Do We Need A Whistleblower To Tell The World Which Senator Killed Whistleblower Protection Law?

from the or-are-they-too-scared dept

Last month, we mentioned that the Senate had given its approval to a new law protecting whistleblowers in the federal government. There were some problems with the bill, which led some to fight against it, but much of the bill was useful. With the whole Wikileaks stuff going on, there had been some concern that such a law might lead to similar leaks, but most of Congress recognized that protecting whistleblowers is important. Except for one anonymous Senator. Even though the bill had already passed the Senate. After the House took a bunch of stuff out of the bill, it went back to the Senate again, where an anonymous Senator put a hold on the bill, effectively killing it. It does seem kind of silly that a Senator can do this anonymously. Of course, we can hope that, in the long run, this will work out for the best. Perhaps sometime in the future Congress can pass a better bill that is actually much more protective of whistleblowers.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 3rd, 2011 @ 3:54pm

    Lieberman?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    icon
    The Infamous Joe (profile), Jan 3rd, 2011 @ 3:59pm

    Re:

    That's my guess.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 3rd, 2011 @ 4:07pm

    Re: Re:

    Mine too. Second guess would be Coburn.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    icon
    Jay (profile), Jan 3rd, 2011 @ 4:35pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    Eh, I'm going with Demint.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 3rd, 2011 @ 4:46pm

    This is part of the democrat package to reform the rules for filibusters that would remove this option. An individual senator can (and often does) use this Nuclear option to knock legislation off the order papers. It is ugly and it's been very popular with whichever side is in the minority.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Coward (Anon), Jan 3rd, 2011 @ 4:58pm

    But sometimes it is used for good

    Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon put a hold on the COICA (aka the Internet Blacklist bill) that prevented it from coming up for a vote in 2010. Given the money and leverage the AAs can bring to the table, the bill is likely to pass if voted on. But the anonymous aspect of the hold on the whistleblower bill seems not right. Either stand up for what you believe in or get out of the way.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Matt, Jan 3rd, 2011 @ 5:30pm

    Re: But sometimes it is used for good

    But there's a huge difference between one principled Senator standing up to block a bad piece of legislation - and a cowardly one sabotaging it from the shadows!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 3rd, 2011 @ 5:46pm

    Re: Re: But sometimes it is used for good

    One is worse than the other, but both are bad. No single senator ore representative should ever have power to completely stop legislation.

    The reason we have 100 senators and multiple hundred representatives is so that everyone's voice is heard equally and the majority opinion prevails. Allowing one person to stop legislation is literally giving that person power greater than the presidential veto (at least the president can be overruled).

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    monkyyy, Jan 3rd, 2011 @ 5:58pm

    if its mine again, after i wrote him complaining about voting for the internet censorship bill, and got repeated lobbyist lies back including ones i did argue of being unsupported; im going to have to....ummmm write him again and complain about his ignorance

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Casey, Jan 3rd, 2011 @ 7:29pm

    Re: Re: Re: But sometimes it is used for good

    It is wrong that the majority view is supposed to prevail. The founding fathers were as distrustful of true democracy as they were of living in a monarchy. We are a representative republic. That rule was created so that legislation would NOT be pushed through the halls of government without being thoughtfully considered. The big issue with the American government is the people who hold power. Our politicians are in no way looking out for us and it is not one side or the other doing it, it is both.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 3rd, 2011 @ 7:35pm

    Senators's action must be responsible for the people they represents. The permission to submit bills anonymously doesn't make any sense at all.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    icon
    The eejit (profile), Jan 4th, 2011 @ 1:10am

    Re:

    OOR...you can kill him and take his stuff, in the grand old tradition of pirates everywhere! :p

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    Darryl, Jan 4th, 2011 @ 1:31am

    wikileaks is not a whistleblower, by its definition

    None of this makes any difference to assange or wikileaks, and they do not fall under the definition of a whitleblower.

    The US will ignore whistleblower laws, and change him on something more substantial.

    Also, if you have been following international news regarding wikileaks, it is MOST CERTAINLY NOT, about how the US has responded to it. Or their reaction to it..

    Most of the international news about wikileaks is about specific leaks, and how trivial they generally are.

    It's turned out to be very little 'dirt' some fluff and little substance. Certainly nothing to get really upset about, but regardless, assange will probably meet his cumuppense soon enough.. if he has not allready, but just does not know it yet.

    He got his 15 minutes of fame, then some, his time has passed, it will be "what ever happend to him??" next. the reply will be 'who cares !!'..

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    icon
    techflaws.org (profile), Jan 4th, 2011 @ 1:58am

    Re: wikileaks is not a whistleblower, by its definition

    next. the reply will be 'who cares !!'..

    Which are you quite used to given your bogus comments. Still, ppl will remember Assange as the one who started it and not a puny Darryl. Pity.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    identicon
    abc gum, Jan 4th, 2011 @ 4:36am

    Re: But sometimes it is used for good

    "Either stand up for what you believe in or get out of the way."

    I like the idea that politicians should wear stickers like in NASCAR.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    abc gum, Jan 4th, 2011 @ 4:39am

    Re:

    "Senators's action must be responsible for the people they represents"

    Naivety, how cute.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 4th, 2011 @ 6:19am

    Re: Re: Re: But sometimes it is used for good

    This rule was specifically crafted to avoid "the tyranny of the majority".

    Also, it can be overruled. By the same margin as a presidential veto if I'm not mistaken (2/3rds majority)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    icon
    mdmadph (profile), Jan 4th, 2011 @ 6:51am

    Re:

    Probably, but does it honestly matter? I honestly think that such a club as the Senate sometimes gets together and decides which guy is going to be the "fall guy" (take the blame for opposing popular legislation that no one wants to be seen actively opposing but all have reservations against), even in situations where it's done discretely, like this.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 4th, 2011 @ 7:13am

    They are all just waiting for the check. Put it on hold until the bribe comes in.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 4th, 2011 @ 9:05am

    Re: wikileaks is not a whistleblower, by its definition

    I love how the Wikileaks whiners seamlessly jump back and forth between "there is nothing that damaging in the leaks so who cares!?" and "these leaks are destroying America!!!!!!!!"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    identicon
    Chinese overlord, Jan 4th, 2011 @ 8:58pm

    Senators bought and sold

    Every senator and congressman is for sale to do the bidding of private industry. This is the American way, and part of the reason America is going down into the shitter. Good luck when the only thing left in America is lawyers, politicians and a giant debt which you can't pay off.

    I'd like to find out who this senator is and send them a big bag of shit to tell them my opinion of their vote.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    identicon
    Yuhong Bao, Jan 4th, 2011 @ 10:25pm

    It is worse than silly

    "It does seem kind of silly that a Senator can do this anonymously."
    It is worse than that. Why did you think the Senator wanted to do this anonymously?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This