False Advertising: CRIA Becomes 'Music Canada,' Even Though It's Not

from the it's-not-about-the-music dept

TorrentFreak points out that the much maligned Canadian Recording Industry Association (CRIA) has apparently decided to change its name to Music Canada. I'm wondering if that's false advertising. The group represents the big record labels, not music. In fact, many of its policies are anti-musician. Of course, there are others who have pointed out that the "Canadian" bit of their name has been false advertising as well, since the group basically takes orders from the RIAA. So, if you have an organization that isn't really run by Canadian interests, and who doesn't represent music -- but a small group of middlemen who profit from screwing over musicians -- is it really fair to call yourself Music Canada?


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 14th, 2011 @ 2:05am

    They should have gone further, change the name to "Hardup Artist Canada" then put a :( by it. You see this is the damage you are doing, shame on you ;D

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    freak (profile), Jul 14th, 2011 @ 2:08am

    IF, during most of an organizations life, it only manages to make a profit margin by screwing its customers, is it really fair to call itself Air Canada?

    Yeah, there's kind a history of not trusting companies with 'Canada' in the name.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Jul 14th, 2011 @ 2:57am

      Re:

      Yeah, stupid Canada Post.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        freak (profile), Jul 14th, 2011 @ 6:23am

        Re: Re:

        "Let's lock our employees out, then a week later, legislate them back to work only on what they already had!"

        (Protip: the employees were striking only to keep what they already had, and they wanted to keep working)



        CBC, OTOH, is doing a good job of being CBC.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          ChrisB (profile), Jul 14th, 2011 @ 6:48am

          Re: Re: Re:

          > "Let's lock our employees out, then a week later, legislate
          > them back only on what they already had!"

          *Canada Post* locked out its employees and the *Canadian government* legislated them back to work. They are not the same thing.

          Oh, and they legislated back for _less_ than Canada Post was willing to pay. In my opinion, this was a perfect time to union-bust these lazy corrupt bums. Did you know it is cheaper for me to send something to the US than it is within Canada? Insane.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            freak (profile), Jul 14th, 2011 @ 7:22am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            They went back for less? I haven;t really looked into the news, but that wasn't my impression. *shrug*


            As for the prices, consider that Canada is one of the least mail-active countries out there, and one of the most population sparse.

            After you consider those two factors, the time and cost of shipping is much more acceptable.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            Vincent Clement (profile), Jul 14th, 2011 @ 9:29am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            The same *Canadian government* that owns *Canada Post*? Pay and benefits have not been legislated. The legislation included the government's offer and CUPWs offer. It's up to an arbitrator to choose which offer applies.

            Did you realize that US has 10 times the population and that it is easier to spread costs over that larger population? Did you also realize that the USPS is losing lots of money each year? Maybe if they raised their rates they wouldn't lose money?

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Andrew (profile), Jul 14th, 2011 @ 2:46am

    Maybe this site should rebrand itself too? You could have a tagline like

    "Supporting Big Content through the Big Issues"

    "Stronger IP laws. Stronger America."

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Richard (profile), Jul 14th, 2011 @ 2:59am

    Blake's 7

    Anyone remeber Blake's 7? For most of the episodes there were 5 of them, none of whom was called Blake!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    JayTee (profile), Jul 14th, 2011 @ 3:12am

    A classic case of misdirection

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    btrussell (profile), Jul 14th, 2011 @ 3:36am

    There was another change as well.
    We now have two mpac's
    http://excesscopyright.blogspot.com/2011/07/cmpda-rebrands-to-motion-picture.html

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    mike allen (profile), Jul 14th, 2011 @ 3:39am

    perhaps instead of music Canada they could call themselves puppets Canada, no need to say who pulls the strings.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 14th, 2011 @ 3:45am

    In fact, many of its policies are anti-musician.

    haha, so are many of yours, you ridiculous asshat,

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 14th, 2011 @ 4:23am

    Truth in naming

    Well, if something has to be called what it really means, then at least half of all the laws passed here in the US should be renamed as well.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Ben (profile), Jul 14th, 2011 @ 4:45am

    I guess Anti-musician Non-Canadians just doesn't have the same ring to it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    drewmerc (profile), Jul 14th, 2011 @ 4:57am

    sorry this still does not beat the canada dry, captain america promotion

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Nicedoggy, Jul 14th, 2011 @ 5:26am

    That also happens in the USA since most big acts are from Europe and pay taxes in Europe and most big labels are not American business but from Europe and yet you get the RIAA that is supposed to be representing American interests not European.

    And it always amuses me to see the RIAA say it creates jobs in America LoL

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Nicedoggy, Jul 14th, 2011 @ 5:29am

    Anyone ever wondered how an Irish dude was able to make Americans extend copyrights?

    The Bono Act was not an American act was it?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Jul 14th, 2011 @ 5:39am

      Response to: Nicedoggy on Jul 14th, 2011 @ 5:29am

      If you're joking... Awesome! I just laughed a bunch. If not (and clarification for anyone else): Sonny Bono (of Sonny and Cher fame) sponsored this bill. U2's Bono has the band manager speaking out about copyright maximalism (whether he asks him to or not).

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Nicedoggy, Jul 14th, 2011 @ 5:59am

        Re: Response to: Nicedoggy on Jul 14th, 2011 @ 5:29am

        Shoot! I was sure it was Bono and not Sonny Bono, the responsible for that mess...aham!...bill.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        crade (profile), Jul 14th, 2011 @ 7:15am

        Re: Response to: Nicedoggy on Jul 14th, 2011 @ 5:29am

        He obviously does ask him to, otherwise he wouldn't be the band manager :) It's not like poor Bono is going to be stuck with a manager who takes positions he doesn't support. lol

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    shawnhcorey (profile), Jul 14th, 2011 @ 6:07am

    Not Surprising

    The record labels are trying to pass legislation to get a world-wide monopoly on the music industry. This is just another red herring, to convince politicians that they represent the best interests of musicians and the general public even though they are required by law to maximize their profits. But, of course, only a communist terrorist would think that they put their profits before the interests of others.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    ClarkeyBalboa (profile), Jul 14th, 2011 @ 6:14am

    Come on Mike, you should know by now that PR + Truth can be a dangerously volatile mix.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 14th, 2011 @ 6:54am

    1984

    Same old. Just as patriotic as the Patriot Act. And remember restrictions are rights (DRM)

    War Is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is strength. All from the Masters of Protecting (stealing).

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    crade (profile), Jul 14th, 2011 @ 7:12am

    Wonder how long that will last before enough people figure out that "Music Canada" is that evil lobby group and they have to change their name again to avoid being recognized.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Hephaestus (profile), Jul 14th, 2011 @ 3:38pm

      Re:

      Funny thing. Changes like this are often used by hackers and the like. The amount of changes that are needed often cause inadvertant security holes in computer systems.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Hephaestus (profile), Jul 14th, 2011 @ 3:44pm

      Re:

      Funny thing. Changes like this often cause huge holes in both business and computer security, they are often exploited by hackers and the like. The amount of changes that are needed often causes inadvertant security holes in computer systems. flaws in contact information, flaws in code, flaws in banking, flaws in email, etc.

      So let them change their name as often as they like. It might turn out to be interesting.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    DV Henkel-Wallace (profile), Jul 14th, 2011 @ 7:42am

    Name should include "Enforcement"

    We should refer to these companies as "Music Enforcement" or "Movie Enforcement" companies. Both highlights the ridiculousness of it as well as indicating clearly that they are shakedown crews of little value to anyone but themselves. But While calling them "Music Shakedown" could sound biased; Music Enforcement is simply normative!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      ltlw0lf (profile), Jul 14th, 2011 @ 2:28pm

      Re: Name should include "Enforcement"

      We should refer to these companies as "Music Enforcement" or "Movie Enforcement" companies.

      I prefer "Copyright Enforcement". They aren't enforcing music, just enforcing copyright.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 14th, 2011 @ 8:17am

    Music Canada is the new name of the organization that made it possible for nettwerk to exist and prosper. Funny who that minor fact gets ignored.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    MM_Dandy, Jul 14th, 2011 @ 11:25am

    But what about the non-musical recorded performances? Will somebody please think of the poor Canadian stand-up comics?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Derek Kerton (profile), Jul 14th, 2011 @ 5:44pm

    RightNamen

    " is it really fair to call yourself Music Canada?"

    No! They should have gone with "Protect The Children Canada"

    Anyone who doesn't like it needs to explain why they are in favor of child porn.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This