Mainstream Press Account In Australia Makes The Case For Why 'Piracy' Is Not The Problem

from the a-wonderful-essay dept

You don't quite expect to see this sort of thing on a mainstream press source, but ABC, down in Australia, has a feature piece entitled, The case for piracy, which sounds quite similar to many of the things we tend to talk about. It argues that the old school opinion that "piracy bad, copyright good" may not be particularly accurate -- and, in fact, it could be argued that "copyright owners" are in many ways their own worst enemies. If you think that sounds like the same thing we've been saying for over a decade, then you're correct -- but you probably haven't seen something like this show up in the mainstream press.

Much of the article focuses on how various industries abuse copyright to do anti-consumer activities, and how infringement is often the only way around it -- even for people who want to pay. The article also covers the recording industry's own suicidal tendencies.
Rather than give customers what they wanted publishers threw every toy they had out of the pram and hit the litigation button. One example saw the recording industry sue a 12-year old girl and won $2000. From her point of view she was simply using a free service on the internet that all her friends were using and discussing. One wonders how happy the recording industry was with its $2000 payout. Over the years industry bodies have spent far more money suing people than they recouped through the courts.

One of the main reasons we all have anti-piracy slogans embedded in our brains is because the music industry chose to try and protect its existing market and revenue streams at all costs and marginalise and vilify those who didn't want to conform to the harsh new rules being set.
It really is a fantastic piece. Kudos to ABC for running it, and to writer Nick Ross for publishing such an article.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    icon
    usul_of_arakis (profile), Oct 20th, 2011 @ 12:54pm

    "One wonders how happy the recording industry was with its $2000 payout"

    Overjoyed if I remember rightly, but not as happy as their Lawyers.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Another AC, Oct 20th, 2011 @ 1:37pm

      If anything I'd think the lawyers would be disappointed with *only* winning $2000... at their hourly rates that pays for a fraction of the time they probably put into it :)

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased) (profile), Oct 20th, 2011 @ 1:41pm

        Re:

        The lawyers were happy...they still got paid. Their employers (recording industry) only got $2k and a legal precedent of sorts...which completely stopped piracy in Australia (sarc).

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        usul_of_arakis (profile), Oct 20th, 2011 @ 1:50pm

        Re:

        Forgive me if I'm wrong, but since the case was won, don't the Lawyers get their full fee?

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    william (profile), Oct 20th, 2011 @ 1:18pm

    I thought we live in an age that businesses understand goodwill.

    Imagine how much business they'll lose from that 12 year old girl in the next 60 years, including her friends, and her families, and some of the people who heard the story.

    All that for a mere $2000.

    Meanwhile, all current copyright infringers rocks on.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Oct 20th, 2011 @ 1:22pm

      Re:

      You don't think that, for at least a few seconds "all her friends" stopped using that pirate service?

      It's pretty sad when there is no balance in a story, no comments on the money lost, the stores closed, and the recorded music industry decimated by piracy.

      It's just insane.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Oct 20th, 2011 @ 1:24pm

        Re: Re:

        "It's pretty sad when there is no balance in a story, no comments on the money lost, the stores closed, and the recorded music industry decimated by the new internet markets."

        ftfy

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Oct 20th, 2011 @ 1:57pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          Hey fuckhead, piracy is not a "new internet market", it's just people taking something for nothing.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, Oct 20th, 2011 @ 2:22pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            oh right because all the new digital ways to acquire shit legally had nothing to do with the disapperence of brick and motor stores. I mean itunes barely sells any music right? There is no correlation between the decrease of cd sales and the increase of digital sales.

            Sure before the internet you had to go to a store to buy a cd, now you don't but that ease of purchase and the ability to pick individual tracks kind of sucks so why wouldn't everyone leave the house to go to a store and buy 14 tracks for the one they like?

            But i know i know "you have no right" "me me me" "theft" yada yada yada. http://www.buggy-whips.com/

            oh yeah i forgot to call you a name because if I do that i dont need any facts or anything, hmmm....pooface!

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            Planespotter (profile), Oct 20th, 2011 @ 2:23pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            taking a copy of something for nothing.

            ftfy.

            Oh and I'm pretty sure the arrival of the digital era and minimal distribution cost put paid to the need of record shops, video stores etc... doesn't matter, industries report greater revenues, more product year on year and people made redundant go find another job.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              Anonymous Coward, Oct 20th, 2011 @ 6:47pm

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              " industries report greater revenues, more product year on year and people made redundant go find another job."

              How is that recession thing working out for you?

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              Anonymous Coward, Oct 20th, 2011 @ 6:47pm

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              " industries report greater revenues, more product year on year and people made redundant go find another job."

              How is that recession thing working out for you?

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              •  
                identicon
                Anonymous Coward, Oct 20th, 2011 @ 10:10pm

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

                >How is that recession thing working out for you?

                For the man on the street, not very well. On the other hand, the recording and film industries report record-breaking profits every year... so they seem to be doing fine.

                Guess who's going to get more sympathy.

                 

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Oct 20th, 2011 @ 1:27pm

        Re: Re:

        Haha.

        iTunes would have killed brick-and-mortar music stores even if no one ever shared a single song.

        As for the rest of it, the music industry is doing fine. The publishing industry however is no longer necessary. They hang on only through inertia and extortion.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Planespotter (profile), Oct 20th, 2011 @ 1:34pm

        Re: Re:

        Are you a human... or some RIAA Turing project?

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Spaceboy (profile), Oct 20th, 2011 @ 1:37pm

        Re: Re:

        Speaking of jobs lost, how many radio people were put out of work because of TV?

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Planespotter (profile), Oct 20th, 2011 @ 1:45pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          Doesn't matter... they just go get some other job, it's not like these people don't do anything ever again, not like some massive human scrapheap full of people who's jobs have been lost due to innovation or a change in the way things happen.

          That's why the AC's comment doesn't matter.. things change, deal with it.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            That Anonymous Coward (profile), Oct 20th, 2011 @ 6:57pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            That would make an awesome image...
            A human scrap yard of people who lost work because of innovation. Forced to sit around and do nothing because we can't allow them to adapt. Would be an epic painting.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Oct 20th, 2011 @ 1:41pm

        Re: Re:

        Maybe if you actually had any facts to back up the "money lost, stores closed, and recorded music industry decimated" you could get some balance.

        But you don't.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Oct 20th, 2011 @ 3:24pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          Maybe if you keep trying, you can convince some fool that those facts are incorrect.

          But I doubt it.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, Oct 20th, 2011 @ 7:27pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            No need to try, those facts are in fact not facts but fabrications.

            There is no other way to explain huge profits never seen before in the middle of a recession cycle is there?

            You can't loose potential, you can't loose what you never achieved, what is this the pre-profit-bureau?

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Karl (profile), Oct 20th, 2011 @ 10:44pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          Maybe if you actually had any facts to back up the "money lost, stores closed, and recorded music industry decimated" you could get some balance.

          Actually, that's not the problem with his sentence. The problem is "by piracy."

          The record stores were closing long before piracy came about. Deliberately so, by record labels who stopped dealing with them, and dealt with folks like Best Buy instead.

          The internet was the nail in the coffin, really. And not "internet piracy," but iTunes and Amazon, and specifically the "un-bundling" of songs from full-length albums.

          The people that are hit the hardest, actually, are radio stations - since everyone listens to Pandora, Last.fm, or Spotify now. Of course, most DJ's had already been laid off when Clear Channel monopolized the industry.

          Frankly, the recording industry has been run by such incompetent, short-term-thinking, artist-destroying yahoos for so long, it's a wonder they lasted as long as they did.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        John Fenderson (profile), Oct 20th, 2011 @ 1:43pm

        Re: Re:

        You don't think that, for at least a few seconds "all her friends" stopped using that pirate service?


        Maybe for a few seconds, but almost certainly not any longer than that.

        And I don't know about the recorded music industry being decimated. Probably the legacy industry, but I see more high-quality recorded music, in greater variety, being produced now than I can remember in my nearly 50 years. Most of it isn't coming from the legacy industry, but there's a lot more, and a lot better, in the "industry" than the old school.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased) (profile), Oct 20th, 2011 @ 1:45pm

        Re: Re:

        no comments on the money lost, the stores closed, and the recorded music industry decimated by piracy

        And it only took a 12-year-old girl and her friends to do all that. Wow! Piracy is really evil!!! Either that or there is something wrong with how the recording industry makes money.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        btr1701 (profile), Oct 20th, 2011 @ 1:55pm

        Re: Re: Decimation

        > and the recorded music industry decimated by piracy.

        Seems to me the recorded music industry is doing just fine. It's only the disc makers that are seeing the end of days.

        But even if I take you at your word for the sake of argument, a decimated industry is still doing pretty good. "Decimate" means "to reduce by 10%", so if the recorded music industry is only decimated by piracy, it means they're still 90% strong.

        Hardly a crippling blow.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Oct 20th, 2011 @ 3:25pm

          Re: Re: Re: Decimation

          That's because you have no fucking idea what you're talking about.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, Oct 20th, 2011 @ 3:59pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Decimation

            Decimation is a reduction of 10%. The horror!

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            BeeAitch (profile), Oct 20th, 2011 @ 4:20pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Decimation

            Good argument!

            Let me guess, you were captain of the debate team?

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            btr1701 (profile), Oct 21st, 2011 @ 10:46am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Decimation

            > That's because you have no fucking idea what
            > you're talking about.

            Wow. Behold the irony. Crack a book once in a while, jackass.

            The word 'decimate' comes from the practice in the Roman legions whereby Caesar would have one out of every ten soldiers executed if they lost a battle. Therfore, to 'decimate' means to reduce by 1/10th.

            The fact that people today have no idea what the word actually means and misuse it to mean 'completely wipe out' or 'destroy' hardly means I have no idea what I'm talking about. Quite the opposite, actually.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Oct 20th, 2011 @ 2:14pm

        Re: Re:

        the money lost, the stores closed, and the recorded music industry decimated by piracy


        ... by a 12-year-old girl and her friends?

        So you're saying that a dozen members of the 12-year-old demographic was able to singlehandedly "decimate" the entire music industry and close music stores? That's some heavy purchasing power they have!

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Some Guy, Oct 20th, 2011 @ 2:23pm

        Re: Re:

        "It's pretty sad when there is no balance in a story, no comments on the money lost, the stores closed, and the recorded music industry decimated by piracy."

        Really? You're going to go with that after 10+ years of listening to "lost sales", "piracy is killing the industry", "piracy is theft", "won't somebody please think of the artists", etc.

        And you're saying ONE goddamn article from Australia is not being balanced? Wow. Lol. Man, seek help. Reality waved bye bye to you a long time ago apparently. (And yes, I went with the partial insult just cause I can. Well, mostly because of your asinine comment if I'm going to be truly honest. Which is something apparently you can't do.)

        "No balance in a story..." [chuckles softly to himself as he shakes his head in wonderment at the things some people say]

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Planespotter (profile), Oct 20th, 2011 @ 3:20pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          The BPI "Home taping is killing music" campaign was started in the 80's... so to be fair it's at least 30 years of "lost sales", "piracy is killing the industry", "piracy is theft", "won't somebody please think of the artists".

          No wonder no one is listening any more.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        PaulT (profile), Oct 21st, 2011 @ 12:56am

        Re: Re:

        "You don't think that, for at least a few seconds "all her friends" stopped using that pirate service?"

        Maybe. What makes you think they suddenly started spending money on legal services as opposed to simply switching to a different piracy method, or free legal methods of listening?Or, of course, boycotting the music industry in favour of another form of entertainment?

        "no comments on the money lost"

        What money lost? There's still never been any proof that piracy actually loses the industry money other than an assumption based on a correlation. Every study that "proves" losses has been based on made-up numbers and/or faulty methodology.

        The industry's almost certainly "lost" more money by people having a wider choice of entertainment and being able to "unbundle" their purchases than as a direct result of piracy. Of course, I have the same level of proof to prove my view as you have to prove yours, so mileage may vary.

        "the stores closed"

        Physical stores closed, yes, but digital stores opened to replace them. Why do you people always think the physical ones are the only important ones?

        "the recorded music industry decimated by piracy"

        Another assumption, and a failure to recognise that the music industry consists of more than plastic disc manufacturers. Typical.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Ninja (profile), Oct 21st, 2011 @ 3:59am

        Re: Re:

        Oh the troll. No they didn't. They just got a slap from their parents (or not) and kept sharing more carefully.

        There's no comment on the money lost, decimation of the music industry and the apocalypse because there's no such a thing. Simple as that.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Karl (profile), Oct 21st, 2011 @ 11:43pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          There's no comment on the money lost, decimation of the music industry and the apocalypse because there's no such a thing.

          Hey, now you're thinking like modern artists.

          Well, unless you're being sarcastic. But I hope that's not the case, because the music industry has been complaining about the "apocalypse" since, at least, cassette tapes have existed.

          Let's be frank. The reason the recording industry (and not any other music industry) has been losing money, is because consumers have been allowed to buy singles, and not full albums. Piracy has nothing to do with it.

          So, it's entirely appropriate that "there's no comment on the money lost," since this article has absolutely zero to do with "lost" money. It has everything to do with people who sit in boardrooms and are idiots.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Flash Freddy, Oct 21st, 2011 @ 7:08am

        Re: Re:

        As technology changes so do jobs - it is a simple matter of fact and has little or nothing to do with copyright. The ridiculous attempt to criminalizing everybody under the age of 35 is looking increasingly anachronistic as the technology continues to move on reguardless of their protestations.

        The Big 5 have lost money hand over fist for musicians in the last decade. Real companies provide services - dieing companies engage in lawsuits. Their big moan in this situation is that they do not control the patents - the music industry is used to holding the patents and carving up regions based on cosy patent and licensing agreements - that is what this argument was always about - a substantial lose of power due to an inability to change with the times. They seem incapable of changing which is understandable given the size of the monopolies they control.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    anonymous, Oct 20th, 2011 @ 1:21pm

    what a shame that the US and UK press dont have the balls to publish similar articles. it is about time that the entertainment industries views weren't the only ones that were put into mainstream print!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Chargone (profile), Oct 20th, 2011 @ 3:10pm

      Re:

      ehh, given previous articles here, i think the main reason it's not done in the US is because the newspaper companies like to abuse the hell out of copyright too, and don't want to undermine their own position.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Oct 20th, 2011 @ 5:49pm

        Re: Re:

        In the US most of the paper and TV news companies ARE the content companies.

        CNN: Owned by Time Warner a major player in film and television content
        MSNBC: Owned by NBCUniversal a major player film (Universal Studios) and television (NBC) content which is, itself, owned by Comcast and GE.
        Fox News: Owned by Fox, a major player in television, and Fox is obviously own by News Corp who is a major player in newspaper and magazines.
        USA Today: Owned by the Gannett company who owns, in addition to dozens of other city papers, several tv stations as well as other digital media properties.
        The Wall Street Journal: Also own by News Corp
        NYT: Still a legacy holdout from when individual families dominated the newspaper scene.

        Honestly the only reason this editorial was even published by a news outlet at all is because ABC is like NPC, it's a publicly own broadcasting company.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    weneedhelp (profile), Oct 20th, 2011 @ 1:33pm

    ABC:

    We are sorry to announce that Nick Ross will no longer be with us due to creative differences. We are sorry to see him go. - ABC

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Gwiz (profile), Oct 20th, 2011 @ 2:33pm

      Re: ABC:

      We are sorry to announce that Nick Ross will no longer be with us due to creative differences. We are sorry to see him go. - ABC

      Lol. My first thought was why the heck is Disney allowing this - then I Wikapedia-ed "ABC Australia" and realized that it's the Australian Broadcasting Corp. - run by the Australian government, not the ABC in the US owned by Disney.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 20th, 2011 @ 6:39pm

    What non-Australian (especially US) readers might not appreciate at first is that this article accounts for piracy from an Australian perspective.

    Since we don't produce anywhere near enough hours of TV to cover e.g. sixteen (free-to-air) channels at 24 hours each and however many cinemas, most of our movies and TV movies which isn't sport, news, community interest or local remakes of overseas stuff comes in directly from overseas - predominantly from the US and the UK. (Not that we can't make good movies or TV down here - we just can't make as much of it.)

    Legitimate ways of getting "current" content are often lacking, pricing is comparatively inflated and as consumers with a clue we don't feel obliged to put up with the incompetence of our local content providers if there's an alternative.

    We sometimes face months (if not years) of waiting for TV shows and movies to arrive on our screens - if at all. Top Gear and QI both took years to show up down here. The problem is that we're very much aware of the existence of the content in the first place because we have overseas news telling us how awesome it is. So of course we're going to go off and find it for ourselves - local providers miss out on our custom one way or the other, whether it's through piracy or importing things from overseas (whether they're available here for significantly more or not available here at all).

    As for DVD/Blu-Ray, it's not much sunnier - a few years ago, the national consumer watchdog (ACCC) decreed that DVD/Blu-ray players down here must be region-unlockable or unlocked at purchase. Compared with the range of stuff released for region 1 and 2, region 4 misses out on so much. (Blu-ray's a bit less rubbish since Australia gets lumped in the same region as Europe and the UK.)

    The impact of shipping things in from overseas due to price/timing disparity compared to what we have locally is having a noticeable effect on the bricks-and-mortar shops as well - entire chains of bookstores and CD/DVD stores have folded recently since our currency's been at parity with USD. It's almost always cheaper to hit up Book Depository or Amazon UK/US and pay (often no) shipping than shop locally, and the range is better too. Some local shops even have region 1 or 2 discs on the shelf; that's how rubbish region 4 is.

    The release schedules for games are usually much kinder - places like Steam are a godsend - but don't get me started on regional video game pricing. (AU$90 for a US$50 game - sold digitally? While the two currencies are at parity? Very funny, EA.) Indies are levelling the playing field when it comes to that, so there's at least that.

    Major record labels, studios and publishers are treating Australian DVD/CD shops, cinemas and bookstores far worse than copyright infringement ever could, in my opinion, if they can't compete with overseas. As the iiNet vs AFACT case seems to prove, Big IP would rather not spend the money to solve the TV/movie problem in this particular territory and increase their legitimate revenue streams in the process. (They'd also rather not let on that it's USA Big IP vs Australia. Thanks for blowing the lid off that, Wikileaks.)

    So take all that into account when you read the ABC piece for added perspective. If you're in the USA where the movies are in the cinema that week, or the show is on TV that night, you're not necessarily going to understand so much where Nick's article is coming from.

    Incidentally, the ABC's position (think of it as the Australian counterpart to the BBC) as a government-funded entity allows them not to be beholden to corporate interests but only to the Australian public interest - this is how they can run pieces like that. :)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Oct 20th, 2011 @ 6:50pm

      Re:

      The problem of Australia is pretty simple: Small market, small money. You aren't going to get 24 hours a day of locally produced content.

      The result? Piracy doesn't "hurt" Australia anywhere near as much, because you aren't pirating yourselves, you are pirating others.

      It's like China and the patent issue - they don't worry about patents for now, because they are really only taking from others. Give them a while, and they will turn into Japan, paranoid and protectionist.

      When you have little or no skin in the game, it's not hard to play wildly.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        That Anonymous Coward (profile), Oct 20th, 2011 @ 7:08pm

        Re: Re:

        Small market, Small money?
        so that explains the price gouging on products?
        on creating a system that forces them to wait even longer for content to protect them from importing "cheap" discs from elsewhere?

        Region coding was going to be the panacea for all of this...
        We can sell good at the right price for the market because no bad people can take advantage of the cheaper goods and move them elsewhere. Instead they use the region coding to charge more at every chance, ignore any consumer demand and keep being idiots about it.

        and if 21,874,900ish people is to small a market to bother with with your entire industry "dying"... you need to die faster.

        Seems like an amazing place to setup a bluray/dvd pressing facility and just have the content shipped over that new fangled interwebs thingy and meet the market demand, seems less costly than spending millions trying to change laws to punish consumers who are just being undeserved.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Ninja (profile), Oct 21st, 2011 @ 6:35am

          Re: Re: Re:

          That. If 21 million ppl is small then I can't even begin to imagine what's big. He's a more educated and subtle troll.

          It is obvious MAFIAA will dismiss and try to discredit this study and the source. Will they manage to do it? Dunno, I have yet to see the thing and evaluate the method used to come up with the entire thing. One thing is certain: MAFIAA studies are bogus. It takes just a peek at the sampling and premises used and you'll get enough evidence to discredit them. And if you are sane and reasonable, when you listen to the MAFIAA moaning about trillions lost in Australia you already know there's something wrong.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Oct 20th, 2011 @ 7:33pm

        Re: Re:

        Japan was always paranoid and protectionist what are you talking about?

        On the good news I just ripped THOR, do you want a copy? I have to warn you thought that it is lame.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        B Pickel (profile), Oct 22nd, 2011 @ 6:55am

        Re: Re:

        You could be right that it might be a small market (compared to other places with a population of 21 million /sarc) but I haven't seen the local TV/movie mobs complaining about their losses in "this" small market

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Jay (profile), Oct 22nd, 2011 @ 9:56pm

      Re:

      Gaming - Look into Gog which took off the regionalization for games. You'll have a great delivery system that you can price match with the UK or the US for the best one.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    The Logician (profile), Oct 21st, 2011 @ 7:10am

    Fascinating how, as they grow more desperate, copyright maximalist commentors bring less cohesion to their arguments and more insults. And nothing to back up what they say, although that has always been a failing of theirs. I believe they know their time is almost up, and that we who seek more sensible government and policies will not tolerate their irrational behavior for much longer. In thinking about our situation, I am reminded of the poet Langston Hughes:

    What happens to a dream deferred?

    Does it dry up
    like a raisin in the sun?
    Or fester like a soreó
    And then run?
    Does it stink like rotten meat?
    Or crust and sugar overó
    like a syrupy sweet?

    Maybe it just sags
    like a heavy load.

    Or does it explode?


    How long until that happens with us, I wonder? How long until the pressure upon us becomes so great that it can no longer be contained? I do not believe it is as far off as some might think.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This