Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

1.  

   Amazing!

   

   PW (profile), Oct 7th, 2011 @ 4:21pm

   
   

   It baffles the mind how they think themselves so above humanity as to believe that everyone should believe what they say despite the numerous breaches of trust we've seen from this and other gov't departments over just the past 10 yrs, and even worse over the past few since the Wikileaks document release. Crazy.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

2.  

   Pff

   

   Jeffhole (profile), Oct 7th, 2011 @ 4:38pm

   
   

   K, so even if they don't abuse the information (laughable claim), what exactly makes them think that other people won't get ahold of it and abuse it? The DHS doesn't have a good enough reputation when it comes to...anything...for me to believe that there won't be a cablegate-like leak. 10 million people probably just fired up a new version of LOIC...

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

3.  

   

   Anonymous Coward, Oct 7th, 2011 @ 5:38pm

   
   

   It's not particularly convincing.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

4.  

   Yay for recursion

   

   TechnoMage (profile), Oct 7th, 2011 @ 5:44pm

   
   

   recursiveFunction(){ recursiveFunction(); }

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

5.  

   DHS Goes Ahead With 'Pre-Crime' Detection Project

   

   Anonymous Anonymous Coward, Oct 7th, 2011 @ 6:07pm

   
   

   Did everyone here miss this, this morning?
   
   http://yro.slashdot.org/story/11/10/07/151258/dhs-goes-ahead-with-pre-crime-detection-proj ect
   
   They NEED those data to make sure they can predict your next act.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

6.  

   what DHS needs...

   

   Njdobber (profile), Oct 7th, 2011 @ 6:23pm

   
   

   is Chuck Norris as spokesman... no one would ever question anything...ever...

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

7.  

   Re: what DHS needs...

   

   Dementia (profile), Oct 7th, 2011 @ 7:42pm

   
   

   No, what DHS needs is a good Chuck Norris round kick to the head.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

8.  

   "Privacy for them *seems* to have been violated."

   

   Valis (profile), Oct 7th, 2011 @ 8:21pm

   
   

   The sheer arrogance of these people is just astonishing.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

9.  

   same old same old

   

   mrtraver (profile), Oct 7th, 2011 @ 8:50pm

   
   

   But...but...piracy!

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

10.  

    

    That Anonymous Coward (profile), Oct 8th, 2011 @ 4:44am

    
    

    Is this the same DHS that claimed
    -theft by their employees was not happening?
    -agents are well trained and professional while one was pulling people over on the roads?
    -that the searches are random, but they always manage to get "muslim looking" and the very pretty girls for extra screening?
    -still professional while offering to move people in line in a wheelchair to skip them ahead, but if you don't offer enough cash they get loud and abusive?
    -that photography is not allowed, even when handed the official DHS policy documents?
    -that feeling up children needed to be done?
    -it was ok that several checkpoints missed test bombs repeatedly?
    -that the radiation dose had been tested and was safe, until it was proven there was no such testing of the actual units.
    -that developed no maintenance plans for the pronoscanners?
    -that has millions in equipment collecting dust in a warehouse after it was shown it did not work as promised, but they keep paying out the full contract?
    
    Given the record of DHS behavior, I do not see how anyone can trust anything they tell us. They are an overreaction to a horrible terrorist event, but they are rapidly creating the same amount of terror in citizens they seek to stop.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

11.  

    Re: same old same old

    

    Anonymous American, Oct 8th, 2011 @ 5:27am

    
    

    But... but... privacy!

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

12.  

    Re:

    

    Atkray (profile), Oct 8th, 2011 @ 8:19pm

    
    

    "but they are rapidly creating the same amount of terror in citizens they seek to stop."
    
    So they are meeting 100% of their mission goals.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

13.  

    Why would anyone...

    

    Thomas (profile), Oct 12th, 2011 @ 8:47am

    
    

    trust DHS or any government "security" agency? The DHS steasl stuff that goes through their screening, fondles young girls in ways that would send ordinary people to prison for long terms, etc, I am far more afraid of my own government's "security" agencies than any terrorist group.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment