France Wants To Extend Private Copying Levy To Tablets... But Not If They Run Microsoft Windows

from the say-what-now? dept

Kurata points us to the news that French politicians are debating extending the "you must be a criminal" private copying levy to tablet computers -- but, oddly, the new levy would not apply to tablets running Windows (Google translation from the original French). The tax would apply to any iPad or Android-based device, but apparently Windows tablets won't be counted, since they'll be classified as full computers, while the other tablets are in this new taxable category. Not surprisingly, this has some companies up in arms, with the French-based Archos particularly steamed, since it's producing Android-based tablets, and doesn't like the fact that its government seems to be giving preferential treatment to an American company.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    icon
    crade (profile), Dec 28th, 2010 @ 10:22am

    Good for microsoft. Legislation is an easier way to get rid of pesky competition than work is.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 28th, 2010 @ 10:37am

    The one thing you can count on to get the French riled up is appearing to give preference to an American company. This will probably go nowhere in this form.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    icon
    crade (profile), Dec 28th, 2010 @ 11:01am

    Re:

    appearing?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 28th, 2010 @ 11:14am

    Of course they shouldn't tax Microsoft tablets! You can do anything on one of those tablets that you can do with any normal computer, unlike the silly Android and iPad toys. Only tax Microsoft tablets if they start taxing all PCs the same way.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    icon
    The eejit (profile), Dec 28th, 2010 @ 11:16am

    Heh. So France is violating its own antitrust laws in order....to prevent a monopoly.

    Swing and a miss!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    PC, Dec 28th, 2010 @ 11:22am

    Time to sing

    It's grrrrreaaaat... to be me. :)

    *start-up sound*

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    icon
    Kevin (profile), Dec 28th, 2010 @ 11:28am

    Are we really all that shocked

    The only thing France has ever done consistently is say "nous nous rendons!" (Google Translation)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    abc gum, Dec 28th, 2010 @ 11:48am

    The whole idea of remuneration simply because something might be used to infringe is stupid. If creators of content are to be subsidised, then so be it, but do not atempt to foist the responsibility upon those who have nothing to do with the infringement. That is simply bad policy.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    icon
    crade (profile), Dec 28th, 2010 @ 11:58am

    Re:

    "You can do anything on one of those tablets that you can do with any normal computer"
    Yeah the exact same thing you can do on android and iPad - run programs written for that OS and hardware.
    Whatever you think excludes Android or IPad from being a "real" computer could be written and released tomorrow if it isn't already, or I could write my own.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    icon
    el_segfaulto (profile), Dec 28th, 2010 @ 11:59am

    Re:

    I'd argue that they are giving preference to an OS rather than an American company. Windows 7 is a full-fledged operating system, although in honesty I don't know where you draw the line between what qualifies as a "tablet" operating system as opposed to a regular one. Personally I'd rather not see any tablets taxed but c'est la vie.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    icon
    crade (profile), Dec 28th, 2010 @ 12:06pm

    Re: Re:

    Since the OS is the product of the company and no one else can make it, giving preference to the OS and to the company is the same thing.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 28th, 2010 @ 12:07pm

    Seriously, Im confused.

    I have the same question in regard to the Canadian blank media fee.

    If you pay these fees in advance, fees that say "I am paying a price for potentially being able to place pirated [whatever] on this media."
    Shouldn't that mean that you are legally allowed to place the pirated [whatever] on the media?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    icon
    Chronno S. Trigger (profile), Dec 28th, 2010 @ 12:09pm

    Re: Time to sing

    Somehow the Windows 95 start-up sound poped into my head. It is now the notification noise on my cell phone.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    icon
    Richard (profile), Dec 28th, 2010 @ 12:10pm

    Re: Re:

    Windows 7 is a full-fledged operating system, although in honesty I don't know where you draw the line between what qualifies as a "tablet" operating system as opposed to a regular one.
    But the tablets don't run Windows 7 - they run Windows CE.

    So Microsoft are actually getting an exemption because their operating system for tablets has a similar name to a PC operating system.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    icon
    crade (profile), Dec 28th, 2010 @ 12:16pm

    Re: Seriously, Im confused.

    The great lie with these fee's (in Canada at least)
    is that they don't allow the consumer to do anything.

    We are paying to allow us to copy things we already own such as copying our records to tape, making MP3s out of CDs we have already purchased or recording the game to watch after work.
    The giant lie is that no one in the country honestly believes creators deserve to get compensated again when we do these activities and the only thing people can contemplate they are paying for is the right to copy things they haven't already fully paid for the right to use. The only reason we have any levy is because politicians make sure people don't understand what it is for.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    icon
    vivaelamor (profile), Dec 28th, 2010 @ 12:20pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    "Since the OS is the product of the company and no one else can make it, giving preference to the OS and to the company is the same thing."

    I think the test would be whether they would apply the same exemption to a tablet shipped with Ubuntu or something similar that has the same capabilities as on a PC.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    icon
    crade (profile), Dec 28th, 2010 @ 12:21pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Pretty sure you can install linux on an android anyway.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    icon
    Chronno S. Trigger (profile), Dec 28th, 2010 @ 12:21pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    No, they ether run Windows 7 starter or Windows embedded which is Windows 7 slimmed way down but still fully functional (or just full blown Windows 7 depending on the tablet). Windows CE is mostly used now a days for dedicated hardware like ATMs.

    Ether way, Android is just a specialized front end for Linux. That's still a full blown installed operating system, so the exemption is silly.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    icon
    vivaelamor (profile), Dec 28th, 2010 @ 12:23pm

    Re:

    "The whole idea of remuneration simply because something might be used to infringe is stupid. If creators of content are to be subsidised, then so be it, but do not atempt to foist the responsibility upon those who have nothing to do with the infringement. That is simply bad policy."

    Kinda reminds me of the UK TV licence. They just don't like calling things a tax.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 28th, 2010 @ 12:25pm

    Re: Re:

    Could be, but never will. They're just toys.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    icon
    Marcus Carab (profile), Dec 28th, 2010 @ 12:25pm

    Re: Seriously, Im confused.

    Shouldn't that mean that you are legally allowed to place the pirated [whatever] on the media?

    In fact, yes. It has created a ridiculous legal vortex here where if you have material for personal uses on leveed media then it is not infringement - however it is on any other media.

    So if I download an album from an unauthorized, I am infringing - but then if I burn it to a CD (leveed) and remove it from my hard-drive (not leveed) I am no longer infringing. It's rather bizarre and to my knowledge there are a lot of questions about the details that have yet to be sorted out in court.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 28th, 2010 @ 12:39pm

    What about a dual-boot tablet, with both Linux and Windows on it? Would it be exempt from the tax because it had Windows?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23.  
    identicon
    Jesse, Dec 28th, 2010 @ 1:07pm

    Re:

    Hasn't that been the business model since like, 1985?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  24.  
    identicon
    abc gum, Dec 28th, 2010 @ 1:07pm

    Re: Re: Seriously, Im confused.

    "We are paying to allow us to copy things we already own "

    Heh - you only bought a license.

    I do not recall any content which restricts, via EULA or otherwise, the medium upon which it can be transferred to.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  25.  
    identicon
    Jesse, Dec 28th, 2010 @ 1:09pm

    Re: Re:

    Grammar Nazi:

    Someone who has failed to grasp that forums are not in fact English essays. Language has always varied according to context, just as we use different types of words in a job interview compared to with our mates.

    /nice fail tho...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  26.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 28th, 2010 @ 1:12pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    you can install froyo on an iphone 3g. I'm sure it's possible.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  27.  
    identicon
    Jesse, Dec 28th, 2010 @ 1:14pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    Yes, that's why mine, along with hundreds of other companies, the entire pharma industry (which has more money than god) Are dev'ing for iPads.

    Oh wait, some anonymous zealot from the internet says it's a toy, never mind.

    Oh wait, he's just another retard who doesn't know anything about what he's commenting on, were all back on!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  28.  
    identicon
    Bernard, Dec 28th, 2010 @ 1:21pm

    I think the French are counting on the Windows tablets not actually functioning properly, therefore you couldn't copy anything if you wanted to.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  29.  
    icon
    crade (profile), Dec 28th, 2010 @ 1:23pm

    Re: Re: Re: Seriously, Im confused.

    "Heh - you only bought a license."
    There is no license. What you buy is a copy of a sound recording. What you are allowed to do with it is restricted by the copyright act, not by a license agreement.

    The restrictions were in the copyright act because copying didn't used to be required for regular use of the copy as often as they are now. The restriction was the default (you can't make copies of anything for any reason ever period) and was taken out with the private copying exception (you can now make private copies for your own personal use, but not distribute them in any way) when they put the levy in.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  30.  
    identicon
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro, Dec 28th, 2010 @ 1:40pm

    Re: You Only Bought A Licence

    Where does it say in the record shops and video shops that they are only selling licences?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  31.  
    icon
    crade (profile), Dec 28th, 2010 @ 1:50pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    I don't care about grammar, my grammar is un-good :). I just thought "appearing" was being far too kind by leaving the possibility they might not actually *be* giving the preference.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  32.  
    icon
    ChurchHatesTucker (profile), Dec 28th, 2010 @ 1:51pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    It's worse than silly, it's bass-ackward. It's easier to 'pirate' stuff with Windows OS than with iOS.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  33.  
    identicon
    ethana2, Dec 28th, 2010 @ 3:24pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    I think you mean Ubuntu. Android and Ubuntu are both linux based OSes. No one is going to bother trying to get Fedora, CentOS, or Suse running on one of these things.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  34.  
    icon
    crade (profile), Dec 28th, 2010 @ 3:31pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    It depends on the device I guess. I was thinking gentoo myself.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  35.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 28th, 2010 @ 3:32pm

    Re: Re:

    What would happen to EastEnders without the TV Tax?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  36.  
    identicon
    joe, Dec 28th, 2010 @ 5:42pm

    toys? yea, but not some GNU/Linux varients

    All tablets are toys. The limitations are just sick. However some of the GNU/Linux variants potentially are a bit more functional on the tablets than the OS on the iPad and MS Windows variants. Free software is undoing infringement not encouraging it. If anything a tax should be levied against Microsoft and Apple because those who purchase have shown a willingness to use non-free software. Something they will have to pay for and might infringe.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  37.  
    identicon
    SImon, Dec 28th, 2010 @ 9:01pm

    Tax Microsoft....

    One should get a 30% discount for not using windows on any piece of computer hardware.
    Until one gets the same level of software support for non Microsoft OS's, from the hardware manufacturers, one shouldn't be expected to pay as high a price.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  38.  
    icon
    vivaelamor (profile), Dec 29th, 2010 @ 12:47am

    Re: Re: Re:

    "What would happen to EastEnders without the TV Tax?"

    The same thing as Coronation Street? It would continue anyway because people like stuff that I find repulsive.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  39.  
    identicon
    Doc, Dec 29th, 2010 @ 1:50am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    If you've followed the tech news, Android IS Linux. Everything that is now running Android, are running LINUX.

    Google are good at making money on FOSS stuff, aren't they

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  40.  
    icon
    Marcel de Jong (profile), Dec 29th, 2010 @ 2:40am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    it's a nice example of how to make money with open source software indeed. Despite what the naysayers have always said.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  41.  
    icon
    senshikaze (profile), Dec 29th, 2010 @ 4:13am

    Re:

    if it came with window, then yes.

    Are there places that will sell pre-dualboot computers from the factory? that would be cool.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  42.  
    identicon
    abc gum, Dec 29th, 2010 @ 6:27am

    Re: Re: You Only Bought A Licence

    The intent was to make light of licensing claims by the music industry. I have yet to encounter said license when purchasing a CD, so I guess it is just hot air.

    For example:
    "When you buy a CD you own the physical product, but you are only licensing the music"

    http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/letters/beyond-small-print-copyright-breaches-are-plain -theft/2009/08/09/1249756207131.html

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  43.  
    icon
    Marcus Carab (profile), Dec 29th, 2010 @ 6:37am

    Re: Re: Re:

    Are you a troll or just a fool?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  44.  
    icon
    Marcus Carab (profile), Dec 29th, 2010 @ 6:39am

    Re: toys? yea, but not some GNU/Linux varients

    What is your definition of "toy" exactly?

    Plenty of people are using tablets to enhance their productivity in all sorts of fields. A tablet is not the same kind of tool as a desktop or a laptop, but it is still a tool.

    Just because you can't see how one would be useful to you doesn't mean they are "all toys"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  45.  
    icon
    nasch (profile), Dec 29th, 2010 @ 7:46am

    Re: Re:

    Please note that actually giving preference to an American company will also result in appearing to do so.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  46.  
    icon
    nasch (profile), Dec 29th, 2010 @ 7:56am

    Re: Re: Time to sing

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  47.  
    identicon
    Woadan, Dec 29th, 2010 @ 10:17am

    It's an interestingly cynical logic at work here, but logic it is.

    Android tablets and the iPad use a smartphone OS, while the Windows tablets use Windows 7 (or, previously, Vista or XP), a computer OS. It's the exact same OS as otherwise, but with added functionality.

    In Windows XP, it was an actual add-on to the OS from MS. In Vista and 7, it's functionality that is turned off by default for workstations/desktops/notebooks. You just go to the Control Panel and turn it on.

    Even though I think it is cynical, the distinction is being drawn around the OS, so there is a logic to it involved.

    Wonder if MS was behind the distinction?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  48.  
    identicon
    hippie, Dec 30th, 2010 @ 11:33am

    Micro$oft

    ... i know what to do ... i don't use Micro$oft products ... and yes it's possible to live that way ... cheers from Paris.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  49.  
    identicon
    Joseph, Jan 1st, 2011 @ 10:48pm

    Re:

    Would Americans be upset if their government gave tax or regulatory advantages to a foreign company? Yeah, I think they would be.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  50.  
    identicon
    prax, Jan 3rd, 2011 @ 6:48am

    To the Micro$oft fans who consider their normal computers..

    Have a look at top500.org

    I am writing this on a linux mint machine where win7 x64 was crashed almost every hour (for strange driver issues though)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This