Don't Mess With Texas... Or, Well, Don't Use That Slogan As A Book Title Or Texas Will Sue
from the moron-in-a-hurry dept
You've probably heard the phrase "don't mess with texas." It's pretty widely known in general, but what you might not know is that the phrase is actually trademarked by the Texas Department of Transportation as a part of an anti-litter campaign. I had no idea. Anyway, the state is quite upset that anyone might think of the phrase in any context other than combating litter. Stephen S. Power alerts us to the news that the state has sued over a romance novel with the phrase as its title. And they're going all in. They've sued the publisher of the book, Hachette Book Group, and the author, Christie Craig, and they're even going after Barnes & Noble for daring to stock the book.
"The book," TxDOT's suit says, "contains numerous graphic references to sexual acts, states of sexual arousal, etc."They're afraid that this will harm their ability to keep the streets clean of litter. I'm not quite sure how. Of course, if you look, it appears that TxDOT does, in fact, have a number of federal registered trademarks on the phrase. I went through them all and not a single one appears to be for books, however. There are things like clothing, signs, luggage tags, beverage holders, garbage bags, "plastic squeeze flashlights," etc. But nothing about books.
Here's hoping the defendants do decide to "mess with Texas" and teach them a little something about trademark law.
43 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Who Needs SOPA When Courts Will Pretend SOPA Already Exists?
- Of All The Coats, In All The Scenes, In All The Films: Burberry Threatened Over Humphrey Bogart Publicity Rights
- Unfortunate: Appeals Court Revives Misguided Rosetta Stone Lawsuit Against Google
- No, Telling Customers Why Your Product Is Better Than A Competitor's Is Not Trademark Infringement
- Trademark Lawyers Push For Crazy New Domain Rules Making It Easy For Them To Take Away Others' Domains






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Don't they know...
And kids..... Don't do sodomy....
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Don't they know...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
It could certainly lead to confusion about the State of Texas being involved with such a work.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
How?
I just can't fathom the connection.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Trademark abandonment
And Texas DOT has been actively selling “clothing, signs, luggage tags, beverage holders, garbage bags, ‘plastic squeeze flashlights‘” during the past three years?
Or Texas DOT has just tried “merely to reserve a right in a mark” for those “clothing, signs, luggage tags, beverage holders, garbage bags, ‘plastic squeeze flashlights‘”.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
The moral of this story is:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Don't they know...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Don't they know...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
moron in a hurry
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Trademark abandonment
Actually. Yes they do. They sell that stuff all the time as part of their anti-litter campaign with the "Don't Mess with Texas" logo on it.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
If you asked a "moron in a hurry" if he thought the Texas DOT would publish or support the publishing of a bodice-ripper novel that has nothing to do with transportation, regardless of what the title of the novel was, he'd like say, "no."
You could call it, "The Texas Department of Transportation Officially Endorses this Romance Novel" and the "moron in a hurry" would probably have a good suspicion that the title was disingenuous.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Anyway, I thought of Texas as more sexually liberal with manly men but they don't like sexually suggestive books? LA should transfer its gay parade, Texas seems a better place for it ;)
Now seriously, how twisted can this IP (trademark/copyrights) become... Just add some fundamentalist moralism to it and what the fuck it's the cataclysm.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
I don't see why they needed a trademark
Plus it looks more like free advertising to me...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Sex Doesn't Exist
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Don't Mess with Texas: The Story Behind the Legend [Hardcover]
Amazon.Com: Don't Mess with Texas: The Story Behind the Legend [Hardcover]
Is Texas DOT behind this Don't Mess With Texas book?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Not without protection
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Ok let's f#$! with Texas instead.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
By keeping another romance novel from existence, thereby preventing someone from throwing that drivel out the window ...?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Don't Mess with Texas: The Story Behind the Legend [Hardcover]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Trademark abandonment
The best way to show displeasure would be not to mess with Texas: don't visit there, don't buy anything produced there. Total boycott.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
I, for one, am grateful to the Texas Department of Trademark Abuse
All Hail The Master Of Our Literature!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Gotta laugh.
Blame It On Texas
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Complaint [PDF]
• Count I - Trademark Infringement
[15 U.S.C. § 1114]
• Count II - Blurring
[15 U.S.C. § 1125(c)]
• Count III - Dilution (Tarnishment)
[15 U.S.C. § 1125(c)]
• Count IV - Dilution (Texas State Law)
[Section 16.29 of the Texas Business and Commerce Code.]
• Count V - Unfair Competition
[15 U.S.C. § 1125]
• Count VI - Request for Temporary Restraining Order, and Temporary and Permanent Injunctive Relief
[15 U.S.C. §§ 1116(a) and 1125(c)(1)]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Aug 24 Update: Author can 'mess with Texas' all she wants
(Via Houston Press Hair Balls blog.)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Isn't it obvious?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
TxDOT
All you have to do is drive on the roads here and you wonder who the hell designed this crap.
Seems like their lawyers are equally stupid.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Messin' with Texas
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Messin' with Texas
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
It IS related to littering
Can't believe you missed that connection.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Trademarks
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Trademark abandonment
Also don't vote for anybody from there.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Trademark abandonment
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment