Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

1.  

   

   John Doe, Sep 1st, 2010 @ 4:39am

   
   

   Unfortunately for the innovators

   The innovators in this space who aren't patenting their works are probably going to get sued soon enough by patent trolls if they don't stockpile now.
   
   When I first came to this blog, I thought you were full of it. But after reading here long enough and seeing how patents and copyrights are stifling innovation and creativity, I am a convert. Personally I think copyright and patents should be pared down to the bare minimum and then trimmed some more. But I don't believe for a minute that will happen.
   
   We, the US, don't manufacture much anymore so we are left with IP as our main output. So the government is going to beat on every other country in the world to honor that IP in the hopes we can stay on top in that realm. We will never learn how to make money from IP unless we can keep it artificially locked up.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

2.  

   

   abc gum, Sep 1st, 2010 @ 4:46am

   
   

   Has anyone yet laid a trademark claim upon the word green?

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

3.  

   

   Altaree, Sep 1st, 2010 @ 6:54am

   
   

   If you don't rush it no one knows they are infringing.

   Aren't patent applications secret (ish) until they are granted? If your patent takes a long time to be granted, there is more opportunity for others to also invent the same thing. Then you get to sue those guys! Why would you want to rush the application?

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

4.  

   

   Corncob, Sep 1st, 2010 @ 6:59am

   
   

   Extension

   I forget what the term is for this, but couldn't a lot of "green" patent applicants be waiting to modify/alter their applications to cover any new technology that does come out?

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

5.  

   

   xs (profile), Sep 1st, 2010 @ 8:28am

   
   

   Not hard to understand at all

   Patent application put through under this "green" banner would cover just the narrow field of "green" technology, where as any patent applicant wanting to take advantage of the current system, if just for defensive purpose, would try to make a claim covering as wide a field as possible.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

6.  

   

   Nick Dynice (profile), Sep 1st, 2010 @ 8:35am

   
   

   It's simple. Patents aren't "green."

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

7.  

   

   Josh in CharlotteNC (profile), Sep 1st, 2010 @ 8:42am

   
   

   Re: Unfortunately for the innovators

   "The innovators in this space who aren't patenting their works are probably going to get sued soon enough by patent trolls if they don't stockpile now."
   
   Stockpiling patents only help (as deterrance) in a patent nuclear war, where both sides make products that infringe on the other sides overly broad patents. Stockpiling doesn't help against a patent troll, because there's nothing to counter-sue against if the troll only owns a few pieces of paper that say they own an idea.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

8.  

   

   Anonymous Coward, Sep 1st, 2010 @ 8:46am

   
   

   Maybe is because the green technology is being developed in other countries that is why people are in no rush to patent anything in the U.S.

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

9.  

   

   Vincent Clement, Sep 1st, 2010 @ 9:07am

   
   

   Re: Unfortunately for the innovators

   It's a myth that the USA does not "manufacture much anymore".

    

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

10.  

    

    penstock, Sep 1st, 2010 @ 12:06pm

    
    

    Yes - we are busy "innovating"...

    The patent process has become an industry unto itself - disconnected from the innovation industry. Hands-on innovation I can handle myself - I can actually participate in the day-to-day process. But patents - no more - they are something that is "bought" from a vendor (patent lawyers) who work pretty much within the vacuum of their own industry's legal jargon and claims development based on prior art. I'm trying to solve current problems, not analyzing the nuances of prior art to find a way to slip into a new patent. Not to mention that the patent application process has become hellishly expensive - tens of thousands of dollars on new products that require multiple claims and separate patents.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

11.  

    

    Idobek (profile), Sep 2nd, 2010 @ 3:13am

    
    

    Re:

    "Has anyone yet laid a trademark claim upon the word green?"
    
    I don't think it is trademarked but accross large parts of Europe they use "blue" to avoid confusion witt (or sugguested endorsement by) pre-existing, non-environmental political parties. Hence the VW "Bluemotion" series of cars.

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

12.  

    

    Pete Braven (profile), Sep 2nd, 2010 @ 6:40am

    
    

    What's green about a patent/trademark?

    There is of course plently of green technology happening and many people are using it. What possibly thows the patent offices, is that a very large chunk of it is developed very much as open source technology.
    The attitude of most inventors/innovators in 'green tech' is that the patents process makes such developments far too expensive for the resulting inventions to benefit the environment,.. so they publish the whole thing as free and it then gets far greater use with other applications built around it.
    The 'green tech' community has been telling governments and legal bodies to 'foxtrot-oscar' for years!

     

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment