Florida Man Sues Wikileaks Over The Personal Distress It Caused Him
from the enterprisingly-wasteful dept
While the US government is struggling to come up with something (anything!) to bring Julian Assange to court over, one man in Florida has taken matters into his own hands. Slashdot points us to the news that a guy in Florida, David Pitchford, has apparently sued Wikileaks for all the distress it has caused him, claiming that the leaks have resulted in "hypertension," "depression" and "living in fear of being stricken by another heart attack and/or stroke" as a result of living "in fear of being on the brink of another nuclear [sic] WAR."' The full complaint is embedded below, and it's quite amusing. He's also afraid that others must be similarly suffering, and the impact of this will be to "diminish the Medicaid benifits [sic] that the Plainiff [sic] Depennds [sic] apon [sic] for health care in that the United States is Out of money." Mr. Pitchford is demanding (respectfully) $150 million dollars (well, "dollors" according to him).
According to the Superkuh blog, Mr. Pitchford in the past has tried similar tactics in suing Osama bin Laden. Of course, he also threatened to sue Superkuh for distress, after the blogger indicated he did not agree with Pitchford's lawsuits. It appears he likes to sue. Pitchford indicated that he didn't believe "any internet based medium could be a real member of the press." Another amusing bit was when Superkuh pointed out Wikileaks' relationship with various large media organizations such as the Guardian. In the lawsuit complaint, you can see that Pitchford claims that "after exhaustive research" he has determined that Wikileaks and Assange "have no known association with any known jourlism [sic] entity with the exception of that which is self proclaimed." You would think that an association with The Guardian or other major newspapers (including, in the past, the NY Times) would point out the problem with this line of argument. Instead, Pitchford suggested he planned to sue The Guardian too. Oh, and the Associated Press as well, which is guilty of talking about the leaks. In other words, don't expect this lawsuit to get any traction at all.
According to the Superkuh blog, Mr. Pitchford in the past has tried similar tactics in suing Osama bin Laden. Of course, he also threatened to sue Superkuh for distress, after the blogger indicated he did not agree with Pitchford's lawsuits. It appears he likes to sue. Pitchford indicated that he didn't believe "any internet based medium could be a real member of the press." Another amusing bit was when Superkuh pointed out Wikileaks' relationship with various large media organizations such as the Guardian. In the lawsuit complaint, you can see that Pitchford claims that "after exhaustive research" he has determined that Wikileaks and Assange "have no known association with any known jourlism [sic] entity with the exception of that which is self proclaimed." You would think that an association with The Guardian or other major newspapers (including, in the past, the NY Times) would point out the problem with this line of argument. Instead, Pitchford suggested he planned to sue The Guardian too. Oh, and the Associated Press as well, which is guilty of talking about the leaks. In other words, don't expect this lawsuit to get any traction at all.






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
man what
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Vexed?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: be careful
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
This reminds me...
The answer was almost ALWAYS Florida....
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This reminds me...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This reminds me...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Build a bunker
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Answers
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
re: Pitchford
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Finally
Thanks my fellow Floridian for helping that cause!
/sarcasm, (start)shame-induced-alcohol-binge.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Does anybody not open those?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
spell check
He gives his address as a Stadium Trailer Park. No further comment needed.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
http://gizmodo.com/5733307/wikileaks-lawsuit-documents-gallery/gallery/4
Are those dollor amounts supposed to match?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Every time I read TechDirt I wonder if I shouldn't take out a patent for 'System of Inhaling Air using muscles to pull a diaphragm below lungs' Then every one who breaths must give me money.
I was also wondering, does anyone hold copyright on the 3 primary colors?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
idiot
theft of oxygen.
what a f---in d--- head.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Scientology criminal
Are you should this guy's name isn't Helena Kobrin? Kendrick Moxon? David Miscavige? Or some other well-known Scientology crime boss?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Nope, not Scientology connected
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
World War II does not count.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
How many million dollors?!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How many million dollors?!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Correct Venue?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment