Take Two Told To Take A Hike In Its Attempt To Get Bioshock.com

from the late-to-the-game dept

It often seems like big companies tend to win domain dispute rulings over companies that just squat on various domains -- and perhaps that makes sense. So it's a bit of a surprise to find out that Take-Two Interactive has lost its bid to get the domain name bioshock.com, which is currently held by a company that owns hundreds of thousands of domains, Name Administration. The problem? The domain was registered a year before Take-Two filed to register a trademark over Bioshock, for the video game series. Name Administration noted, in its defense, that "bioshock" is not a term that's exclusive to Take-Two, and the arbitration board found no evidence of "bad faith" in using the name.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 25th, 2010 @ 4:57pm

    Squatting is bad faith. Case closed.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    icon
    Mike Masnick (profile), Aug 25th, 2010 @ 5:14pm

    Re:

    Squatting is bad faith. Case closed.


    Except that's the exact opposite of what the ruling said.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    icon
    Sallo (profile), Aug 25th, 2010 @ 5:49pm

    Tell that to...

    ...Mr. Uzi Nissan, who has been fighting Nissan Motors for years now. http://www.nissan.com/

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    icon
    Aaron Martin-Colby (profile), Aug 25th, 2010 @ 6:18pm

    Ugh

    I agree with the ruling, but I still hate companies like Name Administration.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Wolfy, Aug 25th, 2010 @ 8:39pm

    At the dawn of the web, what is now called "squatting" was only one of very few ways a smaller entity could "make it" over a larger, richer entity... simply by beating them to the punch. It was almost like the early web's form of a "gold rush." A few people made some money by selling their "claims." Then the Lawyers arrived with lots of cash for the Judges re-election campaigns.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    icon
    PaulT (profile), Aug 26th, 2010 @ 1:50am

    ""squatting" was only one of very few ways a smaller entity could "make it" over a larger, richer entity."

    Only if you were an immoral opportunist. Other people managed to "make it" by coming up with new or well-implemented ideas and building a company up from that (Yahoo, IMDB, Google, eBay, Amazon, etc.).

    If the only way you could make money was by buying a domain name for a well-known company's trademark and waiting for them to pay a ransom, you didn't deserve the money.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    icon
    Chronno S. Trigger (profile), Aug 26th, 2010 @ 6:32am

    Re:

    It's unethical, not illegal. The same exact thing happens in real life all the time. People buy up large areas of land cheap, do nothing with it, and sell it off at inflated prices when someone else wants to develop there. In a stretch, the stock market could be said to be the same thing. People buy up stocks cheap and sell at an inflated price when others want it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 26th, 2010 @ 7:21am

    Re:

    Except this isn't what happened in this case. If you had read the article you would know that bioshock.com was registered a full year before a trademark was filed for the game of the same name.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Danny, Aug 27th, 2010 @ 9:17am

    Its a jerk move

    But unfortunately it looks like Take Two will just have to go with bioshockgame.com or something like that. Although I do wonder what exactly is at bioshock.com (I'm at work and the site is blocked). Chances are Name Administration is/was probably hoping to get some ransom money out from Take Two (they may not have known about the game but what other reason could they have for owning hundreds of thousands of domain names). Take Two should just cut its losses and get another name.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This