TSA Refuses To Provide Body Scanner Info In Lawsuit... Claiming Copyright Prevents Handing Over The Info
from the uh,-what? dept
Last year, we mentioned that privacy advocates EPIC were suing over the TSA's decision to use the naked scanners at airports. Reader jilocasin alerts us to a bizarre update in that lawsuit. Apparently the TSA is refusing to provide specific evidence to the court first claiming that it was "sensitive security information," but also saying that it won't hand over the info because it's copyrighted material. Say what? This makes no sense. If it's US government documents, then it's almost certainly not covered by copyright. But even if it's a private company's documents and covered by copyright, there's nothing stopping it from being handed over to the court.
25 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Congress: The TSA Is Wasting Hundreds Of Millions In Taxpayer Dollars
- Homeland Security Admits That TSA Scanners Have 'Vulnerabilities'
- More Righthaven IP Up For Auction, Including The Name Righthaven
- FTC Reminds EPIC That Suing The FTC To Get It To Investigate Google Might Not Be The Best Idea
- Is Facebook Violating The Law Just By Encouraging You To Share?






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
The government would love to answer your question, but unfortunately the answer is copyrighted too.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Secret law
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
...now that song is stuck in my head...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Of course the judge could always view it in his chambers, separate from the court to decide, regardless of it's copyright status. It's amazing how many times copyright comes out as a reason to do things.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Copyright...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Perhaps they would put it on their existing Puppy Gallery:
http://www.tsa.gov/lawenforcement/programs/editorial_multi_image_0009.shtm
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Only if it's transformative and original, which is why I long ago replaced my biological phallus with a dual-tipped mega-wang made to look like it's wearing a Derrick Rose jersey....
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
What if a plastic surgeon who designs their own implants go with this.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
I bet if you added "On the Internet" you could manage to get a patent on it too.....
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
Once a dick, always a dick ...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Copyright...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Copyright...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment