Batty Trademark Dispute
from the pow!-blam!-trademark! dept
Not quite sure what to make of this one, but the Consumerist alerts us to a bit of a trademark dispute between DC Comics and a small BBQ restaurant called BATS. Apparently, the restaurant's name comes from the names of its owners, "Beau And TraviS' restaurant," and they designed the following logo:
Now, that clearly does have some similarities to the Batman logo, even though they insist "Our bat is not their bat." In fact, they're correct that the bats are not the same. As someone in the comments on the Consumerist post notes, the actual Batman logos, which have morphed over time, are ever so slightly different from this logo:
But, of course, that doesn't matter. All that really matters is if there's a likelihood of confusion in areas for which DC has the trademark or (potentially) if DC can make a case of dilution. Given how many people see the logo and pretty much immediately think "Batman," DC probably can make a strong "likelihood of confusion" case. The restaurant owners are apprently fighting DC, specifically by suggesting that DC's trademarks on Batman don't extend into the restaurant space, but that does seem like it might be a difficult sell. At best, it's a total crap shoot based on the judge -- and given the cost of fighting a trademark battle over such a logo, this is one where it actually seems like it could make more sense to just change the logo.






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Mike, is that you?
The capriciousness of our legal system aside, the real factor here is that DC has a team of lawyers and BaTs does not.
Disgusting.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Confusion
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Looks like Batman to me
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
poll to smurf
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
You are getting soft Mike.
I didn't realize you could have a trademark be as vague as "any shape that resemble this" so much for specific instance.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Looks like Batman to me
http://www.infovisual.info/02/064_en.html
Convert that bat diagram into a silhouette, remove the hands and feet, and what do you get?
http://personal.psu.edu/bsf5033/blackbat.jpg
Gee, pretty much looks exactly like their logo. Just with slightly bigger ears. But then, simplify it a bit more - draw two lines straight down from the ears - and it looks _exactly the same_ as the restaurant's logo. A marginally simplified picture of something shouldn't be trademark infringement.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Pure bull
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Batman Logo
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Subject
I wonder if Sesame Street is now going to go on a suing spree?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
I'll chalk it down to overzealous prosecution due to the "must defend" aspect of trademark law.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
I mean let's face it, it's kinda hard for most people to see that logo and NOT think of Batman. I think it very unlikely that the restaurant owners did not see the similarity until the lawyers showed up...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Even DC has modified its logo (nice addition of the video, btw) over the years which means even they can't keep a specific design without re-branding the franchise, unlike the Superman "S", for example.
Clearly DC is in the wrong here. There's much more to the Batman franchise than the logo, which they've also trademarked.
Of course, with comic book sales in the toilet now, DC has to make money somehow. /eyeroll
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: looks like Bacardi
did DC ever sue Bacardi & Company Ltd? Guess not - bullies always pick on the weak ones...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
MMM good
I'm annoyed that DC appears to that *nobody* can use the outline of a bat because of their crappy franchise because that doesn't seem right. I went to their website to register a complain but the DC Contact Us page only has mailto: links for money making opportunities. Instead, I'll vote with my wallet and no longer see a DC franchise movie, or buy toys or comic bo\\ graphic novels. Sorry DC, you've lost a potential customer thanks to your lawyers.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Mike, is that you?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Two complaints
Second complaint: crappy font used in the logo.
So.. I guess that means I would rather eat bat than look at that horrible font. Can I sue for bad taste in false advertising? Please?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Damn! Louisiana Style BBQ? Sign me up. DC Comics were always lame, anyway. Why don't Beau and Travis just retcon to prove that their restaurant did in fact exist BEFORE Batman was created... at least in some universe. DC Comics knows *all* about that kind of logic. Hell go ahead and offer a 'Marvel No-Prize' to someone who could write that retcon, that would *really* stick it to DC.
/geek
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
The Likelihood of Confusion . . . about what a trademark is for.
Once again, it must be said that the use of the term "intellectual property" is responsible for a lot of this confusion in the public discourse, because people have the common-sense conception that if you "own" something then you should have the full and exclusive right to determine precisely how, and if it is to be used.
It is if owning a trademark were no different than owning a car.
Most unfortunately, I believe this is exactly how IP maximalists believe the law "should" read . . .
The hell with how the law actually does read.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
"Even DC has modified its logo (nice addition of the video, btw) over the years which means even they can't keep a specific design without re-branding the franchise, unlike the Superman "S", for example."
You'd be supprised how much the Superman S has changed over the years
Original
http://www.examiner.com/images/blog/wysiwyg/image/Superman_Shield_Golden_Age.jpg
Compared to now.
http://www.louderthanwordsbooks.com/marni/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Anonymous-Superman-Logo-1 5837.jpg
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment