Feds Subpoena Twitter For Info On Wikileaks-Supporting Icelandic Politician

from the fishing-expedition dept

In the feds continued efforts to find something (anything!) to charge Wikileaks with, its latest fishing expedition apparently involves issuing a subpoena to Twitter asking for info on the account of Birgitta Jonsdottir, a Member of Iceland's Parliament, who had been instrumental in helping Wikileaks establish a strong free speech legal structure in Iceland. More recently, like many former Wikileaks' supporters, she has distanced herself from the operation, due to disagreements over Julian Assange's role in the organization. Apparently the subpoena is seeking everything she's done on Twitter since November 2009 (presumably including private direct messages). Given all the recent talk questioning whether or not private emails stored on third party servers are protected under the 4th Amendment, it does make you wonder if the same applies to private direct messages as well. Jonsdottir is apparently planning to fight the subpoena, so we may just find out...


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Doc Sheldon, Jan 7th, 2011 @ 6:09pm

    Twitter subpoena

    In an Icelandic court, I would certainly expect Jonsdottir to be supported completely in quashing the subpoena. Unfortunately, Iceland's influence will probably be very limited in this case. EFF has has good folks on their legal team, so I suppose we'll just have to wait and see. That it'll be a landmark decision seems pretty likely, though.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 7th, 2011 @ 6:22pm

    "it does make you wonder if the same applies to private direct messages as well."

    The fourth amendment doesn't say that Twitter can't be searched, just that it can't be searched without a court's authorization. Isn't that what a subpoena is?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 7th, 2011 @ 6:32pm

    Re:

    Yes, The feds are doing it the right way, even if it is completely douchey. However, Twitter is also handling it the right way by giving the subject a chance to quash the subpoena.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 7th, 2011 @ 6:37pm

    The fact that one government is trying to find something in another government and could force a company to surrender that data should give pause to anyone.

    Can the U.S. government destroy the trust that others around the world have on American companies and thus kill revenues generated?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    icon
    Marcus Carab (profile), Jan 7th, 2011 @ 6:55pm

    Re:

    The court hasn't ordered her to turn over any information, because it has no legal reason to do so. It's not ordering a search of her property in any way. What it has done is subpoena Twitter for the records.

    It's not firmly established whether or not your private data held on external servers is protected by the 4th Amendment - if it is, this would count as unlawful search. I'll leave it to those with more detailed legal knowledge to argue over whether it is, but it certainly seems like by the spirit of the 4th Amendment it would be.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    icon
    G Thompson (profile), Jan 7th, 2011 @ 7:01pm

    So maybe myself as a representative of Australia should serve subpoenas upon Fox, CSPAN, et.al on any and all representatives of the USA. Congress, Senate and Executive branch alike, on their inducement to harm Julian Assange?

    For the USA to go on a fishing expedition that involves criminal legal action against, and a subpoena is criminal legal action in this instance, another countries democratically elected lawmaker/parliamentarian who by the way would be covered under parliamentary privilege and diplomatic immunity if she was representing her constituents in these instances (that's gunna be a fun one for the Feds) can be classified as a lot more than a breach of protocol and diplomatic privilege, it can be construed as interfering in another countries (who is also a member of NATO) parliament by intimidation etc.

    Wars have been fought for less

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 7th, 2011 @ 7:06pm

    Re: Re:

    "if it is, this would count as unlawful search."

    If the court authorized it then this makes no sense. (if) It's protected by the fourth amendment in that a court needs to authorize the release of the records. If the courts have authorized such a release then there is no violation of the fourth amendment. Who cares if the records are on Twitter or in within someones personal possession, the court authorized it regardless.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 7th, 2011 @ 7:17pm

    If you use PUBLIC media for your PRIVATE things, then expect your PRIVATE things to be made PUBLIC. Simple as that. There are tons of (wayyy more) secure way to communicate. Just shows that people involved in technology often don't understand it.

    Plus, anyone doing anything to piss off the USA and using a platform hosted in the USA is basically an idiot.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 7th, 2011 @ 8:15pm

    Re:

    Agreed, those idiots should make their own platforms and make money on the backs of untrustworthy American business, instead of the other way around.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    icon
    PW (profile), Jan 8th, 2011 @ 1:39am

    Fourth Amendment may not apply

    As you can imagine, Twitter is-a-buzzin' around this story. It might be helpful to note that the request for all information did not include the content of the messages. The Order specifically states among items that are being requested,
    "non-content information associated with the contents of any communication or file stored by or for the account(s); such as the source and destination email addresses and IP addresses."
    You can read the order for yourself at http://bit.ly/gyrdoH. Declan McCullaugh fm cnet does delve into the 4th Amendment issues in his piece here: http://bit.ly/h6weTE. But I believe someone on Twitter pointed the issue of the request not being content. Importantly, he also notes the fact that while one federal appeals court has ruled on the need for a search warrant (as opposed to the Order issued by a Magistrate), this decision is not binding in Virginia or San Francisco, where the legal jockeying action is likely to take place. Glenn Greenwald also has some worthwhile thoughts on the issue here: http://bit.ly/edyD2a.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    icon
    The eejit (profile), Jan 8th, 2011 @ 2:08am

    Re:

    Yep, this should be fun!

    I'd love to see an ice-based submarine just pop up and shoot out Liberty Island. :D

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    icon
    BuzzCoastin (profile), Jan 8th, 2011 @ 3:55am

    Did eye miss something?

    Isn't Twitter kinda like a public forum or somethin?
    Are there secret Tweets?
    Couldn't they just look at her Twitter page?
    OK, subpoena her HushMail account and you've got a story, but this strikes me as a kinda Big Tweet from the FED's.
    Everybody notice Big Brother is checking your Tweets...
    OTay, job done.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    Johnny, Jan 8th, 2011 @ 5:33am

    Subpoena

    We should subpoena all information about US politicians, who have threatened Julian Assange with death. That's a REAL crime.

    As far as I am concerned the likes of Sarah Palin and Joe Liebermann should be arrested if they ever set foot in Europe.

    If the US thinks its laws can apply to what people do in Europe, then our laws can apply to what people do in the US.

    Obama is a BIG disappointment, we thought this kind of crap would be over with the departure of Bush, but it's only getting worse! It's out of control.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    abc gum, Jan 8th, 2011 @ 8:23am

    It must be very difficult to shoot the messenger when there are so many of them, can you really shoot them all?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    icon
    Richard (profile), Jan 8th, 2011 @ 9:18am

    Re:

    Wars have been fought for less

    The UK lost a war against Iceland in the 70's.

    It's not nice when an Icelandic gunboat pops up and cuts your tackle off.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 8th, 2011 @ 9:45am

    Re: Did eye miss something?

    the courts are asking for info suh as:

    IPs used to access those accounts also the IPs used to access the accounts that received messages from those accounts.

    also all identities address by all the above mention accounts.

    among other things http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jan/08/wikileaks-calls-google-facebook-us-subpoenas

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 8th, 2011 @ 9:55am

    Re: Re: Did eye miss something?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    icon
    Marcel de Jong (profile), Jan 8th, 2011 @ 10:21am

    Another person

    The US Justice Department has also laid claim on Dutch activist Rop Gongrijp's Twitter account.

    http://webwereld.nl/nieuws/105321/justitie-vordert-twitter-account-rop-gonggrijp---updat e-2.html
    (sorry dutch article)

    This is the US crossing boundaries and borders and actually looking into creating an international incident, only because it was caught with its pants down. Good old fashioned spite.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 8th, 2011 @ 11:14am

    and in response

    Anonymous crafts a bot that changes every american HDTV to point to the wikileaks website

    HDTV hackable....as in the actual tv enjoy this madness.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    icon
    BuzzCoastin (profile), Jan 8th, 2011 @ 5:14pm

    Re: Did eye miss something?

    Good point about the IP addresses. However, if someone is doing something clandestine, they wouldn't be using Twitter and would be using a VPN, at the very least; otherwise they would be flat-out incompetent. (Notice any CIA Tweets recently?)

    This story strikes me as just another psy-op program to remind people that Big Brother is really watching. Why the program? Because they can't really watch everyone and can barely watch those they want to watch.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    icon
    BuzzCoastin (profile), Jan 8th, 2011 @ 5:18pm

    Re: Re: Did eye miss something?

    Oh & this from your supplied link:
    She said she had no idea why her Twitter account was of interest.
    "I hope they don't think I am so naive that I would be doing any sort of messaging through the Twitter board of any significance or (that would be) incriminating," she said.
    "This shows how nervous the U.S. government is," she said. "I think this should be handled better. I have done nothing illegal."

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    identicon
    JackJersawitz, Jan 8th, 2011 @ 9:55pm

    Re: Subpoena

    So you think Obama's a big dissapointment?

    You may double or triple that.

    Some goon just shot up a bunch of people, a Federal Judge and such, and at least one pol who had been mapped and marked by non other than Sara Palin.

    Clear incitement to murder under U.S. law. Should have been prosecuted before the shootings. You don't map locations and post face shots with an ex across them marking them for elimination and claim that is not incitement to murder.

    But Obama won't tell Holder to prosecute her. What he will do is use it to justify a harsher crackdown on dissent and will seek to jail anyone who has had anything to do with WikiLeaks and Assange.

    The deep economic crisis is now manifesting itself in an even,many fathoms deeper, social crisis.

    Violations of the Fourth Amendment will be but the smallest piece of it. Forget asking a court for a subpoena or warrant.

    Obama may well prove to be our own Hitler.

    j.
    bigjackjj@yahoo.com

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 9th, 2011 @ 6:41am

    Re: Re: Subpoena

    Jack, if you own any guns, perhaps you want to leave them with someone else for a while for safe keeping. Your rhetoric is exactly the sort of thing that leads to this sort of violence.

    You are making connections where none exist, the same way the shooter did. That is actually pretty scary.

    You are what is wrong with US politics.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  24.  
    identicon
    Any Mouse, Jan 9th, 2011 @ 8:00pm

    Re:

    What the hell are you referencing?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This