Responding to a series of questions that Senator Ron Wyden asked, Ron Kirk, the US Trade Representative, and the Obama administration apparently believe that Congress and the courts will not be constrained in any way by ACTA. This is a bit odd, since the last draft of the agreement conflicts with US law in some places, and most certainly appears to state that countries agreeing to ACTA need to follow certain laws that would block Congress' ability to change copyright laws in various ways. Of course, what's really going on here is a sneaky political game. Since the administration wants to call this an "executive agreement," rather than a treaty (so that it doesn't need Senate approval), they have to claim that it won't really impact US laws. Yet... you can be absolutely positive that if Congress moved to change a law in any way that conflicted with ACTA, we'd be hearing speeches and reading stories about how we're not living up to our "international obligations," such as those found in ACTA. It's a really cynical political move by the administration.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Why The USTR Is Working So Hard To Kill American Innovation And The Economy
- Ridiculous: Why Is Any Country Supporting Locking In Life + 70 Copyright Term Protection?
- House Approves (Weakened) Anti-Patent Trolling Bill, Now We Wait For The Senate
- Without Anyone Paying Attention, Canada Is About To Change Its Laws To Support ACTA
- Lobbyist Insists His Meeting About 'TPP IP Issues' Wasn't About TPP IP Issues