DailyDirt: Nuclear Power In Space

from the urls-we-dig-up dept

Nuclear energy usually has a significant NIMBY problem (Not In My Back Yard!) that prevents nuclear power plants from being constructed. There's no simple solution to this obstacle, and even when the reactor is going to be thousands (or millions) of miles away from any people in a spacecraft, the danger of launching a nuclear reactor on a rocket is still too risky for some folks. There haven't been any nuclear disasters in space, but as more and more nuclear powered spacecraft are built, the anti-nuclear groups may grow increasingly loud. Here are just a few nuclear spacecraft projects that could travel beyond our planet. If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) Techdirt post via StumbleUpon.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Anonymous, Nov 18th, 2013 @ 5:09pm

    Wow, a whopping 3.3 pounds in a year! And how much is THAT going to cast the taxpayers, I wonder?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Anonymous, Nov 18th, 2013 @ 5:10pm

    Re:

    * cost (not cast)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Nov 18th, 2013 @ 8:01pm

    Plutonium is not in short supply

    there a shit load of it hanging around, what do you think is inside of those nukes that are capable of destroying the world a 1000 times over ?

    They have not produced much since 1980 because they don't need too.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    icon
    Paraquat (profile), Nov 18th, 2013 @ 8:24pm

    Re: Plutonium is not in short supply

    There is a sh*tload of Plutonium-239, but a dire shortage of Plutonium-238. They are different isotopes, with very different properties.

    Despite its nasty reputation for being carcinogenic and toxic (plus the prime ingredient for making atomic bombs), Plutonium-239 is not very radioactive. In fact, you could pick up a chunk the size of a golf ball and hold it in your hands safely. I would suggest you wear rubber gloves though, not because of radioactivity, but because you wouldn't want any of the metal to rub off onto your skin and work its way through into your blood stream. Pu-239 is a heavy metal poison with devastating effects if it enters your blood stream. Which is why its a nuclear waste problem - you don't want it leaking into water supplies, for example. Plutonium 239 has a very long half-life (24,000 years).

    Plutonium-238, on the other hand, is highly radioactive, but with a short half-life (88 years). It puts out considerable decay heat, which is perfect for powering RTGs (radioisotope thermoelectric generators). NASA uses RTGs for powering all deep space probes.

    Give the Wikipedia page a read:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutonium-238

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Nov 18th, 2013 @ 10:03pm

    NASA should try thorium to jump start that technology.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    yaac, Nov 19th, 2013 @ 4:38am

    Timely Nasa decision

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    icon
    kP (profile), Nov 19th, 2013 @ 7:05am

    Re:

    Is "thorium" your word of the day?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    icon
    RyanNerd (profile), Nov 19th, 2013 @ 7:06am

    DUFF, Isn't that a brand of beer?

    I'm quite sure it is.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Nov 19th, 2013 @ 11:57am

    But there could be a meltdown and it would get radiation all over space!!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This