Avast Claims Single Pro License Installed 774,651 Times Around The Globe

from the that's-a-lot dept

In yet another case of a copyright holder turning "piracy" into publicity, security firm Avast has been making some news after watching a single pro license apparently "go viral" on file sharing sites, leading it to be installed 774,651 times around the globe. The company is claiming it's been installed in 200 countries -- including two computers in Vatican City. Of course, this might raise some skepticism, because depending on who you talk to there are fewer than 200 countries in the world (though, others claim there are more -- so... who knows). Either way, it does appear that Avast has turned the whole thing into a publicity stunt, both with the press coverage, and popping up a note on those 774,561 installs, urging people to switch to legit versions (including the company's popular free version).


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Rabbit80, Dec 8th, 2010 @ 6:33am

    Avast has just gone up in my estimation - good for them!

    Being an ESET reseller though, I use the in-house licenses that they give me, so I'm not going to swap to Avast.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 8th, 2010 @ 6:43am

    Their name encourages piracy.

    Avast me hardies we've been boarded, ARRR!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 8th, 2010 @ 6:54am

    I guess their license protection security ain't that well thought out.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 8th, 2010 @ 6:58am

    made me search what Avast was. Pretty prolific software distribution to 200 countries. Sad that US is only number 6 on the list. The press release is quite humorous especially "With no pirated licenses identified at the North Pole"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    icon
    Michael Goff (profile), Dec 8th, 2010 @ 6:58am

    Software Piracy Business Intelligence

    This type of data is critical to software vendors confronting unlicensed use of their products. Trying to attack the piracy distribution channels can only yield Pyrrhic victories, but identifying the businesses that are actually using software without paying for it gives vendors the data they need to make the most informed decisions on how to address the problem. Vendors can analyze the data and see which geographies require a stronger presence, the actual size of their piracy problem, the license revenue recovery opportunity, which businesses they should pursue for license revenue recovery, etc. If a business is using unlicensed software it has made a decision that of all the solutions on the market ("free" or not), this one works best for them - they are a customer in every sense of the word except the most obvious: they haven't paid for it. If vendors can identify these businesses, they can reach out and offer them a real customer relationship complete with support, training, feature requests, and other added value. I've blogged about this here - please let me know what you think: http://www.vilabs.com/blog/software-piracy-lemonade-part-2/ Michael Goff V.i. Labs www.vilabs.com

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    icon
    Gracey (profile), Dec 8th, 2010 @ 7:18am

    Re:

    Apparently it is if they were able to track all of those. If they're able to track them all, they'd probably also be able to shut them all down.

    And I'd say they've handled it in a rather reasonable way too. At least if the reports are true.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 8th, 2010 @ 7:19am

    Re: Software Piracy Business Intelligence

    Would they be a customer if they had to pay? Or would they instead switch to another free alternative? Going further, would they, instead of paying for the software, pay for development of an on-demand scanner for ClamAV (which is free)?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 8th, 2010 @ 7:24am

    There are obvious ways to protect a software the requires definition updates at regular intervals from the mothership.

    But then again, it is easier to monetize by making a weak license protection system and then prosecuting.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 8th, 2010 @ 7:27am

    Re: Re: Software Piracy Business Intelligence

    businesses are pretty annoying creatures. Many of them are willing to shell out tons of cash for products that do them no good at times. Other times they go cheapo depot.

    If the business wasn't going to buy your product anyways then... no loss.

    If the business is made aware that they could get better support for their products by paying a software fee which is far below normal and they go for that... then you just made money you would not have made anyways.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    icon
    Michael Goff (profile), Dec 8th, 2010 @ 7:35am

    Re: Re: Software Piracy Business Intelligence

    Many businesses would (and do) pay when approached by the vendor. If the business depends on a specific application, it's providing them with value, they've invested in processes around the use of the application, etc., it is hard to switch to an alternative (free or paid). Keep in mind that when the business made the original decision to use that application, it had all of the other free/unlicensed alternatives to choose from as well. Of course, businesses do switch applications over time, but there can be significant cost to doing so (time, effort, training, new/revised processes, etc.)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    Transbot9, Dec 8th, 2010 @ 7:56am

    Re: Re: Re: Software Piracy Business Intelligence

    Makes sense, especially when the arrival of a vender essentually implys "we'd rather have you as a client than take you to court." I know in US court, that can get really expensive really quick, for much more that the cost of ordering it legit.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    icon
    fogbugzd (profile), Dec 8th, 2010 @ 8:06am

    Some people converted

    The first article I saw on this said that at least some of the people who used the pirated copy converted over to paid before Avast took any action.

    Global marketing is expensive and nearly impossible for a small company. Avast saw what happened as a marketing opportunity. That seems like it would be a more profitable approach than the approaches taken by some other companies and organizations.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    icon
    pringerX (profile), Dec 8th, 2010 @ 8:52am

    I like Avast's active scanner, it catches crap before it happens. The free version seems pretty decent, although usage patterns/behavior and tech savviness are ultimately the main determinants. If you don't know squat about computers and click on everything you come across, no AV in the world is going to keep you clean.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    icon
    Richard (profile), Dec 8th, 2010 @ 9:35am

    Avast

    If they call themselves "Avast" they should expect piracy!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    icon
    loki_racer (profile), Dec 8th, 2010 @ 9:41am

    Re: Their name encourages piracy.

    There be software pirate on that ship.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 8th, 2010 @ 10:52am

    A small quibble, you switched the "5" and the "6" in the last number.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    icon
    telnetdoogie (profile), Dec 8th, 2010 @ 11:49am

    Donationware

    If they asked (not mandated) those using the pirated license to make a donation and allowed them to keep using the software, they'd probably make MUCH more than they would by trying to shut those folks down or 'convert' them to paying customers. "Oh shit, they're asking me to buy it. I'm switching to the illegal downloaded version of Norton instead"

    With all the free avast alternatives out there (even avast itself) it's kind of interesting to me that so many people are pirating the 'pro' version anyway.

    Personally I find myself MUCH more willing to donate to useful free products online than to pay ridiculous prices in order to be a 'privileged' retail customer (who will inevitably have to pay again for a new version when the next major release comes out)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 8th, 2010 @ 3:20pm

    774,561 stupid people, heh.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    identicon
    athe, Dec 8th, 2010 @ 3:33pm

    Re:

    Santa doesn't have an internet connection. If he did, the elves would never get any work done...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    icon
    Michael Long (profile), Dec 8th, 2010 @ 9:33pm

    The trouble with quibbles...

    Of all of the things to quibble over... Mike is actually trying to refute their numbers based on country codes?

    How about facts instead? There are 239 current ISO 3166 Country Codes USED BY COMPUTER AND DATABASE SYSTEMS. Plus dozens more that have been deleted or are in transition.

    http://userpage.chemie.fu-berlin.de/diverse/doc/ISO_3166.html

    And that's not even counting any that might have been entered or reported to their system incorrectly.

    Hey Mike, why don't you contact them and get some facts, instead of simply making fun of numbers it's clear that you don't understand anyway.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    icon
    Mike Masnick (profile), Dec 8th, 2010 @ 11:25pm

    Re: The trouble with quibbles...

    How about facts instead? There are 239 current ISO 3166 Country Codes USED BY COMPUTER AND DATABASE SYSTEMS. Plus dozens more that have been deleted or are in transition.

    And if you actually looked at them, you'd realize that many of them are not actually for countries, but territories, and some are for places that have no residents.

    I linked to the explanation of how many actual countries there are. It's a lot more complex than how many "country codes" there are.

    it's clear that you don't understand anyway.

    I always know when I'm right: it's when people claim I don't understand something.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 9th, 2010 @ 4:58am

    Re:

    Hey, one of them had a degree!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23.  
    identicon
    Jon, Dec 9th, 2010 @ 8:23am

    It's a strategy

    You nailed it. They did this on purpose for the publicity.

    I worked for a software company that intentionally named a product too similar to one offered by Microsoft. They counted on Microsoft filing a trademark lawsuit in order to get PR from the lawsuit. It was a marketing strategy.

    To their credit, Microsoft never filed that lawsuit. Our product eventually died.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  24.  
    icon
    Michael Long (profile), Dec 9th, 2010 @ 10:47am

    Re: Re: The trouble with quibbles...

    And if your computer system is in one of those places, it will no doubt use one of those codes to indicate such.

    Over the years, they probably have over 200 such locations reported and stored in their database, and did a database query to count them. Or would you been happier if they'd said, "over 200 countries, territories, and locations, including a few countries that have been renamed, and some that no longer exist?"

    Feel better now?

    Regardless, you're quibbling over a simple technicality in what, for you, is an extremely lame attempt to discredit them and their findings. I really expect better from you.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  25.  
    icon
    ashlee (profile), Dec 13th, 2010 @ 1:24am

    This was a great viral marketing campaign for avast.

    Around 770,000 user systems are/were sending mutiples of emails daily with a footer message with a web link direct to http://www.avast.com/ as follows;

    avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
    Virus Database (VPS): 9/12/2010
    Tested on: 10/12/2010 7:51:19 AM
    avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2010 AVAST Software.

    Avast chose to let this run for almost 18mths and then gloat about how many pirated copies they "detected". Who's fault is that?

    Running a sting operation such as this does not help their credibility as reputable software vendor.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  26.  
    identicon
    cegorach, Dec 14th, 2010 @ 6:30pm

    Re: This was a great viral marketing campaign for avast.

    How was that a sting operation? Sure, they left up a way to find the pirated versions, but they aren't going after the users. Instead of freaking out and giving themselves bad PR by attacking people, they are just encouraging people to switch.

    If anything, Avast's response to this should be the model for all companies to react to piracy. Work with the people, rather than against the people.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  27.  
    identicon
    giovanni colalillo, Apr 21st, 2011 @ 6:47pm

    reinstall

    a tecnitian made amistake, and did delete my antivirus, wich i bot not long time go( For tho years! Can you reinstal it (please)
    I am living in canada!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This