If The Major Record Labels Tried To Adopt The 'Radiohead' Model...
from the laugh,-it's-funny dept
A whole bunch of you have been sending in the recent Toothpaste for Dinner cartoon about how the RIAA/major record labels would "adopt the Radiohead model" if they ever really thought about it:
While it is amusing, there's a lot of truth behind that comic (which is part of what makes it funny). We keep seeing people misleadingly claim that if you talk about "free" in one context, you must mean everything should be free. That kind of thinking comes out of the labels all too often, so you could totally see them saying that "well, if pay what you want is supposed to work for buying music, why not for paying people..."






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Hello radios
It's called payola. It's why FM radio is down in the dumpster in regards to actual music to discover new artists.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
If??!?!
http://boingboing.net/2009/12/07/major-record-labels.html
http://www.negativland.com/a lbini.html
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090602/2308085105.shtml
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: If??!?!
I do believe the point is most record labels cook the books so that "free" IS what they're paying them.
At least, that's how I read the comic.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
The labels loan you money.
They make you pay for everything with your loan.
They take all of the profits, from the money that you invested.
Now you owe them money.
So, I think this would probably be an improvement.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: If??!?!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment