Revealed: The Mysterious Cleavage-To-Age Effectiveness Ratio For Dating Sites

from the abs-it-up dept

Dennis points us to dating site OKCupid's Sam Yagan revealing some of the data crunching results they've done on what works and what doesn't work on dating sites. It's actually pretty impressive just how much data the site has to work with, so there are some interesting (and some amusing) findings. Of course, some of it is blindingly obvious: women showing cleavage get a greater response. But did you know that said cleavage is apparently much more effective for women who are 32 than women who are 18? Apparently, at 18, "revealing" shots get 24% more interest, but at 32 such photos get 79% more interest. Not quite sure what to make of that. On the flip side, apparently guys showing their abs actually works... though, as Yagan rightly points out, there's a self-selection issue here, where it's pretty much only guys who have good abs who choose to reveal them in their profile photos.

Yagan also points out some differences about whether or not your profile picture should involve you staring into the camera. Turns out it depends on your gender:
So on the photos we've learned a bunch of things. We've learned that you should be doing something interesting. We've learned that if you are a man, you shouldn't look straight into the camera because that's intimidating to women. If you are a woman, you should be looking into the camera because men don't want to imagine you looking at some other guy. They want you looking straight at them. So we've learned that if you take a photo in your bathroom or a photo taken with your cell phone, those have a more authentic, more intimate appeal and those actually do very, very well.
I find this kind of stuff fascinating (not because I'm interested in online dating -- happily married and all that) but because suddenly all sorts of bizarre data is now available that opens up a window into the human brain that just wasn't there before. The obvious stuff is no surprise, clearly, but some of the specifics and other oddities really are fascinating, and give you a data-based look into human psychology.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    identicon
    Pixelation, Dec 14th, 2010 @ 7:39am

    Cleavage

    I bet if you put an image of a woman showing cleavage with each article, you would get even more interest.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Adam (profile), Dec 14th, 2010 @ 7:42am

      Re: Cleavage

      Maybe they could change the auto-generated gravatar images to auto-generated fractal boobs.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Hephaestus (profile), Dec 14th, 2010 @ 8:35am

        Re: Re: Cleavage

        "Maybe they could change the auto-generated gravatar images to auto-generated fractal boobs."

        How would that attract women to the site? You want to look at both sides of the spectrum ... abs maybe?

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Dark Helmet (profile), Dec 14th, 2010 @ 8:35am

        Re: Re: Cleavage

        "Maybe they could change the auto-generated gravatar images to auto-generated fractal boobs."

        I wonder if you could figure out a way for the fractal boob to actually alter its image (or progress fractally, if speaking in complexity theory terms) based on the formatting and grammar of one's comments. Well formatted comments get a nice, pert, round, Jenn Sterger breast.

        Darryl would get some hairy saggy orangutan titty....

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Cixelsid (profile), Dec 14th, 2010 @ 8:35am

    Doesn't work so well when its a guy showing cleavage.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Dark Helmet (profile), Dec 14th, 2010 @ 8:45am

    Different attraction

    "Apparently, at 18, "revealing" shots get 24% more interest, but at 32 such photos get 79% more interest."

    The younger girl attraction, no matter what the males age IMO, has at least something to do with attaction to innocence. Even the uptick in "revealing" photos is probably due to some attaction to an innocent looking girl doing something out of character.

    With the older women, the attraction is to confidence, and probably even a little bit aggression. Confident, good-looking older (relatively speaking) are hot. Confident, good looking but aggressive teenagers just kind of come off as stupid (regardless of gender)....

    I think I'll refer to this as the Stifler's Mom effect. I'll be famous like YOU soon!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    slacker525600 (profile), Dec 14th, 2010 @ 8:47am

    I think my favorite stat from the blog was

    in the http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/gay-sex-vs-straight-sex/ article, if you search down to "I discovered one question with a surprising disparity, not between orientations, but between genders." Tis ... comical.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 14th, 2010 @ 8:58am

    Abs smabbs, why would a woman want a guy with a 6 pack when she can have a guy like me with a keg?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Comboman (profile), Dec 14th, 2010 @ 9:08am

    The better the product, the less you need to advertise.

    I would think it should be fairly obvious that 18 year olds get plenty of responses, with or without the cleavage. The 32 year olds need all the help they can get.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Dark Helmet (profile), Dec 14th, 2010 @ 9:14am

      Re: The better the product, the less you need to advertise.

      "The 32 year olds need all the help they can get."

      I have to wonder honestly how old you are. Once you get into your late twenties, there is something incredibly sexy about a good-looking, confident woman in her early 30's....

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        crade (profile), Dec 14th, 2010 @ 9:37am

        Re: Re: The better the product, the less you need to advertise.

        Sure, but you have to admit the percentage of women (and guys as well of course) who are in good physical shape in their 30s is going to be less than those who are 18 (or early twenties)
        You've also got to remember that we are looking at the subset of individuals who are most likely unattached and probably somewhat desperate. The women in their 30's are likely (not neccessarily of course) to have been unattached for a much longer period :)

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Dark Helmet (profile), Dec 14th, 2010 @ 9:49am

          Re: Re: Re: The better the product, the less you need to advertise.

          Hm, well, okay...but he made it sound like 32 year olds were invariably less hot than younger women, which ain't true....

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, Dec 14th, 2010 @ 10:12am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: The better the product, the less you need to advertise.

            Yeah, thats a load of crap. I do think there might be something there as far as overall stats on dating sites though.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            crade (profile), Dec 14th, 2010 @ 10:13am

            Re: Re: Re: Re: The better the product, the less you need to advertise.

            Yeah, thats a load of crap. I do think there might be something there as far as overall stats on dating sites though.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              icon
              crade (profile), Dec 14th, 2010 @ 10:20am

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The better the product, the less you need to advertise.

              PS: Not sure why but discussing such things candidly also feels completely wrong. lol

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

              •  
                icon
                Dark Helmet (profile), Dec 14th, 2010 @ 10:21am

                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The better the product, the less you need to advertise.

                Meh, never bothered me....

                 

                reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                •  
                  icon
                  crade (profile), Dec 14th, 2010 @ 10:43am

                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The better the product, the less you need to advertise.

                  I was just trying to picture a page of 20 pictures of 18 year olds and a page of 20 pictures of 32 year olds and asking myself: Why are 10/14 of the 32 year olds who are not showing cleavage in my head about 40 pounds overweight? and only 2/18 of the 18 year olds? Then I thought.. 18 is far to young for me anyway.. Then I thought.. I'm married! What am I doing on this dating site! :)

                   

                  reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                  •  
                    icon
                    Dark Helmet (profile), Dec 14th, 2010 @ 11:18am

                    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The better the product, the less you need to advertise.

                    Was it then that you discovered you'd already been fapping for twenty minutes?

                     

                    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                    •  
                      icon
                      crade (profile), Dec 14th, 2010 @ 11:59am

                      Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The better the product, the less you need to advertise.

                      twenty minutes!? What do you think I am superman?

                       

                      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

                      •  
                        identicon
                        Anonymous Coward, Dec 14th, 2010 @ 8:38pm

                        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The better the product, the less you need to advertise.

                        Pff... Twenty minutes is nothing. ;)

                         

                        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          scarr (profile), Dec 14th, 2010 @ 5:55pm

          Re: Re: Re: The better the product, the less you need to advertise.

          You mustn't have read OK Cupid's other blog post, on "The Case for an Older Woman". (http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/the-case-for-an-older-woman/ -- See "Exhibit C: Looks")

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Dec 14th, 2010 @ 9:47am

        Re: Re: The better the product, the less you need to advertise.

        Yes there is. For that matter, if a woman is well kept then there is something sexy about a good-looking, confident woman in her late 40s (Mary-Louise Parker...I'd do things to her that aren't even legal).

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    pclanguy, Dec 14th, 2010 @ 9:28am

    Perhaps Techdirt needs to kill 2 birds with 1 stone... fractal boobs with nice abs.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 14th, 2010 @ 10:50am

    "you should be looking into the camera because men don't want to imagine you looking at some other guy"
    So women are ok with imagining you looking at some other girl? Yeah right. Reasoning fail.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      The Mighty Buzzard (profile), Dec 14th, 2010 @ 1:12pm

      Re:

      Meh, it's simply much more difficult overall for a man to be intimidated by a woman than the inverse. Equality shmequality. If you had to live your life in a world where half the people in it handily outclassed you in strength, you'd be easily intimidated too.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Ryan Diederich, Dec 14th, 2010 @ 11:05am

    Daemon

    If anyone has read Daemon by Daniel Suarez it outlines this outcome exactly. With the overwhelming source of information, a dark network allows people to see every detail about everyone.

    With special glasses with a HUD display, they can see their credit scores and their recent purchases above their heads, as well as a wealth of other information.

    I see this as the future.

    What really sparked my interest was the iPad app that allowed you to point your iPad down the street, and it would put callouts above locations that it recognized via the image and GPS.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Double D, Dec 14th, 2010 @ 12:33pm

    Boobs

    "Apparently, at 18, "revealing" shots get 24% more interest, but at 32 such photos get 79% more interest. Not quite sure what to make of that..."

    Here's what I make of it...
    24% of men are ok looking at barely legal boobs, and 76% feel weird about it.

    32 year-old women have older, more experienced boobs, and 79% of men are interested in that.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Kingster (profile), Dec 14th, 2010 @ 1:19pm

    The article...

    Jeeez louise! OK, I know that this isn't a blog about design or anything... but...

    I clicked the link for the article... And while I like the concept of that site - I hate it. WTF is up with a post area that fits all of like 5 lines in it?? I mean, I get that it's in the video... But... Either don't have the post, or put it into a usable area. They may be big thinkers, but they don't put those thoughts into a usable space.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Pixelation, Dec 14th, 2010 @ 7:16pm

    I, for one, am glad that Mike has kept us "abreast" of the situation.
    Someone had to say it...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This