Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

1.  

   

   Jay (profile), Jan 13th, 2011 @ 11:13pm

   
   

   Uhm...
   
   Where's the incentive to free up the data?
   
   I'm sure that there will be more incentive to sell everything for a price.
   
   This is just as bad as Freddie and Fannie and the entire QSE fiasco.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

2.  

   Re:

   

   The eejit (profile), Jan 14th, 2011 @ 1:09am

   
   

   I agree wholeheartedly. This feels like a 419 scam, only government-sanctioned. "Want your info? Please send a small administration fee of $200 to Congress!"

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

3.  

   RE

   

   Keith G (profile), Jan 14th, 2011 @ 5:26am

   
   

   "it will open up opportunities for innovative developers" sounds more like they are putting our personal data online than 'freeing' data.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

4.  

   

   Anonymous Coward, Jan 14th, 2011 @ 6:05am

   
   

   In other words. We will put all the stuff the government wants in this pool of 'publicly usable content' and then we lock it away and require 50 forms to let the public use it. Who gets to decide what goes in the pool of content? Will it be actual Public Domain or just some more bull?

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

5.  

   

   Anonymous Coward, Jan 14th, 2011 @ 6:07am

   
   

   Will this be like the 'Freedom of Information Act'?

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

6.  

   

   Anonymous Coward, Jan 14th, 2011 @ 6:09am

   
   

   The fact that they call it a corporation makes it suspect immediately. It will information for sale just like everything else. Those that have, get. Those that have not, get not.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

7.  

   Overly complicated

   

   Josh in CharlotteNC (profile), Jan 14th, 2011 @ 6:45am

   
   

   Wait... this seems overly complicated to me. The government sets up a corporation. The point of this corporation is to get various government agencies to free up their data. The corporation then provides it to the public.
   
   Why doesn't the government, you know, just free the data and give it to the public? Through whatever the British equivalent of the Freedom of Information Act is.
   
   This seems to me like something that politicians can point to and say "We're being transparent!" without actually accomplishing anything and not really being transparent at all.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

8.  

   Re: Overly complicated

   

   Chronno S. Trigger (profile), Jan 14th, 2011 @ 8:35am

   
   

   Take everything that has been deemed "unclassified" and would be accessible threw a FOIA request (or whatever in the UK) and put it all on an open webserver. Put it all in a nice database with a good API and let someone else figure out how to make a pretty user interface. Sounds relatively easy to do and it saves taxpayer money by not having to pay asinine amounts to a web developer.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

9.  

   Re: Re: Overly complicated

   

   Idobek (profile), Jan 14th, 2011 @ 12:20pm

   
   

   The "UK equivalents" are the Freedom of Information Act and a FoI request.
   
   I think the reason for setting up the corporation is to head of the criticism they get whenever they release raw information. Almost all the commentators insist that no one will be have any incentive to create a user interface or investigate the data (and make it understandable to the mainstream media). Witness the tone of amazement in all today's Wikipedia anniversary stories - the MSM really doesn't understand why people contribute.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

10.  

    UK info database

    

    Bruce, Jan 16th, 2011 @ 9:28am

    
    

    This sounds like a British version of the portal www.usa.gov. Simple enough, just follow the US example.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

11.  

    UK info database

    

    Bruce, Jan 16th, 2011 @ 9:31am

    
    

    This sounds like a British version of the portal www.usa.gov. Simple enough, just follow the US example.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

12.  

    Sounds Like A New Labour-ish National Database

    

    aikiwolfie (profile), Jan 16th, 2011 @ 11:05am

    
    

    This just smacks of New Labour. Which is a bit scary. I thought we voted them out at the last election by not actually voting for anybody.
    
    So Conservative + Liberal Democrat = New Labour? Dam! ...

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment