Viacom Hires Former Solicitor General For YouTube Appeal

from the politics-gone-mad dept

Viacom certainly isn't messing around in its appeal of its fight against YouTube, which Viacom lost big time in the first round. The company has apparently brought on high profile superstar lawyer Ted Olson, the former Solicitor General under George W. Bush to handle the appeal. Bringing Olson in is probably more about preparing for the inevitable Supreme Court review of this case, but clearly Viacom wasn't happy with how its existing legal team did in the first round, where it couldn't even get past summary judgment.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    out_of_the_blue, Oct 21st, 2010 @ 5:52am

    For the right results, hire a connected lawyer.

    Olsen is about as deep in it as any, so I give Viacom a good chance of success.

    All you really need to know about Olsen is that the story of the phone call from his wife on 9/11 can't be verified (in any version):
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8514

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    icon
    Pickle Monger (profile), Oct 21st, 2010 @ 6:16am

    Ted Olson

    First of all, I'm pretty sure it's Olson and not Olsen.
    Second, considering his (shared) success in bringing down Prop 8, he's got a good chance of success.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    TDR, Oct 21st, 2010 @ 7:48am

    Isn't there a way for the right of appeal to be denied? So this doesn't drag on for an eternity?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    icon
    Free Capitalist (profile), Oct 21st, 2010 @ 8:05am

    Re:

    One would think that a lawsuit being patently frivolous or obviously social engineering would be enough to deny an appeal. However in practice that standard doesn't seem to hold for corporations. Corporations are treated like individuals only when the rights and treatment of an individual would be better than the advantage of having very deep pockets.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 21st, 2010 @ 8:14am

    This is the jerkwad that filed lawsuits to try to overturn the laws that were put into place by the Congress of the United States. If the Bushies didn't like a law or found it restricted them, then they sued using public money to try and overturn the law. This guy is a weasel and should be put up against a wall and shot as a traitor.

    When Cheney or George W. die I will carry a sign celebrating the fact that another traitor to freedom has been erased. I just added his name to the list.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    icon
    Mike Masnick (profile), Oct 21st, 2010 @ 10:17am

    Re: Ted Olson

    First of all, I'm pretty sure it's Olson and not Olsen.

    Oops. You're correct. Fixed. Thanks.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 21st, 2010 @ 11:47am

    Trial practice and appellate practice are sufficiently distinct that it is not at all unusual for appellate counsel to be appointed, and this is especially true if a trip to the Supreme Court is a future possibility.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This