UK Music Retailers Ask Why They Should Pay Performance Licenses To Play Music When They're Trying To Sell The Music

from the seems-like-a-fair-point dept

We've had plenty of stories about music collections agencies shaking down various businesses for playing music -- and over in the UK a fight is apparently brewing over whether or not music retailers should have to pay such fees. As you might imagine, the collection agencies say of course such retailers should pay. But the retailers point out that they're trying to sell the music directly and letting them play the music freely will help them do that. Apparently (I had no idea), in the US, record stores have an exemption from paying licensing agencies. But not so in the UK.
"These license fees imposed on record stores are iniquitous and in my view should be abolished," said UK-based Entertainment Retail Association (ERA) president Paul Quirk in a speech to members on Wednesday, while squarely pointing to "industry bodies like PRS and PPL who still pursue record stores for license fees in order to play music, promote music and ultimately to sell music."
Can you imagine running any other business this way? A bakery that wants to sell you cakes, but has to pay a separate "performance rights fee" to the baker? Don't see that working..


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 28th, 2011 @ 2:49am

    Yo dawg, heard you like music licences so we put music licences in your music licences so you can pay while you pay.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    icon
    That Anonymous Coward (profile), Sep 28th, 2011 @ 2:50am

    Free music promotion is killing music sales....

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    icon
    Richard (profile), Sep 28th, 2011 @ 2:56am

    If they play only cc/pd music in the shop

    If they play only cc/pd music in the shop as a protest - that might skew sales a bit and make the rights agencies think twice.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    icon
    The eejit (profile), Sep 28th, 2011 @ 3:02am

    Re: If they play only cc/pd music in the shop

    Nah, they'll just blame it on the pirates.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 28th, 2011 @ 3:26am

    "UK Music Retailers Ask Why They Should Pay Performance Licenses To Play Music When They're Trying To Sell The Music"

    Because if people could actually hear the music they may actually buy it, duh! How dumb are you freetards

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    icon
    Spaceboy (profile), Sep 28th, 2011 @ 3:53am

    Re: "UK Music Retailers Ask Why They Should Pay Performance Licenses To Play Music When They're Trying To Sell The Music"

    Why would people pay for music when they can just go to their local record store and listen to it free?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    anonymous, Sep 28th, 2011 @ 4:02am

    easiest way out of this is to stop selling music. see how the artists and the labels like it when the sales plummet through the floor and the blame lays squarely at their feet and the feet of the collection agencies that are employed by the labels. cant wait to see what excuses come out then!
    this whole pattern/copyright/license thing has gotten totally out of control. wont be long before a license has to be bought so that a license can be bought, so a license can be bought, so a person/shop can then promote and sell the very things that keep these thick industry fuckers alive! unbelievable!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 28th, 2011 @ 4:13am

    There's still record stores?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    icon
    Ben (profile), Sep 28th, 2011 @ 4:34am

    Biology

    Ears are killing the music industry!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 28th, 2011 @ 4:39am

    Re: "UK Music Retailers Ask Why They Should Pay Performance Licenses To Play Music When They're Trying To Sell The Music"

    But surely, if the companies want their music sold, Then it would be wise for them to allow them to play their music in stores for free. It free advertising! In fact, the companies realy should be paying the stores! No wonder they are struggling with logic like this.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    icon
    The eejit (profile), Sep 28th, 2011 @ 4:56am

    Re: Biology

    So are mouths! They talk far too much!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    icon
    Chargone (profile), Sep 28th, 2011 @ 5:01am

    Re: Re: If they play only cc/pd music in the shop

    indeed. still a good idea though.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    icon
    Chargone (profile), Sep 28th, 2011 @ 5:03am

    Re:

    ......

    there's a fundamental flaw in the logic of having a music store follow your plan. see if you can spot it.

    (i do agree with the sentiment though.)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    Bengie, Sep 28th, 2011 @ 5:07am

    That's backwards

    In the MAFIAA world, the advertisers pay you money.

    I should put up a billboard that's advertising my product, then charge the billboard owners money to advertise my product.

    WIN!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    icon
    Ima Fish (profile), Sep 28th, 2011 @ 5:10am

    "A bakery that wants to sell you cakes..."

    It's like if GM threatened and required payment from its car dealers for patent infringement for letting potential customers test-drive cars.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 28th, 2011 @ 5:19am

    Re: Re: "UK Music Retailers Ask Why They Should Pay Performance Licenses To Play Music When They're Trying To Sell The Music"

    No, you don't get it. You freetards will learn to pay every single time you hear or interact with music or anything sounding like music. Why do you hate artists?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 28th, 2011 @ 5:57am

    Re: Re: Re: "UK Music Retailers Ask Why They Should Pay Performance Licenses To Play Music When They're Trying To Sell The Music"

    But then how on earth would I know what music to buy? You expect people to guess what music is good? Besides, the stores don't even need to play the whole song to get intrest in it, which would mean that if they like the song they will likely buy it, meaning MORE money for the artists. not less. See, I love artists. :)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    icon
    HuwOS (profile), Sep 28th, 2011 @ 6:00am

    It's the same in Ireland as well, if you play music in your music store to help sell the music, you have to pay a licence so that the writers,performers can be duly rewarded.
    It's insanity.
    But then, it's actual an insane concept even for non music retailers, so what's a bit more insanity between friends.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    icon
    harbingerofdoom (profile), Sep 28th, 2011 @ 6:04am

    Re: Re:

    i know i know....
    the flaw is that they are selling music in the first place right???

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    icon
    HuwOS (profile), Sep 28th, 2011 @ 6:04am

    Re: Re: "UK Music Retailers Ask Why They Should Pay Performance Licenses To Play Music When They're Trying To Sell The Music"

    Radio play also sells music, but the radio stations pay?

    It isn't surprising given their win-win-win-win historical setup that the music labels and licencing agencies are slow to adapt to the digital era, they've effectively lived in what to anyone else would be fantasy land for the last 50 years.

    Who wants to have to leave fantasy land?

    Yeah, Yeah Yul might, but hardly anyone else.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    identicon
    jimbo, Sep 28th, 2011 @ 6:08am

    until everyone involved with the distribution/selling of anything entertainment industry related actually grows some balls and tell them what is going to happen, instead of kowtowing to the wants/orders of those industries, nothing will change. stop dealing with them completely, start dealing with another commodity. even if the industries deal with everything themselves, do they honestly expect the world to flock to their shops and/or web sites? i think not! people wont pay the prices they will insist in charging. surely even the artists can see the fallacy of what is happening and how much they are losing out?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 28th, 2011 @ 6:12am

    Re:

    That is the real news here.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23.  
    icon
    DannyB (profile), Sep 28th, 2011 @ 6:14am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: I have a solution

    Look. I can solve both your problem and the problem posed by the poster right above you.

    Mandatory RIAA/MPAA brain implant chips, at birth.



    > But then how on earth would I know what music to buy?

    The brain implant chip tells you.

    But wait! There's more! It not only tells you which music to buy, but also which movies to watch. Now how much would you pay?


    > You freetards will learn to pay every single time
    > you hear or interact with music

    The brain implant chip will automatically charge your credit card any time you hear any music, or see any clip or portion of a movie.

    There is a small fee for this service. You freetards can't expect to enjoy the convenience of this automated payment system for free do you? Think of the time saved by not having to manually make payments.



    Problem solved. Everyone happy.

    You are happy aren't you? The brain implant chip tells you that you are happy and love whatever new music and movie is being promoted this week.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  24.  
    identicon
    Simon, Sep 28th, 2011 @ 6:24am

    Collection agencies are just con artists

    In my experience, these so-called collection agencies are just flat-out liars and scammers. My wife has a retail shop, and a PPL representative recently visited the shop, asking if they ever played any music. The answer given by a member of staff was that she didn't know. A few weeks later, my wife receives an invoice for around 80 saying the shop needs a performance licence. The shop has no radio or music system, so my wife rang them up and told them she wasn't going to pay.

    The PPL then blatantly lied to her, said that staff had been playing Katie Perry in the shop when their agent visited (no radio, or CD player and my wife owns no Katie Perry music anyway), then claimed the the PPL is a Government agency (it's not) and she was legally obliged to pay up. She called him out as a liar and hung up on him. It's been 3 weeks and they haven't followed up...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  25.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 28th, 2011 @ 6:27am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I have a solution

    Do the Artists get one of these too? Or do they get a special version which means any money they make go to the agencies? If so, they should be billed for this helpful timesaving feature. Of course the chip makes them more than happy to do so so there is no problem. Fun times all around!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  26.  
    identicon
    NullOp, Sep 28th, 2011 @ 6:32am

    Why?

    The why is because the music industry is run by greedy shits. Any more questions?

    Obama 2012 - NO!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  27.  
    identicon
    Beech, Sep 28th, 2011 @ 6:35am

    Didn't know us record stores were exempt either. surprised more shopkeepers aren't exploiting it. Take night clubs: they need to pay to play music. Buy a lady Gaga CD, put it up for sale behind the bar for $1000. Now you're a record store that just so happens to sell liquor and have a dance floor!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  28.  
    icon
    Berenerd (profile), Sep 28th, 2011 @ 6:38am

    "Can you imagine running any other business this way? A bakery that wants to sell you cakes, but has to pay a separate "performance rights fee" to the baker? Don't see that working.."

    I don't think this works...I think its more like...

    Having a bakery and then having to license the aroma of fresh baked goods because someone copyrighted it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  29.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 28th, 2011 @ 6:41am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I have a solution

    http://newscenter.berkeley.edu/2011/09/22/brain-movies/

    Scientists are working hard to enable that future LoL

    Reconstruction of brain activity
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsjDnYxJ0bo

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  30.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 28th, 2011 @ 6:46am

    Re: Re:

    Yep, sleep with dogs and wake up with flees.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  31.  
    icon
    PaulT (profile), Sep 28th, 2011 @ 6:48am

    Re: Why?

    What does a situation that existed before Obama's election (music industry run by the greedy) and a story on the UK music industry have to do with Obama?

    Oh yeah, you guys are going to start up your troll circus for next year's election soon, right? Joy. I can't wait to be called a communist because I happen to live in a country that provides adequate health care again...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  32.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 28th, 2011 @ 6:57am

    Meanwhile in France Post-it wars break out with hundreds of copyright infringer's going unpunished for stealing art.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5ZuUGQipms

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  33.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 28th, 2011 @ 6:59am

    Re:

    Forgot about what I thought about it.
    Are those companies that made those post-it things going to pay anybody for using art they didn't create and putting it on the sides of buildings?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  34.  
    icon
    ethorad (profile), Sep 28th, 2011 @ 7:35am

    Re: If they play only cc/pd music in the shop

    Or agree to pay whatever rates the RIAA wants, but charge them twice as much to advertise in their shop, more than cancelling out the licence fees.

    Then play cc/pd/etc music

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  35.  
    icon
    Jeremy7600 (profile), Sep 28th, 2011 @ 8:01am

    http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100706/10570810083.shtml

    I hope Dave Natriss comes back. That was fun.

    No, I really do.

    In a pure schadenfreude kind of way :)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  36.  
    icon
    ClarkeyBalboa (profile), Sep 28th, 2011 @ 8:23am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I have a solution

    If you are watching a movie, do you get charged for each song in the soundtrack? What about if you are watching a music video for a song and it shows clips of the movie? Seems only fair to charge a fee on top of a fee for those privileges.

    Maybe the chip can be programmed to cause you to go blind or deaf whenever music or movies are playing that you aren't willing to pay for. That way we only have to reject one or two of our senses temporarily to avoid infringing.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  37.  
    icon
    Qritiqal (profile), Sep 28th, 2011 @ 8:43am

    let's see if i have this straight

    A music retailer shouldn't have to pay licensing fees because customers hearing the music might BUY the music as a result of hearing it.

    So why should ANYONE pay licensing fees for publicly playing music?
    Does the customer's distance from a cash register somehow affect the likelihood they enjoy the song and want to purchase it? What, do people just hang out in music stores on the off chance they might hear something they like and go find it on the shelves?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  38.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 28th, 2011 @ 9:35am

    PRS is vicious... the U.S. allows direct licensing for public performance rights. For example, if you have a restaurant and want to play music, and you have an agreement with a musician who happens to own the master, publishing and performance rights to all of his/her music, you can, of course play their music. Ditto if there's a third party intermediary, like a Muzak-style provider who procures such agreements from musicians and labels. In the U.K.? Nope, gotta pay PRS no matter what. They make the jackals at ASCAP and BMI look reasonable by comparison.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  39.  
    icon
    Rikuo (profile), Sep 28th, 2011 @ 10:56am

    Re:

    I know of one chinese takeaway in Ireland that had a sticker on his front door saying they paid for a music performance license from some acronym.

    Odd thing was, they didn't play music. They had a TV in the corner though, tuned to a news channel permanently, but surely that doesn't count.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  40.  
    identicon
    j r, Sep 28th, 2011 @ 11:32am

    If people hear the crap passed off as music they won't buy it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  41.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 28th, 2011 @ 11:34am

    GOOD IDEA:::::

    Take all that RIAA Music and throw it in the trash or send it back.Stock your store with cool Indie type bands and problem solved.There will be no issue as any small band wants exposure and wants an edge to get somewhere.I know the two bands I play in would never bring a lawsuit against someone for helping us out by exposing us to potential new fans.

    FUCK UK BIGWIGS !!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  42.  
    icon
    Rikuo (profile), Sep 28th, 2011 @ 12:12pm

    Re: Re:

    "Are those companies that made those post-it things going to pay anybody for using art they didn't create and putting it on the sides of buildings?"

    One word to you mate- Disney.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  43.  
    icon
    Gwiz (profile), Sep 28th, 2011 @ 2:24pm

    Re:

    I hope Dave Natriss comes back. That was fun.

    Dave's fingers might still be in traction from all that furious typing he did on that article.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  44.  
    icon
    JMT (profile), Sep 28th, 2011 @ 3:06pm

    Re: Re:

    Holy crap, 600 comments!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  45.  
    icon
    The Devil's Coachman (profile), Sep 28th, 2011 @ 7:10pm

    Re:

    I wouldn't term them "vicious", because I have first hand knowledge of what vicious really connotes. Vicious is a word that they would fully understand if they ever came to me for their unjustifiable monetary demands, threatening litigation. Once you sit directly across the desk, or perhaps a restaurant table, from one of these "vicious" individuals, and carefully explain to them the errors of their ways in dealing with you, and the likely consequences of failing to correct those errors, then if they still persist, or display intent to put up resistance, they will get an advanced education in what the word vicious can truly mean. Sometimes, this epiphany will produce incontinence. Not very nice, but sometimes unavoidable. Just another way of resolving business disputes.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  46.  
    icon
    btrussell (profile), Sep 28th, 2011 @ 10:44pm

    Re:

    If everyone who entered store bought indie music, labels would still be making money, with these licenses.

    So:
    It's like you decided not to buy GM and the government gives them your tax dollars anyway.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  47.  
    icon
    nasch (profile), Sep 30th, 2011 @ 2:49pm

    Re:

    see how the artists and the labels like it when the sales plummet through the floor and the blame lays squarely at their feet and the feet of the collection agencies that are employed by the labels.

    You should realize by now that they would just blame piracy.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  48.  
    icon
    nasch (profile), Sep 30th, 2011 @ 2:55pm

    Re: let's see if i have this straight

    A music retailer shouldn't have to pay licensing fees because customers hearing the music might BUY the music as a result of hearing it.

    They shouldn't have to pay because they are playing music for the sole purpose of trying to sell it. It would be like running a TV ad for an album and then charging the TV station a license fee for playing the music.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  49.  
    icon
    Dwayne (profile), Nov 21st, 2011 @ 2:13pm

    So what you're saying is music stores in the US don't pay licencing fees to play music in the store? LOCK THEM UP, THAT IS THEFT REGARDLESS OF WHATEVER LICENCE OR AGREEMENT THESE STORES HAVE WITH THE LABELS! AHHHHH!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  50.  
    icon
    Karl (profile), Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 12:20am

    Re:

    Didn't know us record stores were exempt either. surprised more shopkeepers aren't exploiting it

    You know what's surprising about this comment?

    That record stores have been exempt during their entire existence, and yet you think that the law is a license for shopkeepers to exploit it.

    You sound like one of those douchebags who thinks the royalty system for terrestrial radio is "akin to piracy."

    Or, you're being sarcastic. That may be the case. It's a sad state of affairs when sarcasm is indistinguishable from genuine sentiment.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  51.  
    icon
    Karl (profile), Nov 22nd, 2011 @ 12:29am

    Re:

    I hope Dave Natriss comes back. That was fun.

    Shhh! He will appear if you speak his name three times.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This