Share/E-mail This Story

Email This



EU Tried To Get US To Force ICANN To Delay .xxx Domain

from the can-this-please-just-end... dept

The years long (and, at times, totally contradictory) fight over .xxx shows no signs of letting up, even though ICANN has approved the TLD, despite protests from various countries. Apparently European Commissioner for the Digital Agenda, Neelie Kroes, specifically stepped in and asked the US government to delay the implementation of .xxx so that the EU could prepare a way to try to stop the TLD. Thankfully, the White House told Kroes that, even if it doesn't agree with the decision to move forward on .xxx, ICANN is supposed to be independent and stepping in and going against the organization could do more harm than good.

Of course, part of what's amusing is that part of Kroes' reasoning for asking the US to step in is that so many others have been trying to get the management of the domain system moved out of ICANN and into a UN body, in part because they don't trust ICANN being under the control of the US government. She argues that ICANN's decision to go through with .xxx only gives more fodder to those who wish to get rid of ICANN. Of course, couldn't the same be true if the US stepped in and asserted its power to block ICANN? If anything, it seems like that would lead others to scream even louder about how ICANN is a sham and it's all really run by the US government.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    icon
    Chronno S. Trigger (profile), May 6th, 2011 @ 4:59am

    I still want a .xxx domain name

    Non profit organizations have .org, but they can still use a .com. I don't really see a problem with the adult industry having .xxx, but can still use .com or whatever. AS LONG AS THAT'S WHERE THEY LEAVE IT.

    Granted, it is just a giant money grab by ICANN. I can only see two uses for Walmart.xxx, and since ICANN requires the preorder to be by those who own the name already, guess who's getting it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 6th, 2011 @ 5:23am

    Ok, seriously, why fight over the ".xxx" TLD, when we can have the much more efficient ".x^3" TLD domain?

    (I would've save one character, but Techdirt doesn't allow superscript. I think Techdirt's bias against efficient representation of math-related URLs is obvious here)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Cipher-0, May 6th, 2011 @ 5:24am

    Problem?

    The .xxx TLD is a solution to a problem that simply does not exist, unless that problem is registrars needing more TLDs to sell for six times the usual price.

    Anyone who expects Hoppy's House of Pr0n to move all its sites to the .xxx TLD is either deluded or stupid.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 6th, 2011 @ 5:25am

    Re:

    "...TLD domain"

    ...ATM Machine...PIN number...

    Honest mistake...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    icon
    Richard (profile), May 6th, 2011 @ 6:34am

    Re: Re:

    HIV virus

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    icon
    Ralph-J (profile), May 6th, 2011 @ 6:37am

    National-level TLD blocking threatens internet stability?

    I don't mean to defend ICANN's money grab, but where is the evidence for Kroes's claims?

    And those parents that know how to "filter .xxx domain names", will more than likely know about the other naughty sources as well.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 6th, 2011 @ 6:59am

    Couldn't resist....

    If anything, it seems like that would lead others to scream even louder about how ICANN is a sham and it's all really run by the US government.


    ICANN IS A SHAM AND IT'S ALL REALLY RUN BY THE US GOVERNMENT!!

    ...

    Or perhaps more likely just as greedy and inevitably self-centered as most major corporations coupled with a total spinelessness (again much like most major corporations) when it comes to caving in to the US government demanding something of dubious legality.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    icon
    Capitalist Lion Tamer (profile), May 6th, 2011 @ 7:42am

    Time to start up a new panic site

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 6th, 2011 @ 8:00am

    Re: Problem?

    When I read your post's title a trollface image popped into my head.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Chris, May 6th, 2011 @ 8:19am

    irony

    So the EU is wants to get rid of ICANN because they're worried the US government is in too much control of it... so because they believe their own fears, they believe they can ask the US government to exert control over ICANN, who responds with "We don't control ICANN, so we can't act on your desire to control ICANN"

    It's not even noon and you've managed to give me a headache already, thanks.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    icon
    Josef Anvil (profile), May 6th, 2011 @ 8:21am

    If there ever was a non-issue...

    I can't think of much that is less important to debate.

    The .xxx TLD makes 100% PERFECT sense. I would think the porn industry would be pleased to have its own TLD. I guess from the industry viewpoint it's a problem, but from the consumer point of view, it looks great!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    icon
    Qritiqal (profile), May 6th, 2011 @ 8:22am

    Re: I still want a .xxx domain name

    I have dibs on anonymouscoward.xxx

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    icon
    Trails (profile), May 6th, 2011 @ 8:36am

    Re: Problem?

    Agreed. Some claim the point of .xxx is to segregate porn or make it easier to filter. That's absurd on its face (all over its face, har har).

    The point of .xxx is really to establish a TLD that there's a market for. The fact that anyone offended by porn can fairly easily block the entire TLD undermines any "think of the children" type arguments, but while porn on .xxx is easy to segregate and block, online porn will never be easy to block. camgirls.com will not suddenly become a site about women in photography.

    .xxx will not lead to more porn, greater porn availability for minors, it will simply offer more domain names for sale to porn providers. It will have 0 effect on supply, demand or availability of porn.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    icon
    The eejit (profile), May 6th, 2011 @ 8:38am

    Re: Re:

    And from the uselessly redundant category....ANONYMOUS COWARD!!!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    icon
    Trails (profile), May 6th, 2011 @ 8:45am

    Re: Re:

    Look, just cause TLA acronyms are confusing FTP people, doesn't mean their pieces of POS.

    FYI information, I'm surprised this is coming from the EU union. Europe has a reputation for liberalness. Claims like porn promotes the spread of STD diseases(did they make this claim? I didn't RTFA article) is what you'd expect from the GOP party, not the EC commissioner.

    Anyways, it's nice to see the US states govt pushing back, instead of trying to manipulate ICANN corporation, for once, for ffs.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 6th, 2011 @ 9:44am

    Re: If there ever was a non-issue...

    It always looks great from the customer point of view. . .

    Giggity!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    icon
    Billy Wenge-Murphy (profile), May 6th, 2011 @ 1:37pm

    Re: I still want a .xxx domain name

    I want to be the first one to have a non-pornographic .xxx
    The hipster in me craves to use .xxx ironically.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    identicon
    bagas, May 6th, 2011 @ 6:23pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    ertyyiddhjjs

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    identicon
    Josh Stein, May 6th, 2011 @ 6:53pm

    why

    Why did ICANN approve .XXX? There needs to be an investigation

    already. ICANN went against everyone accept the company ICM

    and approved .XXX. How did this happen! Does anything in the

    US govt. work anymore? Really? We need to know whats going

    on with ICANN cause their out of control!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    identicon
    عادل, May 9th, 2011 @ 6:08am

    Re: Couldn't resist....

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    identicon
    hjtgirdf8rbkhvjt, May 11th, 2011 @ 3:02am

    Re: National-level TLD blocking threatens internet stability?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    identicon
    Tanfur, Oct 17th, 2011 @ 5:24pm

    End of Story?

    An old, old convention in short story formatting, is to have at the end, not "END" but "XXX", or "=XXX=", to indicate there are no more pages, but not be part of the text. It even morphed into "=30=" for some writers. I was in a writing group where one writer used that convention.

    So having .XXX TLD available should really be the End of the Story!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This