EU's ACTA Champion Rejects European Parliament Member's Request For ACTA Documents
from the more-secrecy dept
Even with ACTA supposedly in a "final" state, it appears that the negotiators just can't resist keeping up their level of stifling secrecy. Glyn Moody points us to the news that the EU's main backer of ACTA, Commissioner Karel De Gucht, has refused to turn over some "preparatory documents" concerning ACTA that were requested by European Parliament Member Francoise Castex. As the article notes, the European Commission is required to turn over such documents, as per the Vienna Convention, but De Gucht apparently has a different interpretation of all of that, saying that as long as he answers questions by MEPs, he has no obligation to turn over the documents.
It's really quite stunning how tone deaf ACTA supporters are on these issues. People have been asking for a modicum of transparency on this highly questionable agreement, and the response has been to be even more secretive. Of course, all this does is highlight that they know they're pushing an industry agenda, and they're ashamed of it. If you actually were putting together a proposal that benefited everyday citizens, they wouldn't be hiding all the details.
It's really quite stunning how tone deaf ACTA supporters are on these issues. People have been asking for a modicum of transparency on this highly questionable agreement, and the response has been to be even more secretive. Of course, all this does is highlight that they know they're pushing an industry agenda, and they're ashamed of it. If you actually were putting together a proposal that benefited everyday citizens, they wouldn't be hiding all the details.






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
...Sorry, I couldn't keep a straight face after "piracy".
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
"Millions of children die, every minute, from piracy"
"Piracy kills billions of whales every day"
etc.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
The US Chamber of Congress paid for a glowing "documentary" about all of the evils of piracy and copyright infringement.
While there were some serious concerns about actual fake prescription drugs, the main message was when you buy a fake handbag from a street vendor your enforcing a world wide trafficking ring who will bring in terrorist and dirty bombs. They quoted the ever popular trillions of lost revenues and how it harmed everyone, but were careful to keep it all tightly bundled on every level. That if you torrent a tv show your supporting terrorist and gangs who will use all of the money they get to attack us.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
In addition...
When discussing ACTA at a residence or hotel room, one member must disassemble all lamps and phones in a search for bugs while another member peers furtively through the venetian blinds.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
....everyone knows baby seals only go to raves and do not go clubbing....
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
My takeaway on ACTA
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Then make him answer questions.
Question 1: "What is the first word of the ACTA documents we are requesting?"
Question 2: "What is the second word of the ACTA documents we are requesting?"
Question 3: "What is the third word of the ACTA documents we are requesting?"
...
Question n: "What is the nth word of the ACTA documents we are requesting?"
I think he might just turn over the documents after he sees where this line of questions is heading.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
My takeaway on ACTA
My takeaway from ACTA is that you can stonewall by being boring. The ACTA people, from the US Trade Rep office on down, just bore people, critics, sychophantic lawmakers, everyone. The ACTA people are boring beyond any previous benchmark.
The dogged boringness seems to have worked. Nobody's too excited about it at all.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
Versus buying a legitimate music CD and the RIAA using that money to get ICE to attack perfectly legitimate websites...Yeah, that's why I don't buy 'legit' music from the RIAA!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Saying "This is what we want, and this is what we are going to have, end of discussion" would make any laws derived from ACTA into something akin to a Caesar's decree, something minimally, grudgingly, enforced, but not respected.
Saying that about enough laws, and the whole legal structure would get called into question. I personally would think the legitimacy of a legal system where things like ACTA get decreed would be minimal. I just might become a scofflaw, with only official respect for "officers" of the "court", "judges", "laws" and "legislators".
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Then make him answer questions.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
To funny the record labels actually do fund terrorism ...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment