Tweeting Deemed Not 'Broadcasting' And Allowed In Courtroom

from the nice-of-them dept

Michael Scott points us to a case in Connecticut state court, in which "broadcasting" from the courtroom was forbidden, but there was a debate over whether or not Twittering from the courtroom should be allowed. The arguments go back and forth, noting that there are some similarities to broadcasting with Twitter, but not necessarily enough. The judge then looked at the reason behind prohibiting broadcasting, and realized it was to keep direct images from being seen, but that reporting from the courtroom should be allowed. The only concern is if the actions were disruptive (such as with a loud keyboard), but noted that such problems could be dealt with on a case by case basis. The guy trying to restrict the use of Twitter claimed that such "communications tend to be either trivial or inaccurate and thus play no useful role in educating the public about the judicial process," but the judge pointed out that a court should not be controlling the "substance of courtroom reporting," and said that Twittering would be allowed, so long as there is no disruption (which would be dealt with specifically). Seems like a reasonable outcome.

7 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 


 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    Holy spinning newspapers!

    identicon
    Daph, Mar 28th, 2011 @ 7:08pm

    This just in: being reasonable is now newsworthy! Americans experience dizziness from simultaneous mass double-taking!

    Follow this on Twitter! We're out of exclamation points?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    Doubly reasonable

    identicon
    Mike Doherty, Mar 28th, 2011 @ 8:16pm

    It's also the right way to approach this. Go back to first principles - *why* is broadcasting prohibited? What about that reasoning applies? What doesn't? And make an informed decision on that basis.

    Sadly, I'm impressed. This level of quality should be the norm.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    Re: Holy spinning newspapers!

    icon
    xenomancer (profile), Mar 28th, 2011 @ 8:37pm

    This just in, fewer exclamation points left on Earth than atoms of Fancium@ Use your reserves with dear caution@ We have squandered this precious resource and failed to provide monetary incentives to make more for everyone else@

    This also just in: death of joke causes neck injuries across the country from severity of disgusted head shakes.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  

    Re: Doubly reasonable

    icon
    xenomancer (profile), Mar 28th, 2011 @ 8:39pm

    "This level of quality should be the norm."
    QFT

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Bernard Gilroy, Mar 29th, 2011 @ 4:12am

    So, one would assume that tweeting pictures (i.e., from your cellphone) would still be banned? Because that would be broadcasting direct images.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  

    Re: Doubly reasonable

    icon
    Sean T Henry (profile), Mar 29th, 2011 @ 7:11am

    "Go back to first principles - *why* is broadcasting prohibited?"

    They do not want news stations with cameras sitting in the court room taking up space and distracting people. Think any time that there is a high profile case would it be good to have the four local stations and a national one or two taking up space.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  

    Re:

    identicon
    Huph, Mar 29th, 2011 @ 10:18am

    I am wondering the same thing.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
Essential Reading
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This