Talking About Homeland Security's Domain Seizures

from the priorities dept

We've had a bunch of posts this week about Homeland Security's seizure of domain names under questionable legal reasoning. Yesterday I went on The Alyona Show to discuss it. Here's the clip (though, I was actually in Sunnyvale, CA about 400 miles from Los Angeles, despite the claim that I'm in LA):


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    icon
    Dark Helmet (profile), Dec 1st, 2010 @ 5:56pm

    No brown blazer?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 1st, 2010 @ 6:12pm

    Re:

    At least it's an extremely flattering... I can't remember the word, but the picture that shows of the video. It's hard to be sarcastic when you forget basic things.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 1st, 2010 @ 6:15pm

    Re: Re:

    thumbnail* Totally got it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    icon
    Esahc (profile), Dec 1st, 2010 @ 6:18pm

    It was nice knowing you due process.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 1st, 2010 @ 6:24pm

    Good job Mike! Keep doing what you're doing. I for one appreciate it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    icon
    average_joe (profile), Dec 1st, 2010 @ 7:21pm

    That's what you look like? Somehow you look a lot different to me in this pic: http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/photos/uncategorized/2008/12/12/mike_masnick_660px_2.jpg

    Maybe it's the angle.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    icon
    Gary (profile), Dec 1st, 2010 @ 7:22pm

    If DHS can take control of hundreds of domain names, why is wikileak not shutdown. Not that i want it shutdown, but you have to ask.. A few video's get DHS sites shutdown, but a "classified" leak that threatens world leaders isnt important enough to get a site shutdown?

    Who's playing who?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    icon
    average_joe (profile), Dec 1st, 2010 @ 7:36pm

    Re:

    If DHS can take control of hundreds of domain names, why is wikileak not shutdown. Not that i want it shutdown, but you have to ask.. A few video's get DHS sites shutdown, but a "classified" leak that threatens world leaders isnt important enough to get a site shutdown?

    Who's playing who?


    I think the reason is that wikileaks uses a .org top-level domain which is not managed by a company on U.S. soil, i.e., they could not serve a seizure warrant on them.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    .-=RWW=-., Dec 1st, 2010 @ 7:43pm

    But, but, but...

    I am curious why you didn't mention that they failed to utilize a DMCA take down process as a first resort - for the sites accused of infringement (versus the sites selling the counterfeit goods, which appears to be an intentional blurring of the diversity of the two issues), rather than instituting an immediate seizure. Also, she asked you a lot of questions she should be asking an ICE man (like maybe Agent Silver Streak). ;-)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 1st, 2010 @ 8:01pm

    Putting to one side the technical issues associated with trying to effectively drive a web site out of business, it does not seem to me to be problematic when the USG makes it more difficult for a website engaged in the sale of counterfeit goods to keep plying the illicit trade of such goods. Even purchasers in the US who actually take the time to determine if such sites are in fact selling legitimate goods can easily be misled. One of the sites, for example, advertised it was selling honest-to-goodness Ping golf clubs. Turns out that when orders were received the purchasers were none to happy that they had been dupped and instead received POS knockoffs. Sad to say, but this is an issue that arises quite frequently on eBay, for example. Of course, I do agree that safe harbor is an important feature of US law to cabin service provider liability.

    I daresay nobody who purchases a $5 Rolex on a street corner in NYC is misled in the slightest. It seems to me it is a different matter when the seller is located behind an official looking website, most of which it seems are situated in countries such as China.

    Of course, blogs and torrent sites raise a host of other issues, which I readily admit can include legitimate issues under the First Amendment. Blogs situated in the US certainly enjoy rights under the First Amendment. However, it does not necessarily follow that blogs situated outside the US enjoy similar rights since such rights are territorially limited.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    Anonymous, Dec 1st, 2010 @ 8:14pm

    The Alyona Show. Russia. The birthplace of Marxism.

    This is just too funny.

    It's like "Free Ammunition Day" at the gun shop...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    icon
    average_joe (profile), Dec 1st, 2010 @ 8:24pm

    Re:

    The Alyona Show. Russia. The birthplace of Marxism.

    This is just too funny.

    It's like "Free Ammunition Day" at the gun shop...


    I wondered why the clock at the bottom left told the time in Moscow. :)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 1st, 2010 @ 9:41pm

    Germany was the birthplace of Marxism.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 1st, 2010 @ 10:18pm

    and we've discovered that people are willing to pay for the really good ones


    She is right, I would pay for the good ones, the good ones being open source music the rest is just not worth it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    icon
    The Groove Tiger (profile), Dec 1st, 2010 @ 10:34pm

    It's like, they accuse someone of running an illegal smuggling/counterfeiting/whatever operation in your home, and they send the police to SEIZE THE ADDRESS PLAQUE on your house.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    icon
    Mike Masnick (profile), Dec 1st, 2010 @ 11:39pm

    Re:

    Putting to one side the technical issues associated with trying to effectively drive a web site out of business, it does not seem to me to be problematic when the USG makes it more difficult for a website engaged in the sale of counterfeit goods to keep plying the illicit trade of such goods.

    Sure. Sue them, take them to court and have a trial. Then you can put them out of business. But seizing it first and never charging anyone with a crime where a trial can be had? You don't find that even the least bit troubling?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 2nd, 2010 @ 1:15am

    So thats what mike looks like, different than in my head haha.

    Nice clip mate, fingers crossed some people listened!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    icon
    Rose M. Welch (profile), Dec 2nd, 2010 @ 1:41am

    Re:

    I really, really thought that Mike was a Simpsons character.

    I'm so disillusioned now.

    /sadface

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    identicon
    spc, Dec 2nd, 2010 @ 3:09am

    Thank God for Russia. The gold standard for democracy and respect of law...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    icon
    Richard (profile), Dec 2nd, 2010 @ 3:51am

    Re:

    Hmm...
    Look at the general direction they have moved over the last 30 years - and compare with the US or Western Europe.

    They still have a lot of problems - but, broadly, things are getting better.

    Over here on the other hand I'm not so sure.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    icon
    The eejit (profile), Dec 2nd, 2010 @ 4:33am

    Re: Re:

    I'm convinced that all the US will have left is Communism. The irony is not lost on me.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 2nd, 2010 @ 4:46am

    "... Rusia. The birthplace of Marxism."

    Homeschooled in Texas?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23.  
    icon
    Dark Helmet (profile), Dec 2nd, 2010 @ 6:25am

    Re:

    Ugh, I hate it when people claim Marx was Russian. REALLY hate it....

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  24.  
    icon
    Hephaestus (profile), Dec 2nd, 2010 @ 7:25am

    Re: Re:

    LOL ... Republic, Republic, Republic ... ;)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  25.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 2nd, 2010 @ 7:29am

    Re: Re:

    In the case of those companies introducing counterfeit goods into the US that are outside the reach of US authorities, I am not particularly troubled. Since a trial against the people running those companies is virtually impossible, resort to an In Rem action seems reasonable under the circumstances.

    Importantly, it was determined beforehand that they were in fact selling counterfeits. Likewise, the authority to seize was cabined by the fact that before seizure US authorities had to present competent and relevant evidence to the court, and then secure the court's order.

    Of course, the dynamics and procedures would have changed completely if any of these companies were physically present in the US. The principals would have been arrested, and the actual facilities padlocked.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  26.  
    icon
    Gabriel Tane (profile), Dec 2nd, 2010 @ 7:48am

    Re: Re: Re:

    I think we're heading more towards a government run by corporations and industries. Oh wait... Too late. NM.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  27.  
    identicon
    Gwiz, Dec 2nd, 2010 @ 7:48am

    Re:

    It's like, they accuse someone of running an illegal smuggling/counterfeiting/whatever operation in your home, and they send the police to SEIZE THE ADDRESS PLAQUE on your house.

    In a couple of the cases it seems more like a newspaper who printed a want ad of someone selling something illegal and they rushed in and seized the newspaper's printing presses.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  28.  
    icon
    Gabriel Tane (profile), Dec 2nd, 2010 @ 7:51am

    Re:

    Because American politicians and representatives have proven beyond doubt by practice that they truly have law and order in their hearts and would never do anything for personal gain that might be against the law or represent a threat to our democratic republic form of government.

    Yup. Sure does give me the warm fuzzies just thinkin about it!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  29.  
    icon
    mkam (profile), Dec 2nd, 2010 @ 7:54am

    Re: Re: Re:

    Importantly, it was determined beforehand that they were in fact selling counterfeits. Likewise, the authority to seize was cabined by the fact that before seizure US authorities had to present competent and relevant evidence to the court, and then secure the court's order.

    Huh??? Determined beforehand they were guilty? Do you have a transcript of the case because I was not aware of any trial. It seemed we had a guilty until proven innocent seizure here. It has been pointed out here and other places that a couple of the sites were search engines that didn't host any content, and a couple of the other sites were hosting content that definitely included legitimate content (maybe some illegitimate content too).

    DHS has overstepped their bounds by a great deal and trampled free speech in the process. I for one hope that people get fired and the courts get involved.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  30.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 2nd, 2010 @ 9:32am

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    If you happen to read my various comments, you will see that they are limited to those off-shore companies that are selling conterfeit goods. I purposely did not include torrent sites because they raise some different issues.

    Let me ask you a practical question. How would you propose to handle sales by such companies into the US when they are beyond the reach of US authorities? People doing this in the US would be arrested and their sales/shipping facilities closed. These matters would then be addressed at a criminal trial. But what about companies where you are unable to arrest the individuals and close their facilities because they are located outside of the US? It seems to me that making it harder for such companies to ply their illicit trade in the US is a reasonable response.

    It might help to put the shoe on the other foot. You are a purchaser of goods, you buy a product from one of these off-shore sites, and then when the product arrives you discover you have been duped. Yes, sometimes what these sites sell is so discounted that only an idiot would think they are getting an honest to goodness product. Unfortunately, it is not at all unusual for many of these sites to sell their counterfeits at a modest discount over what you would otherwise pay to a retailer here in the US. Even a cautious buyer can find himself in a position of having been screwed big time and having no effective recourse to cure what has happened.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  31.  
    icon
    ChurchHatesTucker (profile), Dec 2nd, 2010 @ 9:59am

    Re: Re:

    I so want to edit this and replace Mike with Comic Book Guy.

    Worst. Policy. Ever.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  32.  
    icon
    Free Capitalist (profile), Dec 2nd, 2010 @ 10:16am

    Re:

    Hehe that is kind of funny (though they didn't actually "birth" Marxism). In essence he's talking about government takeover and control of a market in the land that tried very hard to make that work in scale and showed just how badly it fails in the long run.

    I hope the IP industries enjoy cold fish soup for breakfast.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  33.  
    icon
    ChurchHatesTucker (profile), Dec 2nd, 2010 @ 10:51am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    "You are a purchaser of goods, you buy a product from one of these off-shore sites, and then when the product arrives you discover you have been duped."

    Oh come on. How often does either the merchant or the customer believe they're dealing with authentic goods?

    Everyone except the trademark holder is perfectly happy with this arrangement.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  34.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 2nd, 2010 @ 11:10am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    The merchants already know they are selling bogus goods. It is their customers who may be missing this tidbit of information.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  35.  
    icon
    nasch (profile), Dec 2nd, 2010 @ 11:20am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Seems the WTO would be a great place to start.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  36.  
    icon
    ChurchHatesTucker (profile), Dec 2nd, 2010 @ 11:50am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    "It is their customers who may be missing this tidbit of information."

    Morons in a hurry? Maybe. The rest not so much.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  37.  
    identicon
    athe, Dec 2nd, 2010 @ 1:53pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Caveat emptor

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  38.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 2nd, 2010 @ 4:23pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Remember this should you ever buy a used car and later learn that the odometer has been reprogrammed to show fewer miles.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  39.  
    icon
    Rose M. Welch (profile), Dec 3rd, 2010 @ 4:20am

    Re: Re: Re:

    Do it! I might have watched the whole thing if you had...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This