French Court Says Merely Having The Word 'Torrent' In Your Domain Means You Are Encouraging Infringement

from the legal-uses,-anyone? dept

We've noticed before how many copyright maximalists make claims that suggest they believe that all BitTorrent is used for is infringement, even though it is used as an efficient distribution mechanism for all sorts of legitimate offerings. However, a court in France has apparently decided to punish the admin of a forum/search engine for torrent files, in part, by claiming that having the word "torrent" in your URL means that you're encouraging infringement:
The papers include a statement from the Court which declares that “..the names of these sites [when they include the word 'torrent'] encourage illegal activity. Torrent sites are accessed by users of the BitTorrent protocol which has a main, if not unique purpose, of enabling downloading of copyright protected works.”

In a nutshell, having the word “torrent” in a domain name can be reason enough to presume bad intentions.
That's pretty ridiculous, as there are sites that use the word "torrent" that have nothing to do with infringement. Seems like yet another case of people who don't understand technology making decisions that seriously impact everyone.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    icon
    Mr. LemurBoy (profile), Jun 3rd, 2011 @ 4:37pm

    Can this be applied to everything else? Quick! Tell furnitureporn.com that they're responsible for the corruption of our kids! It has porn in it's URL! It must be dirty!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    icon
    cc (profile), Jun 3rd, 2011 @ 4:40pm

    So when will TorrentFreak be banned in France?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 3rd, 2011 @ 4:47pm

    Bram Cohen did not invent the word "torrent". The French should know that, since they're the ones who derived it from the Latin "torrens".

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 3rd, 2011 @ 4:56pm

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 3rd, 2011 @ 4:58pm

    In practice, often true. As a catch-all principle, ridiculously presumptuous and unjustifiably broad.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Grey Ferret, Jun 3rd, 2011 @ 5:01pm

    Breaking news: In light of the recent ruling out of France, the newly founded IP protectionist group, STN, has decided to sue the creators of their website. "We thought there was something shady about these guys when we hired them to create www.stoptorrentsnow.com for us," said their spokesperson.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Joseph Durnal, Jun 3rd, 2011 @ 5:10pm

    Not

    I have a couple hundred gigs of files shared via bit torrent. Mostly linux and bsd distributions and other open source apps along with some public domain books, audio, & video. I consider it a great use of my unused bandwidth.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 3rd, 2011 @ 5:31pm

    "We've noticed before how many copyright maximalists make claims that suggest they believe that all BitTorrent is used for is infringement.."

    I have taken notice as well...none have ever made the suggestion, at least to my knowledge.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 3rd, 2011 @ 5:32pm

    Re:

    .torrent = .crime

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    icon
    someone (profile), Jun 3rd, 2011 @ 5:34pm

    Re: Not

    I typically get new ISO's for ubuntu/debian using bit-torrent too.

    Considering that Linux and BSD distributions are protected by copyright I guess the courts are right when they said:

    "Torrent sites are accessed by users of the BitTorrent protocol which has a main, if not unique purpose, of enabling downloading of copyright protected works.”

    Too bad the courts overlooked the FACT that some people WANT to share their copyrighted works using bit-torrent.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    icon
    Christopher Gizzi (profile), Jun 3rd, 2011 @ 5:34pm

    TorrentialRain.com is Out

    Well, that ruins my new domain idea.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    icon
    ChurchHatesTucker (profile), Jun 3rd, 2011 @ 5:37pm

    Re:

    toplessrobot.com should be nervous right now.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    icon
    E. Zachary Knight (profile), Jun 3rd, 2011 @ 5:43pm

    Re: Not

    According to Ivan Hoffman, you are destroying the free market.

    http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110603/00214214533/entertainment-industry-lawyer-public-domai n-goes-against-free-market-capitalism.shtml

    You are the dirty rotten thief.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    ScytheNoire, Jun 3rd, 2011 @ 5:55pm

    Idiocracy

    So we could assume then, by their logic:
    StopChildPorn = Site promoting child porn
    StopTorrents = Site promoting illegal downloading
    StopThinking = Site about the French government

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 3rd, 2011 @ 6:34pm

    So, what's with the torrent of bad decisions from France lately?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 3rd, 2011 @ 6:35pm

    I suppose that France will shutdown sites that encourage white water rafting...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 3rd, 2011 @ 6:46pm

    Wow, AJ must have graduated quickly to be a judge in France already.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 3rd, 2011 @ 7:30pm

    The thing is that, this is a decision by the appeal court, which can be appealed again, as the equivalent of the supreme court in france, as "fully knowing of wrongdoings" is not something that's assumed in france.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    identicon
    Snatch, Jun 3rd, 2011 @ 8:00pm

    French court saying all torrent sites are pirate sites? Kind of like how all French smell fishy, are rude, constantly drunk, and their favorite pastime is slapping women... right? lulz, goes both ways panzis

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    icon
    Spaceman Spiff (profile), Jun 3rd, 2011 @ 9:48pm

    Just how stupid?

    Just how stupid can they (the courts) be? Well, now we know! Torrent, torrent, torrent! I guess I am 3x infringing! ...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 3rd, 2011 @ 10:11pm

    Atleast they won't have a problem with piratebay, ISOhunt, Demonoid etc...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 3rd, 2011 @ 10:19pm

    It just doesn't make sense.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 3rd, 2011 @ 10:53pm

    Re:

    Don't be silly. Pirates, ISOs, and Demons are all EVIL! Didn't you hear?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  24.  
    icon
    G Thompson (profile), Jun 4th, 2011 @ 12:09am

    NEWSFLASH: Torrential flooding in France... All persons found dripping wet designated as criminal accomplices!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  25.  
    icon
    The eejit (profile), Jun 4th, 2011 @ 12:10am

    Re: Re:

    Hey, daemons are awesome! They have these cool wish-granting powers and everything!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  26.  
    identicon
    Prisoner 201, Jun 4th, 2011 @ 12:56am

    Re: Re: Re:

    Thats genies (bottle optional). Demons trick you into selling your soul, much like record labels.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  27.  
    icon
    Jeni (profile), Jun 4th, 2011 @ 9:27am

    Went and looked it up on dictionary.com just out of curiosity. It basically says a strong 'stream' of something so I guess that's another "bad" word.

    The insanity just keeps coming like a torrent. OOPS

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  28.  
    identicon
    tony, Jun 4th, 2011 @ 9:32am

    so

    So, say, having a site offering torrents of public domain books, or free/open source software is somehow advocating piracy?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  29.  
    identicon
    tony, Jun 4th, 2011 @ 9:33am

    so

    So, say, having a site offering torrents of public domain books, or free/open source software is somehow advocating piracy?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  30.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 4th, 2011 @ 10:38am

    Everyone is upset because a court figured out what is painfully obvious at even a glance: torrents are mostly used for pirated content and software.

    No, .torrent doesn't mean .crime, the court is only stating the obvious. Companies who want to use torrent style technology for distribution would be smart to move to using .distro files or something, and work to police their lists so that only legal content is available on their networks. Then they wouldn't have the issue.

    If you associate with known criminals, you are very likely to be considered a criminal. It's shocking that it took this long for a court to state the obvious.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  31.  
    icon
    senshikaze (profile), Jun 4th, 2011 @ 11:10am

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    and /daemons/ run the internet.

    Fun with words!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  32.  
    icon
    senshikaze (profile), Jun 4th, 2011 @ 11:12am

    Re:

    NEWS FLASH: People commit most murders, ergo all people are murderers.

    The story at 11!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  33.  
    identicon
    DogBreath, Jun 4th, 2011 @ 11:21am

    Re:

    Well, I guess the Hawkins Exteriors site (deals in Windows/Doors/Siding) http://hawkinsexteriors.com/ , will need to come down too because it encourages S-E-X, with no regard to the fact that a child might visit the site... and then want to have sex... in a French doorway or French Window???

    Based on that same logic, France courts will have to rule that being a Catholic Priest encourages sex with boys. So in France, you can still be a Catholic or a Priest, but not both, because then you're obviously a admitted practicing pedophile.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  34.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 4th, 2011 @ 11:25am

    Re:

    Bram Cohen did not invent the word "torrent". The French should know that, since they're the ones who derived it from the Latin "torrens".

    What? You mean they copied it? Those thieving pirates!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  35.  
    icon
    Jeni (profile), Jun 4th, 2011 @ 11:26am

    Re:

    Torrent technology is utterly fascinating to me, a programming challenged sad sack. It's a great tool for sharing large files.

    I so admire those who came up with the technology and hope they keep their creative talents flowing!

    And I even had some silly school kid hack into my wireless and DL some movie via a torrent and I got the nasty letter for it from my ISP, which after initially being stunned beyond belief, I actually had to chuckle at. What a waste of resources and time that was.

    In fact, it was that instance that got me reading up on what these torrents were/are and I was in awe - still am.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  36.  
    identicon
    DogBreath, Jun 4th, 2011 @ 11:34am

    Re:

    If you associate with known criminals, you are very likely to be considered a criminal. It's shocking that it took this long for a court to state the obvious.

    Have you ever voted? Did you know that many politicians are involved and convicted for illegal and criminal acts? Does the fact that you helped put these people in office by your vote make you a "known to associate with known criminals" and then "likely to be considered a criminal" by your association? By your own definition, it appears to. Hoist meet Petard.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  37.  
    icon
    Jeni (profile), Jun 4th, 2011 @ 11:50am

    Re: Re:

    Oh Bullseye, DogBreath!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  38.  
    icon
    DannyB (profile), Jun 4th, 2011 @ 12:28pm

    A url that does NOT encourage infringement

    Here is an example of a URL that does NOT encourage infringement.

    http://216.180.241.102

    After all, the URL does NOT have "torrent".

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  39.  
    icon
    DannyB (profile), Jun 4th, 2011 @ 12:29pm

    Re: Ban these sites too

    Don't ban this one! It doesn't have torrent in the url.

    http://216.180.241.102

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  40.  
    icon
    DannyB (profile), Jun 4th, 2011 @ 12:33pm

    Re: Re: Not

    BitTorrent protocols does not have a unique purpose of enabling downloading of copyright protected works. There are lots of other protocols (Http, Https, Ftp, email, etc) that can also be used to download copyright protected works.

    Furthermore, there is nothing inherently wrong with downloading copyright protected works.

    Ubuntu, for instance is copyright protected, and I've downloaded and uploaded it many times. With the full blessing of the copyright owners.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  41.  
    icon
    DannyB (profile), Jun 4th, 2011 @ 12:38pm

    Re: Just how stupid?

    Boy: Just how stupid can the courts be?

    Mr. Turtle: I don't know, I've never made it without biting myself in pure shock and horror. Let's ask Mr. Owl.

    Boy: Mr. Owl, just how stupid can the courts be?

    Mr. Owl: Ah one!, ah two, ah three.

    Mr. Owl: Three. You're now disconnected from the Internet.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  42.  
    icon
    DannyB (profile), Jun 4th, 2011 @ 12:44pm

    Brilliantly Inciteful

    But lacking insight.

    No, .torrent doesn't mean .crime, the court is only stating the obvious. Companies who want to use torrent style technology for distribution would be smart to move to using .distro files or something, and work to police their lists so that only legal content is available on their networks. Then they wouldn't have the issue.

    Next thing you now, it will be:

    No, .distro doesn't mean .crime, the court is only stating the obvious. Companies who want to use distro style technology for distribution would be smart to move to using .bazzle files or something, and work to police their lists so that only legal content is available on their networks. Then they wouldn't have the issue.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  43.  
    identicon
    DogBreath, Jun 4th, 2011 @ 1:01pm

    Re: A url that does NOT encourage infringement

    You're right! The French Court got it wrong, it's the DNS server that links the self-incriminating word to the site. Ban DNS servers! Those illegal infernal computational devices will be the downfall of humanity! Burn witch, burn! (Oops, sorry, wrong continent and/or country.) To the guillotine with the DNS servers! Off with their headers!

    DNS Servers: The "roots" of all evil!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  44.  
    icon
    The eejit (profile), Jun 4th, 2011 @ 1:15pm

    Re:

    WE all associate with known criminals all the time. They're called PEOPLE. IT doesn't matter what creed, class or sex you are, you will know a criminal, through the "Six Degrees of Separation" principle. So by your own logic, you associate with criminals, therefore you are a criminal.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  45.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 4th, 2011 @ 1:34pm

    Re: Brilliantly Inciteful

    I understand what you are saying, but you entirely missed the point. If the .distro system was properly maintained (because they have no reason to hide), and perhaps used a system of approved seeders only, it would allow for a system that has only legal and approved distributions on it.

    There is no reason for these people to be using a convoluted system that attempts to hide the files, the servers, the peers, and the like. If anything, they should want to be as open as possible to foster confidence in the files they are providing.

    .hiding is the .problem

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  46.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 4th, 2011 @ 2:21pm

    Re: Re: Brilliantly Inciteful

    What does it hide? There is encryption, but there is HTTPS too. Should HTTPS be illegal?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  47.  
    icon
    G Thompson (profile), Jun 4th, 2011 @ 10:20pm

    Re: Re: Brilliantly Inciteful

    expanding on your strange and convoluted logic you could also state that Judge's, juries, the presumption of innocence itself is also a problem because everyone knows that only accused criminals go to court and if they had nothing to hide they wouldn't need the due process of the law because prosecutors would only accuse and charge the actual guilty.

    Think about that when you next create a comment Anonymously because of course you have nothing to hide.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  48.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 4th, 2011 @ 11:47pm

    Re: Re: Brilliantly Inciteful

    So, what do you have to hide, you anonymous criminal?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  49.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 5th, 2011 @ 7:02am

    Re: Re: Re: Brilliantly Inciteful

    Talk about a logical jump. Nobody is suggesting to cut off due process. All the judge is saying is that if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, there is enough to move forward legally on the basis that it is an alleged duck.

    Moving to be part of a majority illegal community of file sharers, or advertising that you are shows intent, and that is good place to start. It isn't an absolute summary judgement of the sites, but it is enough for authorities to act on.

    Please show anywhere that due process was being removed.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  50.  
    identicon
    TDR, Jun 5th, 2011 @ 8:15am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Brilliantly Inciteful

    I notice, green AC, that you haven't provided a single piece of hard, empirical evidence to support your position. Until you do, you are doing nothing but blowing hot air. Also, I want a complete chain of causality showing showing how a specific artist was harmed by the sharing of a specific file at a specific time, step by step with each step being documented by empirical, non-industry evidence. Or you can just fess up and admit to having no idea what you're talking about. Either way, everyone knows you're dead wrong.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  51.  
    icon
    Jeni (profile), Jun 5th, 2011 @ 8:51am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Brilliantly Inciteful

    What if someone wants to practice their rights to speak out against torrents and wants to have a domain of "notorrents.com" or "stoptorrenting.com" or whatever?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  52.  
    identicon
    Abolitionist, Jun 5th, 2011 @ 9:51am

    Re:

    Everyone is upset because a court figured out what is painfully obvious at even a glance: torrents are mostly used for pirated content and software.

    Most Fords have been used to commit traffic crimes of some sort. Based on that, I suppose you would support banning Fords too.

    People like you are a good example of the harm copyright does society.

    Abolish copyright.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  53.  
    icon
    FUDbuster (profile), Jun 5th, 2011 @ 11:09am

    The court talks about it raising a presumption. Your headline states that courts are saying that it's necessarily so. That is incorrect since a presumption just means it's likely to be, not that it must be. Presumptions are rebuttable. If the vast majority of torrent sites and torrents are used for infringement, then how is wrong to say that a torrent is probably infringing? The court is, of course, correct about this. They're simply stating the obvious.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  54.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 5th, 2011 @ 1:11pm

    Re:

    If the vast majority of [BULLETS] are used for [CRIME], then how is wrong to say that a [BULLET] is probably [CRIMINAL]? The court is, of course, correct about this. They're simply stating the obvious.

    Too easy.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  55.  
    icon
    FUDbuster (profile), Jun 5th, 2011 @ 1:47pm

    Re: Re:

    I don't really get your point. If the vast majority of bullets were used for crime, then you could rightly say that a bullet is probably criminal. How does that demonstrate that what the French court said is incorrect?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  56.  
    icon
    Jeni (profile), Jun 5th, 2011 @ 3:49pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    You can't make a bullet a criminal - it's a thing; a criminal is a human who wrongly uses a bullet. A bullet can do no wrong just sitting there. How it is used is determined by the mind of a human.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  57.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 5th, 2011 @ 4:31pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Don't be silly! We shouldn't blame people, only the things they use.

    Did you know that the vast majority of prisons are nothing more than crime schools? Ergo, we should probably outlaw prisons.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  58.  
    icon
    FUDbuster (profile), Jun 5th, 2011 @ 4:55pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    I should have said: "If the vast majority of bullets were used for crime, then you could rightly say that a bullet is probably used for crime." Sorry if it wasn't clear.

    The point is that all the court was saying is that if a site has "torrent" in the domain name, chances are the site is used for infringement. I don't think that's really a controversial statement.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  59.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 5th, 2011 @ 7:41pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    .torrent = .crime

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  60.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 6th, 2011 @ 12:10am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    The internet is mostly used for copyright infringement. Therefore, it should be eliminated.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  61.  
    icon
    FUDbuster (profile), Jun 6th, 2011 @ 4:18am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    .torrent = .crime

    The court here isn't talking about the .torrent file extension. They're talking about having "torrent" in a domain name.

    Do you agree with the court that if a site has "torrent" in the domain name, then chances are that site is used for infringement?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  62.  
    identicon
    DogBreath, Jun 6th, 2011 @ 9:20am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Brilliantly Inciteful

    Moving to be part of a majority illegal community of file sharers, or advertising that you are shows intent, and that is good place to start. It isn't an absolute summary judgement of the sites, but it is enough for authorities to act on.

    So... for example say you lose your job, your house and you end up moving into the poor part of town, that just happens to have the majority of illegal acts occurring in that location. The cops now have the unimpeachable right to break down your door (with no "probable cause" or "exigent circumstances") to look for illegal activity (don't worry, you'll still get your "due process" in court, if your lucky enough to survive the encounter without being killed), because you wouldn't live in such a crime infested neighborhood unless you were "probably" involved in criminal acts yourself, thereby giving the cops "Probable Cause" in the first place.

    Welcome to: Legal Profiling Failures Based On Circular Logic 101. Please take a seat.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  63.  
    icon
    Greg G (profile), Jun 6th, 2011 @ 9:36am

    Re: Re:

    let's not even mention http://www.penisland.com

    A moron in a hurry might think it's Utopia for Mr. Garrison.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  64.  
    identicon
    Jeff Rife, Jun 7th, 2011 @ 12:09pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Do you agree with the court that if a site has "torrent" in the domain name, then chances are that site is used for infringement?
    No, since one of the most popular sites with "torrent" in the name is merely a news and discussion site (torrentfreak.com). Similarly, every site for torrent software (utorrent.com, etc.) has no infringing material at all, yet many have "torrent" in the name.

    Of course, with this sort of ruling by a court, eventually, you'll have the "presumption" that sites with "movie[sz]?", "mu[sz]ic", "tune[sz]?", "share", etc. will all be "presumed to infringe".

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  65.  
    icon
    FUDbuster (profile), Jun 7th, 2011 @ 12:17pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Seems like it'd be easy enough to figure out. Make a list of every site with "torrent" in the name and then see what that site's about.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  66.  
    icon
    Jeni (profile), Jun 7th, 2011 @ 5:09pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    GAWWWDDDD...now they want to pick apart the English language and make WORDS illegal.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This