Backpage Tells Attorneys General That They Won't Give In To Censorship Demand

from the good-for-them dept

On Tuesday, we wrote about how a group of grandstanding state attorneys general had moved on from blaming Craigslist for the actions of its users, now that they had successfully censored that site, and began demanding similar censorship for Backpage.com, the online classifieds from Village Voice Media. As a few people have sent in, Backpage does not seem interested in backing down, posting a public response and pointing out that they are operating perfectly in accordance with the law, that even the AGs admit that Backpage cooperates with law enforcement, and that the AGs would be better served going after those actually involved in the activities, rather than blaming third parties:
While no system is perfect, even the AGs acknowledge Backpage.com's good-faith cooperation with law enforcement.

In the last two years, Backpage.com users have posted 58 million ads and only 6 million in the adult services section. Federal and state authorities have called on Backpage.com to testify in just five cases involving alleged abuse of underage persons. Backpage.com continues to respond to valid subpoenas from law enforcement officials whose job it is to investigate, apprehend and prosecute criminals who wrongfully post illegal ads and victimize others.

Backpage.com is disappointed that the AGs have determined to shift blame from criminal predators to a legal business operator in an apparent attempt to capitalize on political opportunity during the election season.
They also note: "Censorship will not create public safety nor will it rid the world of exploitation."

Of course, rather than recognizing any of this and maybe backing down, Connecticut Attorney General (and Senate candidate) Richard Blumenthal responded in typically misleading fashion:
"I am deeply disappointed by this unfortunate and unfounded resistance to taking common-sense steps toward protecting women and children. I am hopeful that the company will reconsider its resistance and do the right thing. I will consult with my fellow attorneys general and consider possible next steps."
Notice that he does not respond to any of the actual points raised. He does not respond to the fact that shutting down these services won't do anything to help protect women and children and will almost certainly make the problem worse. He just pretends that the world is the exact opposite of what it is. It's as if Richard Blumenthal thinks that everyone out there is incredibly dumb and believes the world works as he says it does, rather than how it actually works.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    icon
    Dark Helmet (profile), Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 7:56am

    Bah...

    Blumenthal is chiefly notable for filing politically motivated lawsuits. From Wikipedia:

    "In 2007, Hans Bader, Counsel for Special Projects of the Competitive Enterprise Institute (a libertarian think-tank) ranked Blumenthal as "the nation's worst state attorney general", based on "a set of explicit criteria — such as encroachment on the powers of other branches of government, meddling in the affairs of other states or federal agencies, encouragement of judicial activism and frivolous lawsuits, favoritism towards campaign contributors, ethical breaches, and failure to provide representation to state agencies or to provide legal advice.""

    He's noted for being heavily involved in the completely useless 1998 Tobacco settlements as well.

    He also claimed to have served in Vietnam, while the actual evidence shows that he "got at least five deferments that kept him out of the war". (via CBS News)

    He also has claimed several times that he has never taken PAC money for his campaigns, when the evidence shows " that he has accepted $480,000 in political action committee money since he made that claim in January. Moreover, his Republican opponent, former World Wrestling Entertainment CEO Linda McMahon, points to nearly $17,000 Blumenthal received as a state legislative candidate in the 1980s — a figure Blumenthal’s campaign does not dispute." (via Associated Press)

    In other words, he's a liar, a grandstander, and a schemer. What else should we expect?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Poster, Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 8:28am

      Re: Bah...

      Nothing of intelligence, that's for sure. What a joke.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 9:04am

      Re: Bah...

      Exactly what he is doing, because that is what he does, he knows no better. Now how he managed to hang to his job is the real question, how is that incompetent people can find power positions to fill is beyond me.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Yogi, Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 9:06am

      Re: Bah...

      Fine, just answer me this: who the hell is putting this person in office? Someone - lots of someones - are voting for him so tell me: why, who, how?

      He must be doing something right, no?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Dark Helmet (profile), Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 9:17am

        Re: Re: Bah...

        Well, you have to look who he's been running against. Here in America, we're oftened presented with a fantastic voter's option: A Flaming Douche vs. a Turd Sandwich.

        In the current race, it's Blumenthal vs. Linda McMahon, noted executive of World Wrestling Entertainment.

        The Terminator got elected governor of California. A porn star was running for office down south. We've had more Bush's and Clintons in various offices in this country during the last 20 years than I care to mention, and the fact that anyone named Rockefeller is still being elected makes me sick.

        Sigh....

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Yogi, Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 10:35am

          Re: Re: Re: Bah...

          I see what you mean. I guess that's what happens when you are not threatened with extinction 24/7. I envy you. I can't wait for the moment a pornstar runs for office here. I'm guessing that will occur the same day Jesus resurrects and King David comes back holding hands with Muhammad and they all go out for brunch (hummus, tahina and shish kabob) in Gethsemane...

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 6:24pm

          Re: Re: Re: Bah...

          I live in suburban/rural Connecticut, and although I hated Blumenthal from the start, I've changed my opinion slightly after Linda McMahon decided to show up at my town of 3,000's 4th of July parade, which was held on the 5th.

          Both Blumenthal and Linda McMahon were there in person, and after seeing them up close and hearing them talk, in my expert opinion, Linda McMahon is a much bigger douche than Blumenthal. Hopefully he'll realize that people don't vote for him because of his grandstanding, but simply because the Republican option is repulsive and unelectable.

          Also, the biggest turnoff was the fact that McMahon and her campaign aids were practically forcing their campaign stickers on everyone who didn't want them, all while McMahon maintained her creepy smile.

          Sorry for the slightly off topic post, but it just sucks to have someone like Blumenthal be the better option for a senator, a proportional representation system like in many EU countries would be nice to eliminate the two party block.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 9:19am

        Re: Re: Bah...

        Good question what is that he is doing or have done?

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        CommonSense (profile), Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 12:16pm

        Re: Re: Bah...

        No! The guy is a total clown, and I say this as a CT resident. His commercials on TV don't tell you how much of an ass clown he is, and most residents don't go out of their way to find information on candidates. It's a pretty sad state of affairs really, but other than standing on a soap box screaming "Think of the Children" and trying to tell people he does good things on TV, he does nothing of value. Personally, I'd like to seem him fall off the face of the Earth. Professionally, I'm moving out of CT if he gets elected to the Senate.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 8:34am

    and just like that...

    and just like that, backpage is now going to get ALL of craigslist traffic, and not just the adult services.

    smart move for backpage.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
     
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 8:40am

    HELP!!!!!!!!!!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
     
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 8:40am

    HELP!!!!!!!!!!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    ChurchHatesTucker (profile), Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 8:47am

    Close enough

    "It's as if Richard Blumenthal thinks that everyone out there is incredibly dumb and believes the world works as he says it does, rather than how it actually works."

    Not everyone, just the journalists.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 8:58am

    "...58 million ads and only 6 million in the adult services section."

    Assuming that the "bad stuff" only happens in the adult section, I'd like to see someone explaining me how can you filter through 6 million ads and (reliably) identify the "bad stuff". Can't be done, I think.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      jupiterkansas (profile), Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 9:35am

      Re:

      That's why they just want to shut the whole thing down.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        The Infamous Joe (profile), Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 10:00am

        Re: Re:

        Exactly! Illegal prostitution is a fairly recent problem, dating back only to circa 1995, when online classifieds began to appear on the scene. It is only logical to assume, then, that if we shut down the adult sections on these sites, we would be cutting off the life lines of illegal prostitution and it would no longer be a problem.

        My only fear is that there are slightly more intelligent pimps out there posting coded messages in other sections. How do I know that the futon
        This solid piece of craftsmanship is 18 years old, but can take a beating. Not much to look at, but can take on three at once comfortably. $25 OBO
        I'm thinking of buying isn't *really* advertising prostitution?? That's why I'm definitely on board with shutting down sites like these all together. It's good for the newspapers, too!

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 10:43am

          Re: Re: Re:

          You basically destroyed your own argument. Close down the online classifieds, and a (slightly more intelligent) pimp will find another way to sell his "product", probably in ways that are much more difficult to locate and trace.

          The problem still exists and actually got worse, but at least _you_ can't see it anymore. Bet that makes you feel safer.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            The Infamous Joe (profile), Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 11:13am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            You know, Blue-fifties-era-diner-dingy-floor-tiles AC, I was worried that this would happen. I said to myself, "Joe, this sarcasm might be too subtle for the casual reader, maybe you should make it more obvious." but then I thought to myself, "No, I started with a statement saying that prostitution has only been around since circa 1995, no one would miss the sarcasm there!"

            So, here we are. This is awkward.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 10:30am

        Re: Re:

        Right, just bury your head in the sand and pretend the problem does not exist.

        What we should do is seek out those committing these atrocities, not wasting our energies attacking the tools they use.

        A tool is a tool. A hammer can be used to build a house, the same way it can be used to kill a man.

        What you suggest is banning the use of hammers instead of arresting murderers. The end result is that murderers just switch to screwdrivers to do their murdering and you have to start all over again.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    out_of_the_blue, Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 8:58am

    Speak truth to power.

    It's really annoying how 60's hippies turned out right more often than "conservatives" on how to safeguard liberties and preserve civil society, but since I always embrace Truth to the best of my ability, I've had to admit the fact.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 9:03am

    Cant believe he trotted out the "think of the children" line so unashamedly. Can he not see how transparent he is to others, sigh

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    weneedhelp (profile), Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 9:08am

    unfounded resistance

    That pesky 1st Amendment thingie getting in the way again.

    unfounded resistance. Say it again, unfounded resistance.

    unfounded resistance = crazy

    common-sense steps toward protecting = Allow us to trample the pesky Constitution.

    I am hopeful that the company will reconsider its resistance = I hope they come to their senses, because they are crazy.

    I will consult with my fellow attorneys general and consider possible next steps= We know there is nothing legally we can do, so we will find something else.

    I am surprised he didn't pull out the "radical" A-bomb.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Matthew (profile), Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 9:30am

    But how...

    But how do you effectively communicate this sort of information to voters? At first glance the AG's actions seem like an effort to do something about the problem and their campaigns can very easily spin criticism of it as "soft on child prostitution."

    I don't think most voters are smart enough to understand this argument. How could anyone effectively convey to them that the AG's grandstanding is actually hurting the people he's claiming to protect without coming across as a kiddie-porn-loving pervert?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 9:36am

      Re: But how...

      Turn the tables. Accuse him of being the pervert. Say he is doing so to make the police job harder and protect the evil guys by making them harder to catch.

      Yes, it is a lie. What he is doing will have that effect, but it is not his intention, or at least we hope so. But it is as big a lie as the one they would use. Neither side actually wants to protect the molesters, or at least we hope so.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      The Infamous Joe (profile), Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 9:46am

      Re: But how...

      Maybe Lady Gaga could write a song about it. Otherwise, we'd need a school system that teaches people to think instead of regurgitate facts on standardized tests. (aka, it's too late)

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Steven (profile), Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 9:56am

    Meet him face to face.

    The public announcement is good, but if I were Backpages C*O I'd be at his next press conference asking why he wants to protect these human traffickers by making it harder for police to find them.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Spuds (profile), Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 10:26am

    Dumb people...

    "It's as if Richard Blumenthal thinks that everyone out there is incredibly dumb and believes the world works as he says it does, rather than how it actually works."

    But people *ARE* dumb. There are many, many people out there that don't know how legitimate and constructive debate works, and they are guided solely by how they FEEEEEL about something. You only have to play to their emotions to get action, which is something Blumenthal does well.

    Most people don't want constructive debate. They want to feel good about themselves and they want to feel like someone is taking action. They want to feel like someone has stood up and said something for them. And Blumenthal does. He says plenty. He just doesn't address the facts. But that doesn't matter to most people. As long as they feel good and righteous, everything's okay.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      The Infamous Joe (profile), Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 11:15am

      Re: Dumb people...

      This is the word you are looking for. :)

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Christopher (profile), Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 9:10pm

      Re: Dumb people...

      Not in my opinion. Frankly, I'll be blunt: I look at these stuff about pedosexuals and prostitutes in the same light that I do heterosexuals outside of marriage and homosexuals.

      The same BS that they are trying to use to demonize the former was tried with the latter, and it was exposed as a bunch of LIES over a period of years.

      The anti-pedosexuals and anti-prostitutes are NOT trying to protect children and prostitutes. If they wanted to do that, they would bring pedosexuality and prostitution out into the open and legalize them, instead of forcing them into the darkness where people can be impaled with a sword and no one will ever know.

      99% of the problems with those two things can be DIRECTLY linked to trying to keep children IGNORANT (not innocent, there is no such thing) of sex and keeping prostitution illegal.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        vivaelamor (profile), Sep 24th, 2010 @ 3:03am

        Re: Re: Dumb people...

        "If they wanted to do that, they would bring pedosexuality and prostitution out into the open and legalize them"

        Just to clarify, I would presume that you mean legalise the attraction to children (which is currently considered an offence in itself), rather than anything physical. Although I can see an argument for looking at the whole age of consent thing too. You have to marvel when the age of consent in the UK is lower than in the land of liberty. At least they have their guns..

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    arrgster, Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 11:10am

    You have to simplify

    You have to simplify it for most people. for example say:

    blaming Backpage.com for a sex ad involving children would be like blaming ford for someone driving drunk in one of their cars. Lets say the result of the DUI is the death of a small family including children. Would you go after the guy driving drunk or Ford?

    Now yes, A few people out there that would say Ford should put breathalyzers in all their cars to prevent this, but this is where the "lets be realistic" argument comes in. There has to be a line where people are held accountable for their actions. Companies are not the police nor do I want them to be.

    So to stop this BS from these guys, these companies need to run ad campaigns that say things like "would you blame Ford for a DUI accent"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      BearGriz72 (profile), Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 4:18pm

      Re: You have to simplify

      "There has to be a line where people are held accountable for their actions"

      What? My God, NO! This is America, how dare you want to hold people accountable for their own actions. This is the land of the frivolous lawsuit and sleazy defense lawyer, where nobody has to be responsible for anything, because there is always someone else to blame.

      After all when kids commit heinous crimes, who is responsible? The makers of every video game they've ever played, of course. This is the place you want to be when you want to argue at a murder trial that you should be found not guilty of killing your wife because you were under the influence of caffeine at the time. This is the land where a convicted thief can sue whomever he robbed after all.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 12:40pm

    How about some public interest group with a large advertising budget going after these attorneys general and claiming that THEY (the AGs) have no interest in keeping women and children safe, since they're deliberately trying to sabotage their best tools to catch those preying on them? Indeed, one wouldn't be amiss to assume that the AGs are in league with the child traffickers, since they seem to be turning a blind eye towards prosecuting them, and are actively seeking to destroy links to them which could aid in their prosecution

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Christopher (profile), Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 9:07pm

    Good for Backpage. I never understood why Craigslist gave in so easily on this issue. It just didn't make sense, and the Attorney Generals were shooting themselves in the foot if they TRULY thought that people putting these ads on Craigslist were 'dangerous' (with almost all pedosexuals, a dramatic LIE of the worst sort) by sending them somewhere else like to TOR that might be 'more secure'.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    darryl, Sep 23rd, 2010 @ 9:12pm

    Free speech and human rights.

    While no system is perfect, even the AGs acknowledge Backpage.com's good-faith cooperation with law enforcement.

    In the last two years, Backpage.com users have posted 58 million ads and only 6 million in the adult services section.


    So great, to put it another way, over 10% of our total revinue is from 'adult services' what OVER 3 MILLION ADDS PER YEAR..

    No bad scratch, for a super-PIMP.

    Ofcourse it aiding and abetting crime, its inciting crime (therefore not protected by first amendment). Its clearly illegal.

    But backpage makes squillions of dollars from it, and that is why they dont want to stop it..

    Maybe Backpage should get a new PR guy, making statements like the above is really stupid.

    basically stating that 3 million adds per year are for these 'services' shows that its a huge money spinner.

    And with that many adds, how does that explain how it is easier to find and convict those crims who break the law and advertise. Its not happening now, and they are advertising NOW.

    So claiming that taking the adds offline will stop law enforcement is a joke.

    Allowing crimes to be commited with your knowledge is aiding crime, and inciting crime.

    You dont open all the safes in a bank and fire all the security guards so its easier for a bank robber to rob, (and therefore easier to find them).

    You stop the crime before it occures, and a part of that is making it illegal to commit that crime, and illigal to promote, incite or aid the committing of a crime.

    Its a nasty and higly egocentric look to consider your free speech rights are a justification for allowing crimes to be committed, promoted, and partially justified.

    The only people who would want to fight hard for this cause are those that take advantage of those services, or who profit from it..
    And you really dont want to be in that camp, trying to justify what is essentially a human rights issue.

    So your 'free speech' trumps the people forced into prostitution's human rights.. Nice attitude mike.... !!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      vivaelamor (profile), Sep 24th, 2010 @ 3:12am

      Re: Free speech and human rights.

      "The only people who would want to fight hard for this cause are those that take advantage of those services, or who profit from it.. "

      Or those who understand the issue. Please Darryl, stop embarrassing yourself.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      The eejit (profile), Sep 24th, 2010 @ 3:12am

      Re: Free speech and human rights.

      Dude, I don't often say but it's twice now: STFU, you're talking bollocks.

      The AGs HAVE ALREADY STATED that Backpage.com co-operates fully. Repeatedly. So why now, are they going after it when it already co-operates? it discouragtes further co-operation, and I've e-mailed the Connecticut AG office to explain why.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    kym, Sep 24th, 2010 @ 7:53pm

    sick

    I see you are all perverts like the Mcmahons.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anon, Sep 28th, 2010 @ 3:46am

    Abetting?

    Um, if someone turns in a criminal how is that considered "enabling" or "helping" a crime? I think most criminals would consider that "not helping" - (Blade Runner : I mean you're not helping). Aside from safe harbor, actively turning evidence to the Feds and DAs office as well as terms of service providing notice that illegal activities will be handed to the authorities - what part of non-complicit do these morons not understand? Oh right election year. Time to waste some time and money.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Janet Harper, Oct 2nd, 2010 @ 3:26pm

    backpage

    We must do everything in our power to drive Backpage out of business for allowing prostitution!!!!!!!!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This