Google Pays The Borings $1 For 'Damages' From Having A Street View Car Enter Their Driveway

from the symbolically-boring dept

Just a quick post here, closing the loop on a story we've covered for a few years. You may recall that a couple with the surname Boring, sued Google, when they discovered their house was on Street View -- saying that it violated their privacy and "devalued" their property. The court quickly tossed the lawsuit, noting that there was no evidence of damage from the photos, and Google offered easy-to-use tools to opt-out of Street View. The Borings appealed, focusing on a trespassing claim -- saying that the car went up a private road to photograph their house -- and the court was sympathetic that there may have been some trespassing, but not much harm seemed likely. So, it looks like the whole matter is now over, since Google has agreed to pay the couple a grand total of $1 to settle the claims and move on with everyone's lives.

17 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 


 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    Way to pay up Google.

    identicon
    Daryl, Dec 3rd, 2010 @ 4:04pm

    Talk about hitting the lottery. Im sure they are at the Mercedes Benz dealership as we speak.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    icon
    average_joe (profile), Dec 3rd, 2010 @ 4:32pm

    That's what they call "nominal damages." I'm not familiar with the story, but it seems this must have been about the principle of the thing more so than damages. If that's the case, they are probably happy with the result.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 3rd, 2010 @ 4:38pm

    Current minimum wage law in Pennsylvania means they could've made $1 by working for 8 minutes and 17 seconds. Compare with this lawsuit, which went on for 2 years and 8 months.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    icon
    RandomGuy (profile), Dec 3rd, 2010 @ 4:52pm

    They sound like an exciting couple

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 3rd, 2010 @ 4:56pm

    Way to stick it to the man!!

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    icon
    Brian (profile), Dec 3rd, 2010 @ 5:11pm

    I wonder if the lawyers for Google grabbed what change they had in their pockets at the time and just paid them the dollar out of that XD

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  

    Re: Way to pay up Google.

    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 3rd, 2010 @ 5:18pm

    You forgot an "r" there.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  

    Boring

    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 3rd, 2010 @ 5:27pm

    What a Boring story.
    (sorry, couldn't resist)

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Jon Noowtun, Dec 3rd, 2010 @ 6:46pm

    See?!!!! The courts are finally realizing that Gargle's Sneak View is committing an illegal act by photographing people's homes without permission!!!!! This couple should have been awarded much more for all the suffering that Goggle caused them!!!!!

    www.Pee2Peenet.net

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 3rd, 2010 @ 9:28pm

    They spend thousands on a lawsuit to get one dollar. Where do I sign up?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  

    Bloodsucking Lawyers

    identicon
    Joseph, Dec 4th, 2010 @ 6:23am

    The worst part is that after paying the lawyers' contingency fee the people were only left with 60 cents.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  

    Re:

    identicon
    abc gum, Dec 4th, 2010 @ 9:02am

    "Gargle's Sneak View is committing an illegal act by photographing people's homes without permission"

    Wrong.

    Possibly you missed the part about trespass upon private property. The GoogVehicle drove up the Boring driveway and that was worth one dollar in us currency.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  

    BORING!

    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 4th, 2010 @ 10:08am

    who cares?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    Jim, Dec 4th, 2010 @ 12:25pm

    ".....and Google offered easy-to-use tools to opt-out of Street View."

    Somebody want to explain that comment from the article? I do not believe you can opt out of Street View. You can have faces and license plates blurred but that is all I am aware of.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 5th, 2010 @ 6:58am

    Who paid the court costs? Hopefully Google!

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  

    Re:

    icon
    Mikael (profile), Dec 5th, 2010 @ 1:26pm

    Actually you CAN request to have an image removed in its entirety according to this article http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2007/06/want_off_street/

    You can also click on the link to report an image on street view and get it removed that way too. http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2009/03/remove-face-house-car-from-google-street-view/

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  

    Re:

    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 5th, 2010 @ 2:53pm

    RTFA - each side paid their own fees

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
Essential Reading
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This