Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, Aug 7th, 2012 @ 6:47pm

  
  

  laser pistols!?

  Sure, laser pistols sound safe now, but just wait until some idiot uses one of the lasers in a gun:
  
  http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2012/07/jetblue-pilot-suffers-eye-injury-from-green-la ser/
  
  or builds a small one of these:
  
  http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2011/04/08/navy-showboats-destructive-new-laser-gun/

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Killercool (profile), Aug 7th, 2012 @ 7:51pm

  
  

  Re: laser pistols!?

  I still find it odd that a plane in the air, which has it's windshield ABOVE the nose of the plane, as well as effectively recessed behind the curvature of the fuselage, was vulnerable to a laser from the ground.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, Aug 7th, 2012 @ 10:43pm

  
  

  Re: laser pistols!?

  and to think you probably have half a dozen of them, right there in your room !!!!..

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, Aug 7th, 2012 @ 9:50pm

  
  

  do electronic beeps make beeps that travel at faster than the speed of sound ?? (cough,,,idiot)

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, Aug 7th, 2012 @ 10:01pm

  
  

  Re:

  you'll probably also find they have been NOT using starting guns for many many years, it's because without them they do not have to measure one parameter, the starting time of the race.
  
  they only need to measure the time when they cross the line, with a gun you have to measure the exact time the gun is fired as well as the finish time..
  
  it's not because the laws of physics have somehow changed, or an electronic beep's sound travels faster than a starting gun !!!! ..

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Pixelation, Aug 7th, 2012 @ 9:53pm

  
  

  Go from 2 to 3

  "Does a person with XXY compete in the male or female events? "
  
  Just make it male, female, other.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, Aug 7th, 2012 @ 9:57pm

  
  

  Re: Go from 2 to 3

  but they are not 'other', they are either..

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  ethorad (profile), Aug 8th, 2012 @ 3:10am

  
  

  measuring the start of a race

  I've considered different ways of measuring the time as a way of removing false starts.
  
  Currently if you start too early then you are disqualified. Twitch too early and you're out. Harsh, and it's not really what people want to see - they want to see a race with all contestants.
  
  I would propose retaining the starting gun so that all contestants run at the same time (as oppposed to time trials like on cycling where everyone starts one after the other). Your base time is measured as time from the gun to the time you cross the line. However, if you go before the gun instead of being disqualified, you are penalised by adding twice the time you went early to your total time (has to be at least once times the time early, to offset the advantage you got from starting early, and I added a penalty of an additional one times).
  
  Since all contestants are starting at about the same time, the adjustments made should be small - small enough that they won't interfere with the public watching to see who wins, in that if it's decided by the adjustment then it's probably close enough that normal viewers can't tell who won without replays etc.
  
  Should mean that there's no disqualifications from false starts, all races will be run with all entrants, and the skill of going as soon as possible after the gun is retained.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, Aug 8th, 2012 @ 4:35am

  
  

  So I'm a woman and a test says I'm a man... interesting.
  Should I get naked and you still will deny I'm a woman?
  
  humm...

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  Anonymous Coward, Aug 8th, 2012 @ 6:02pm

  
  

  Re:

  obviously you do not know you are a woman, you THINK you are a woman... if the test says you are a man,, you are a man, (plus you are stupid).... for not knowing !!!!

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

•  

  

  ethorad (profile), Aug 10th, 2012 @ 6:26am

  
  

  Re:

  For athletics, the point isn't so much that the race is for men or women, but that people with certain hormones (eg testosterone) have a greater power output than those without. Therefore having the two compete against each other is unfair. Competitions are therefore split into those with those hormones ("male events") and those without ("female events")
  
  As such, whether you are XXY or some other unusual genetic combination, the question is are you racing against other people with the same basic advantages as yourself. The male/female split is just an easy way to determine it for 99% of the population.

   

  [ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

Add Your Comment