IHOP Drops Trademark Lawsuit Against IHOP
from the will-they-settle-it-over-a-prayer-breakfast? dept
Back in September, we noted that restaurant chain IHOP (International House of Pancakes) was suing another IHOP (International House of Prayer), claiming trademark infringement. Trademarks are supposed to only cover the areas of commerce you're in, but IHOP (food) claimed that since IHOP (church) was serving food at some of its locations, it represented infringement. We doubted that there was much likelihood of confusion between the Rooty Tooty Fresh 'n' Fruity menu option and saving your eternal soul. Copycense alerts us to the news that IHOP (food) has now dropped the lawsuit against the church, as the two sides have agreed to settle the matter out of court, at what I can only guess will be a combination prayer breakfast and negotiation session.






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
lunch and dinner prayers of course...
at the house of prayer that is...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Sometimes food and religion can overlap. What about the Pastafarians? Besides, I've heard the Rooty Tooty Fresh 'n' Fruity referred to as 'heavenly' at least once in my life. I think they would have stood a very good chance.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
IHOP and Dilution
This may have been one of those very rare case in which corp. counsel acted properly. As for me, I'm a Denny's lover.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment