RSS
Monster Cable Keeps On Suing; Asks Court To Block Company From Attending CES
from the seriously,-monster? dept
By now, you must know that Monster Cable has a rather terrible reputation for threatening and suing all sorts of other companies over intellectual property issues -- often, it seems, with very little merit (remember when they went after "Monster Golf"? good times...). The latest is that Monster Cable, along with Beats Electronics, are going after competitor Fanny Wang Headphones, claiming both patent and trade dress infringement, because Fanny Wang made headphones that have some similarities in style. The patent (D552,077), by the way, is not a utility patent but a design patent, which is very narrowly focused.
In reading through the actual lawsuit (embedded below), the basic complaint appears to be that Fanny Wang's headphones look pretty similar to the Beats headphones -- but that's how competition works. Beats/Monster seem to take particular umbrage to the fact that all over their website Fanny Wang compares their headphones to Beats and gently chides Beats for not being the same quality. Again, this is how competition works. You see what works and you build something better. In fact, this point seems to undermine Beats/Monsters whole case: since Fanny Wang is making pretty clear that its products are different than Beats'. The response from Monster/Beats should be to keep building something better as well.
As you'd expect, Beats/Monster also demand all sorts of things (treble damages, destruction of all product, etc.). The complaint also points out that Fanny Wang is planning to be presenting its headphones at CES in early January, implicitly asking the court to stop Fanny Wang from appearing at the show. Remember, kids, the lesson of the day is "why compete, if you can have the government block your competition?"
Not surprisingly, Fanny Wang is using this as a chance to mock Monster for its litigious history and also for promoting its own product. The company's letter in response to the lawsuit (also embedded below) is relatively amusing, mocking the company for not even trying out their headphones to find out about the superior sound quality:
In reading through the actual lawsuit (embedded below), the basic complaint appears to be that Fanny Wang's headphones look pretty similar to the Beats headphones -- but that's how competition works. Beats/Monster seem to take particular umbrage to the fact that all over their website Fanny Wang compares their headphones to Beats and gently chides Beats for not being the same quality. Again, this is how competition works. You see what works and you build something better. In fact, this point seems to undermine Beats/Monsters whole case: since Fanny Wang is making pretty clear that its products are different than Beats'. The response from Monster/Beats should be to keep building something better as well.
As you'd expect, Beats/Monster also demand all sorts of things (treble damages, destruction of all product, etc.). The complaint also points out that Fanny Wang is planning to be presenting its headphones at CES in early January, implicitly asking the court to stop Fanny Wang from appearing at the show. Remember, kids, the lesson of the day is "why compete, if you can have the government block your competition?"
Not surprisingly, Fanny Wang is using this as a chance to mock Monster for its litigious history and also for promoting its own product. The company's letter in response to the lawsuit (also embedded below) is relatively amusing, mocking the company for not even trying out their headphones to find out about the superior sound quality:
In short, Fanny Wang has no desire to infringe on your patents or trade dress or be associated with Monster’s sound quality. Instead, Fanny Wang desires to compete by building a superior product marketed under our different and innovative brand: Fanny Wang. In fact, the comparisons that you make reference to in your complaint and letter, clearly demonstrate Fanny Wang’s desire to differentiate itself from Monster & Beats products by identifying differences and allowing the consumer to make its own determinations. Such passing references to competitors are routine in the marketplace and are clearly allowed under both state and federal trademark laws.Separately, the company notes that tons of vendors in the space have similarly designed headphones because that's the trend in the marketplace. It also mocks Beats/Monster for claiming that the packaging of the two sets of headphones are the same by stating: "Have you even looked at our site?" and posting the following comparison:
I have a business...
Why 50,000 Monthly Active Users Weren't Enough To Stop This Company From Pivoting, With Spun Co-Founder Scott Lindenbaum
Why and How Developers Use Mobile Payments: Infographic
I’m looking for policy...
Developers On Patents: Ron Garret of Awun
Jon Potter: Software Patent Trolls Can Be Stopped By U.S. Patent Office And Congress
I’m looking for research...
Why Data Is The New Oil, With Dan Foreman Of Lumi Mobile
Geography Of The App Economy
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Warning.
The link starts at:
"The patent (D552,077), by the way, is not a utility patent but a design patent, which is very narrowly focused. "
And goes to the end of the article.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
-_-'
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Essentially their business model is if we hype something enough, stupid people will give us money. OK, maybe we do need to boycott them. That's a pretty sound business model.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Dear Monster Cable...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Dear Monster Cable...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Dear Monster Cable...
http://marcustroy.com/gadgets/gadgets-monster-x-dr-dre-headphones/
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
sound
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
I keep confusing them with Stinky Dinky™ and I believe the Greeks have the patent on that as the first method of birth control.
Also, I don't think the Government should be allowed to compete in the free market.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Monster is acting like a monster, not news to me.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Dear Monster Cable...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Screw monster
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Back a step please?
My question is, what's not obvious about that that's worthy of a patent in the first place? Or have I tragically misread the purpose of patent to protect non-obvious expressions of invention? Is a "design patent" different?
As far as I can see they are not significantly different from 20 or 30 other similar style headphones that I could hit with the heave of a well-aimed brick so why do they have a patent over which to sue? Can someone enlighten me?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Back a step please?
Apple, for example, holds numerous design patents directed to its admittedly unique product styling, and to a large degree it is its product styling that serves as a product differentiator from the products of other manufacturers.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Why?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
well
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100212/1152388149.shtml
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Fanny wang headphones
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
monster rippoff cables
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Fanny wang headphones
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment