RSS
Patent Lawsuit Fight Over Who Has The Right To Sell Paris Hilton Hair Extensions
from the kill-me-now dept
You know what we haven't seen much lately? Patent lawsuits that are hot -- to use Paris Hilton's favorite phrase. Well, Hilton, herself, may end up getting involved in this lawsuit pointed out by Eriq Gardner over at THREsq. Apparently a company called Celebrity Signatures Int'l went out and patented (7,735,495) a way of making hair extensions, and has built a business selling hair extensions of the rich and famous. I'm not kidding. If you want your hair to look like Raquel Welch or Jessica Simpson, that's the place to go apparently -- and, that's the only place they want you to go because (remember) they've got the patent.
So, when another firm came along, named HairTech Int'l, and started selling hair extensions to make your hair look like Paris Hilton's, Celebrity Signatures got angry and threatened to sue. After being told that HairTech was no longer making the product, it backed off, but upon learning that the Paris Hilton extensions were back on the market, it called up the patent attorneys and filed a lawsuit.
Beyond just straight patent infringement, the company is also jumping on the patent marking bandwagon, and claiming that HairTech is falsely claiming that its product is "patent pending," when that's not true. Of course, it could be that HairTech has applied for its own (equally ridiculous) patent on celebrity hair extensions, and the application just hasn't been published yet, so it's not clear how Celebrity Signatures knows for certain that there's no patent application here.
Either way, the whole thing seems a bit silly. And, as Gardner notes towards the end of his writeup, it seems like there may also be some potential publicity or "misappropriation of likeness" claims that could get Hilton involved. She has apparently licensed the right to sell such hair extensions to HairTech, so even if Celebrity Signatures prevails, it's not like it can easily go out and sell Paris Hilton hair extensions. Though, frankly, perhaps that's not such a bad thing. Either way, as Gardner jokingly points out, both companies product lines are built off of "knocking off" celebrities, so perhaps they shouldn't be so quick for someone else supposedly "knocking off" their own "knock off" designs.
So, when another firm came along, named HairTech Int'l, and started selling hair extensions to make your hair look like Paris Hilton's, Celebrity Signatures got angry and threatened to sue. After being told that HairTech was no longer making the product, it backed off, but upon learning that the Paris Hilton extensions were back on the market, it called up the patent attorneys and filed a lawsuit.
Either way, the whole thing seems a bit silly. And, as Gardner notes towards the end of his writeup, it seems like there may also be some potential publicity or "misappropriation of likeness" claims that could get Hilton involved. She has apparently licensed the right to sell such hair extensions to HairTech, so even if Celebrity Signatures prevails, it's not like it can easily go out and sell Paris Hilton hair extensions. Though, frankly, perhaps that's not such a bad thing. Either way, as Gardner jokingly points out, both companies product lines are built off of "knocking off" celebrities, so perhaps they shouldn't be so quick for someone else supposedly "knocking off" their own "knock off" designs.
I have a business...
The Future Of Commerce Will Combine Your Social Network And Mobile Device
Why 50,000 Monthly Active Users Weren't Enough To Stop This Company From Pivoting, With Spun Co-Founder Scott Lindenbaum
I have an app...
App Developer Conversations: What Does The iPad Mini Mean For The App Economy?
Marketing And Monetization Strategies For Free Apps
I’m looking for policy...
Policy Resources: Data Privacy & Security
Policy Resources: Software Patents
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
I can't believe that people are going "Horse" shit crazy over this.
But I guess hair will always be serious business.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Meh, I just brush the issue aside....
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
They should just cut it out.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Jenny Lind hair extensions?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
If things don't gel quickly here, it could get ugly....
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
When you put your jaw back in place perhaps this suit will not seem so silly after all.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
HairBrains!
So... how much are they paying you Mike? Are they slipping you a little kick back hair? A little Greyola to grease the shills? you make me sick!
DISMISSED!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: HairBrains!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38302242/Partial-cap-hair-accessory-US-patent-7735495
The patent is for a partial wig that clips on the back of your head - a bit like a reversed toupee. Its special feature seems to be that the wig is in several parts: a mesh and separate bunches of hair that you can clip to it. I very much doubt that this is a new concept - I think I say something similar in a TV program about Madam Tussauds.
Yes, a good wig might help a wounded soldier, but what is the relevance to Paris Hilton and this lawsuit?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: HairBrains!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: HairBrains!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
I'm Curious
Maybe it's the mention of Paris Hilton. Or maybe it's some baseless idea that patents only apply to things made out of gears. I'm really not certain. I don't get it.
(And it's not that I don't "get" patents: I've been paid to read, and write, them professionally.)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
feather extensions
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment