Encrypted Civil War Message Finally Decrypted, 147 Years Later

from the wasn't-that-hard,-actually dept

When talking about encryption, people often talk about just how long it would take a certain level of computing to crack the code, so there may be some interest in the fact that it apparently took 147 years to decipher a coded Civil War message... but it turns out that the main reason it took so long was that no one looked. The message had been stored in a bottle and was apparently delivered to Confederate General John Pemberton during the battle of Vicksburg (which the Confederacy lost) on July 4th, 1863. The bottle was given to the Museum of the Confederacy back in 1896 by a former soldier, but the museum staff never bothered to pull the message out of the bottle until a few months ago. After discovering the message was coded, the museum asked some top code breakers to see if they could decipher it, and it apparently took them a few weeks. The message? It probably wasn't that important either, as it basically told General Pemberton he was in trouble and wasn't getting any reinforcements:
"You can expect no help from this side of the river."


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    identicon
    Jake, Dec 28th, 2010 @ 8:04pm

    You might want to check the date of that battle before anyone notices. Not that there weren't plenty of people spoiling for a rematch in 1963, of course.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Ian (profile), Dec 28th, 2010 @ 8:18pm

      Re:

      Ditto! Actually had to read that a couple of times before it clicked!

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        coldbrew, Dec 28th, 2010 @ 8:32pm

        Re: Re: yeah, that's a neat trick

        It's pretty cool that the dude turned it over to a museum 60-some years before it was delivered. I'm gonna patent that in case some one else figures out how to do it some time in the future...

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          ltlw0lf (profile), Dec 28th, 2010 @ 10:04pm

          Re: Re: Re: yeah, that's a neat trick

          It's pretty cool that the dude turned it over to a museum 60-some years before it was delivered.

          I believe the dude's name, if I remember it correctly, was Clint Eastwood or Marty McFly, or something like that. He had a Delorian that he said needed to get up to 87 miles per hour for the flux capacitor to work. I thought he was smoking crack at the time, since my time travelling device just has a spinning lotto wheel on the back of it.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            coldbrew, Dec 28th, 2010 @ 10:13pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re: yeah, that's a neat trick

            Exactly. One point twenty-one gigawatts, and then we can stop the terrorists from killing us. Or, something like that. I'm sure they'll remake it soon so I can remember.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Mike Masnick (profile), Dec 29th, 2010 @ 12:33am

      Re:

      You might want to check the date of that battle before anyone notices

      Yeah... whoops. Fixed. :)

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    reechard (profile), Dec 28th, 2010 @ 8:40pm

    This changes everything

    I'm off to edit Wikipedia right now! Who knew the Civil War was going on all the trime?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 28th, 2010 @ 9:38pm

    "top code breakers to see if they could decipher it, and it apparently took them a few weeks."

    Wow, some regular "coder" can crack WEP in a few minutes, yet this prehistoric code takes two weeks to crack?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Dec 28th, 2010 @ 9:45pm

      Re:

      Heck, even the FBI can crack WEP.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      anonymous coward, Dec 28th, 2010 @ 10:31pm

      ;)

      Just like to point out that the script kiddies can crack WEP in a "few minutes" because some very smart people spent a lot of time figuring it out for them.

      Using a program made by someone else, does not a "coder" make. :D

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Dec 28th, 2010 @ 11:01pm

        Re: ;)

        I know, I was joking.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Dec 29th, 2010 @ 5:28am

        Re: ;)

        I read a more detailed article about this and it looked like it took weeks because none of the code breakers took the job as a high priority. The code was a simple shift cypher that was easily cracked once someone sat down and worked on it.

        The bullet was in the bottle so that it would sink if it was tossed into a river.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 28th, 2010 @ 9:39pm

    Piling on

    The longest civil war ever!

    LoL

    But different from others above I will point to the exact point where it is.

    (which the Confederacy lost) on July 4th, 1963(this should be maybe 1863)
    .

    Now it is easy to find it, just by highlighting it and clicking CTRL+F(on Firefox).

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Sydney (profile), Dec 28th, 2010 @ 9:50pm

    The Full message

    "Gen'l Pemberton:

    You can expect no help from this side of the river. Let Gen'l Johnston know, if possible, when you can attack the same point on the enemy's lines. Inform me also and I will endeavor to make a diversion. I have sent some caps (explosive devices). I subjoin a despatch from General Johnston."

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Silvo, Dec 28th, 2010 @ 9:58pm

    So much text and it decodes to only this one sentence?!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Susan, Dec 29th, 2010 @ 2:22am

    Security by obscurity? ;)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This