DailyDirt: Lots Of New Education Ideas -- Quality Or Quantity?
from the urls-we-dig-up dept
The array of institutions aiming to improve education is more diverse than ever before. There are all sorts of tutoring services (Kumon, the Khan Academy, Sylvan, etc), and it's still not clear what approach (assuming there is a single solution) is the best way to teach kids. Maybe in a few decades, we'll have figured out what the optimal strategy is to educate the most children, but in the meantime, we have a lot of different opinions on what to do. Here are just a few links on teaching kids.
- Some folks think we need to cultivate more effective teachers. But that just shifts the debate to arguing over what the best incentives for teachers are... [url]
- Perhaps for-profit schools are better than the traditional non-profit schools. Build it and they will come, but buyer beware. [url]
- How about smaller schools instead of bigger schools? Small schools correlate with better performance, and big schools in big districts correlate with cheating scandals? [url]
- Just create some goals and skills to master -- and let kids achieve them at their own pace. Introduce blogging to second graders! [url]
- To discover more interesting education-related content, check out what's currently floating around the StumbleUpon universe. [url]






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
For-profit schools? I don't like it (at least not as a replacement for our entire education system.) The government requires kids to go to school... what are you going to do when one company owns all the schools in the county (think rural areas) and then jacks up the price one year? Competition can't come in that quickly, and now you either have to pay what they ask, move, or stick your kid on a bus for a few hours every day.
Smaller schools? Yes! I'm sure you save money in some areas by having one big school. On the other hand, with a smaller school, maybe you don't need that extra vice principal. And the kids don't have to be bussed so far.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Feds out
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
That was several years ago... and I'm pretty sure there's still no conclusion on how to teach teachers.
But we should start somewhere -- and a scientific approach to developing better educational programs could bear fruit someday....
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
We need to raise the Light bulb
We need to find ways to raise the light bulb.
Ultimately the goal of all Education institutions should be a medley of face-to-face, online and even some old and proven Pedagogical methods such as rote, that suit students needs and aspirations. Allowing them to challenge and reach for the light bulb forever.
[Note: this is part of a 23page report I co-wrote back in 2003 on “Advanced Learning Technologies in Higher Learning” and is still very relevant today]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
A Good Start
Take my ninth grade English teacher, for example. He sent a student to the office one day for arguing with him during class. Which would have been fine if the student hadn't been trying to explain to him that bilingual did not, in fact, mean that you can't speak English.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Hookers and cocaine. It works for politicians and rock bands.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
This guy is on the right track...
With all the tools we have available with programmers we should be able to develop a better education system that is more fun to study in and better adjusted to each person individually. IMHO, customization is the name of the game... it's going to be all about how well you can customize your child's education in a way that works best for them. You set your child on a path to end up at a point that is most beneficial to their future as a contributing member of society. That's all you can really do as a good parent, is give your child the best shot. I think there's some way to apply a learning apparatus with these goals to public education.
As you point out, Michael, it's hard to tell where the solutions will come from. But I can assure you, the solutions (as I expect there will be more than one way) won't come from Washington; it'll come from the minds of great visionaries like 19-year-old, Stanford PhD dropout Andrew Hsu, the dude who had 3 B.S.degrees at 16.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Source: http://educationinjapan.wordpress.com/of-methods-philosophies/the-boom-in-indian-math-education/
I don't think the problem really is with teachers, not all that is because of them there is a cultural factor too, if you get everything you want and there are no hardships why you will ever bother to do hard work?
I have been noticing that most countries that have the best scores are countries developing or that recently became wealthy where real hardship is a reality and they have rigid on the extreme side of things educational systems that in the USA would be considered concentration camps.
Maybe is not only the teachers but the environment that needs some rethinking.
People think of children as little moving dolls that have no brains, but they do have brains and they can see their parents struggling and that can create the powerful motivation to learn to be able to do something about it, if that doesn't exist how do you recreate that?
Should parents start to live beneath their means and start taking acting classes to enact hardship so their children create some sense of need for education?
Or is just a crazy idea?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment