patent Troll Bill Introduced In Congress (13)
8:19pm: District Attorney And Major TV Network Sued Over Stupid Reality Show (11)
More arrow
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This