RSS
Some Actual Backlash For Groups That Unthinkingly Sign Their Name In Support Of Telco Positions
from the policy-backlash dept
For years, we've covered how slimy DC-insiders and secretive "lobbying" firms have a list of "interest groups" that they "fund" in order to use them to support various initiatives they don't really care about. The telling quote from someone involved in these astroturfing efforts:
Of course, this still goes on because there's almost no downside. We can call it out every time it happens, and most people just don't seem to care very much. But, every so often, actual members of these groups recognize the problems with such things, and they speak up. Broadband Reports has the news of how GLAAD's boss has been pressured into resigning after membership grew quite concerned about GLAAD's sudden endorsement of the merger -- and some connections between the company and the organization are suddenly being scrutinized. Whether or not you agree with the merger, it seems pretty sleazy to line up random interest groups in support of or against it.
It's tragic that this is the way of DC. It's not about doing what's right, or focusing on the best argument possible. It's a purely cynical land grab about who can do whatever it takes to get certain things rammed through. It's nice that, just once, there are repercussions for some of the organizations that let themselves be flat-out used in this manner.
"You go down the Latino people, the deaf people, the farmers, and choose them.... You say, 'I can't use this one--I already used them last time...' We had their letterhead. We'd just write the letter. We'd fax it to them and tell them, 'You're in favor of this.'"AT&T has been working overtime on this front, and we've seen random groups who really are unlikely to have any interest in the AT&T/T-Mobile merger come out in favor of it, culminating in the ultimate in ridiculous arguments, from a rural education group, that the merger would help kids do better in school (yes, seriously).
Of course, this still goes on because there's almost no downside. We can call it out every time it happens, and most people just don't seem to care very much. But, every so often, actual members of these groups recognize the problems with such things, and they speak up. Broadband Reports has the news of how GLAAD's boss has been pressured into resigning after membership grew quite concerned about GLAAD's sudden endorsement of the merger -- and some connections between the company and the organization are suddenly being scrutinized. Whether or not you agree with the merger, it seems pretty sleazy to line up random interest groups in support of or against it.
It's tragic that this is the way of DC. It's not about doing what's right, or focusing on the best argument possible. It's a purely cynical land grab about who can do whatever it takes to get certain things rammed through. It's nice that, just once, there are repercussions for some of the organizations that let themselves be flat-out used in this manner.
I have an idea...
Founders, Funders, Farmers, Fools, And Family
Finding Co-Founders in a Recovering Economy
I have an app...
Developer Census: Be Counted. It takes less than two minutes.
App Developer Conversations: What Does The iPad Mini Mean For The App Economy?
I have a business...
To Understand The Data Move It Closer
Why 50,000 Monthly Active Users Weren't Enough To Stop This Company From Pivoting, With Spun Co-Founder Scott Lindenbaum
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
downside
after a few such organizations get burned, i imagine they will be much more careful about letting others speak for them.
they are sowing the seeds of their own calamity.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
"Sleazy" is every corporation's operating method.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Since this has been going on for years (according to this article) can you give any examples of how organizations have experienced downside from a boy who cried wolf problem? Does this downside outweigh the benefits they recieve from ATT and the like?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
"One direction"?
Astroturf knows no boundaries or divisions. Here is an article about corporate-funded astroturf groups that oppose the merger:
http://dailycaller.com/2011/06/20/the-astroturf-opposition-to-an-attt-mobile-merger/
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Regulatory and Legislative Capture
Techdirt should be distinguishing between regulatory capture and legislative capture. They are two different things.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
boy who cried wolf
An example of this is Niger Innis'(http://www.hannity.com/guest/innis-niger/10174) recent appearance on Sean Hannity's program where he talked about the signal vs. noise problem among African-American political groups. He said that so often their discussions of issues facing the African-American community were derailed by "noise". Because these groups allow noise they will have the same problem when they try to mobilize their base.
Any group that allows their messaging, brand building, community building, etc. to be co-opted by someone else is setting themselves up for failure in their own mission.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Write up at Stop the Cap
http://stopthecap.com/2011/06/21/gay-rights-group-exposes-atts-dollar-a-holler-skunkwork s-new-revelations-about-fcc-ties/
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment