Guy Sues Over 'Da Da Da Da Da Da.... CHARGE!' Jingle He Might Not Have Written
from the da-da-da-da-da-da....-SUE! dept
A few different folks sent over variations on this story about how a guy named Bobby Kent claims to have come up with the now ubiquitous "da da da da da da... CHARGE!" music in 1978. If you've been to a major sporting event in the US in the past few decades, you've almost certainly heard it. You can finds tons of examples on YouTube, but here's a decent one:
Kent apparently was the musical director for the San Diego Chargers football team in 1978, and claims he came up with (and registered a copyright for) the song "Stadium Doo Dads," which apparently includes the same notes, though I cannot find a full version of the song anywhere to compare. Either way, Kent is now suing ASCAP for not paying him royalties for all the stadiums playing those six notes, and that he intends to sue every professional sports team in the US, with the exception of the Los Angeles Lakers, who coughed up $3,000 when he sent them a letter.
You can see the full lawsuit against ASCAP embedded below in all its glory. Of course, it does raise questions about whether or not these six simple notes really rise to the level of creativity required for a copyright. But, even if you accept that, there's another (big) problem. For years, it's been claimed that the true originator of the "da da da da da da... CHARGE!" concept was a dude named Tommy Walker, who was both a drum major and the field kicker for the USC Trojans in the late 1940s and claims to have come up with the basic jingle in 1946. Of course, others point out that, it's really built on an old calvary bugle call, with some reports pointing to a German WWI army manual that has the same six notes listed as number 20 "Battery." Others have pointed out that the (newly moved from Brooklyn) LA Dodgers picked up on using the charge call from USC in 1958 and it spread from there.
All of that history certainly calls into serious question the legitimacy of Kent's overall claims. When asked about this, Kent's lawyer says that the two songs have a different tempo:
You can see the full lawsuit against ASCAP embedded below in all its glory. Of course, it does raise questions about whether or not these six simple notes really rise to the level of creativity required for a copyright. But, even if you accept that, there's another (big) problem. For years, it's been claimed that the true originator of the "da da da da da da... CHARGE!" concept was a dude named Tommy Walker, who was both a drum major and the field kicker for the USC Trojans in the late 1940s and claims to have come up with the basic jingle in 1946. Of course, others point out that, it's really built on an old calvary bugle call, with some reports pointing to a German WWI army manual that has the same six notes listed as number 20 "Battery." Others have pointed out that the (newly moved from Brooklyn) LA Dodgers picked up on using the charge call from USC in 1958 and it spread from there.
All of that history certainly calls into serious question the legitimacy of Kent's overall claims. When asked about this, Kent's lawyer says that the two songs have a different tempo:
Kent's attorney acknowledged that the USC song "does contain five notes that are close to the last five notes of the crescendo of Mr. Kent's song." But, he said, the notes are played at a different tempo.In the end... I'm sorta left with the simple question: what kind of system do we have when there's now going to be legal fights over the "Charge!" jingle?






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Isn't the whole point of that jingle that the tempo isn't fixed, but gradually increases until the end? I'm not sure the basic musical concept of accelerando deserves a copyright...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
*nah, just getting that argument out of the way now.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
We called it the 'Tuba Charge' because we tuba players usually started it.
Strangely, I don't recall seeing the plaintiff there in 1974 or 1975 when we played at it every home game here in Gloversville, NY.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
And say this gets tossed on some grounds by the judge, does that make the 3,000 from the Lakers, extorsion?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Ah yes
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Maybe he didn't watch Looney Tunes as a kid?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
It probably doesn't, but I bet you could get a patent on it.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Not likely in those days. Copyright wasn't quite the lottery-ticket-hoarding institution that it is today.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Too little, far too late
Who do I see about getting ?my" money?....
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Trumpet players
Some people have more nerve than brains.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Wait, wait, wait... This just gave me an idea. I have DNA proof that I'm a direct descendant of early humans, and since they invented fire I'm gonna be filthy rich.
Pay up, all you lazy food-cooking bastards!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Trumpet players
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Patent a method of raising the temperature of food to levels safe for human consumption. Would be as good as patenting a method for swinging.
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2F netahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=5&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=6368227& ;OS=6368227&RS=6368227
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
In the Flintstones
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZsWd2ke-I4#t=10m50s
The sports illustrated piece you linked to, also says there were toy bugles sold by the Dodgers in 1959 that played the tune. I'm sure they could dig up even earlier hard evidence to hopefully completely trounce this guy's copyright claim.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Goes 'way back
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
I'm not sure how one person's legal claims calls into question the whole legal system. People make all sorts of stupid claims in every branch of law, not just copyright.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Charge
This guy is clueless.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Dudley DoRight in the 60s? Or something similar.
Three Stooges shorts also? Maybe?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Hi, Righthaven!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
MUSIC IS STOLEN!!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Even Dr. Pepper used it
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
There are thousands of cases of murderers abusing mental defect laws, should they be eliminated?
Some cops abuse their authority to write tickets, or to to physically thrash a person. Should we outlaw police protection in general?
All laws are taken advantage of. Should they all be called into further question?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
Because I think that all laws should be questioned. Nothing should just be accepted.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Flintstones - that's just spooky!
And in the spirit of Bobby Kent, I think I thought of the Flintstones angle first, and I claim copyright on it! Expect a C+D from the law offices of Dewey, Cheatham, & Howe...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: MUSIC IS STOLEN!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnwOE_44D9M
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: MUSIC IS STOLEN!!
Except the ones that rip off Pachelbel's Canon, which is pretty much all of them....
If his copyright hadn't expired = and if he was still alive - Pachelbel would be very very rich indeed!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
A different tempo, really?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Things like this should be charged with fraud with some jail time attached.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Really??!!!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Really??!!!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
...Same system
The same system where nobody is actually allowed to sing "Happy Birthday" because it was bought by Warner even though the Wikipedia entry states the composition and melody were copied from an earlier song. Not only that but the combination of words and melody to make the Happy Birthday Song were printed and likely played in the early 1900's before anybody copyrighted it.
Da da Da da da Happy Birthday!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Charger football?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: MUSIC IS STOLEN!!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
US Cavalry Bugle Call
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
"Charge" Music
Michael R.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment