South Korea Tries To Patent Military Uniforms To Prevent North Korean's Dressing Like Them
from the that'll-stop-them dept
Two years ago, we wrote about how the Finnish military was accusing the Russians of infringing on their camouflage intellectual property. The Finns had apparently registered the camouflage as a design right, and the Russians were copying it. Perhaps building on that idea, it appears that the South Korean military is now trying to patent the camouflage design of its new uniforms, with the idea being (again) to prevent others (the North Koreans, for example) from copying the uniforms in order to confuse South Korean soldiers. I'm not quite sure how South Korean patent law works, or how it's even possible to patent such a thing there, but if the goal really is to prevent nefarious enemy soldiers from dressing up in South Korean uniforms, you'd have to imagine it's not going to be effective. After all, if we're talking about an army invading or infiltrating, one imagines that they wouldn't have much concern about how they're also infringing on the patent. In the meantime, I'm curious if anyone can explain the "incentive" provided to the South Korean military by this potential patent. Is anyone really suggesting that such a uniform would not have been designed without the protection of a patent?






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Didn't we joke about starting an IP based war on techdirt a long time ago? Looks like it's becoming reality. An infringement war.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Yes, because governments don't care about the lives of their solders and designing stuff costs money. Do you think a govt will design this if its only purpose was to help save the lives of its solders?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Are you kidding? Do you know how much a soldier costs?!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Huh
I see this idea in general as a great way to ensure that another nation, in times of war, will not produce highly accurate replicas of enemy uniforms for hostile purposes. I mean, imagine the lawsuit!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Well, it is the Korean Penninsula...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fan_death
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Excuses?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Excuses?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
add on
For example, when entering the US, a friend of mine who was an international student had to fill out a form with such questions as:
Are you affiliated with any terrorist groups?
___yes
___no
Were you a member of the Nazi party between 1932 - 1945?
___yes
___no
Have you ever illegally smuggled an infant across international boarders?
___yes
___no
These questions might seem insanely stupid at first; but if it turns out that they are in the states for some nefarious purpose, they can tack on an "entered the country illegally" charge.
So, while the law itself might be useless, if the South catches a North Korean on their side, they might not have enough to get him for spying, but they can get him for infringement.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Excuses?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Really?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Your days are numbered
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Maybe
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Blazing Kimchee
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Excuses?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Enemy Brass: Okay, the plan is to infiltrate their base by dressing our soldiers in similar uniforms.
Enemy Lawyer: I'm afraid we can't do that. They have a patent on their uniform design.
Enemy Brass: Damn! Back to the drawing board then. Unless...perhaps we could license it for a couple days? What's the procedure for that?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Excuses?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Welcome to Warner Bros...East
Come to think of it I always wondered what Pinky and Brain did after they were canceled. Now we know the rest of the story!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Well, obviously! (or not.....)
Hmm Helmetism? Is that "Jedi" for the teens?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Excuses?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Excuses?
Yogi, asked:
You should only hate and wish dead those who hate anybody and wish them dead.
Question: should you hate and wish dead yourself?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Well, obviously! (or not.....)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Aren’t You Glad ...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Welcome to Warner Bros...East
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Excuses?
Mustard is the only sauce* fit for sausage.
*Chili is not a sauce, duh!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Fun Fact
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Excuses?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: add on
Sort of like how every high profile criminal now has a "19 Images of Child Pornography" charge in addition to the drugs, drug paraphenalia, illegal firearms, contraband cigarettes and armor piercing bullets changes.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Welcome to Warner Bros...East
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: add on
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Aren’t You Glad ...
about the only thing the USA's really free from is the (now defunct) British Empire, btw.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
I know it is wishful thinking, but perhaps someday the site might actually present an article that does not peg its bias tachometer past redline.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
There is a logic to this
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
At least we have our euphemism for the next go-around.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment